Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
592
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
592 results for “Cross-Sectional Studies”
Knowledge, Attitude, And Practice In A Group Of Egyptian Dentists Towards Preventive Measures In Pediatric Dentistry: A Cross-Sectional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03556865. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Belgian Cross-sectional Allogeneic Transplant Survivor Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02312830. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Cross-sectional Study Evaluating Pregnancy Related Use of Vitamins and Medication
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03105583. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Cross-sectional Study on a Given Day Within the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04022278. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Cross-sectional Study of Covid-19 Pandemic in Zhejiang Province
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05668052. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Traditional Medicine Syndromes in Internal Hemorrhoids: a Cross-Sectional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06876428. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Covid-19 In Tunisia: An Observational Cross-Sectional Registry Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04384614. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Oral Ulcer Prevalence: Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03167632. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Cross-sectional Study on the Impact of Shift Work on Diastolic Dysfunction in Healthcare Workers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07331233. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
A Cross-sectional Study to Investigate the Effect of Topiramate on Bone and Mineral Metabolism in Female Participants With Epilepsy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01030094. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
The amniotic fluid proteome improves prediction of imminent delivery relative to quantitative cervical length: a cross-sectional study in women with a short cervix
GEO Series GSE186135. Homo sapiens. 106 samples. Type: Protein profiling by protein array.
Dataset related to article "Cognitive and behavioral associated changes in manifest Huntington disease A retrospective cross-sectional study"
<p>.xls dataset containing clinical and neuropsychological data of HD patients included in the study described at title by Fondazione Besta</p>
Data set of Sepsis awareness at the university hospital level: a survey-based cross-sectional study
<p><strong>This is the dataset for the SAfE survey</strong></p> <p>We conducted a survey on nurses and physicians distributed over all adult departments of the Lausanne University Hospital (LUH) and local paramedics. The survey aimed to assess professionals’ demographics (age, profession, seniority, unit of activity), prior sepsis education, perceptions, knowledge of sepsis epidemiology, definition, recognition and management. Correlation between surveyed personel and sepsis perceptions and knowledge were assessed with univariate logistic regression models.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong></p> <p>The research team designed a survey inspired from previously published surveys assessing knowledge and awareness of sepsis.</p> <p>The questions were tailored to the profession (clinical scenario adapted activity sector - medicine, surgery, emergency department or gynecology). The survey was written and completed in French. Each section of the survey (paramedics’, nurses’ and physicians’ section) was submitted to three focus groups consisting of 3 to 6 participants of each profession, commonly involved in care of patients with sepsis. These focus groups assessed the applicability and appropriateness (validity) of the survey. The focus group were constituted of nurses, physicians and paramedics of all seniority levels. Their primary task was in assessing whether formulations and relevance of questions were adequate. The survey was revised using feedback from the groups. Surveys of nursing staff and paramedics were more focused on screening, initial evaluation and early management whereas physicians were also tested on diagnosis and management. Responses options included Likert-type scales, binary (e.g. “yes/no”) or multiple choices. Each question was locked upon answering, which prevented post hoc changes that could be influenced by information provided at a later stage of the survey. The final survey contained questions on participants’ demographic characteristics (5/7/6 questions for nurses/paramedics/physicians), sepsis continuous education (3/3/3 questions), self-evaluation of sepsis knowledge and clinical management (2/2/2 questions), definitions, scores and epidemiology (11/12/14 questions), and sepsis management (4/4/5 questions). The survey was developed in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) software so as to automatically export participants’ responses to a database. Surveys are provided as supplementary material (supp. meth. survey).