Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,575
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
3,575 results for “2009”
Monthly aggregated GLASS FAPAR V6 (250 m): 50th percentile monthly time-series (2009)
<p><strong>List of Subdatasets:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>General Description</strong></p> <p>The <i>monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</i> dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Long-term:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> (p95.r2_m).</p> <ul> <li><strong>Monthly time-series:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month.</p> <p><strong>Data Details</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> March 2000 – December 2021</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC. The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a></p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a></p> <p><strong>Name convention</strong></p> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi–LSTM)</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution / variable type:</strong> p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 250m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> s = surface</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>
Monthly aggregated GLASS FAPAR V6 (250 m): 5th percentile monthly time-series (2009)
<p><strong>List of Subdatasets:</strong></p> <ul> <li>Long-term data: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8381409">2000-2021</a></li> <li>5th percentile (p05) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408654">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411611">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412712">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413021">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8413689">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414639">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411609">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414085">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414960">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415476">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415686">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412154">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414082">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411364">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414933">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415414">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8412246">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8414083">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8411366">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415203">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415549">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8387608">2021</a></li> <li>50th percentile (p50) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408710">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408798">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408866">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415319">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415619">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415878">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416080">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416619">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417164">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417513">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417708">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415669">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416000">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416542">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417055">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417467">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8415747">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416333">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416835">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417326">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417589">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8388078">2021</a></li> <li>95th percentile (p95) monthly time-series: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8408949">2000</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409059">2001</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409154">2002</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8409362">2003</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416487">2004</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417029">2005</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417833">2006</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417996">2007</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418308">2008</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418669">2009</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418986">2010</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417649">2011</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417816">2012</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417959">2013</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418253">2014</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418625">2015</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417759">2016</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8417898">2017</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418076">2018</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418442">2019</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8418751">2020</a>, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8392976">2021</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>General Description</strong></p> <p>The <i>monthly aggregated Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</i> dataset is derived from <abbr title="glass.umd.edu/FAPAR/MODIS/250m/">250m 8d GLASS V6 FAPAR</abbr>. The data set is derived from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) reflectance and LAI data using several other FAPAR products (MODIS Collection 6, GLASS FAPAR V5, and PROBA-V1 FAPAR) to generate a bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) model to estimate FAPAR. The dataset time spans from March 2000 to December 2021 and provides data that covers the entire globe. The dataset can be used in many applications like land degradation modeling, land productivity mapping, and land potential mapping. The dataset includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Long-term:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Derived from monthly time-series. This dataset provides linear trend model for the p95 variable: (1) slope beta mean (p95.beta_m), p-value for beta (p95.beta_pv), intercept alpha mean (p95.alpha_m), p-value for alpha (p95.alpha_pv), and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup> (p95.r2_m).</p> <ul> <li><strong>Monthly time-series:</strong></li> </ul> <p>Monthly aggregation with three standard statistics: (1) 5th percentile (p05), median (p50), and 95th percentile (p95). For each month, we aggregate all composites within that month plus one composite each before and after, ending up with 5 to 6 composites for a single month depending on the number of images within that month.