Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 11 in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 11. Majority-rule consensus tree of Thelepus species sequences obtained in this study and available on GenBank for COI gene. Asterisk indicates posterior probability> 80%. Sequence accession numbers refer to Table 1, text in red to specimens sequenced during this study.

FIGURE 9 in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 9. Thelepus japonicus AM W.53073 (A), SMA_Arc_Thele_08 (B–C), MNHN-IA- PNT 117 (D). A. Anterior end, lateral view; B. Anterior end, dorsal view; C. Anterior end, lateral view; D. Anterior part, ventral view. Br, branchiae; Bu, buccal tentacles; Ey, eyes; Np, nephridial papillae; Ll, lower lip; Ul, upper lip; Vl, ventral lobe. Numbers referring to segments.

FIGURE 8. Thelepus corsicanus n in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 8. Thelepus corsicanus n. sp. SEM, paratypes AM W.53068 (A–E), AM W.53071 (F). A. Anterior end, dorsal view; B. Anterior end, ventral view; C. Anterior parapodia, antero-lateral view (from CH5 to CH8); D. Notochaeta from anterior row, CH6, anterior view; E. Tip of notochaeta from posterior row, CH6, anterior view, MG staining; F. Uncini, CH6. Abbreviations: Br, branchiae; Bt, buccal tentacles; Ll, lower lip; Pr, prostomium; Ul, upper lip; Vl, ventral lobe. Numbers referring to segments.

FIGURE 7. Thelepus corsicanus n in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 7. Thelepus corsicanus n. sp., holotype MNHN-IA- type 2003 (A–B, E–F), paratypes AM W.53069 (C), AM W.53068 (D). A. Anterior end, lateral view; B. Anterior end, ventral view; C. Entire worm, anterior end in lateral view; D. Anterior end, ventral view, MG staining; E–F. Uncini from CH9. Abbreviations: Br, branchiae; Bt, buccal tentacles; Ey, eyes; Ul, upper lip; Vl, ventral lobe.

FIGURE 6. Streblosoma lindsayae n in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 6. Streblosoma lindsayae n. sp., MNHN-IA- type 1999 A. Anterior end, dorso-lateral view, MG staining; B. Anterior end, dorsal view, MG staining; C. Anterior end, ventral view, MG staining; D. Notopodia, CH6, SEM. E. Uncini, CH23. F. Uncini, CH26, SEM. Abbreviations: Br1, first pair of branchiae; Br2, second pair of branchiae; Ul, upper lip; Ll, lower lip; Vl, ventral lobe derived from SG1. Numbers referring to segments.

FIGURE 3 in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 3. Parathelepus collaris (Southern, 1914) SEM, AM W.53063. A. Anterior end, lateral view; B. Anterior region, frontal view (most of the buccal tentacles removed); C. Anterior parapodia, lateral view (SG6–SG7); D. Tips of notochaetae of anterior row, CH4, antero-lateral view; E. Uncini, thoracic chaetiger; F. Uncini, abdominal chaetiger. Arrows indicate nephridial openings. Abbreviations: Ne, first neuropodia (SG11); No, nephridial openings; Ul, upper lip.

FIGURE 10 in A revision of the French Telothelepodidae and Thelepodidae (Annelida Terebelliformia), with descriptions of three species and first European record of a non-indigenous species

FIGURE 10. Thelepus japonicus AM W.53072 (A–B), MNHN-IA- PNT 119 (C), MNHN-IA- PNT 117 (D). A. Notochaetae, CH8, SEM; B. Uncini, CH37, SEM; C. Uncini, CH12; D. Uncini, CH15. Arrow indicates dorsal button.

FIG. 1 in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

FIG. 1. Maximum values of pairwise K2P genetic distances for a fragment of the mtDNA gene cytb for the 28 bat species known in Iberia. Shadowed are those species complexes that showed distance values over 5.5%. Additional information (species codes, samples, locations, haplotypes, etc.) is given in Appendix I and Table 1

List of specimens, species codes, localities (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; AU, Austria; BL, Bulgaria; CR, Croatia; CZ, Czech Republic; DK, Denmark; FR, France; GE, Germany; GR, Greece; HN, Hungary; SD, Sweden; SW, Switzerland; TK, Turkey), haplotypes codes for species and GenBank accession numbers of the samples used for an overall molecular screening of bat cryptic diversity in Iberia using a mtDNA cytb fragment in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

List of specimens, species codes, localities (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; AU, Austria; BL, Bulgaria; CR, Croatia; CZ, Czech Republic; DK, Denmark; FR, France; GE, Germany; GR, Greece; HN, Hungary; SD, Sweden; SW, Switzerland; TK, Turkey), haplotypes codes for species and GenBank accession numbers of the samples used for an overall molecular screening of bat cryptic diversity in Iberia using a mtDNA cytb fragment

