Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 65 in The Phanaeus tridens species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a dung beetle group with genital morphological stasis but a changing ecological niche

Fig. 65. Predicted distribution of P. daphnis Harold, 1863, P. substriolatus Balthasar, 1939 and P. herbeus Bates, 1887.

Fig. 69 in The Phanaeus tridens species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a dung beetle group with genital morphological stasis but a changing ecological niche

Fig. 69. Niche overlap of the P. tridens species group. Right: overlap pairwise comparison using two indexes (Warren's I and Schoener's D). Left: dendrogram result of the UPGMA analysis of the indexes.

Fig. 63 in The Phanaeus tridens species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a dung beetle group with genital morphological stasis but a changing ecological niche

Fig. 63. Phallobase, parameres and endophallite copulatrix of the P.tridens species group. Scale bar = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 13. Phanaeus coeruleus Bates, 1887 in The Phanaeus tridens species group (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea): a dung beetle group with genital morphological stasis but a changing ecological niche

Fig. 13. Phanaeus coeruleus Bates, 1887, stat. rev., holotype and labels (by Keita Matsumoto, BMNH).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2012View details →

FIGURES 31–40. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 31. Postepigastric scutum, ventral view. 32. Same, posterior view. 33. Internal female genitalia, dorsal view. 34. Carapace, dorsal view. 35. Abdomen, dorsal view. 36. Sternum, ventral view. 37. Leg I, prolateral view. 38, 39. Genital area, ventral view. 40 in Got Males?: The Enigmatic Goblin Spider Genus Triaeris (Araneae, Oonopidae)

FIGURES 31–40. Triaeris stenaspis Simon, female. 31. Postepigastric scutum, ventral view. 32. Same, posterior view. 33. Internal female genitalia, dorsal view. 34. Carapace, dorsal view. 35. Abdomen, dorsal view. 36. Sternum, ventral view. 37. Leg I, prolateral view. 38, 39. Genital area, ventral view. 40. Same, dorsal view (figs. 37, 38 taken by Cristina Rheims).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →

Figs. 23–27 Macroponema beveridgei Mawson, 1978 from Osphranter robustus and O. antilopinus. 23 Bursa, apical view. 24 Spicule tip, left lateral view. 25 Genital cone, apical view. 26 Female tail, right lateral view. 27 in Revision of MaCroponema Mawson, 1978 (Nematoda: Strongylida) from macropodid marsupials with the description of two new species

Figs. 23–27 Macroponema beveridgei Mawson, 1978 from Osphranter robustus and O. antilopinus. 23 Bursa, apical view. 24 Spicule tip, left lateral view. 25 Genital cone, apical view. 26 Female tail, right lateral view. 27 Vagina and ovejector, right lateral view. Scale-bars: 23, 26, 27, 0.1 mm; 24, 25, 0.01 mm

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →

Рис. 1–6. Новые виΑы огневок с острова Борнео: 1, 3, 4 — Cirrhochrista milada Korb, sp. n., гоΛотип самец (1 — виΑ сверху; 3 — генитаΛии, эΑеагус уΑаΛен; 4 — эΑеагус); 2, 5, 6 — Paracymoriza platon Korb, sp. n., гоΛотип самец (2 — виΑ сверху; 5 — генитаΛии, эΑеагус уΑаΛен; 6 — эΑеагус) Fig. 1–6. New species of pyralid moths of the Borneo island: 1, 3, 4 — Cirrhochrista milada Korb, sp. n., male holotype (1 — top view; 3 — genitals, aedegus removed; 4 — aedeagus); 2, 5, 6 — Paracymoriza platon Korb, sp. n., male holotype (2 — top view; 5 — genitalia, aedeagus removed; 6 — aedeagus) in Contribution To The Knowledge Of Pyraloid Moths (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea) Of The Borneo Island With The Descriptions Of Two New Species

Рис. 1–6. Новые виΑы огневок с острова Борнео: 1, 3, 4 — Cirrhochrista milada Korb, sp. n., гоΛотип самец (1 — виΑ сверху; 3 — генитаΛии, эΑеагус уΑаΛен; 4 — эΑеагус); 2, 5, 6 — Paracymoriza platon Korb, sp. n., гоΛотип самец (2 — виΑ сверху; 5 — генитаΛии, эΑеагус уΑаΛен; 6 — эΑеагус) Fig. 1–6. New species of pyralid moths of the Borneo island: 1, 3, 4 — Cirrhochrista milada Korb, sp. n., male holotype (1 — top view; 3 — genitals, aedegus removed; 4 — aedeagus); 2, 5, 6 — Paracymoriza platon Korb, sp. n., male holotype (2 — top view; 5 — genitalia, aedeagus removed; 6 — aedeagus)