</p> <p><strong>Data Details</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> March 2000 – December 2021</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> Derived from 250m 8 d GLASS V6 FAPAR using Python running in a local HPC. The time-series analysis were computed using the <a href="https://github.com/scikit-map/scikit-map">Scikit-map</a> Python package.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> for the long-term, Ordinary Least Square (OLS) of p95 monthly variable; for the monthly time-series, percentiles 05, 50, and 95.</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Antarctica.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (-180.00000, -62.0008094, 179.9999424, 87.37000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 1/480 d.d. = 0.00208333 (250m)</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 172,800 x 71,698</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Support</strong></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: <a href="https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues">https://github.com/Open-Earth-Monitor/Global_FAPAR_250m/issues</a></p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Hackländer, J., Parente, L., Ho, Y.-F., Hengl, T., Simoes, R., Consoli, D., Şahin, M., Tian, X., Herold, M., Jung, M., Duveiller, G., Weynants, M., Wheeler, I., (2023?) "Land potential assessment and trend-analysis using 2000–2021 FAPAR monthly time-series at 250 m spatial resolution", submitted to PeerJ, preprint available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1">https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3415685/v1</a></p> <p><strong>Name convention</strong></p> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describes important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> fapar = Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> essd.lstm = Earth System Science Data with bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi–LSTM)</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution / variable type:</strong> p05/p50/p95 = 5th/50th/95th percentile</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 250m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> s = surface</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000301 = 2000-03-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20211231 = 2022-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> go = global (without Antarctica)</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.4326 = EPSG:4326</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20230628 = 2023-06-28 (creation date)</li> </ol>
Long-term trends in pesticide residues and physical chemical parameters of superficial water samples with accompanying macro-benthic invertebrate community surveys from the Palo Verde National Park, Costa Rica: 1993-1994; 2001; 2004-2005; 2009-2011
During the years 1993-1994, 2001, 2003-2005 and 2009-2011, the Central American Institute for Studies on Toxic Substances (IRET-UNA) executed independent research projects which quantified the presence of pesticide residues on superficial water samples from the Palo Verde National Park (PVNP) and surrounding areas. The PVNP (5460 sq km) is a RAMSAR wetland of international importance, which has been subjected to pesticide pressure from agricultural fields (mainly rice and sugarcane) since the 1960s and 1970s. In 1993, the PVNP wetlands were placed on the RAMSAR Montreux Record, indicating that it was considered an “impaired ecosystem” due to ecotoxicology concerns. Water is the key component of all issues regarding the biodiversity, management, restoration, and economic development of this region. Therefore, water quality is a critical component of many social ecological discussions and research efforts. This data package contains uniform pesticide, biological and water quality data from all PVNP wetland projects (1993- 2011) in order to present long-term trends in the environmental water quality and accompanying biological patterns for this conservation area. Study sites were spatially determined to compare clean upstream waters with a gradient of pesticide-affected waters. Superficial water samples were collected at various sites for chemical (pesticide) analysis and water quality parameters were recorded in situ for environmental monitoring. Corresponding biological sampling was completed to survey benthic macroinvertebrate communities and compare with local eco-toxicological profiles. This data package contains information from four separate projects.
Soil nitrogen availability and acidity: effects on aboveground production and belowground carbon allocation in mid- and late-successional mixed temperate forests (2009-2021)
In 2011, an experimental nitrogen x pH manipulation study was initiated in mid- and late-successional mixed temperate forests in central New York, USA to disentangle the often-confounded roles of nitrogen (N) and soil pH in driving various ecosystem processes. This data package contains forest productivity (wood, litterfall, and aboveground net primary production), total belowground carbon flux (TBCF), and leaf litterfall and fine root chemistry (C and N concentration) data collected from all experimental plots. It also includes plot-level, species-weighted estimates of measured and modeled photosynthesis (Anet) for the late-successional stands. Wood production, litterfall production, and litterfall chemistry data were collected between 2009 and 2019. Aboveground net primary production data are reported for a pre-treatment interval (2009-2011) and the interval including years 6-9 of experimental treatment (2016-2019). All other properties were measured between years 9 and 11 of the experiment (2019-2021).
Interagency Ecological Program San Francisco Estuary Smelt Larva Survey 2009 – 2025
The Interagency Ecological Program's Smelt Larva Survey was initiated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) in 2009 to monitor the distribution and abundance of newly hatched Longfin Smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) in the San Francisco Estuary. Surveys are conducted bi-weekly, and sampling begins in December and continues through mid-March. The SLS samples at fixed stations, from San Pablo Bay through Suisun Bay and into the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Napa River stations were added in 2014 and the San Pablo Bay expansion stations were added in December 2022. Each sampling week currently consists of 59 stations. At each station, one 10-minute stepped oblique (bottom to top) tow is conducted following a prescribed tow schedule. The net is a conical 500 µm mesh lashed to a D-shaped frame mounted on skis. Larval fish samples are preserved in the field in 10% formalin and brought back to the CDFW Stockton Lab for identification and enumeration under a microscope. Several types of data are collected at each station in addition to the larval fish sample, including the volume of water sampled by the net, surface water temperature, surface and bottom specific conductance (EC normalized at 25˚C), Secchi disk depth, tow duration, tidal condition, and surface water turbidity.