FIG. 2 in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

FIG. 2. Phylogenetic relationships among haplotypes of the cytb and ND1 genes for European bats of the species complexes: a) Myotis nattereri, b) Eptesicus serotinus, c) Plecotus auritus d) Hypsugo savii, e) Pipistrellus kuhlii. Localities of the haplotypes are shown in bold in the trees (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; AU, Austria; CR, Croatia; DK, Denmark; GE, Germany; GR, Greece; HN, Hungary; SW, Switzerland; TK, Turkey). Reconstructions are NJ trees based on corrected genetic distances (see Table 2 for details of each model). Bootstrap values for NJ and ML trees are indicated above and below nodes, respectively. The geographic locations of the haplotypes are shown in an approximate distribution map for each species complex in the western Palaearctic (shadow area). See Appendix II for haplotype codes. Distance units correspond to 0.02 substitutions/site. Nodes in bold are also supported by phylogenetic reconstructions using RAG2 sequences and based on NJ algorithm and ML search with corrected genetic distances (see Table 2 for details of each model)

FIG. 3 in The Iberian contribution to cryptic diversity in European bats

FIG. 3. Phylogenetic relationships based on unrooted median-joining networks among haplotypes of the RAG2 gene for European bats of the species complexes: a) M. nattereri, b) E. serotinus, c) P. auritus d) H. savii, e) P. kuhlii. Little black dots represent reconstructed missing haplotypes (median vectors) in the sampling. Colours and lineages codes follow Fig. 2 and Tables 3–7. For each representation, distances between haplotypes are proportional to the number of mutated positions. The geographic locations of the haplotypes (NI, Northern Iberia; CI, Central Iberia; SI, Southern Iberia; GR, Greece; SW, Switzerland) are shown in an approximate distribution map for each species complex in the western Palaearctic (shadow area) in Fig. 2. See Appendix II for haplotype codes

FIGURE 5 in Description of the first extinct member of the tribe Anaglyptini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from European Tertiary

FIGURE 5. Reconstruction of Acanthoglyptus picollus gen. et sp. nov. from Baltic amber. Habitus, dorsal view.

FIGURE 9 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 9. Marginal band of third instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, B), M. analis (C, D) and M. devius (E, F); left, dorsal view; right, detail of marginal band. A = 500 µm; B, E = 300 µm; C = 100 µm; D = 50 µm; F = 200 µm.

FIGURE 8 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 8. Posterior spiracular tubercle of third instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, B), M. analis(C, D), M. devius (E, F) and M. mutabilis (G, H); left, anterior view; right, apical view. A–H = 500 µm. ReFis, respiratory fissures; RH, respiratory hole; SC, smooth crown.

FIGURE 6 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 6. Marginal band of first instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, C, E) and M. analis (B, D, F): A, B—dorsal view; C, D—ventral view; E, F—detail of processes, dorsal view. A = 100 µm; B, C, D = 50 µm; E = 40 µm; F = 20 µm. FS, flower–like sensilla; IJ, imbricate joint; SpS, spiniform setae; WMrB, waves of marginal band.

FIGURE 4 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 4. Pseudocephalon of first instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, C, E, G) and M. analis (B, D, F, H): A, B—dorsal view; C, D antennomaxillary lobes; E, F—anterior sensorial organs; G, H—posterior sensorial organs. A = 100 µm; B = 200 µm; C = 40 µm; D = 50 µm; E, F = 30 µm; G, H = 10 µm. Ant, antenna; Asn, anterior sensillum; MxPlp, maxillary palp; Psn, posterior sensillum.

FIGURE 3 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 3. Details of first instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, C, E, G) and M. analis (B, D, F, H): A, B—dorsal microsculpture; C, D—ventral microsculpture; E, F—dorsal flower–like sensilla; G, H—ventral flower like sensilla. A, B, C, D = 100 µm; E, F, G = 10 µm; H = 30 µm. FS, flower-like sensilla.

FIGURE 11 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 11. Eggs of M. myrmicae trapping small drops of water (pointed with red arrows) with their volcano-like processes (A); third instar M. myrmicae larvae with larvae and workers of Myrmica scabrinodis (B); third instar larva and first instar larva (red arrow) of M. myrmicae with M. scabrinodis larvae, ventral view (C); M. myrmicae adult emerging from puparium, anterior view (D); two M. analis pupae and a puparium (E); M. devius pupa (F).

FIGURE 1 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 1. Egg of M. myrmicae (A, C, E) and M.analis (B, D, F): A, B—lateral view; C, D—detail of anterior pole with micropyle area. E, F—chorion microsculpture of volcano-like processes. A, B = 500 µm; C = 100 µm; D, E = 50 µm; F = 40 µm. ASl, alveolate slope; Cr, crater; MA, micropyle area; RP, radial projection; VP, volcano-like process.

FIGURE 2 in Comparative morphology of myrmecophilous immature stages of European Microdon species (Diptera: Syrphidae): updated identification key and new diagnostic characters

FIGURE 2. First instar larvae of M. myrmicae (A, C, E) and M. analis (B, D, F): A, B—dorsal view; C, D—lateral view; E, F—ventral view. A–F = 500 µm. AO, anal opening; LLb, lateral lobe; MrB, marginal band; MG, medial groove; MrS, marginal stripe; PC, pseudocephalon; PSprTu, posterior spiracular tubercle; VLb, venteral lobe; WMrB, waves of marginal band.