Fig. 39 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 39. Bayesian phylogenetic tree, inferred from the same matrix as in figure 37, but with all genital plate characters removed. Numbers at nodes represent posterior probabilities. Extinct species are marked with a cross. The overall structure is more comb-shaped, and most clades are no longer recovered.

Fig. 38 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 38. Same tree as in Fig. 37, clades collapsed into families. Coloured ellipses mark clades that are paraphyletic, compared to the molecular phylogeny in O'Hara et al. (2017). Ophiopsilina Matsumoto, 1915 is nested inside Gnathophiurina Matsumoto, 1915, instead of being a sister clade. Ophioleucida Matsumoto, 1915 is in Ophiacanthida O'Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017 instead of being a sister clade to Amphilepidida O'Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017. Ophioscolecida O'Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017 may be a sister clade to Ophiacanthida, but the relationships in this group of clades are unclear. Ophienigma Stöhr & Segonzac, 2005 and Ophiopus Ljungman, 1867 may constitute a new family. The relationships of Ophiomusaidae O'Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy & Martynov, 2018 could not be resolved.

Fig. 35 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 35. Genital plates in early developmental stages (postlarvae) of brittle stars. SEM images. A–E. Ophiura sarsii Lütken, 1855. A. 1.12 mm dd, genital plates in situ. B. 1.4 mm dd, genital plates in situ. C. adGP at 1.4 mm dd. D. abGP at 1.4 mm dd. E. 3 mm dd, adGP, abGP and RS articulated. F. Ophiomusa lymani (Wyville-Thomson, 1873), 2.4 mm dd, genital plates in situ. G. Amphiophiura convexa (Lyman, 1878), 3.2 mm dd, genital plates in situ. H. Amphipholis squamata (Delle Chiaje, 1828), 1. 2 mm dd, genital plates in situ. Scale bars: A–D, G–H = 0.1 mm; E–F = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 37 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 37. Bayesian phylogenetic tree, inferred from the morphological character matrix revised in this study. Numbers at nodes represent posterior probabilities. Extinct species are marked with a cross.

Fig. 32. Amphilepidida O in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 32. Amphilepidida O'Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017, family incertae sedis, SEM images. A–E. Ophiopus arcticus Ljungman, 1867. A. adGP, abradial aspect. B. adGP, adradial aspect. C. Radial shield, inner aspect.D. Oral shield, inner aspect. E. Madreporite, inner aspect. F–I. Ophienigma spinilimbatum Stöhr & Segonzac, 2005. F. adGP, adradial aspect. G. abGP. H. Radial shield, inner aspect. I. Madreporite, inner aspect. Scale bar: A–I = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 31. Ophiopsilidae Matsumoto, 1915 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 31. Ophiopsilidae Matsumoto, 1915, Ophiopsila guineensis Koehler, 1914, SEM, unless otherwise noted. A. Genital plates in situ, micro-CT. B. Articulated adGP and abGP. C. adGP, adradial aspect. D. Radial shield, inner aspect. E. adGP, articular structures. F. oGP in situ, bleached, digital image. G. Oral shield, inner aspect. H. Madreporite, inner aspect. I. oGP. Scale bars: A–D, F–H = 0.5 mm; E, I = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 36 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 36. Genital plates in fossil brittle stars. SEM images. A. Aganaster gregarious (Meek & Worthen, 1869), adGP. B–C. Aplocoma agassizi (von Münster, 1839). B. adGP and abGP in situ. C. Radial shield, internal aspect. D–E. Palaeocoma milleri (Phillips, 1829). D. adGP, different aspects. E. Section of ventral disc, showing abGP and genital papillae. Scale bars: A = 0.1 mm; B–C, E = 0.5 mm; D = 1 mm.

