Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in The first record of Diacrisia metelkana (Lederer, 1861) for Kazakhstan with notes on its bionomics and distribution (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini)

Figure 4. The habitat of Diacrisia metelkana: NE Kazakhstan, Pavlodar Region, Uspenka District, NE shore of Osolodochnoe Lake, ruins of uninhabited village Vesely Klin, 53°16'39.92''N 77°53'20.91''E, 18.VII.2016 (photo by S.V. Titov).

Figure 7 in The first record of Diacrisia metelkana (Lederer, 1861) for Kazakhstan with notes on its bionomics and distribution (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini)

Figure 7. The distribution map of Diacrisia metelkana. Green spots: previously known localities; red spots: new localities in Kazakhstan.

Figure 6 in The first record of Diacrisia metelkana (Lederer, 1861) for Kazakhstan with notes on its bionomics and distribution (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini)

Figure 6. The habitat of Diacrisia metelkana: NE Kazakhstan, Pavlodar Region, Zhelezinka District, Temirbaysor Lake, 54°10'50.92''N 76°9'44.25''E, 16.VII.2018 (photo by T. Aylybayev).

Figures 1–3. Diacrisia metelkana. 1 in The first record of Diacrisia metelkana (Lederer, 1861) for Kazakhstan with notes on its bionomics and distribution (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Arctiinae, Arctiini)

Figures 1–3. Diacrisia metelkana. 1, male adult in nature, shore of Temirbaysor Lake, 16.VII.2018 (photo by S.V. Titov); 2, male adult, Temirbaysor Lake, 16.VII.2018 (photo by O. Belyalov); 3, male genitalia, Temirbaysor Lake, slide AV4901 Volynkin (photo by A.V. Volynkin).

Figures 1−5 in A new locality of Mesobuthus eupeus thersites (C. L. Koch, 1839) (Scorpiones: Buthidae) in East Kazakhstan

Figures 1−5: 1. Mesobuthus eupeus thersites (C. L. Koch, 1839) at the new locality. 2. Juvenile specimens. 3−4. The habitat at the new locality, Kyzylbel΄tau Mountains (47˚13'N, 81˚18'E), altitude 900 m. 5. Collecting localities of Mesobuthus eupeus thersites in East Kazakhstan. Circles, previous records; star, new record.

Fig. 12 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 12. Representatives of Wuchiapingian ammonoids from the Hambast Formation of Abadeh, Central Iran. A. Pseudogastrioceras abichianum (Möller, 1879), DVGI, no. 10/850 (most likely Clarkina leveni Zone). B. Paraceltitites sp., DVGI, no. 1/850 (most likely Clarkina transcaucasica Zone): right lateral (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. Paratirolites waageni (Stoyanov, 1910), DVGI no. 11/850 (Hambast Formation, upper Member 7), late Dorashamian Paratirolites kittli Zone.

Fig. 10 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 10. Ammonoids suture lines from lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, south Primorye. A. Ceratitid Inyoites sedini sp. nov., DVGI 1/851 (holotype). Suture line, height 21.2 mm (A1); whorl cross−section, height 21.1 mm (A2). B. Suture line of phylloceratid Subbalhaeceras shigetai gen. and sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype). Abbreviations: L, lateral lobe; U, umbilical lobe; V, ventral lobe.

Fig. 7 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 7. Mangyshlak, Kazakhstan: temporal ranges of ammonoid genera of the upper Olenekian. Abbreviation: Reg. Series, Regional Series.

Fig. 1 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 1. Study areas: 1, Iran−Transcaucasia area; 2, Siberia and northern Russian Far East; 3, southern Russian Far East (South Primorye and Amur River); 4, Mangyshlak, Kazakhstan.

Fig. 2 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 2. View of the Permian–Triassic sequences of the section from the Wuchiapingian–Changhsingian Hambast (H) Formation to latest Changhsigian– Induan Elikah (E) Formation at the Hambast region, 28 km to south−western of the village of Abaraku, Abadeh, Central Iran.

Fig. 8 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 8. Suture lines of some Prolecanitida. A. Mesohedenstroemia olgae sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), height 18.4 mm; Lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, south Primorye. B, C. Hedenstroemia tscherskii (Popov, 1961). Lower Olenekian, Lepiskites kolymensis Zone; Kenyelichi River, Kolyma River basin. B. DVGI 256−3b, height 60.0 mm (B1) and 73.0 mm (B2). C. DVGI 255−19c, height 73.0 mm. Abbreviations: D, dorsal lobe; I, inner lateral lobe; L, lateral lobe; U, umbilical lobe; V, ventral lobe.

Fig. 11 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 11. Suggested phylogenetic relationships in the Changhsingian–Olenekian goniatitid, prolecanitid, ceratitid, and phylloceratid ammonoid superfamilies and families.

