Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 10 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 10. Changes in mean ciliated cell size on the ventral side of the yolk: (A) in three species of Hylidae; (B) in two species of Leptodactylidae. H, hatching stage. Error bars show standard deviations.

Figure 9 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 9. Ciliated cell patterns around the lateral line system. (A) R. temporaria, stage 20, lateral side of the head; (B) R. temporaria, stage 21, lateral side of the head; (C) P. pustulosus, stage 26, lateral side of the head; (D) P. pustulosus, stage 26, tail. Arrow heads show lateral line system (neuromasts); arrows show ciliated cells. Scale bar: 500 Mm (A, B); 150 Mm (C, D).

Figure 8 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 8. Examples of different patterns of cilia resorption. (A) Cilia reabsorption starts from the anterior side of the cell, H. minuta, stage 22, ventral side of the trunk; (B) cilia reabsorption starts from the periphery of the cell, H. minuscula, stage 25, ventral side of the trunk; (C) cilia reabsorption starts from the centre of the cell, P. venulosa, stage 22, dorsal side of the head; (D) cilia have disappeared from the whole of the cell, P. venulosa, stage 23, dorsal side of the head. Scale bars: 30 Mm.

Figure 7 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 7. Elongated ciliated cells at different locations. (A) B. viridis, stage 18/19, ventral side of the trunk before cell elongation; (B) B. viridis, stage 23, ventral side of the trunk after cell elongation; (C) P. trinitatis, stage 22, tail; (D) H. crepitans, stage 20, ventral side of the trunk; (E) P. trinitatis, stage 20, lateral side of the trunk; (F) B. viridis, stage 22, ventral side of the trunk. Scale bars: 500 Mm (A–D); 120 Mm (E); 15 Mm (F).

Figure 6 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs to show distribution of ciliated cells on the surface of E. urichi at different stages and locations. The need to open up the yolk sac before processing accounts for the somewhat crumpled appearance of some embryos. (A) Stage 5, overall dorsal view; (B) stage 6/7, overall dorsal view; (C) stage 8/9, anterior end, dorsal view; (D) stage 14, overall dorsal view; (E) stage 5, dorso-lateral side of the head; (F) stage 6/7, dorso-lateral side of the head and forelimb bud. *forelimb. Scale bars: 500 Mm (A, C); 1 mm (B, D); 150 Mm (E, F).

Figure 5 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 5. Sketch of E. urichi embryo, approximately TS stage 6/7. Regions assessed for ciliated cells are 1, head, dorsal; 2, head, lateral; 3, trunk dorsal; 4, trunk, lateral; 5, tail, stem; 6, tail, fins; 7, forelimbs; 8, hindlimbs; 9, yolk sac.

Figure 2 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 2. Ciliated cell patterns at different body regions. (A) P. pustulosus, stage 27, nostrils; (B) R. temporaria, stage 19, adhesive gland; (C) H. geographica, stage 21, tail; (D) H. crepitans, stage 22, external gill; (E) L. bolivianus, stage 24, dorsal head; (F) L. fuscus, stage 27, hind-limb bud. Scale bars: 500 Mm; (A, B, C, E); 20 Mm (D); 50 Mm (F).

Figure 3 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 3. The range of ciliated cell densities from ''very dispersed'' to ''very dense''. (A) H. minuta, very dispersed, stage 20, ventral side of the body; (B) R. temporaria, dispersed, stage 18, dorsal side of the head; (C) L. fuscus, intermediate density, stage 20, ventral side of the trunk; (D) L. fuscus, dense, stage 24, ventral side of the trunk; (E) Phrynohyas venulosa, very dense, stage 17, adhesive gland. Scale bars: 35 Mm (A, D); 30 Mm (B, C, E).

Figure 1 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 1. Ten study locations on the surface of the amphibian embryo/larva at Gosner state 19. (A) Dorsal view; (B) lateral view; (C) ventral view. a, dorsal side of head; b, dorsal side of trunk; c, nostril; d, external gill; e, lateral side of trunk; f, tail; g, mouth; h, adhesive gland; i, ventral side of head; j, ventral side of trunk.

Figure 4 in The surface ciliation of anuran amphibian embryos and early larvae: Patterns, timing differences and functions

Figure 4. The range of ciliated cell shapes. (A) B. viridis, five-sided, stage 15, lateral side of the head; (B) P. venulosa, six-sided, stage 17, ventral side of the trunk; (C) H. boans, multi-sided, stage 20, ventral side of the trunk; (D) L. fuscus, circular, stage 23, ventro-posterior side of the trunk; (E) L. fuscus, oval, stage 23, ventral side of the trunk; (F) P. trinitatis, elongated, stage 20, lateral side of the trunk. Scale bars: 30 Mm (C, D, F); 35 Mm (A, B); 60 Mm (E).

