Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,206
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,206 results for “Communications”
GenBank accession numbers of the four marker genes and associated voucher specimens/tissues that were used in this study. For more details see Guo et al. (2014). Sequences of species in bold are unpublished and were provided by P. Guo as personal communication in Rediscovery of Andrea's keelback, Hebius andreae (Ziegler & Le, 2006): First country record for Laos and phylogenetic placement
GenBank accession numbers of the four marker genes and associated voucher specimens/tissues that were used in this study. For more details see Guo et al. (2014). Sequences of species in bold are unpublished and were provided by P. Guo as personal communication
Research4Life Landscape and Situation Analysis - Trends in Scholarly Communication PEST Analysis
<p>A PEST infographic summarising the key trends in scholarly communication, as identified in the report 'Research4Life Landscape and Situation Analysis' prepared by Research Consulting for the Research4Life partnership.</p>
morethanbooks/XML-TEI-Bible: XML-TEI Bible: Entities and communication (66 Books)
<p>This release contains the biblical text in XML-TEI (66 books). The encoded text is in Spanish, but the codification (elements, attributes, values, ids) is in English. It makes explicit following information:</p> <ul> <li>Books, chapters, pericopes and verses.</li> <li>References to peoples, places, times, groups and books, using ids.</li> <li>Direct speech, including who is communicating, to whom and how (written, oral, prayer...).</li> </ul>
Approach of concepts of public opinion, communication and information
<p>The general accepted definition of public opinion is that it can describe the attitudes held by a significant number of people on matters of government and politics, thus public opinion plays an important role in the political sphere.</p> <p>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk7zXuuuuNQ&feature=youtu.be </p>
Science Communication Webinar Series: Taking Risks in Science Communication
<p>Blue-Action are coordinating a series of webinars on climate science communication in 2020. These are aimed at early-career researchers, but anyone who wishes to engage people with their research at any stage will find them valuable.</p> <p>This webinar was delivered on 18th September 2020 by <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mcoath/?originalSubdomain=uk">Martin Coath</a>, who is a Senior Affiliated Researcher at the University of Lapland. Martin is an experienced science communicator, and here explains how sometimes you need to take risks to make an impact. </p>
The COVID Transmission: How Scientists and Science Journalists Are Communicating During the Pandemic
<p>In this episode we talk to Wiebke Hollersen, a science journalist and editor from the German newspaper <em>Welt, </em>and Dr Emanuel Wyler, a molecular biologist at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, about their approaches, collaborations, and concerns about communicating about the Coronavirus and science communication in general. </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Episode Links: </strong></p> <p><a href="https://www.mdc-berlin.de/person/dr-emanuel-wyler">Emanuel Wyler</a></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/ewyler">Twitter</a></li> <li><a href="https://emanuelwyler.wordpress.com/">Blog (German Language)</a></li> </ul> <p><a href="https://www.welt.de/autor/wiebke-hollersen/">Wiebke Hollersen</a></p> <ul> <li><a href="https://twitter.com/wiebkehollersen">Twitter</a></li> </ul>
Artefacts for ICSE 2021 technical paper: "RAICC: Revealing Atypical Inter-Component Communication in Android Apps"
<p>This repository represents our artefacts to replicate our paper which is in the proceedings of ICSE 2021: "RAICC: Revealing Atypical Inter-Component Communication in Android Apps"</p>
Risk Communication and Community Engagement: A Ghanaian Perspective
<p>Risk communication and community engagement is essential component of health emergency preparedness and response action.</p> <p>Dataset encompasses responses from all the sixteen (16) administrative regions of Ghana. Responses to risky behaviors, perceived probability of covid-19 infection, sources of information, perceived severity etc. are well captured by the dataset.</p>
Communication Characterization and Optimization of Applications Using Topology-Aware Task Mapping on Large Supercomputers (Data)
<p>Auxiliary materials for ICPE 2016 paper titled:<br /> "Communication Characterization and Optimization of Applications Using Topology-Aware Task Mapping on Large Supercomputers".</p> <p> </p>
Innovations in scholarly communication - data of the global 2015-2016 survey
<p>Innovations in scholarly communication - data of the global 2015-2016 survey.</p> <p>This data set contains:</p> <ul> <li>Full raw (anonymized) and cleaned data files of the 2015-2016 global Survey on Innovations in Scholarly Communication. Data are in xls format (raw and cleaned) and csv format (only for cleaned data as the raw data contain non-Roman script).</li> <li>Survey questionnaires for 7 languages (zipped PDFs)</li> <li>Variable list (xls)</li> <li>Readme file (txt)</li> </ul> <p>The data files contain >3,000,000 cells, and thus cannot be opened in their entirety in Google Drive.</p> <p>Many new websites and online tools have come into existence to support<br /> scholarly communication in all phases of the research workflow. To what extent<br /> researchers are using these and more traditional tools has been largely<br /> unknown. This 2015-2016 survey aimed to fill that gap. Its results may help<br /> decision making by stakeholders supporting researchers and may also help<br /> researchers wishing to reflect on their own online workflows. In addition,<br /> information on tools usage can inform studies of changing research workflows.<br /> The online survey employed an open, non-probability sample. A largely<br /> self-selected group of 20663 researchers, librarians, editors, publishers and<br /> other groups involved in research took the survey, which was available in seven<br /> languages. The survey was open from May 10, 2015 to February 10, 2016. It<br /> captured information on tool usage for 17 research activities, stance towards<br /> open access and open science, and expectations of the most important<br /> development in scholarly communication. Respondents’ demographics<br /> included research roles, country of affiliation, research discipline and year of<br /> first publication.</p> <p>A full description of data collection, survey response and methodology is in a data publication in F1000 Research:</p> <p>Kramer, Bianca & Jeroen Bosman (2016) Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage. F1000 Research. DOI:10.12688/f1000research.8414.1</p> <p>Contact:</p> <p>Jeroen Bosman: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5796-2727 / j.bosman@uu.nl</p> <p>Bianca Kramer: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5965-6560 / b.m.r.kramer@uu.nl</p>
Dataset for "Communication with family and friends across the life course"
<p>This is the dataset for "Communication with family and friends across the life course", to be published in PLOS One.</p> <p>The file contains data corresponding to egocentric networks of 3340868 individuals, derived from anonymized call detail records for a 7 months period in the year 2007 from a mobile phone service provider in a European country. Each line in the file corresponds to a different ego-alter pair and provides aggregated voice calling information for the concerned month.</p> <p>Details in README file.</p> <p> </p>
Figure 9b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
<p>Figure 9b. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11)</p>
Figure 7c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7c. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 7b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7b. - Use of Trello during the workshopFigure 7a.Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision. Figure 7b.Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.Figure 7c.Screenshot of public Trello board <br>
Figure 8b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8b. - Workshop visualization - collection of ideas and group visionsFigure 8a.Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication. Figure 8b.Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping. <br>
Figure 6d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6d. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's suggested principles (session 11)
Figure 9c. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9c. - Visualization showing one example of development of a group's vision and progress to group principlesFigure 9a.One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)Figure 9b.One group's vision as a interconnected elements (triples, derived after session 7)Figure 9c.One group's suggested principles (session 11) <br>
Figure 6a. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6a. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping.
Figure 5d. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 5d. - Fair of the Future of Scholarly CommunicationFigure 5a.Figure 5b.Figure 5c.Figure 5d. <br> Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication.
Figure 6b. from: Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016 - Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340 (26 May 2016) https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 6b. - Workshop impressionsFigure 6a.Figure 6b.Figure 6c.Figure 6d. <br> One group's vision as a collection of ideas (session 7)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.