Fig. 9 in The ammonoid recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction: Evidence from the Iran-Transcaucasia area, Siberia, Primorye, and Kazakhstan

Fig. 9. Some Early Olenekian Prolecanitida, Ceratitida, and Phylloceratida from Lower Olenekian, Mesohedenstroemia bosphorensis Zone; SMID quarry at the Artyom environs, South Primorye. A. Prolecantid Mesohedenstroemia olgae sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), right lateral (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. Ceratitid Inyoites sedini sp. nov., DVGI 1/851 (holotype). C. Phylloceratid Subbalhaeceras shigetai gen. and sp. nov., DVGI 2/851 (holotype), right lateral (C1), left lateral (C2), ventral (C3) views.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

Figures 2–21 in New data on the family Himantariidae Bollman, 1893 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha) from Kazakhstan

Figures 2–21. Bothriogaster signata (Kessler, 1874): 2 – head and first segment, ventral view; 3 – cephalic plate, ventral view; 4 – maxillary complex, ventral view; 5 – some anterior sternites, ventral view; 6 – terminal part of body (male), ventral view; 7 – same, dorsal view; Polyporogaster porosa (Sseliwanoff, 1881): 8 – head and two anterior segments, ventral view; 9 – labrum, ventral view; 10 – maxillary complex, ventral view; 11 – some anterior sternites, ventral view; 12 – terminal part of body (male), ventral view; 13 – same, dorsal view; Stigmatogaster sp.: 14 – head and two anterior segments, ventral view; 15 – labrum, ventral view; 16 – maxillary complex, ventral view; 20 – same, schematic draw, ventral view; 17 – some anterior sternites, ventral view; 18 – terminal part of body (female), ventral view; 19 – same, dorsal view; Polyporogaster schnitnikowi Lignau, 1929 (after (Lignau 1929b)): 21 – labrum, ventral view. Scale: 1–14 – 0.2 mm, 15–20 – 0.1 mm; 21 – without scale.

Figure 3 in Phylogeographic affinities, distribution and population status of the non-native Asian pond mussels Sinanodonta lauta and S. woodiana in Kazakhstan

Figure 3. Shells of Sinanodonta lauta and the temperate invasive lineage of S. woodiana from Kazakhstan. A-C) S. lauta, irrigation channel of the Ili River near Topar settlement [specimens RMBH biv764_7, RMBH biv763_1, and RMBH biv763_5, respectively]. D-F) Temperate invasive lineage of S. woodiana, Kapchagay Reservoir [specimens RMBH biv762_3, RMBH biv762_5, and RMBH biv762_2, respectively]. Scale bar = 20 mm. (Photo: Ekaterina Konopleva).

Figure 4 in Phylogeographic affinities, distribution and population status of the non-native Asian pond mussels Sinanodonta lauta and S. woodiana in Kazakhstan

Figure 4. Shell morphometry and age of Sinanodonta lauta (N = 20) and the temperate invasive lineage of S. woodiana (N = 10) from Kazakhstan. A) Shell length vs shell height scatterplot. B) Shell length vs shell width scatterplot. C) Shell length vs age scatterplot. D) Shell elongation index vs shell convexity index scatterplot.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

Figure 1 in New data on the family Himantariidae Bollman, 1893 (Chilopoda: Geophilomorpha) from Kazakhstan

Figure 1. Distribution of the Himantariidae members in Kazakhstan: square – Bothriogaster signata; star – Polyporogaster porosa; triangle – Polyporogaster schnitnikowi; oval – Stigmatogaster sp. White marks indicate new data, black marks concern literature data.

Figure 2 in Phylogeographic affinities, distribution and population status of the non-native Asian pond mussels Sinanodonta lauta and S. woodiana in Kazakhstan

Figure 2. Habitat of a viable population of Sinanodonta lauta in Kazakhstan: irrigation channel of the Ili River near Topar settlement. (Photo: Ilya Vikhrev).

Figure 1 in Phylogeographic affinities, distribution and population status of the non-native Asian pond mussels Sinanodonta lauta and S. woodiana in Kazakhstan

Figure 1. Ranges and population status of Sinanodonta lauta and the temperate invasive lineage of S. woodiana in Middle Asia. The circles indicate recent well-established populations, and the squares indicate old unconfirmed records of S. lauta (green) and S. woodiana (red). The green star indicates the site of putative initial introduction of S. lauta to Kazakhstan between 1961 and 1971. The color filling indicates freshwater basins, in which non-native populations of S. lauta and S. woodiana (light green) and S. woodiana (pink) were established. The species occurrence data are presented in Table 1.

Figure 5 in Phylogeographic affinities, distribution and population status of the non-native Asian pond mussels Sinanodonta lauta and S. woodiana in Kazakhstan

Figure 5. Median joining networks of the COI sequences of Sinanodonta spp. The list of sequences is given in Table 2. The red numbers near branches indicate the numbers of nucleotide substitutions between haplotypes. Size of circles corresponds to the number of available sequences for each haplotype (smallest circle = 1 sequence). A) Temperate invasive lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana (N = 72). B) S. lauta (N = 24).