Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
172
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
172 results for “DART”
Fig. 51. Character 66, large intestine color. A in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 51. Character 66, large intestine color. A: State 0, unpigmented (''Neblina species'', AMNH 118679). Note that the distended tissue is translucent. B: State 1, anteriorly pigmented (pratti, SIUC 07654). C: State 2, extensively pigmented (beebei, ROM 39631).
Fig. 70 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 70. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: outgroup relationships and monophyly and placement of dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Family group names applied as in Frost et al. (2006). Cycloramphinae and Hylodinae were nested within Cycloramphidae in Frost et al.'s study. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without numbers or with alphanumeric identifiers (GenBank numbers) were not sequenced for the present study or Frost et al. (2006) and were taken from GenBank. Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.
Fig. 69. Character 143 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 69. Character 143, expansion of sacral diapophyses. A: State 0, unexpanded (riveroi, AMNH 134143l). B: State 1, moderately expanded (pumilio, AMNH 118514). C: State 2, greatly expanded (Melanophryniscus stelzneri, AMNH 77710).
Fig. 37. Character 52, dorsolateral stripe A. A, B in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 37. Character 52, dorsolateral stripe A. A, B: State 1, present in juveniles (A), absent in adults (B) (terribilis, A: captive-raised specimen; B: AMNH live exhibit). C: State 2, anterior, narrow,
Fig. 31. Character 29 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 31. Character 29, morphology of tarsal keel. A: State 0, straight or very weakly curved, extending proximolaterad from preaxial edge of inner metatarsal tubercle (imbricolus, AMNH 102082). B: State 1, tuberclelike and strongly curved at proximal end, extending from metatarsal tubercle (degranvillei, AMNH 90876). C: State 2, short, tuberclelike, curved or directed transversely across tarsus, not extending from metatarsal tubercle (''Neblina species'', AMNH 118657). D: State 3, weak, short dermal thickening, not extending from metatarsal tubercle (pumilio, AMNH 102261). The hind limb is rotated to view the inconspicuous tarsal keel in profile.
Fig. 71 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 71. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: relationships among dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without numbers or with alphanumeric identifiers (GenBank numbers) were not sequenced for the present study or Frost et al. (2006) and were taken from GenBank. Unidentified species taken from GenBank are labeled as originally published. Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.
Fig. 73 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 73. Strict consensus of 25,872 most parsimonious trees of 46,520 steps: relationships among dendrobatids. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values. Numbers following terminal names are unique sample identifiers. Terminals without sample numbers were taken from GenBank. Note that Morales (Morales, 2002 ''2000'') identified ''PortoWalter2'' 356 as gasconi, and ''Curuá-Una'' 354 as brunneus (see fig. 72). Upper right inset shows entire cladogram and corresponding figure numbers, with present view in black.
Fig. 61. Character 88, larval oral disc. A, B in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 61. Character 88, larval oral disc. A, B: Ventral (A) and lateral (B) views of State 0, ''normal'' (''Neblina species'', AMNH 118673). C, D: Ventral (C) and lateral (D) views of State 1, umbelliform disc (nubicola, AMNH 94849). Note also the submarginal papillae scattered over the surface of the oral disc (character 91).
Fig. 26. Characters 11–18 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 26. Characters 11–18, finger fringes. In Megaelosia goeldii (AMNH 103949) fringes are present on pre- and postaxial edges of all fingers.
Fig. 24. Character 4 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 24. Character 4, length of finger IV. A: State 0, surpassing distal subarticular tubrcle of finger III (histrionicus, AMNH 88259). B: State 1, reaching distal half of distal subarticular tubercle of finger III (tricolor, USNM 286082). Note also the strong preaxial swelling of finger III. C: State 2, not reaching distal subarticular tubercle of finger III (insperatus, KU 149684). Note also the absence of the distal subarticular tubercle of finger IV.