Fig. 30. Ophiothamnidae O in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 30. Ophiothamnidae O'Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy & Martynov, 2018, Histampica duplicata (Lyman, 1875). A–B. Micro CT, all others SEM. A. oGP (arrowheads) in situ, internal dorsal aspect. B. Genital plates in situ. C. adGP. D. abGP. E. adGP, distal end. F. Radial shield, internal aspect. G. Madreporite, internal aspect. Scale bars: A, F = 0.5 mm; B–E, G = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 28. Ophiopholidae O in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 28. Ophiopholidae O'Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy & Martynov, 2018, Ophiopholis aculeata (Linnaeus, 1767), SEM, unless otherwise noted. A. Genital plates and radial shield in situ, micro-CT. B–C. Articulated adGP and abGP. D. Radial shield, inner aspect. E. adGP, abradial aspect. F. abGP. G. adGP adradial aspect. H. oGP in situ (arrowheads), digital image. I. oGP. J. Oral shield, inner aspect. K. Madreporite, inner aspect. Scale bars: A, H–K = 0.5 mm; B–G = 1 mm.

Fig. 29. Ophiotrichidae Ljungman, 1867 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 29. Ophiotrichidae Ljungman, 1867, Ophiothrix fragilis (Abildgaard in O.F. Müller, 1789), SEM, unless otherwise noted. A. Genital plates and radial shield inside disc, micro-CT. B. Genital plates in situ, ventral aspect. C. adGP, abradial aspect. D. adGP, adradial aspect. E. abGP, abradial aspect. F. abGP, adradial aspect. G. Radial shield, internal aspect. H. Madreporite, internal aspect. I. Oral shield, internal aspect. J. oGP (arrowheads) in situ, ventral aspect, digital image. K. Same, internal dorsal aspect. L. oGP. Scale bars: A–G, J–K = 1 mm; H–I, L = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 34. Ophioleucidae Matsumoto, 1915 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 34. Ophioleucidae Matsumoto, 1915, Ophiopallas paradoxa Koehler, 1904, SEM, unless otherwise noted. A. Genital plates in situ, micro-CT. B. adGP, adradial aspect. C. adGP, abradial aspect. D. abGP, arrow connects articular structures to adGP. E. Radial shield, internal aspect. F. Oral GP (arrowheads) in situ, digital image. G. Madreporite, internal aspect (broken during bleaching). H. Oral shield, internal aspect. I. oGP, abradial aspect. J. oGP, adradial aspect. Scale bars: A–H = 0.5 mm; I–J = 0.01 mm.

Fig. 27. Ophiactidae Matsumoto, 1915 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 27. Ophiactidae Matsumoto, 1915, SEM, unless otherwise noted. A. Ophiactis savignyi (Müller & Troschel, 1842), genital plates in situ, micro-CT. B–L. Ophiactis abyssicola (M. Sars, 1861). B. adGP and adGP articulated. C. Radial shield, internal aspect. D–E. adGP, dorsal aspect. F. adGP, ventral aspect. G. abGP, abradial aspect. H. adGP, ventrolateral view (from other, smaller specimen). I. oGP in situ (arrowheads, digital image), oral shield removed. J. Oral shield, internal aspect. K. Madreporite, internal aspect. L. oGP. Scale bars: A, J–L = 0.1 mm; B–I= 0.5 mm.

Fig. 25. Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867 in Taxonomic analysis of the genital plates and associated structures in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata)

Fig. 25. Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867, SEM, unless otherwise noted. A–N. Amphiura chiajei Forbes, 1843. A–C. adGP and abGP in situ, micro-CT. D. adGP, dorsal aspect. E. adGP, ventral aspect. F. abGP, lateral aspect. G. Radial shield, inner aspect. H. Oral section, oGP. I. Oral GP. J–K. Digital images. J. Oral shield section, ventral disc scales removed, oGP. K. Oral GP in situ after removal of oral shield. L. Oral GP in situ (arrows), inside disc, micro-CT. M. Oral shield, inner aspect. N. Madreporite, inner aspect. O–R. Amphiura filiformis (O.F. Müller, 1776). O. adGP, dorsal aspect. P. adGP, ventral aspect. Q. abGP, lateral aspect. R. Oral GP. S–U. Amphipholis squamata (Delle Chiaje, 1828). S. adGP, lateral aspect. T. abGP lateral aspect. U. Radial shield, inner aspect. Arrowheads (H, J–K) mark oGP. Scale bars: A–H, J–L, O–Q = 0.5 mm; I, M–N, R–U = 0.1 mm.