Forest-wide bird survey at 183 sample sites the Andrews Experimental Forest from 2009-2019 (Reformatted to a Darwin Core Archive)
This data package is formatted as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A, event core). For more information on Darwin Core see https://www.tdwg.org/standards/dwc/. This Level 2 data package was derived from the Level 1 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/edi/359/2, which was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-and/4781/3. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: Bird occurrence data collected at 183 sample locations within the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest (HJA) from 2009-present. We used a stratified, systematic, random design to select sample locations. We stratified across elevation, distance to road, and habitat type (plantation or mature/old-growth forest). We conduct point counts on six separate occasions from May – July, which corresponded to spring arrival and subsequent breeding period for the majority of bird species at HJA. Surveys occur between 05:15h and 10:30h and each consists of a 10-min point count where we record all birds seen or heard. The species of all birds seen and heard are recorded as well as all individual squirrels, chipmunks and pikas seen and heard. Survey-level information is also collected at each point count and includes: weather and wind conditions, stream noise, snow cover on the ground, phenology of vine maple and rhododendron. Data collection is ongoing. The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest is a living laboratory that provides unparalleled opportunities for the study of forest and stream ecosystems in the central Cascade Range of Oregon. Since 1980, as a part of the National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-LTER) program, the Andrews Experimental Forest has become a leader in the analysis of forest and stream ecosystem dynamics. Long-term field experiments and measurement programs have focused on climate dynamics, streamflow, water quality, and vegetation succe
Eddy Flux Measurements, Tussock Station, Imnavait Creek, Alaska - 2009
The Biocomplexity Station was established in 2005 to measure landscape-level carbon, water and energy balances at Imnavait Creek, Alaska. The station is now contributing valuable data to the Arctic Observing Network that was established at two nearby stations. These will form part of a network of observatories with Abisko (Sweden), Zackenburg (Greenland) and a location in the Canadian High Arctic which will provide further data points as part of the International Polar Year. This particular part of the project focuses on simultaneous measurements of carbon, water and energy fluxes of the terrestrial landscape at hourly, daily, seasonal and multi-year time scales. These are the major regulatory drivers of the Arctic climate system and form key linkages and feedbacks between the land surface, the atmosphere and the oceans. We will provide a comprehensive description of the state of the regional Arctic system with respect to these variables, its overall regulation and controlling features and its interaction with the global system.
Eddy Flux Measurements, Fen Station, Imnavait Creek, Alaska - 2009
In contribution to the Arctic Observing Network, the researchers have established two observatories of landscape-level carbon, water and energy balances at Imnaviat Creek, Alaska and at Pleistocene Park near Cherskii, Russia. These will form part of a network of observatories with Abisko (Sweden), Zackenburg (Greenland) and a location in the Canadian High Arctic which will provide further data points as part of the International Polar Year. This particular part of the project focuses on simultaneous measurements of carbon, water and energy fluxes of the terrestrial landscape at hourly, daily, seasonal and multi-year time scales. These are the major regulatory drivers of the Arctic climate system and form key linkages and feedbacks between the land surface, the atmosphere and the oceans. We will provide a comprehensive description of the state of the regional Arctic system with respect to these variables, its overall regulation and controlling features and its interaction with the global system. In support of these objectives, a 3m eddy covariance station was established on Imnaviat Creek, Alaska. This station has been continuously monitoring carbon dioxide, water vapor, energy fluxes and various micro-meteorological variables.
Eddy Flux Measurements, Pleistocene Park, Cherskii, Russia - 2009
In contribution to the Arctic Observing Network, the researchers have established two observatories of landscape-level carbon, water and energy balances at Imnaviat Creek, Alaska and at Pleistocene Park near Cherskii, Russia. These will form part of a network of observatories with Abisko (Sweden), Zackenburg (Greenland) and a location in the Canadian High Arctic which will provide further data points as part of the International Polar Year. This particular part of the project focuses on simultaneous measurements of carbon, water and energy fluxes of the terrestrial landscape at hourly, daily, seasonal and multi-year time scales. These are the major regulatory drivers of the Arctic climate system and form key linkages and feedbacks between the land surface, the atmosphere and the oceans. In support of these objectives, a new 32m tower was deployed in Pleistocene Park, about 20km south of North-East Science Station in Cherskii, Russia. This station is currently measuring fluxes of carbon dioxide, methane, water vapor and energy in addition to other meteorological variables.
Fish tagging data (length, weight, tag number) from the Kuparuk, the Sagavanirktok (primarily Oksrukuyik Creek) and the Itkillik (primarily the I-Minus outlet stream) watersheds, 2009 - 2017
Since 2009, the FISHSCAPE Project (grant number 1719267, 1417754, and 0902153), based at Toolik Field Station, has monitored physical, chemical, and biological parameters within three watersheds: The Kuparuk (including Toolik Lake and Toolik outlet stream); The Sagavanirktok (primarily Oksrukuyik Creek, but also including sections of the Ailish and Atigun Rivers and the Galbraith Lakes); and The Itkillik (primarily the I-Minus outlet stream, a tributary that that feeds into the Itkilik River). Target species were primarily Arctic grayling and Lake trout, although Arctic char, Burbot, Dolly varden, round whitefish, and slimey sculpin were also captured. Fish were collected on each river/lake. Coordinates and/or specific station locations were noted. All fish captured during the field season are measured, weighed, tagged (if large enough) and released. If fish were not previously tagged, they were tagged with Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags which can be read with a whole stream antenna to track the migration of the fish, predminately Arctic grayling, throughout the systems.
