Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in The nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768)

FIGURE 5. Reproduction of part of the tree of vertebrates in Pramuk et al. (2008: 76) including their BUFONIDAE. The specific nomina are those used by these authors, whereas the generic nomina in the column on the right are those supported here, either for genera or subgenera (see text for details). Bidirectional arrows point to reported cases of successful hybridization resulting in adult specimens: (1) between Bufo fowleri and Bufo valliceps (Blair in Moore 1955); (2) between Bufo terrestris and Bufo valliceps (Blair 1941; Moore 1955); (3) between Bufo bufo and Bufo woodhousii (Blair 1972: 420). The larger grey rectangle includes all the species that must be maintained in the genus Bufo according to these data if the crossability criterion of Dubois (1988a-b, 2004c) is implemented. The darker grey rectangle includes species that could be excluded from this genus if the only reported case between Bufo bufo and Bufo woodhousii proved to be in error. See text for explanations.

FIGURE 3 in The nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768)

FIGURE 3. Reproductions of extracts from the works of Garsault (1764, 1767): plates 673–675 (1764); text page 414 (1767). See text for explanations.

FIGURE 2 in The nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768)

FIGURE 2. Reproductions of extracts from the work of Garsault (1764): plates 669–672. See text for explanations.

FIGURE 1 in The nomenclatural status of the nomina of amphibians and reptiles created by Garsault (1764), with a parsimonious solution to an old nomenclatural problem regarding the genus Bufo (Amphibia, Anura), comments on the taxonomy of this genus, and comments on some nomina created by Laurenti (1768)

FIGURE 1. Reproductions of extracts from the work of Garsault (1764): title page, plates 666–668. See text for explanations.

FIGURE 3 in Lost and found: Rediscovery of the genus Margaromantis Piza, 1982 and consequential nomenclatural changes in the genus Colombiella Koçak & Kemal, 2008 (Mantodea: Mantidae, Photinainae)

FIGURE 3. Known distribution of Margaromantis planicephala and the type localities of Margaromantis margaritaria Piza and Metriomantis planicephala Rehn.

FIGURE 1 in Lost and found: Rediscovery of the genus Margaromantis Piza, 1982 and consequential nomenclatural changes in the genus Colombiella Koçak & Kemal, 2008 (Mantodea: Mantidae, Photinainae)

FIGURE 1. Male holotype of Margaromantis margaritaria (coloration slightly modified from the original) and labels.

FIGURE 2. A in Lost and found: Rediscovery of the genus Margaromantis Piza, 1982 and consequential nomenclatural changes in the genus Colombiella Koçak & Kemal, 2008 (Mantodea: Mantidae, Photinainae)

FIGURE 2. A, Frontal view of the head of Margaromantis margaritaria (male; from Piza, 1982); B, Frontal view of the head of Metriomantis planicephala (female; from Rehn, 1916).

FIGURE 1. Bansella oregonica, comb. nov. a in Revised systematics of Fabricia oregonica Banse, 1956 (Polychaeta: Sabellidae: Fabriciinae): an example of the need for a uninomial nomenclatural system

FIGURE 1. Bansella oregonica, comb. nov. a, inferior thoracic notochaeta (redrawn from Banse 1956: fig. 8); b–c, anterior end, dorsal view (branchial crown removed), showing rectangular shape of ventral, anterior peristomial ring collar (redrawn from Banse 1963: fig. 3c, and Hobson & Banse 1981: fig. 25n, respectively); d, entire specimen, lateral view (left side); e, left half of branchial crown, inner margin; f, inferior thoracic notochaeta, chaetiger 4; g, thoracic uncinus, chaetiger 5; h, abdominal uncini from lower (left) and median (right) region of torus, chaetiger 9; i–k, dorsal, lateral (right side), and ventral views of anterior end, respectively. Abbreviations: apr, anterior peristomial ring; bh, branchial heart; c, anterior peristomial ring collar; dl, dorsal lip; ppr, posterior peristomial ring; s, spermatheca.

FIGURES 3, 4 in A new species of Mymar (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from the Palaearctic region, with nomenclatural changes in the genus

FIGURES 3, 4. Mymar ramym female (paratype from near Boo-Terek, Talas, Kyrgyzstan). 3. Wings. 4. Mesosoma and metasoma.

FIGURES 1, 2 in A new species of Mymar (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) from the Palaearctic region, with nomenclatural changes in the genus

FIGURES 1, 2. Mymar ramym female (paratype from near Boo-Terek, Talas, Kyrgyzstan). 1. Antenna. 2. Head (frontal view).

FIGURES 4a–e in Nomenclatural changes in Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)

FIGURES 4a–e. Polynema (Dorypolynema) magniceps: a, ♀ habitus; b, ♂ habitus (holotype); c, ♀ antenna; d, ♂ head and antenna (holotype); e, ♀ mesosoma and antenna.

FIGURES 2a–e in Nomenclatural changes in Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)

FIGURES 2a–e. Agalmopolynema porteri holotype: a, head, anterior view; b, antenna; c, mesosoma; d, metasoma; e, ♀ a pair of wings.

