Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2019View details →

Supporting data for "A global test of the subsidized island biogeography hypothesis".

Dataset for: Menegotto A., Rangel T.F., Schrader J., Weigelt P., Kreft H. 2019. A global test of the subsidized island biogeography hypothesis. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29, 320-330.

dryad32/100

Invasion disharmony in the global biogeography of native and non-native beetle species

These data consist of a comprehensive list (as of 2020) of all known non-native Coleoptera (beetle) species established in 10 world regions: North America (excluding Mexico), Japan, the Okinawa and Ogasawara Islands, the Hawaiian Islands, South Korea, Europe (including the European part of Russia), New Zealand, Australia, and the Galapagos Islands. It does not include species that were known to have been intentionally introduced, species that failed to establish or species that only exist indoors (e.g., in greenhouses). Taxonomy of each species was verified using the GBIF backbone taxonomy. We also include tables summarizing numbers of Coleoptera species in each family for both native and non-native species established in each of the 10 regions

opencc-zeroJun 2021View details →

FIGURE 5 in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation

FIGURE 5. Present distributions of Syncordulia species in South Africa. Uppermost box shows the distributions of all Syncordulia species, lower boxes show individual species distributions: S. gracilis (top and top left); S. legator (top right); S. serendipator (bottom left); S. venator (bottom right).

FIGURE 3. R8S in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation

FIGURE 3. R8S analysis on a 26-taxon tree; Geological maps adapted from figures on rst.gsfc.nasa.gov.

FIGURE 4 in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation

FIGURE 4. Ancestral distributions; DIVA analysis optimized with 2 regions; larger letters indicate the scenarios discussed in the text

FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree from a in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation

FIGURE 1. Strict consensus tree from a PAUP parsimony heuristic search; 10,000 addition sequence replicates; bootstrap support shown above branches

FIGURE 2. Consensus tree from a in Biogeography and divergence time estimation of the relict Cape dragonfly genus Syncordulia: global significance and implications for conservation

FIGURE 2. Consensus tree from a PHASE analysis; 10 million generations. Posterior probabilities shown above branches

Figure 5 in Endorsing Darwin: global biogeography of the epipelagic goose barnacles Lepas spp. (Cirripedia, Lepadomorpha) proves cryptic speciation

Figure 5. Haplotype genealogy of the COI genes from Lepas anatifera and Lepas testudinata populations, computed with Fitchi. A separation of oceanic regions described in the main text and depicted in Figure 6 can be seen, as well as one global group in L. anatifera. The L. testudinata haplotype recovered from Australia is set apart from the South African haplotypes.

Figure 3 in Endorsing Darwin: global biogeography of the epipelagic goose barnacles Lepas spp. (Cirripedia, Lepadomorpha) proves cryptic speciation

Figure 3. Phylogenetic (maximum-likelihood and Bayesian) tree based on the analysis of a fragment of the 18S ribosomal gene, including two out-group species. Posterior probabilities and bootstrap values are indicated; where support is maximal, only posterior probabilities are given. A neighbour net constructed in SplitsTrees indicates a clear tree-like signal in the sequence data, in conflict with the data for Lepas anserifera, which led us to analyse mitochondrial loci independently.

Figure 4 in Endorsing Darwin: global biogeography of the epipelagic goose barnacles Lepas spp. (Cirripedia, Lepadomorpha) proves cryptic speciation

Figure 4. Comparsion of mitochondrial single locus phylogenies based on PhyMl and MrBayes. All major groupings are retrieved from both loci. The faster evolving COI gene provides more intra-group resolution. Bootstrapping values are given above branches; posterior probabilities are given below branches.

Figure 2 in Endorsing Darwin: global biogeography of the epipelagic goose barnacles Lepas spp. (Cirripedia, Lepadomorpha) proves cryptic speciation

Figure 2. Initial phylogeny based on three genes (18S, 16S, and COI) from a subset of samples from the major oceans (PAUP*, re-confirmed with PhyML and MrBayes). A split in subtypes is found in Lepas anatifera and Lepas australis. The red arrows indicate 'outliers' in L. anatifera and Lepas pectinata. In L. anatifera, these were later found to belong to a global group, whereas in L. pectinata no obvious biogeographic subgroup was found.

Figure 1 in Endorsing Darwin: global biogeography of the epipelagic goose barnacles Lepas spp. (Cirripedia, Lepadomorpha) proves cryptic speciation

Figure 1. Major oceanic current systems and the distribution of Lepas anatifera (blue), Lepas australis (green), and Lepas pectinata (orange, vertically ruled), after Hinojosa et al. (2006). Lepas anatifera is restricted to waters warmer than 15 °C, whereas L. australis is found in cooler water masses.