Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 9 in Osoriinae of Cuba with description of new species and an identification key (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Fig. 9. Head, pronotum and elytra, showing shape, punctation and microsculpture. A – Osoriellus lewisi (Blackwelder, 1943); B – O. obtusicollis Irmler, 2014; C – O. schwarzi (Notman, 1925); D – O. haitiellus (Darlington, 1937); E – Antillosorius crenulifrons (Notman, 1925); F – A. darlingtoni (Blackwelder, 1943). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Fig. 8 in Osoriinae of Cuba with description of new species and an identification key (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Fig. 8.Head, pronotum and elytra, showing shape, punctation and microsculpture.A – Lispinus striola Erichson, 1840; B – L. insularis Chevrolat & Fauvel, 1863; C – Mimogonus fumator Fauvel, 1889; D – Holotrochus minor Chevrolat & Fauvel, 1863; E – Osoriellus eggersi (Bernhauer, 1904); F – O. exiguus (Notman, 1925). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Fig. 7 in Osoriinae of Cuba with description of new species and an identification key (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Fig. 7. Head, pronotum and elytra, showing shape, punctation and microsculpture. A – Clavilispinus exiguus (Erichson, 1840); B – C. megacephalus (Fauvel, 1865); C – C. politus (Sharp, 1887); D – C. minutus (Sharp, 1887); E – Lispinus cubensis Irmler, 1994; F – L. laticollis Erichson, 1840. Scale bars: 0.2 mm (A–D), 0.5 mm (E–F).

Fig. 11 in Osoriinae of Cuba with description of new species and an identification key (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Fig. 11. Head, pronotum and elytra, showing shape, punctation and microsculpture. A – Antillosorius cubensis (Blackwelder, 1943); B – A. oriente (Blackwelder, 1943). Scale bars: 0.5 mm.

Figs 1–4 in Osoriinae of Cuba with description of new species and an identification key (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)

Figs 1–4: Morphological details of Cuban Osoriinae. 1 – Allotrochus cubensis sp. nov.; 2 – Nacaeus dejectus (Sharp, 1887); 3 – Thoracophorus cubensis sp. nov.; 4 – Antillosorius martini sp. nov. Body parts: A – aedeagus in lateral/ ventral aspect; B – paramere; C – last abdominal tergite; D – last abdominal sternite; E – antenna; F – protibia in posterior aspect. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Figures 18–19 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding

Figures 18–19. Colonies of aphids on their respective perennial host plants. 18) Aphis elena sp. nov. on Pycnanthemum virginianum (L.) T. Dur. & B.D. Jacks. ex B.L. Rob. & Fernald. Photograph: David Voegtlin, emeritus University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois. 19) Aphis monardae Oestlund on Monarda fistulosa L. Photograph: David Voegtlin, emeritus INHS of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Figure 20 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding

Figure 20. Neighbor-joining tree of K2P distances of DNA barcodes of targeted species. Species names are followed by the GenBank accession numbers.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Figures 1–17 in Identification of a new species of Aphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae) based on distinct morphology rather than DNA barcoding

Figures 1–17. Holotype (INHS: 511,252 collection number) of Aphis elena 1–8) Apterous vivipara. 1) Body. 2) Antennal segments: II–V. 3) Ultimate rostral segment. 4) Cauda. 5) Siphunculus and marginal tubercle on abdominal segment VII. 6) Marginal tubercle on abdominal segment I, and hind coxa. 7) Setae on subgenital plate. 8) Setae on abdominal tergite VIII. 9–17) Alate vivipara. 9) Body. 10) Fore wing. 11) Antennal segments: II–IV. 12) Ultimate rostral segment. 13) Siphunculus and marginal tubercle on abdominal segment VII. 14) Marginal tubercle on abdominal segment I, and hind coxa. 15) Setae on abdominal tergite VIII. 16) Cauda. 17) Setae on sub-genital plate.

Fig. 4 in Identification Of Pomadasys Species (Pisces, Haemulidae) From An Archaeological Midden Site In Nankuanli East (Taiwan), Based On Otolith Morphology

Fig. 4. Relationships between fish total length and fish weight (a), otolith length and fish total length (b), and otolith length and fish weight (c) of Pomadasys argenteus.

