Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2013View details →

FIG. 8 in Review of the Frog Genus Silverstoneia, with Descriptions of Five New Species from the Colombian Chocó (Dendrobatidae: Colostethinae)

FIG. 8. Diverse habitats of Silverstoneia dalyi, n. sp., in the Río San Juan drainage. Top: Swamp forest 2 km above Playa de Oro, 210 m, upper Río San Juan. Frogs collected in 1970 and 1971 in this forest were found mainly along a small sluggish stream. Bottom: Forest stream, 80 m, near Quebrada Vicordó about 5 km above Noanamá. The frogs were most common on the forested hillside above the stream, to about 100 m elevation (photographs by C.W.M., February 20, 1970, and February 3, 1971).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2013View details →

FIG. 14. Silverstoneia minima, n in Review of the Frog Genus Silverstoneia, with Descriptions of Five New Species from the Colombian Chocó (Dendrobatidae: Colostethinae)

FIG. 14. Silverstoneia minima, n. sp., and S. minutissima, n. sp., showing diagnostic differences in pigmentation on dorsal surface of thigh (not to same scale). A, B: S. minima (LACM 72031, 72033). C, D: S. minutissima (LACM 72020, 44053). Each pair of photographs shows approximate extent of observed variation in the two species.

Fig. 11. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 11. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribe Dendropsophini.

Fig. 14. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 14. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the geographic distribution of the components of Cophomantini. Distributions, in general, are taken from Duellman (1999). Only collective groups referred in ''Biogeographic Commentary'' are shown. An asterisk (*) indicates the distribution of Hypsiboas punctatus that ranges from the Chaco/Cerrado through the Amazon Basin and Guayana lowlands up to the Caribbean lowlands. Two asterisks (**) indicate the geographic distribution of Hypsiboas cordobae that is restricted to the Sierras of Central Argentina.

Fig. 3. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 3. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the relationships of the South American I clade and its correspondence with the currently recognized species groups. Numbers above nodes are Bremer support values. Numbers below nodes are Parsimony Jackknife absolute frequencies; those with an asterisk (*) have a 100% frequency. Black circles denote nodes that are present in the quick consensus estimation.

Fig. 15 in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 15. Partial view of the strict consensus showing the geographic distribution of the components of Dendropsophini. Distributions, in general, are taken from Duellman (1999). Only collective groups referred in ''Biogeographic Commentary'' are shown. An asterisk (*) indicates the geographic distribution of Scinax squalirostris that includes the Atlantic forest, Cerrado, Chaco, and Pampean grasslands. Two asterisks (**) indicate the geographic distribution of Scinax ruber that includes the Amazonian and Guayana lowlands, Caribbean lowlands, and Llanos. Three asterisks (***) indicate the geographic distribution of Pseudis paradoxa that extends from the Chaco region to the Amazonian and Guayana lowlands, the Llanos, and the Caribbean lowlands.

Fig. 6 in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 6. Current state of phylogenetic knowledge of the 30chromosome Hyla. Redrawn from Duellman (2001: 857) with the addition of Kaplan's (2000) suggestion regarding the relationships of Hyla praestans with the H. garagoensis group. Numbered synapomorphies, as textually described by these authors, are: 1, 30 chromosomes; 2, reduced quadratojugal; 3, 1/2 labial tooth rows; 4, nuptial excrescences absent; 5, tadpole tail xiphicercal; 6, tadpole mouth terminal; 7, 0/1 labial tooth rows; 8, 0/0 labial tooth rows; 9, one ventral row of small labial papillae in tadpoles; 10, extensive axillary membrane; 11, longitudinal stripes on hindlimbs of tadpoles; 12, one ventral row of large labial papillae in tadpoles; 13, tadpole body violinshaped in dorsal view; 14, body of tadpole depressed; 15, labial papillae absent in tadpoles; 16, internal surface of the arytenoids with a small medial depression.

Fig. 12. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 12. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribes Hylini

Fig. 4. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 4. A partial view of the strict consensus showing the relationships of the South American II clade and its correspondence with the currently recognized species groups. Numbers above nodes are Bremer support values. Numbers below nodes are Parsimony Jackknife absolute frequencies; those with an asterisk (*) have a 100% frequency. Numbers in boldfaced italic are node numbers for the list of morphological synapomorphies (see appendix 3). Black circles denote nodes that are present in the quick consensus estimation. The arrow shows alternative placement of the (Scarthyla 1 (Lysapsus 1 Pseudis)) clade when using the 3:1:2 weighting scheme (see text).

Fig. 10. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 10. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for the tribe Cophomantini.

Fig. 9. A in Systematic Review Of The Frog Family Hylidae, With Special Reference To Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis And Taxonomic Revision

Fig. 9. A partial view of the strict consensus, updated with the new taxonomy for Phyllomedusinae proposed here.

Fig. 14 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 14. Plantar view of feet with toes splayed. Left: C. mcdiarmidi (holotype USNM 257805). Right: C. alessandroi (AMNH 157004). Scale bar = 2 mm.

Fig. 11 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 11. Narrowband (59 Hz) spectrogram and waveform of advertisement call of Colostethus melanolaemus (MUSM 15607).

Fig. 10 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 10. Ventral and dorsal views of adult male Colostethus melanolaemus from the type locality. From left to right, top row: AMNH FS 11920, MUSM 17741 (holotype); bottom row: AMNH FS 11922, MUSM 15607. ×2.8.

Fig. 7 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 7. Narrowband (59 Hz) spectrogram and waveform of advertisement call of Colostethus trilineatus from Yurimaguas, the type locality (AMNH FS 8689).

Fig. 13. Colostethus alessandroi AMNH 157004 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 13. Colostethus alessandroi AMNH 157004 (SVL = 21.3 mm). (From color transparency by Alessandro Catenazzi.)

Fig. 8. A in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 8. A specimen of Colostethus melanolaemus from the type locality. [From color transparency by LOR.]

Fig. 16 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 16. Dorsal view of similar species of Colostethus. From left to right, top row: C. alessandroi MUSM 15609 (Ƌ), MUSM 15608 (Ƌ), AMNH 157004 (Ƌ); bottom row: C. mcdiarmidi USNM 257805 (Ƌ), USNM 257806 (♀), NKA 3712 (♀), NKA 3708 (Ƌ). ×1.3.

Fig. 6 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 6. Lateral view of two similar Amazonian species of Colostethus. Note the variation in the pale area anterior to the groin and the distance of the pale ventrolateral stripe from arm. From top to bottom, C. trilineatus (AMNH FS 8689 Ƌ; MUSM 15618 Ƌ), and C. melanolaemus (AMNH FS 11920 Ƌ; AMNH 114944 ♀). ×2.8.

Fig. 5 in Two New Species of Frogs of the Genus Colostethus (Dendrobatidae) from Peru and a Redescription of C. trilineatus (Boulenger, 1883)

Fig. 5. Variation in ventral and dorsal coloration among adult male Colostethus trilineatus from Cocha Cashu. All specimens in top row have only Finger III swollen; those of bottom row have Fingers II and III swollen. From left to right, top row: AMNH 153038, MUSM 9201, MUSM 9184, MUSM 9182, MUSM 9198; bottom row: MUSM 9183, MUSM 9188, MUSM 15618, MUSM 9200, MUSM 9191. Slightly larger than life size.