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR): Half-hourly growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
The Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem warming cause a net release of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C, that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool, influence ecosystem C loss?, and 3) How do winter and summer warming alone, and in combination, affect ecosystem C exchange? We are answering these questions using a combination of field and laboratory experiments to measure ecosystem carbon balance and radiocarbon isotope ratios at a warming experiment located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. This data contains CO2 fluxes measured using an automated chamber system that measures net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE). Measurements are made every ~1.5 hours and modeled half-hourly. Half hour ecosystem respiration is modeled using an exponential Q10 relationship when light conditions are low (PAR<5umol/m2/s) and using a hyperbolic light relationship when PAR>5umol/m2/s. GPP is calculated as the difference between NEE and Reco.
Eight Mile Lake Research Watershed, Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating and Drying Research (DryPEHR): Growing season, chamber-based, CO2 flux data, 2009-2021
This drying and warming experiment addresses the following questions: 1) Does ecosystem drying, warming and permafrost thaw cause a net release or uptake of C from the ecosystem to the atmosphere?, 2) Does the decomposition of old C that comprises the bulk of the soil C pool influence ecosystem C loss? 3) How do drying and warming affect plant communities and ecosystem properties? We are answering these questions using a combined warming and drying experiment (DryPEHR), which is situated with the Carbon in Permafrost Experimental Heating Research (CiPEHR) project and located in an upland tundra field site near Healy, Alaska in the foothills of the Alaska Range. Warming treatment here refers to growing season air temperature warming (~1C) using open top chambers (OTC) combined with soil 'warming' using snow fences during the snow covered months. Drying is achieved using an automated pumping system that lowers the water table in the dry plots. Soil warming began in 2008; OTCs and drying in 2011. This data set includes measured values of CO2 fluxes during the growing season.
Overwintering Fires from 2009-2010 Burns near Fairbanks, Alaska: Post-fire Seedling Recruitment Collected 2023
This dataset contains data from adjacent overwintering and single-season burn sites. For the overwintering fires, we targeted locations that had burned in the summers of 2009, smouldered through the winter months, and reignited in 2010. Adjacent to these overwintering sites, we identified single-season burn sites from within portions of the 2009 fires that were unaffected by overwintering. A total of seven overwintering fire sites and four single-season fire sites were sampled. Within each site, three plots were established. Data inlcudes within plot measurments of post-fire seedling composition and density, residual SOL, burn depth estimated by black spruce adventitious roots, thaw depth, and pre-fire tree species composition and estimates of combustion. This is one of three packages from this project; this one contains the seedling recruitment data.
Overwintering Fires from 2009-2010 Burns near Fairbanks, Alaska: Residual Soil Organic Layer Depth, Burn Depth and Thaw Depth Collected 2023
This dataset contains data from adjacent overwintering and single-season burn sites. For the overwintering fires, we targeted locations that had burned in the summers of 2009, smouldered through the winter months, and reignited in 2010. Adjacent to these overwintering sites, we identified single-season burn sites from within portions of the 2009 fires that were unaffected by overwintering. A total of seven overwintering fire sites and four single-season fire sites were sampled. Within each site, three plots were established. Data inlcudes within plot measurments of post-fire seedling composition and density, residual SOL, burn depth estimated by black spruce adventitious roots, thaw depth, and pre-fire tree species composition and estimates of combustion. This is one of three packages from this project; this one contains the soils data.
Overwintering Fires from 2009-2010 Burns near Fairbanks, Alaska: Pre-fire Tree Species Density and Combustion Collected 2023
This dataset contains data from adjacent overwintering and single-season burn sites. For the overwintering fires, we targeted locations that had burned in the summers of 2009, smouldered through the winter months, and reignited in 2010. Adjacent to these overwintering sites, we identified single-season burn sites from within portions of the 2009 fires that were unaffected by overwintering. A total of seven overwintering fire sites and four single-season fire sites were sampled. Data inlcudes within plot measurments of post-fire seedling composition and density, residual SOL, burn depth estimated by black spruce adventitious roots, thaw depth, and pre-fire tree species composition and estimates of combustion. This is one of three packages from this project; this one contains the pre-fire tree species density and combustion data.