Fig. 5. Camp 2 in Additional Amphibians And Reptiles From The Phnom Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary In Northwestern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, With Comments On Their Taxonomy And The Discovery Of Three New Species

Fig. 5. Camp 2 in a secondary forest 10 km east of the eastern foothills of Phnom Samkos, Pursat Province, Cambodia.

Fig. 6. Camp 3 in Additional Amphibians And Reptiles From The Phnom Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary In Northwestern Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia, With Comments On Their Taxonomy And The Discovery Of Three New Species

Fig. 6. Camp 3 in a transitional zone between dry dipterocarp forest and hill evergreen forest at the base of Phnom Samkos, Pursat Province, Cambodia.

Fig. 2 in A Survey For Chytrid Fungus In Thai Amphibians

Fig. 2. Distribution of museum specimens sampled from Thailand for the presence of Batrachochytridum dendrobatidis. Numbers correspond to provincial names in Table 1.

Fig. 1 in A Survey For Chytrid Fungus In Thai Amphibians

Fig. 1. Predicted distribution of the fundamental niche of Batrachochytridium dendrobatidis in Southeast Asia (redrawn from Ron, 2005). Dark areas represent those regions where niche presence was predicted by more models (i.e., Overlap Index 1 means that 10 of 10 models predicted niche presence; 0 means that none of the 10 models predicted niche presence). Models are based on known New World occurrences of B. dendrobatidis.

FIGURE 4 in Amphibians and Reptiles of the Madrean Archipelago of Arizona and New Mexico

FIGURE 4. Regression analysis of the Simpson coefficient of similarity (S) on geographic distance (km) for pairwise comparisons of mountain ranges and herpetofaunas within the three phenetic groups (black diamonds and line: S = 0.768 - 0.00020 km) and between the groups (gray squares and line: S = 0.707 - 0.00057 km).

FIGURE 2 in Amphibians and Reptiles of the Madrean Archipelago of Arizona and New Mexico

FIGURE 2. Phenograms of the 20 mountain ranges based on UPGMA clustering of the Simpson coefficient of similarity (S) among the herpetofaunas, using A. all 83 species recorded from Madrean evergreen woodland, petran montane conifer forest, and interior chaparral (appendix 1); B. 57 species, with 26 species eliminated as occurring primarily in desert and grassland; C. 28 species that were considered to occur primarily in Madrean evergreen woodland and higher elevations.

FIGURE 1 in Amphibians and Reptiles of the Madrean Archipelago of Arizona and New Mexico

FIGURE 1. Map of the Madrean Archipelago in southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico with the 23 ranges for which herpetofaunal lists were constructed.

FIGURE 3 in Amphibians and Reptiles of the Madrean Archipelago of Arizona and New Mexico

FIGURE 3. Map of mountain ranges of the Madrean Archipelago with lines delineating the three phenetic groups recognized from UPGMA clustering using the Simpson coefficient of similarity (S) among the herpetofaunas.

opencc-by-4.0May 2011View details →

FIG. 2 in Status of Early 19th-Century Names Authored in Parallel by Wied and Schinz for South American Reptiles and Amphibians, with Designations of Three Nomina Protecta

FIG. 2. Cnemidophorus nativo Rocha et al., 1997, a Brazilian lizard discovered in 1818 by Prince Maximilian zu Wied. The earlier names Lacerta cyanomelas Schinz, 1822, and Teius cyanomelas Wied, 1824 (1822–1831) are qualified herein as forgotten names (nomina oblita), whereas Cnemidophorus nativo is qualified as a protected name (nomen protectum). Top: The original Abbildungen illustration of Teius cyanomelas Wied, reproduced ×1.38 from a composite plate (Wied, 1824 [1822–1831], Lief. 5). The plate was prepared from an artist's copy of Wied's pen-and-watercolor field sketch, in which the background was a horizontal line. The accompanying letterpress text includes "Rücken schwarz, mit einem breiten bläulichen Längsstreif in der Mitte, und zwei weissbläulichen schmäleren an der Seite [Back black, with a wide bluish median stripe, and two narrower bluish white lateral stripes]." Bottom: A specimen of Cnemidophorus nativo from Restinga do Barra Seca, Linhares, state of Espirito Santo, Brazil. The extent of color variation is unknown, but Rocha et al. (1997: 378) wrote that the median "light salmon stripe... continues mostly as light grey and/or light blue [emphasis added] along the dorsal region of tail" and "vivid white" lateral stripes.