Fig. 3 in Identification Of Pomadasys Species (Pisces, Haemulidae) From An Archaeological Midden Site In Nankuanli East (Taiwan), Based On Otolith Morphology

Fig. 3. Medial surfaces of the right sagittae of Pomadasys argenteus, NMMBOL00223 (a); P. kaakan, NMMBOL01952 (b); P. maculatus, NMMBOL00719 (c); P. quadrilineatus, NMMBOL00799 (d). Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Identification Of Pomadasys Species (Pisces, Haemulidae) From An Archaeological Midden Site In Nankuanli East (Taiwan), Based On Otolith Morphology

Fig. 2. Medial view (a) and dorsal view (b) of the otolith illustrating the features described and their measurements. The grey area is the sulcus. OH, otolith height; OL, otolith length; OT, otolith thickness; OsH, ostium height; OsL, ostium length.

Fig. 1 in Identification Of Pomadasys Species (Pisces, Haemulidae) From An Archaeological Midden Site In Nankuanli East (Taiwan), Based On Otolith Morphology

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling sites for the modern (a) and archaeological (b) Pomadasys otoliths. NKLE (Nankuanli East) archaeological site.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Figs 5–10. Synchonnus species. 5–6 in A new species of Synchonnus (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from New Guinea, with an identification key to the Papuan species

Figs 5–10. Synchonnus species. 5–6 – basal antennomeres (5 – S. testaceithorax; 6 – S. etheringtoni sp. nov.). 7–8 – male genitalia of S. etheringtoni sp. nov. (7 – ventral view; 8 – lateral view). 9–10 – right elytron, the middle part in detail (9 – S. testaceithorax; 10 – S. etheringtoni sp. nov). Scales = 0.5 mm (Figs 5–10).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Figs 1–4. Synchonnus species. 1–2 in A new species of Synchonnus (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from New Guinea, with an identification key to the Papuan species

Figs 1–4. Synchonnus species. 1–2 – general appearance (1 – S. testaceithorax Pic, 1923; 2 – S. etheringtoni sp. nov.). 3–4 – detail of pronotum (3 – S. testaceithorax; 4 – S. etheringtoni sp. nov.) Scales = 1 mm (Figs 1–2), 0.5 mm (Figs 3–4).

FIG. 9 in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 9. — Geographic distributions of the Ciliopagurus Forest, 1995 species included in the "strigatus complex" based on the material examined for this work and literature. Light gray area is the distribution of C. strigatus (Herbst, 1804) (●); dark gray areas are the distribution of C. tricolor (Forest, 1995) (▲) and C. vakovako Poupin, 2001 (★); asterisk (Å) is the distribution of C. galzini n. sp. A doubtful locality for C. tricolor is indicated by "▲?".

FIG. 6 in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 6. — Length of ocular peduncle/shield length. Data from Table 1, means ± 1.00 or 1.96 standard deviation, calculated for species of the strigatus species complex and Ciliopagurus krempfi (Forest, 1952): * indicates a significant difference (ANOVA and paired tests, P<0.05).

FIG. 4 in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 4. — Left third pereiopod colour pattern, outer view: A, Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804), ♂ 3.8 mm, Réunion I. (MNHN Pg 7759); B, C. tricolor (Forest, 1995), ovig. ♀ 3.3 mm, Réunion I. (MNHN Pg 7760); C, C. vakovako Poupin, 2001, holotype ♂ 4.3 mm, Marquesas Is (MNHN Pg 5896); D, C. galzini n. sp., holotype ♂ 3.8 mm (UF Crust 10901). Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 5. — Ciliopagurus galzini n in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 5. — Ciliopagurus galzini n. sp., holotype ♂ 3.8 mm (UF Crust 10901): A, shield and cephalic appendages; B, ocular scales; C, left antenna, dorsal view; D, left chela, dorsomesial face, with detail of stridulating apparatus and identification of four main areas (1-4). Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIG. 2 in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 2. — Type specimen of Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804): A, C, D, type specimen in ZMB collection; A, general view; C, detail of frontal region; D, detail of right chela, outer view (photographs courtesy of O. Coleman); B, colour pattern as illustrated in Herbst (1804: pl. 61, fig. 3) (courtesy of M. Türkay).

FIG. 1 in Identification of a Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804) species-complex, with description of a new species from French Polynesia (Crustacea, Decapoda, Anomura, Diogenidae)

FIG. 1. — Live colorations: A, Ciliopagurus strigatus (Herbst, 1804), Futuna I., ♂ 7 mm (MNHN Pg 7762); B, C. tricolor (Forest, 1995), Réunion I., ovig. ♀ 2.9 mm (UF Crust 5433); C, C. vakovako Poupin, 2001, Marquesas Is, holotype ♂ 4.3 mm (MNHN 5896); D, C. galzini n. sp., Tuamotus, holotype ♂ 3.8 mm (UF Crust 10901).