Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
70
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
70 results for “Moldova”
FIGURES 1–2. 1 in A new species and new records of Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Republic of Moldova
FIGURES 1–2. 1, places of findings of Arrhopalites prutensis sp. nov. (point 1—Leușeni, 2—Braniște) and Arrhopalites sp. gr. diversus (point 3—Stejăreni); 2, Arrhopalites prutensis sp. nov., habitus of mounted holotype.
FIGURES 26–31 in A new species and new records of Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Republic of Moldova
FIGURES 26–31. Arrhopalites prutensis sp. nov.: 26, proximal part of antenna with swelled Ant III; 27, head dorsum with spine-like setae; 28, mucro, lateral view; 29, neosminthuroid seta; 30, chaetotaxy of trichobothrial complex; 31, Abd VI with cuticular spines (marked with arrows), lateral view.
FIGURES 22–25 in A new species and new records of Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Republic of Moldova
FIGURES 22–25. Arrhopalites prutensis sp. nov.: 22, chaetotaxy of great abdomen; 23, tenaculum; 24, chaetotaxy of furca, lateral view; 25, chaetotaxy of Abd VI, setae of circumanal row are filled with grey colour.
FIGURES 32–39 in A new species and new records of Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Republic of Moldova
FIGURES 32–39. Arrhopalites sp. gr. diversus: 32, Ant III (a—posterior side, b—anterior side, c—"sensory field"); 33, maxillary outer lobe with sublobal hairs; 34, neosminthuroid seta; 35, foot complex (a—fore, b—mid, c—hind); 36, furca (adens, anterior side, b—dens and mucro, posterior side); 37, Abd VI, lateral view; 38, head, frontal side; 39, chaetotaxy of trichobothrial complex.
Flag Moldova Blender
**Flag Moldova Blender**free dawnload Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Serological surveillance of COVID-19 in the general population of Moldova
<p>Results of population-based age stratified seroepidemiological investigation in Moldova</p>
Subspecies and Distribution. N. p. procyonoides Gray, 1834 — W & SW China and N Indochina. N. p. albus Hornaday, 1904 — Japan (Hokkaido). N. p. koreensis Mori, 1922 — Korean Peninsula. N. p. orestes Thomas, 1923 — C & S China. N. p. ussuriensis Matschie, 1907 — NE China, E Mongolia, and SE Russia. N. p. viverrinus Temminck, 1839 — Japan. Introduced (ussuriensis) to the Baltic states, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, W Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Sweden, and Ukraine, occasionally seen in Austria, Bosnia, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, and Switzerland. in Canidae
Subspecies and Distribution. N. p. procyonoides Gray, 1834 — W & SW China and N Indochina. N. p. albus Hornaday, 1904 — Japan (Hokkaido). N. p. koreensis Mori, 1922 — Korean Peninsula. N. p. orestes Thomas, 1923 — C & S China. N. p. ussuriensis Matschie, 1907 — NE China, E Mongolia, and SE Russia. N. p. viverrinus Temminck, 1839 — Japan. Introduced (ussuriensis) to the Baltic states, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, W Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Sweden, and Ukraine, occasionally seen in Austria, Bosnia, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, and Switzerland.
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.
Subspecies and Distribution. N. p. procyonoides Gray, 1834 — W & SW China and N Indochina. N. p. albus Hornaday, 1904 — Japan (Hokkaido). N. p. koreensis Mori, 1922 — Korean Peninsula. N. p. orestes Thomas, 1923 — C & S China. N. p. ussuriensis Matschie, 1907 — NE China, E Mongolia, and SE Russia. N. p. viverrinus Temminck, 1839 — Japan. Introduced (ussuriensis) to the Baltic states, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, W Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Sweden, and Ukraine, occasionally seen in Austria, Bosnia, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, and Switzerland. in Canidae
Subspecies and Distribution. N. p. procyonoides Gray, 1834 — W & SW China and N Indochina. N. p. albus Hornaday, 1904 — Japan (Hokkaido). N. p. koreensis Mori, 1922 — Korean Peninsula. N. p. orestes Thomas, 1923 — C & S China. N. p. ussuriensis Matschie, 1907 — NE China, E Mongolia, and SE Russia. N. p. viverrinus Temminck, 1839 — Japan. Introduced (ussuriensis) to the Baltic states, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, W Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Sweden, and Ukraine, occasionally seen in Austria, Bosnia, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Norway, Slovenia, and Switzerland.
