Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2014View details →

Figure 2 in The contribution of molecular data to our understanding of cephalopod evolution and systematics: a review

Figure 2. Polyploidy scenario suggested by and reproduced from Bonnaud et al. (2004). Updated diploid chromosome numbers (see Table 2) for the various branches are now Nautiloidea 52; Octopoda 56–60; Sepiolida 74; Sepiida 48–112; Myopsida 86–92 (?22-?172).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2014View details →

Figure 6 in The contribution of molecular data to our understanding of cephalopod evolution and systematics: a review

Figure 6. Relationships among Sepiida. (A) Consensus tree based on 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, cytochrome oxidase subunit II (Bonnaud et al. 2006); (B) maximum likelihood tree of cytochrome oxidase subunit I, cytochrome b and ND5 combined (Yoshida et al. 2010); (C) whole evidence approach using four to ten genes (Lindgren et al. 2012). Trees redrawn from original sources.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2014View details →

Figure 7 in The contribution of molecular data to our understanding of cephalopod evolution and systematics: a review

Figure 7. Relationships within Onychoteuthidae. (A) Neighbour-joining tree based on 16S ribosomal RNA (Bonnaud et al. 1998); (B) maximum likelihood tree of five genes (see text) combined (Lindgren 2010); (C) maximum likelihood tree based on whole evidence approach using four to ten genes (Lindgren et al. 2012). All trees redrawn from original sources. Nomenclature uses systematic revision of Bolstad (2010).

Fig. 4 in Review of the scorpionfly genus Dicerapanorpa Zhong & Hua (Mecoptera: Panorpidae), with descriptions of two new species

Fig. 4. Dicerapanorpa zhengkuni sp. nov. A. Ƌ, holotype, dorsal view, NWAU. B. ♀, paratype, dorsal view, NWAU. C. Head, frontal view. D. Ƌ, abdominal segments III and IV, showing the notal organ, dorsal view. E. Anal horns, dorsal view. F. Ƌ, A6–A8, lateral view. G–H. Ƌ, genital bulb in dorsal and ventral views, respectively. I. ♀, subgenital plate, ventral view. J. ♀, medigynium, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 5.0 mm; C–F = 0.5 mm; G–J = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 3 in Review of the scorpionfly genus Dicerapanorpa Zhong & Hua (Mecoptera: Panorpidae), with descriptions of two new species

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of genitalia of Dicerapanorpa bifurcata sp. nov. A. Ƌ, genitalia in ventral view, with hypandrium removed. B. Magnification of A. C. ♀, medigynium, ventral view. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm; B–C = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Review of the scorpionfly genus Dicerapanorpa Zhong & Hua (Mecoptera: Panorpidae), with descriptions of two new species

Fig. 5. Scanning electron micrographs of genitalia of Dicerapanorpa zhengkuni sp. nov. A. Ƌ, genitalia in ventral view, with hypandrium removed. B. Magnification of A. C. ♀, medigynium, ventral view. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm; B–C = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Review of the scorpionfly genus Dicerapanorpa Zhong & Hua (Mecoptera: Panorpidae), with descriptions of two new species

Fig. 2. Dicerapanorpa bifurcata sp. nov. A. Ƌ, holotype, dorsal view, NWAU. B. ♀, paratype, dorsal view, NWAU. C–D. Ƌ, genital bulb in dorsal and ventral views, respectively. E. ♀, subgenital plate, ventral view. F. ♀, medigynium, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 5.0 mm; C–F = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 3 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 3. Laminion birenifer (Gravely, 1921) gen. et comb. nov., ♂♀, syntypes of Storena birenifer Gravely, 1921 (NZC-ZSI-2914/H2). A. Left pedipalp of male, prolateral view. B. Same, retrolateral view. C. Same, ventral view. D. Epigynum of female, ventral view. Abbreviations: lSP = lateral sclerotised plate; mSP = median sclerotised plate. Scale bars: A–C = 0.5 mm; D = 0.2 mm. Arrows indicate the femoral disto-ventral depression.

Fig. 6 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 6. Laminion debasrae (Biswas & Biswas, 1992) gen. et comb. nov., ♀, holotype of Storena debasrae Biswas & Biswas, 1992 (NZC-ZSI-5411/18). A. Female habitus, dorso-lateral view. B. Epigynum of the same, ventral view. C. Vulva of the same, dorsal view. D. Type label. E. Original illustrations of S. debasrae adapted from Biswas & Biswas (1992). Abbreviations: lSP = lateral sclerotised plate; mSP = median sclerotised plate. Scale bars: A = 2 mm; B–C = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 9 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 9. Currently known distributional records of Laminion gen. nov. Ǫ Laminion arakuensis (Patel & Reddy, 1989) gen. et comb. nov. ● Laminion birenifer (Gravely, 1921) gen. et comb. nov. ♦ Laminion debasrae (Biswas & Biswas, 1992) gen. et comb. nov. ■ Laminion gujaratensis (Tikader & Patel, 1975) gen. et comb. nov.