Fig. 23. Character 3 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 23. Character 3, distal subarticular tubercle of finger IV. A: State 0, absent (degranvillei, AMNH 90876). B: State 1, present (pictus, AMNH 79209).
Fig. 5 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 5. Hypothesized phylogeny of Dendrobates, redrawn from Summers et al. (1999b: 261, fig. 1), based on parsimony analysis of cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome b, and 16S DNA sequences aligned with Clustal W (Thompson et al., 1994) (parameters not specified) and modified manually, excluding ambiguously aligned regions. Numbers are bootstrap frequencies (unlabeled nodes present in fewer than 50% of replicates).
Fig. 21 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 21. Number of DNA base-pairs analyzed per terminal. For specific terminal data see appendices 4 and 5.
Fig. 1 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 1. Accumulation of dendrobatid species, 1797–2005. Only named species currently recognized and included in Dendrobatidae are counted. For data see appendix 1.
Fig. 13 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 13. Phylogeny of dendrobatids redrawn from Vences et al. (2003a: 219, fig. 3), based on maximum likelihood analysis (under the GTR + I + C model) of 368 bp of 16S rDNA aligned ''using the clustal option of Sequence Navigator (Applied Biosystems)'' (parameters not specified) and excluding ''all regions of the gene fragments that could not be clearly aligned among all taxa'' (p. 217). Numbers above branches are neighbor-joining bootstrap frequencies (frequencies.50% shown); numbers below branches are frequency of clades among trees sampled in Bayesian analysis (frequencies.70% shown).
Fig. 10 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 10. Hypothesized phylogeny of dendrobatids, redrawn from La Marca et al. (2002: 239, fig. 4), based on maximum likelihood analysis (model not specified) of 16S DNA sequences (alignment method not stated), excluding hypervariable regions. Numbers are maximum likelihood/parsimony/neighborjoining bootstrap frequencies.
Fig. 22. Character 0, dorsal skin texture. A in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 22. Character 0, dorsal skin texture. A: State 0, smooth (galactonotus, AMNH live exhibit). B: State 1, posteriorly tubercular (fraterdanieli, MHNUC 364). C: State 2, granular (macero, AMNH 129473). D: State 3, spiculate (Dendrophryniscus minutus, AMNH 93856).
Fig. 20 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 20. Posterior view of several species of dendrobatids, showing variation in morphology of the vent. A: edwardsi (ICN 21936). Contrary to the other species depicted, the vent of edwardsi is conspicuously enlarged and elongated relative to that of other anurans. B: molinarii (UMMZ 176222, paratype), a species referred to Nephelobates by La Marca (1994). The vertical folds vary as an artifact of preservation. C: alboguttatus (AMNH 10503), the type species of Nephelobates. D: trinitatis (AMNH 125796), a species referred to Mannophryne by La Marca (1992). E: petersi (AMNH 42546). F: petersi (AMNH 42506). This species has never been claimed to be part of or closely related to Nephelobates. Note the differing prominence and apparent shape and size of the vent as an artifact of preservation.
Fig. 7 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 7. Hypothesized phylogeny of dendrobatids, redrawn from Vences et al. (2000: 37, fig. 1), based on neighbor-joining analysis of 16S DNA sequences aligned manually and excluding highly variable regions. Numbers are bootstrap frequencies (unlabeled nodes present in fewer than 50% of replicates).
Fig. 3 in PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)
Fig. 3. Hypothesized phylogeny of Mannophryne, redrawn from La Marca (1995: 70, fig. 11). Synapomorphies are: A1, narrow collar, uniformly colored; B1, tadpoles with small papillae (presumably B1 on the cladogram is B0 from the text on p. 53); B2, tadpoles with large papillae (B2 is undefined in the text on p. 53; presumably it refers to B1); C1, uniformly colored dorsum; A2, wide collar without conspicuous pale markings; D1, posteroventral dark band present; A3, wide collar with pale flecks or spots; E1, bright throat coloration reduced, melanophores on anterior part of throat; A4, wide collar with large pale dots.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.