Distribution. India, S Nepal, S Bhutan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Chital have been introduced in Europe (Croatia, Ukraine, Moldova), Armenia, the Andaman Is, New Guinea, Australia, USA (California, Texas & Hawaii), Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina. in Cervidae
Distribution. India, S Nepal, S Bhutan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. Chital have been introduced in Europe (Croatia, Ukraine, Moldova), Armenia, the Andaman Is, New Guinea, Australia, USA (California, Texas & Hawaii), Brazil, Uruguay, and Argentina.
Distribution. Known only from ten locations in E Romania, S & E Ukranie, and SW Russia (W Belgorod Region). Distribution poorly known and it certainly occurs at more localities than are currently documented; status unknown in Moldova and Bulgaria. in Sminthidae
Distribution. Known only from ten locations in E Romania, S & E Ukranie, and SW Russia (W Belgorod Region). Distribution poorly known and it certainly occurs at more localities than are currently documented; status unknown in Moldova and Bulgaria.
Distribution. NW Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, C & S European Russia, SE Bulgaria, E Greece, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Lebanon, Israel, E Syria, Jordan, N Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, SW Siberia (Omsk Region), Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, NW India (Jammu and Kashmir), N China (Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia [= Nei Mongol], and Ningxia), and Mongolia. in Cricetidae
Distribution. NW Romania, Moldova, Ukraine, C & S European Russia, SE Bulgaria, E Greece, Turkey, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Lebanon, Israel, E Syria, Jordan, N Iraq, Iran, Kazakhstan, SW Siberia (Omsk Region), Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, NW India (Jammu and Kashmir), N China (Xinjiang, Qinghai, Gansu, Inner Mongolia [= Nei Mongol], and Ningxia), and Mongolia.
Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.suaveolensPallas,1811—SBelarus,C&EUkraine,Moldova,andEuropeanRussiaStoNCaucasusandEtoSUralMts. C.s.ilensisG.S.Miller,1901—Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan,Kyrgyzstan,SWTajikistan,NIran,andprobablyNAfghanistan. C. s. pamarensis Ognev, 1928 — Pamir Mts. Also present in NW China and W & C Mongolia, but subspecies involved not known. in Soricidae
Subspecies and Distribution. C.s.suaveolensPallas,1811—SBelarus,C&EUkraine,Moldova,andEuropeanRussiaStoNCaucasusandEtoSUralMts. C.s.ilensisG.S.Miller,1901—Kazakhstan,Uzbekistan,Turkmenistan,Kyrgyzstan,SWTajikistan,NIran,andprobablyNAfghanistan. C. s. pamarensis Ognev, 1928 — Pamir Mts. Also present in NW China and W & C Mongolia, but subspecies involved not known.
Distribution. Endemic to SE Europe (Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia). in Muridae
Distribution. Endemic to SE Europe (Austria, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine, and Russia).
FIGURES 1–13 in Neanurinae and Morulininae of Moldova (Collembola: Neanuridae), with description of Neanura moldavica sp.nov.
FIGURES 1–13. Neanura moldavica sp.nov.: 1, habitus, chaetotaxy and tubercles; 2, distal part of a long macrochaeta on Abd VI; 3, short macrochaeta (Di2) on Abd V; 4, short macrochaeta (DL6) on head; 5, microchaeta S1, chaeta S2 and ordinary mesochaeta of the Ant III organite; 6, ordinary microchaeta (An of Abd VI); 7, S-chaeta of Abd III tergite; 8, chaeta S3 of Ant IV; 9, microchaeta ms of Th. II; Neanura muscorum: 10, Ant I–II chaetotaxy, dorsal view. Ventral chaetae in dotted lines; *, additional chaetae of Ant I compared to standard chaetotaxy and additional chaetae of Ant II compared to N. moldavica; Neanura moldavica sp.nov.: 11, Ant I–II chaetotaxy, dorsal view. Ventral chaetae in dotted lines; *, additional chaetae of Ant I compared to standard chaetotaxy; 12, labium and distal part of the labrum; 13, head chaetotaxy and tubercles.
