Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
559
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
559 results for “Incertae”
Fig. 5 a in The Acoela: on their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis)
Fig. 5 a Image of a live specimen of Convolutriloba retrogemma reproducing asexually by budding. White arrowheads point to buds. Note the reversed polarity. b, c CLSM projections showing muscles (blue) and serotoninlike immunoreactive nervous system (red) in dorsal (b) and central (c) planes of a mature Isodiametra pulchra. White arrowheads point to neurite bundles, asterisk marks the position of the statocyst. Scale bars: a 1 mm; b and c 50 μm
Fig. 3 in The Acoela: on their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis)
Fig. 3 Image of a mature and live specimen of Isodiametra pulchra without (left) and with superimposed colors (right) to illustrate the general morphology of acoels. From top to bottom: yellow: frontal organ (fo); red: nervous system (ns); green: central syncytium (cs); cyan: testes (t); pink: ovaries (o); gray: mouth; purple: female copulatory organs (fco) composed of seminal bursa, bursal nozzle, and vestibulum (from posterior to anterior); white: chordoid vacuoles (cv); blue: false seminal vesicles and prostatoid glands (fsv); orange: male copulatory organ (cop) composed of muscular seminal vesicle and invaginated penis. Scale bar: 100 μm
Fig. 1 in The Acoela: on their kind and kinships, especially with nemertodermatids and xenoturbellids (Bilateria incertae sedis)
Fig. 1 Images of various live acoels found in a beaker of sublittoral sand from the Indian Ocean. Animals are oriented with the anterior end to the top. Note the statocyst in all and mature oocytes in some animals. Scale bar: 200 μm
Fig. 15 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 15. Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Rhinocypha spp. based on (a) COI gene, (b) 16S rRNA gene, and (c) combined COI + 16S rRNA sequences with R. bisignata as an outgroup. Bootstrap values are shown on the branches.
Fig. 12 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 12. Results of principal components analysis of all specimens. PC1 = 48.64%, PC2 = 17.45%, accounting for 66.09% of the total variation.
Fig. 6 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 6. Scanning electron micrographs of the morphometric measurements of the ovipositor for the females of Rhinocypha spp. (lateral view). (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (c) Rhinocypha perforata. (i, ii & iii) length of each segment; (iv) length of anal appendages; (v) basal width of anal appendages; (vi) length of stylus; (vii) width of the V3.
Fig. 9 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrographs of the stylus and the base of stylus of Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella – (i) width of the stylus from the third of hair sensilla, (c) Rhinocypha perforata. (d, e & f) scanning electron micrographs of the base of stylus. (d) Rhinocypha biforata, (e) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (f) Rhinocypha perforata.
Fig. 4 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 4. Wing of Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (b) Rhinocypha perforata, and (c) Rhinocypha biforata.
Fig. 3 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 3. Landmark configuration of Rhinocypha spp. Fifteen landmarks were used in geometric morphometric analysis. Landmarks represent: (1) costa – subcostal connection, (2, 3 & 4) distal angles of arculus, (5) the nodus, (6) posterior intersection of the pterostigma and radius 1 (R1), (7) end of vein radius 2 (R2), (8) posterior end of the radius 4 (R4), (9) posterior end of the anterior media (MA), (10) posterior end of the Cubital Vein (CuP), (11) posterior end of the Anal Vein 1 (A1), (12) proximal apex of anal triangle, (13) anterior end of the cubital vein supplementary (Cupspl); (14) anterior end of the anterior media supplementary (Mspl); and (15) anterior end of the radius 4 supplementary (R4spl).
Fig. 2 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 2. Lateral view of the external morphology of the ovipositor of Rhinocypha spp. Ap: anal appendages; St: stylus; Dt: distal tooth; V3: third valves of ovipositor (valvulae 3); Lam: basal plate of ovipositor (lamina valvarum).
Fig. 1 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 1. Lateral view of thorax and anterior abdomen. Characters used in order to create the key identification for females of Rhinocypha spp. using the morphological nomenclature by Djikstra et al. (2014) and modified from Gunther (2009).
Fig. 14 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 14. Canonical Variate analysis (CVA) plot. CV1 (eigenvalue 8.887) vs CV2 (eigenvalue 2.150). 90% confidence ellipses of CVA scores. Colour of ellipses corresponds to the species written alongside.
Fig. 8 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 8. Scanning electron micrographs of sheathing valve (V3) and distal tooth of Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (c) Rhinocypha perforata – inset shows the carina, (d) measurement of (i) the peak of the tooth to the median base (ii) the space between the tooth. (e, f & g) shows the scanning electron micrographs of distal tooth of Rhinocypha spp.: (e) Rhinocypha biforata - (iii) indicates the width of the distal tooth, (f) Rhinocypha fenestrella – inset shows the campaniform sensilla, (g) Rhinocypha perforata, (h) campaniform sensilla at the distal tooth surface.
Fig. 11 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 11. Wireframe visualization of shape variation along the principal components one (PC1) from geometric morphometric analysis. (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (c) Rhinocypha perforata. Light blue landmarks represent the configuration of average specimen; dark blue landmarks represent one approximate extreme of the variation on that axis. Percentages indicate the proportion of total variance explained by each axis.
Fig. 5 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 5. Thorax of the females of Rhinocypha spp. (a) R. fenestrella, (b) R. perforata, and (c) R. biforata.
Fig. 7 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 7. Scanning electron micrographs of anal appendages of Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha biforata – inset indicates the group of sensilla; (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella – inset shows the caeloconica-like sensilla; (c) Rhinocypha perforata; (d) group of sensilla on the tip of anal appendages; (e) caeloconica-like sensilla on the surface of the anal appendages. Gs: group of sensilla; Bs: basiconic sensilla; As: articulated setae.
Fig. 13 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 13. Thin-plate spline deformation grids of wing shape variation in Rhinocypha spp. (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (c) Rhinocypha perforata, demonstrating the directions (arrows).
Fig. 10 in Saphonecrus sinicus Belizin 1968, incertae sedis
Fig. 10. Scatterplot of all 15 landmarks configurations after Procrustes superimposition. The plotted line and blue dots represent the mean shape for the respective species; (a) Rhinocypha biforata, (b) Rhinocypha fenestrella, (c) Rhinocypha perforata.
Fig. 11 in Fig. 1. Norileca indica and its protandrous hermaphroditic reproductive system. A in Chloeia incerta de Quatrefages 1866
Fig. 11. Male pleon of three new species of Parasesarma from southern Taiwan. (A) P. aurifrons n. sp., holotype male (10.4 × 8.5 mm) (NCHUZOOL 15602); (B) P. sanguimanus n. sp., paratype male (14.1 × 12.1 mm, NCHUZOOL 15625); (C) P. gemmatum n. sp., holotype male (15.7 × 13.1 mm, NCHUZOOL 15639). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.
Fig. 12 in Fig. 1. Norileca indica and its protandrous hermaphroditic reproductive system. A in Chloeia incerta de Quatrefages 1866
Fig. 12. Coloration in life. (A, B) Parasesarma lenzii (De Man, 1895), male (CW about 15 mm, not collected) from Tanzih Fishing Port, Hengchun, Pingtung, Taiwan; (C, D) P. dumacense (Rathbun, 1914), male (23.9 × 19.1 mm, NCHUZOOL 16088) from Dongsha Island, Taiwan.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.