FIGURES 3a–e in Nomenclatural changes in Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)

FIGURES 3a–e. Stephanodes giraulti: a, ♀ habitus (lectotype), lateral view; b, ♀ antenna (lectotype); c, ♂ fore wing (paralectotype); d, lectotype slide; e, ♂ antenna (paralectotype).

FIGURES 1a–c in Nomenclatural changes in Mymaridae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea)

FIGURES 1a–c. Acmopolynema albicoxa holotype: a, habitus, dorsal view; b, habitus, lateral view; c, head, antenna and mesosoma, ventral view.

FIGURES 3–5. Bakerdania urbanensis Sevasianov, 1974 in Nomenclature changes in the mite families Neopygmephoridae and Pygmephoridae (Acari: Heterostigmata: Pygmephoroidea) with redescription of two little known species

FIGURES 3–5. Bakerdania urbanensis Sevasianov, 1974, female, 3–5— legs I, II and IV, respectively. Scale bar 20 μm.

FIGURES 6–7 in Nomenclature changes in the mite families Neopygmephoridae and Pygmephoridae (Acari: Heterostigmata: Pygmephoroidea) with redescription of two little known species

FIGURES 6–7. Neositeroptes rosae (Sevastianov and Abo-Korah, 1984) comb. nov., female, 6—dorsum, 7—venter. Scale bar 50 μm.

FIGURE 2 in Nomenclatural and taxonomic status of bird taxa (Aves) described by an ornithological swindler, Josef Prokop Pražák (1870 – 1904)

FIGURE 2. Pražák's dedication of his paper on tit systematics (Pražák 1894f) to Antonín Frič; undated. Library of the Department of Zoology, National Museum, Praha (90.VIII.758). Enlarged.

FIGURES 18–23 in New taxonomic and nomenclatural data on Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with description of six new species

FIGURES 18–23. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) mediterranea sp. nov. 18. Head, paratype from Sicily, Paternò (ZMUC), scale bar 0.5mm. 19. Cercus and surstylus, specimen from Sicily, Corleone (ZMUC), scale bar 0.1mm. 20–21. Paratype from Sicily, Torre Salsa (CNBFVR), scale bars 0.1mm. 20. Gonites. 21. Distiphallus (lateral). 22–23. Paratype from Sicily, Paternò (ZMUC), scale bars 0.1mm. 22. Juxta (dorsal). 23. Distiphallus (ventral, arrow showing vesica).

FIGURES 54–65. 54–56 in New taxonomic and nomenclatural data on Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with description of six new species

FIGURES 54–65. 54–56. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) enderleini Jacentkovský. 54. Cercus and surstylus, specimen from Italy, Abetina di Rosello (CNBFVR), scale bar 0.25mm. 55. Distiphallus (lateral), type specimen of Heteronychia (Eupierretia) macedonica Povolný from Greece, St. Panteleimon (MMBC), scale bar 0.1mm. 56. Juxta (apical), specimen from Italy, Borgo Capanne (NHRS), scale bar 0.05mm. 57. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) ferox Villeneuve, distiphallus (half ventral, arrow showing vesica); paratype of Heteronychia (Asceloctis) perplexa Peris et al. from Spain, Pego, scale bar 0.15mm. 58. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) giganta Pape, distiphallus (lateral); specimen from Croatia, Biokovo (NHRS), scale bar 0.25mm. 59. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) kataphygionis (Povolný), distiphallus (lateral); paratype from Greece, Olympos (MMBC), scale bar 0.1mm. 60. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) sp., distiphallus (lateral); specimen from Ukraine, Andriyivka (YVC), scale bar 0.1mm. 61. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) kerteszi Villeneuve, terminalia; specimen from Lebanon, Mt. Barukh (TAU, as "Heteronychia dayani det. Lehrer"), scale bar 0.25mm. 62–63. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) minima Rondani, specimen from Israel, Hameshar (TAU, as "Ctenodasypygia fertoni det. Lehrer"). 62. Cercus and surstylus, scale bar 0.15mm (arrow showing subapical hump of cercus). 63. Distiphallus (lateral), scale bar 0.1mm (arrow showing protruding lateral membranous process of juxta). 64. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) nanula (Povolný), distiphallus (apical); specimen from Sicily, Sortino (ZMUC), scale bar 0.05mm. 65. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) depressifrons Zetterstedt, distiphallus (apical); specimen from Switzerland, Zürichberg (NHRS), scale bar 0.05mm.

FIGURES 36–41 in New taxonomic and nomenclatural data on Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with description of six new species

FIGURES 36–41. Sarcophaga (Heteronychia) tunisiae sp. nov., paratypes from Tunisia, Tabarka (ZMUC). 36. Head, scale bar 0.5mm. 37. Cercus and surstylus, scale bar 0.25mm. 38. Gonites, scale bar 0.1mm. 39. Distiphallus (lateral), scale bar 0.1mm (arrow showing vesica). 40. Distiphallus (apical), scale bar 0.05mm. 41. Juxta (dorsal), scale bar 0.05mm.