Bull shark catches, water temperatures, salinities, and dissolved oxygen levels in the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE) , from May 2005 to May 2009
This dataset provides information on the catches of bull sharks in the Shark River Slough in relation to physical factors including dissolved oxygen, water temperature, salinity, and distance upstream. Analysis of data collected from 2005-2007 indicate that distance from the Gulf of Mexico and dissolved oxygen concentrations have the largest effects on bull shark catch rates. Data are presented for both young of the year sharks, which are concentrated in areas away from the main channel approximately 20km upstream, and older juvenile sharks which are found along the main channel at similar distances upstream. Salinity has a surprisingly weak impact on catches over the time frame initially investigated.
Biomarker assessment of spatial and temporal changes in the composition of flocculent material (floc) in the subtropical wetland of the Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE) from May 2007 to December 2009
Flocculent material (floc) is an important energy source in wetlands. In the Florida Everglades, floc is present in both freshwater marshes and coastal environments and plays a key role in food webs and nutrient cycling. However, not much is known about its environmental dynamics, in particular its biological sources and bio-reactivity. We analysed floc samples collected from different environments in the Florida Everglades and applied biomarkers and pigment chemotaxonomy to identify spatial and seasonal differences in organic matter sources. An attempt was made to link floc composition with algal and plant productivity. Spatial differences were observed between freshwater marsh and estuarine floc. Freshwater floc receives organic matter inputs from local periphyton mats, as indicated by microbial biomarkers and chlorophyll-a estimates. At the estuarine sites, the floc is dominated by mangrove as well as diatom inputs from the marine end-member. The hydroperiod (duration and depth of inundation) at the freshwater sites influences floc organic matter preservation, where the floc at the short-hydroperiod site is more oxidised likely due to periodic dry-down conditions. Seasonal differences in floc composition were not consistent and the few that were observed are likely linked to the primary productivity of the dominant biomass (periphyton in the freshwater marshes and mangroves in the estuarine zone). Molecular evidence for hydrological transport of floc material from the freshwater marshes to the coastal fringe was also observed. With the on-going restoration of the Florida Everglades, it is important to gain a better understanding of the biogeochemical dynamics of floc, including its sources, transformations and reactivity.
Fall 2009 plant monitoring survey -- shoot height and flowering status of plants in permanent plots at GCE sampling sites 1-10
A quadrat survey was conducted in October 2009 to measure the species and size distribution of plants at 10 GCE LTER sampling sites. The quadrats were established as permanent plots at GCE sampling sites in October 2000 by placing wooden stakes at random locations across two nominal zones at each site, designated based on marsh structure (creekbank and high marsh). Several new plots were also added in October 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 to replace those lost due to catastrophic wrack disturbance or creek bank erosion. The plots were visually surveyed and the species, shoot height, and flowering status was recorded individually for each shoot over 10 cm in height present in each plot. Observations from plots exhibiting signs of disturbance were noted in the data set with additional details recorded in GCE data set PLT-GCEM-1801. This survey will be repeated annually to assess changes in plant distribution and biomass in relation to environmental changes documented by other GCE LTER monitoring efforts.
Fall 2009 plant monitoring survey -- biomass calculated from shoot height and flowering status of plants in permanent plots at GCE sampling sites 1-10
The biomass of plants surveyed in permanent plots at 10 GCE LTER sampling sites in October 2009 was estimated based on allometric relationships between biomass and shoot height and flowering status derived for each site, zone, and species in October 2002 and October 2008. Biomass was only calculated for dominant species, including Spartina alterniflora, S. cynosuroides, Juncus roemerianus, and Zizaniopsis miliacea, as well as rarer species including Scirpus spp, Panicum spp. and Typha angustifolia. This data set is based on GCE plant monitoring survey data set PLT-GCEM-1004a, and allometric relationships were based on GCE data sets PLT-GCEM-0211b, PLT-GCEM-0711, and PLT-GCEM-2011.
Aboveground vegetation cover and biomass in plots with experimentally altered precipitation variability at the Jornada Basin LTER site, 2009-ongoing
This dataset contains cover and biomass data collected starting in 2012 for a long-term precipitation variability manipulation experiment at the Jornada Basin LTER site in southern New Mexico, U.S.A. The study was designed to assess the effect of interannual variability in precipitation on average aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) in Chihuahuan Desert grasslands. The study began in 2009, has five annual precipitation treatments, and contains 50 plots (10 per treatment). This experiment uses precipitation shelters and irrigation treatments to manipulate water inputs to 2.5 x 2.5 meter plots in a desert grassland. There are high, low, and ambient (control) precipitation variability treatments. Ambient plots receive natural precipitation each year, while variability treatments alternate between 20% and 180% (high variability), or 50% and 150% (low variability) of ambient precipitation each year. Plant cover measurements are made annually in each plot, from which biomass or net primary production are derived. This is an ongoing study and the dataset will be updated yearly.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.