</p> <p>Participants were recruited between January 20 and October 10, 2020. We aimed for a convenience sample size of 1,000 persons (approx. 20% of the active HCPs) distributed over all departments (Emergency department (ED), intensive care unit (ICU), Medicine, Paramedic, Psychiatry, or Surgery) and professions (paramedics, nurses and physicians) to reach 20% of LUH staff considered HCPs, being as representative as possible. Pediatrics and neonatology staff (not covered by Sepsis-3 consensus definitions) as well as nurses and physicians not in daily contact with patients (i.e., who were working in research team or in administration) were excluded. We favored a supervised approach rather than a dissemination of the survey to all HCPs by email. Participants answered the online survey under trained interviewer supervision so as maximize data quality and to avoid biased responses (internet queries, discussions between colleagues). Furthermore, to avoid multiple answers by a same HCP, surveys were accessed by QR-code only available at screening; timing of survey completion was registered and email addresses were registered.</p> <p>Thus, participants were screened amongst the medical (n=1664) and nursing staff (n=2463) in daily contact with patients of LUH and amongst paramedics of the Canton of Vaud (n=290) during the screening period. Screening by trained interviewers took place during scheduled patient hand-offs, seminars or group meetings, as permitted by heads of units. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. Participants completed the online survey using tablets or smartphones (participants’ or provided by the investigators).</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong></p> <p>Between January and October 2020, 1,116 of 1,216 contacted professionals completed the survey (participation rate 91.8%). These participants represented about 25% of the workforce (n=4417) – i.e., 25.1% of nurses (619/2,463), 20.9 % of physicians (348/1,664),and 51.4% of paramedics (149/290). Only 13% of participants (physicians: 28.4%, nurses: 5.9%, paramedics: 6.8%) correctly identified the Sepsis-3 consensus definition. Similarly, less than 50% of participants (physicians: 48.6%, nurses: 10.0%) selected the SOFA score as a sepsis defining score for infected patients. Furthermore, 24% of participants properly identified the qSOFA score as a predictor of increased mortality; and 6% selected correctly its components. For a suspected sepsis, 96.1%, 91.6% and 75.8% of physicians respectively chose blood cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotics and fluid resuscitation as required interventions; 76.4% and 18.2% of physicians requested initial measures within 1 and 3 hours, respectively. For physicians, recent training correlated with awareness regarding definitions, SOFA and qSOFA score use and components: ORs (95%CI) 2.2 (1.4-3.6), 4.3 (2.7-6.7), 3.4 (2.2-5.2), and 2.6 (1.5-4.6), respectively).</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong></p> <p>We identify a deficit of awareness among physicians, nurses and paramedics at LUH correlating with a lack of sepsis-specific training.</p>
Investigation of oral microbiome composition in elderly Chinese patients with hypertension: A cross-sectional study
GEO Series GSE277296. human oral metagenome. 206 samples. Type: Other.
Non-occupational and occupational factors associated with specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Hospital Workers – a multicentre cross-sectional study
<p>Variables and baseline data from this cross-sectional study. Manuscript currently available as preprint: https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.11.10.20229005v1.</p>
Uncertain crisis time affects psychosocial dimensions in beta-thalassemia patients during Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
<p>Submitted materials consist of study dataset (Dataset_Thalassemia.xsls, EXCEL format), Syntax of analyses performed (Syntax_Thalassemia.sps, SPSS format), Output of results (Logfile_Thalassemia.spv, SPSS format).</p> <p>Study dataset includes socio-demographic data of 43 beta-thalassemia patients and 86 controls and the clinical and psychosocial variables used in the study (i.e., distress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, coping strategies) as well as scores of perceived impact of Covid-19 outbreak and changes in life habits. Statistical analysis included group differences (one-way ANOVA) between patients and control subjects on: 1) psycho-socio-emotional measures including distress, depression and anxiety, loneliness and coping styles; 2) perceived impact of Covid-19 outbreak on health and economy; and 3) life habit changes, and in particular on the Social Habits, the Outdoor Habits and the Indoor Habits Scales. Study results no significant group differences (one-way ANOVA) in loneliness sub-scores, distress and depression variables. A significant group effect was found on anxiety scale and transcendent coping scale, with patients showing higher scores than control subjects in both measures. After multiple comparison correction, only the difference on transcendent coping scores remained significant. Significant group differences in the perceived impact of Covid-19 for economy was also found, showing that patients perceived the impact of Covid-19 for economy as more serious than control subjects. Finally, a significant group difference in the Outdoor Habits Scale emerged, with patients reporting greater changes in outdoor habits than controls. Outdoor Habits Scale correlated with DASS anxiety sub-scale.</p>
