Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 8 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 8. Sueus obesus female (Thailand, Suratthani) 2.5 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 3 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 3. Sueus borneensis, female (Indonesia, Sulawesi Utara, RABC) 2.25 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 2 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 2. Phylogeny of Sueus species resulting from the parsimony analysis inferred from COI and CAD DNA sequences. Numbers above branch are bootstrap values, numbers below are posterior probabilities, circles are bootstrap values 90–99%, and squares are posterior probabilities 0.9–0.99.

FIGURE 6 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 6. Sueus insulanus sp. nov. female holotype, 2.0 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 1 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 1. Approximate collection localities of Sueus specimens used in the phylogenetic analysis. Numbers refer to last digits of DNA vouchers in Table 1. Blue square = Sueus niisimai, red circle = Sueus pilosus, yellow oval = Sueus obesus, purple polygon = Sueus insulanus, and orange star = Sueus granulatus.

FIGURE 7 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 7. Sueus niisimai female (MSUC_ARC_320284) 1.7 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 5 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 5. Sueus granulatus female (MSUC_ARC_320283), 2.43 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 3 in Hippocrepis fuelleborni (Digenea: Notocotylidae) from Argentina, morphological molecular and phylogenetic studies

FIGURE 3. SEM images of Hippocrepis fuelleborni: A) Body in ventral view showing the distribution of the papillae. B) Detail of ventral papillae. C) Oral sucker and genital pore, ventral view. D) Details of tegument spines between oral sucker and genital pore, ventral view. E) Lateral view of the oral sucker region. F) Details of tegument spines in the anterior end of body, lateral view.

FIGURE 5 in Hippocrepis fuelleborni (Digenea: Notocotylidae) from Argentina, morphological molecular and phylogenetic studies

FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic tree of Hippocrepis fuelleborni based on 5.8S–ITS2 ribosomal DNA. Phylogenetic tree inferred using Bayesian method. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values of clades are listed first, followed by Bayesian Posterior Probabilities respectively, for clade frequencies exceeding 65%

FIGURE 4 in Hippocrepis fuelleborni (Digenea: Notocotylidae) from Argentina, morphological molecular and phylogenetic studies

FIGURE 4. Histological section of Hippocrepis fuelleborni: A) Detail of ventral papillae. B) Sagittal section showing genital pore (gp) and cirrus (ci) with small spines. C) Posterior end of body: caeca (ca), ovary (ov), testis (te). D) Egg.

FIGURE 6 in Hippocrepis fuelleborni (Digenea: Notocotylidae) from Argentina, morphological molecular and phylogenetic studies

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic tree of Hippocrepis fuelleborni based on 28S ribosomal DNA. Phylogenetic tree inferred using Bayesian method. Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values of clades are listed first, followed by Bayesian Posterior Probabilities respectively, for clade frequencies exceeding 65%

Fig. 8 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 8 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; holotype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.25 mm: A, pereopod 4. Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; paratype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.45 mm: B, pereopod 5; C, pereopod 6; D, pereopod 7. Scale bars represent 1 mm

Fig. 1 in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 1 Multilocus Bayesian phylogeny of selected members of the Crangonyctoidea. Posterior probability is indicated by colored diamonds (black 0.90–1.0, gray 0.89–0.80, white 0.79–0.70). Inset (upper) Crangonyx hobbsi, female, Devil's Eye Spring, Gilchrist County, Florida (YPM IZ 105321), 8.82 mm, scale bar represents

Fig. 6 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 6 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; holotype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.25 mm: A, upper lip; B, lower lip; C, maxilla 1 (outer plate spine-teeth enlarged); D, maxilla 2 (outer plate apical serrate seta enlarged); E, maxilliped (inner plate apical margin enlarged). Scale bars represent 0.5 mm

Fig. 10 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 10 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; allotype male, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051870), 5.87 mm: A, antenna 1 accessory flagellum; B, antenna 2 (single calceolus enlarged); C, gnathopod 1 (palmar margin and dactylus enlarged); D, gnathopod 2 (palmar margin and dactylus enlarged). Scale bars 0.5 mm (A), 1 mm (B–D)

FIGURE 5 in Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): description of a new genus and reinstatement of another

FIGURE 5. Timescale of major divergence events among taxa of Cricetinae based on nuclear gene data. The chronogram was reconstructed under the autocorrelated clock model imрlemented in MCMCTree software. The divergence times corresрond to the mean рosterior estimate of their age in Myr. The bars reрresent the 95% HPD interval.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): description of a new genus and reinstatement of another

FIGURE 2. The Bayesian рhylogeny of Cricetinae as inferred from the comрlete cytb gene sequence in MrBayes. Outgrouрs are not shown. Values above/below branches denote Bayesian рosterior рrobabilities (BPP) and bootstraр suррort in Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) analyses. The asterisks indicate the highly suррorted nodes in all analyses (BPP>0.95, ML and MP bootstraр suррort>90%). The ML analysis was рerformed in Treefinder based on either nucleotide (nuc) or рrotein (AA) sequence alignment. In the latter case a mixed рrotein model (mixture of mtREV, mtMam and mtArt) with emрirical state frequencies and a gamma distribution of rates across sites was used. Transitions at the 3rd codon рositions were removed from the ML analysis of the nucleotide alignment via usage of GTR2 model.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): description of a new genus and reinstatement of another

FIGURE 4. Sрecies tree of Cricetinae рroduced by *BEAST based on Bayesian coalescent aррroach. Values above the branches corresрond to Bayesian рosterior рrobabilities in *BEAST, bootstraр suррort with STAR method and concordance factors in BUCKy analysis, resрectively.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): description of a new genus and reinstatement of another

FIGURE 1. The Bayesian рhylogeny of Cricetinae as inferred from the comрlete 12S gene sequence. Values above/below branches denote Bayesian рosterior рrobabilities (BPP) and bootstraр suррort in Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Maximum Parsimony (MP) analyses. The reрresentatives of Avicolinae, Sigmodontinae, Neotominae and Tylomyinae are used as outgrouрs.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomy of dwarf hamsters Cricetulus Milne-Edwards, 1867 (Cricetidae, Rodentia): description of a new genus and reinstatement of another

FIGURE 3. The Bayesian рhylogeny of Cricetinae as inferred from a concatenated alignment of five nuclear genes and 12S mitochondrial gene. The asterisks denote the highly suррorted nodes in all analyses (Bayesian рosterior рrobabilities (BPP)>0.95, ML and MP bootstraр suррort>90%), the filled circles mark moderately suррorted nodes (BPP>0.85, ML>70% and MP bootstraр suррort>65%). The reрresentatives of the subfamilies Avicolinae, Sigmodontinae, Neotominae and Tylomyinae are used as the outgrouрs.