Fig. 5 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 5. Laminion birenifer (Gravely, 1921) gen. et comb. nov., ♂, syntype of Storena birenifer Gravely, 1921 (NZC-ZSI-2914/H2), details of left pedipalp. A. Bulb, prolatero-ventral view. B–D. Details of conductor, median apophysis and disto-prolateral tegular apophysis. B. Ventro-retrolateral view. C. Oblique ventral view. D. Prolateral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; dpTA = disto-prolateral tegular apophysis; E = embolus; EB = embolic base; MA = median apophysis; pMA = prolateral branch of median apophysis; rC1 = first retrolateral branch of conductor; rC2 = second retrolateral branch of conductor; rMA = retrolateral branch of median apophysis. Scale bars: A, C = 0.5 mm; B, D = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 4 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 4. Laminion birenifer (Gravely, 1921) gen. et comb. nov., ♂, syntype of Storena birenifer Gravely, 1921 (NZC-ZSI-2914/H2), left pedipalp. A. Cymbial retrolateral flange, ventral view. B. Distal part of cymbium and bulb, prolateral view. C. Disto-prolateral tegular apophysis, dorso-prolateral view. D–I. Details of retrolateral tibial apophysis, cymbial processes, lamellate extension of tibia and patellar apophysis. D, F. Retrolateral view. E. Ventral view. G. Prolatero-ventral view. H. Dorso-ventral view. I. Ventral view. Abbreviations: C = conductor; CP1 = first cymbial process; CP2 = second cymbial process; CP3 = third cymbial process; dpTA = disto-prolateral tegular apophysis; LTi = lamellate extension of tibia; MA = median apophysis; PA = patellar apophysis; RTA = retrolateral tibial apophysis. Scale bars: A = 0.5 mm; B–I = 0.2 mm. Arrows: 1 indicates cymbial retrolateral flange, 2 indicates dorsal hair mat of cymbium.

Fig. 7 in A review of the Indian species formerly assigned to the genus Storena Walckenaer, 1805 (Araneae: Zodariidae) with the description of a new genus

Fig. 7. Laminion gujaratensis (Tikader & Patel, 1975) gen. et comb. nov., ♂, holotype of Storena gujaratensis Tikader & Patel, 1975. A. Male habitus, dorsal view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Spinnerets showing PVS, ventral view. D. Type label. E. Original illustrations of S. gujaratensis adapted from Tikader & Patel (1975). Scale bars: A–B = 2 mm; C = 0.1 mm.

ROB 2 assessments_Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19_a living systematic review

Risk of bias assessments and support for judgement with ROB 2 tool for the Cochrane Review: Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID-19:a living systematic review (Version 3).

Fig. 6 in A new species of Bidessus from Anjozorobe-Angavo and a review of Malagasy Bidessus (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)

Fig. 6. Two localities of the high-altitude alpine species Bidessus nesioticus Guignot, 1956 previously known but from the type locality at 2500 m a.s.l. near the peak Tsiafajavona of Ankaratra mountain. A. A glade swamped by water from a source [MAD-MJK12-13] in Manjakatompo Ankaratra, 2070 m a.s.l. B. The new location [MAD13-33] of Bidessus nesioticus Guignot, 1956 at a pond in the alpine zone 2030 m a.s.l. on the Andringitra mountain massif in Andringitra NP.

Fig. 3 in A new species of Bidessus from Anjozorobe-Angavo and a review of Malagasy Bidessus (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)

Fig. 3. Male genitalia of the Malagasy species of Bidessus Sharp, 1882. For each subpanel from left to right penis in dorsal view, penis in lateral view and paramere in lateral view. A. B. apicidens Bistr̂m & Sanfilippo, 1986. B. B. cf. ceratus Guignot, 1941. C. B. anjozorobe sp. nov. D. B. cf. nero Gschwendtner, 1933. E. B. nesioticus Guignot, 1956. F. B. perexiguus Kolbe, 1883. G. B. longistriga Régimbart, 1895.

Fig. 5 in A new species of Bidessus from Anjozorobe-Angavo and a review of Malagasy Bidessus (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)

Fig. 5. Type locality [MAD14-78] for Bidessus anjozorobe sp. nov. in Anjozorobe forest in AnjozorobeAngavo protected area on the Central Highlands. A glade in the rainforest with marsh vegetation. Multiple individuals of Bidessus anjozorobe sp. nov. were found by tramping in the vegetation at the edges of the marsh.

Sistematic Mapping review of literature about public policies innovation and reading competences

The systematic mapping method makes possible to identify what is known about a topic, what has been researched, what aspects remain unknown, and to obtain information about current trends and future challenges regarding this topic. In this Excel , the following articles were included: studies on innovative public policies related to reading skills, those published only in journals that can be found in two databases: Web of Science (WOS) and Scopus, published from January 2015 to December 2019, and related to the educational sector (social sciences, psychology, multidisciplinary, educational research, medical education, environmental education).

SmartUpLab- Co-Creation in sustainable mobility research - Systematic Reviews and Case Studies

The current dataset presents the results of systematic reviews and case studies about co-creation tools best practice for sustainable mobility, carried out in the context of the research project SmartUpLab (funded by EFRE).