Effects of Mutuality, Anxiety, and Depression on Quality of Life of Patients With Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study
<p>Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Palpella F, Diazzi A, Orrico M, Magon A, Pittella F, Caruso R. Effects of Mutuality, Anxiety, and Depression on Quality of Life of Patients With Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study. Creat Nurs. 2021 Aug 1;27(3):181-189. doi: 10.1891/CRNR-D-20-00025. PMID: 34493639.</p> <p>This study aimed to describe the impact of mutuality, anxiety, and depression on quality of life (QoL) in patients with heart failure (HF) using cross-sectional, convenient, and consecutive sampling. A total of 97 patients were recruited. Socio-demographic and clinical variables and self-report measures of anxiety, depression, mutuality, and QoL were collected. The results highlighted the pivotal role of mutuality (specifically the domain of shared values between patients and their caregivers) in determining perceptions of physical health. Conversely, depression was a negative determinant of perceptions of both physical and mental health. Future research is needed to describe in-depth and longitudinally the associations between mutuality and QoL in patients with HF.</p>
Burnout syndrome and its determinants among healthcare workers during the first wave of the Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: a cross-sectional study to identify sex-related differences.
<p>Brera AS, Arrigoni C, Dellafiore F, Odone A, Magon A, Nania T, Pittella F, Palamenghi L, Barello S, Caruso R. Burnout syndrome and its determinants among healthcare workers during the first wave of the Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: a cross-sectional study to identify sex-related differences. Med Lav. 2021 Aug 26;112(4):306-319. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v112i4.11316. PMID: 34446687; PMCID: PMC8436819.</p> <p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several studies described burnout levels of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, sex-related differences remain poorly investigated.</p> <p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe sex-related differences in burnout and its determinants among HCWs during the first pandemic wave of the COVID-19 in Italy.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed between April and May 2020. The framework given by the Job Demands Resources (JD-R) model was used to assess burnout determinants (risk and protective factors).</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Male HCWs (n=133) had higher levels of depersonalization than female HCWs (P=0,017) and female HCWs (n=399) reported greater emotional exhaustion rates (P=0,005). Female nurses were the most exposed to burnout (OR=2,47; 95%CI=1,33-4,60; P=0,004), emotional exhaustion (OR=1,89; 95% CI=1,03-3,48; P=0,041), and depersonalization (OR=1,91; 95% CI=1,03-3,53; P=0,039). Determinants of burnout differed between sexes, and some paradoxical associations were detected: the score of job demands was a protective factor in females for burnout, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization, resilience was a risk factor for males.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals that the stressors in male and female HCWs tended to be associated with burnout differently. Both sexes showed alarming burnout levels, even if the weights of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization acted in different ways between the sexes. The revealed paradoxical effects in this study could reflect the study's cross-sectional nature, highlighting that more resilient and empathic individuals were more consciously overwhelmed by the challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, thus reporting higher scores of emotional exhaustion and burnout. Future in-depth and longitudinal analyses are recommended to further explore sex-related differences in burnout among HCWs.</p>
DATASET RELATED TO ARTICLE "A cross-sectional, prospective ocular motor study in 72 patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C"
<p>data related to article at title</p>
Alexithymia and psychological distress in fibromyalgia and chronic migraine: a cross-sectional study
<p>This is the processed data for the manuscript "Alexithymia and psychological distress in fibromyalgia and chronic migraine: a cross-sectional study".</p> <p>Dataset refers the prevalence of psychological distress and alexithymia in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic migraine, compared to a healthy control group.</p> <p>To this end, participants were assessed using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results suggest a common psychological dysregulation in patients suffering from fibromyalgia and chronic migraine, which manifests with a different degree of intensity and into a different expression of physical symptoms.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.