FIGURES 14–16 in Neanurinae and Morulininae of Moldova (Collembola: Neanuridae), with description of Neanura moldavica sp.nov.
FIGURES 14–16. Neanura moldavica sp.nov.: 14, tubercles Af and CL on head; 15, lateral area and tubercle Oc on head; 16, tergites of Abd IV–VI.
FIGURES 1–8 in Species of the genus Xenylla Tullberg, 1869 (Collembola: Hypogastruridae) from the Republic of Moldova
FIGURES 1–8. Xenylla andrzeji sp. nov.: 1, dorsal chaetotaxy; 2, antennal segments III and IV, dorsally; 3, labrum; 4, mental, submental and perilabial chaetotaxy; 5, maxillary outer lobe; 6, distal part of leg III; 7, furca; 8, ventral chaetotaxy of abdominal sterna I–VI.
Open Science stakeholders in Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia [updated, February 2023]
<p>The dataset contains tabular information about 1118 stakeholders (1079 unique entities) in 15 countries of Southeastern Europe that have been identified as Open Science stakeholders within the framework of the project NI4OS-Europe, funded by the European Commission under the INFRAEOSC-5b call.</p> <p>It was collected between November 2022 and the end of January 2023 based on the information provided by project partners from Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia. It builds upon the dataset collected in 2019 as part of the NI4OS-Europe landscaping activity (Kosanović, Biljana, Ševkušić, Milica, & Otašević, Vladimir. (2020). Open Science stakeholders in Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Georgia, Greece, Hungary, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia [Data set]. Zenodo. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3766125">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3766125</a>). In November 2022, the project partners were invited to review and update this original dataset.</p> <p>The stakeholders are classified into five groups based on their role in the research ecosystem: FUND (research funders and policymakers), CREATE (universities, research institutes, etc.), SUPPORT (libraries, repositories, research infrastructures, etc.), CONSUME (organizations using research results in their work, e.g. SMEs) and FACILITATE (individuals and organizations involved in promoting the principles off open science).<br> The dataset contains the following information for each entry: country, stakeholder category/role, official/legal name of the organization, city, Zipcode, addresses (street name and number), URL of the institutional website, geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude).</p> <p>****Dataset contents****<br> NI4OS_Stakeholder_Map_20230222.csv, data file, comma-separated values<br> NI4OS_Stakeholder_Map_20230222-README.txt, metadata, text format</p> <p>****Column headers and field types***<br> Country (text)<br> StakeHoldersRole (text, ItemList{fund,create,facilitate,consume,support})<br> InstitutionName (text)<br> City (text)<br> Zipcode (text)<br> Address (text)<br> URL (text-web address)<br> Latitude (number.decimal(2,7))<br> Longitude (number.decimal(2,7))</p> <p>Data from this dataset have been quality-checked by the NI4OS-Europe project team. We recommend these data for further use.<br> <br> The dataset was used to generate an interactive map: https://ni4os.eu/os-stakeholders-map//</p> <p>****Dataset license****<br> The dataset is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</a></p>
Reducing the Need for In-Clinic Follow-Up for Medical Abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01410266. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.
Figure 4 from: Busmachiu G, Kováč Ľ, Dana M, Weiner WM (2017) Riparian Collembola (Hexapoda) communities of northern Moldova, Eastern Europe. ZooKeys 724: 119-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.12478
Figure 4 Box-plot diagram of Collembola specimens' number (a) and species richness (b) in riparian habitats of the Prut River. For abbreviations see Materials and methods.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.