Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree topology of partial 18S rRNA nucleotide sequence data for different microcotylids and outgroup as diclidophorids through NJ and ME methods. The bootstrap values for 1000 replicates are shown as in the phylogram and branch length is genetic distance between taxa.

Fig. 3 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree topology of parital 28S rRNA nucleotide sequence data for the members of microcotytlidae and outgroup of members of diclidophoridae through NJ and ME methods. The bootstrap values for 1000 replicates are shown as in the phylogram and branch length is genetic distance between taxa.

Fig. 1 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 1. Diplostamenides sciaenae: A — whole mount (ventral view): OS, oral sucker; P, pharyn×; OE, oesophagus; GA, genital atrium; IC, intestinal caecum; VI, vitellarium; H, haptor; C, clamp B — reproductive system: V, vas deferens; VD, vitelline duct; O, ovary; CVD, common vitelline duct; GIC, genitointestinal canal; OD, oviduct; OT, ootype; T, testes C — genital atrium and spines: AS, atrial spines; D — clamp and associated sclerites: SMD, scleritum marginal dorsale; SMV, scleritum marginal ventrale; SM, Scleritum median; SOB, scleritum obliqum basale; ETD, extreme terminal dorsale; ETV, extreme terminal ventrale.

Fig. 2 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 2. Diplostamenides sciaenae digital phototmicrographs (present study): A — whole mount; B — clamp and associated sclerites; C — gential atrium and spines; D — anterior region with oral suckers, pharyn× and oesophagus. Abbreviations are provided in figure 1.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →

Fig. 2 in Morphological Redescription And Molecular Characterization Of Dactylogyrus Labei (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) From Catla Catla: A New Host Record In India

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic position of the present Dactylogyrus species based on 28S rDNA sequences. Distances were estimated using Kimura two-parameter model. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. The tree was identical to that obtained using maximum-parsimony and the numbers along branches represent bootstrap values given as above branch NJ and lower branch MP. Bootstrap support (> 50 % for 1,000 replicates) is shown at each node.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →

Fig. 1 in Morphological Redescription And Molecular Characterization Of Dactylogyrus Labei (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) From Catla Catla: A New Host Record In India

Fig. 1. Dactylogyrus labei: a — сopulatory complex; b — egg; c — dorsal anchors and hooks I–VII; d — ventral bar; e — dorsal bar. Scale bar 40 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in New Records of Gemmaecaputia corrugata (Monogenea: Chauhaneidae) from Sphyraena forsteri (Sphyraenidae) off Yomitan Town, Okinawa-jima Island, Southern Japan

Fig. 3. Bayesian inference (BI) trees for the Gastrocotylinea based on partial 28S rDNA (654bp) and cox1 (226bp) data using Diclidophoridae species as the outgroup. The corresponding GenBank accession numbers are shown. The tree includes results for BI and Maximum Likelihood with PP/BS branch support.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →

Fig. 1. Gemmaecaputia corrugata Tripathi, 1957 from Sphyraena forsteri Cuvier, 1829 in New Records of Gemmaecaputia corrugata (Monogenea: Chauhaneidae) from Sphyraena forsteri (Sphyraenidae) off Yomitan Town, Okinawa-jima Island, Southern Japan

Fig. 1. Gemmaecaputia corrugata Tripathi, 1957 from Sphyraena forsteri Cuvier, 1829. Whole body (ventral view, MPM 21744e). Scale bar: 500 µm. Abbreviations for morphological characters: cgp, common genital pore; clI–IV, first–fourth clamp on left side; crI– IV, first–fourth clamp on right side; es, esophagus; gic, genito-intestinal canal; h, haptor; ic, intestinal ceca; o, ovary; os, oral sucker; p, penis; ped, pedunculate; ph, pharynx; sgc, spheroidal gland cell; spl, subtriangular proximal lobe; t, testes; tvd, transverse vitelline ducts; u, uterus; vas, vas deferens; vd, vaginal duct; vid, vitelline duct; vit, vitellarium.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →

Fig. 2. Gemmaecaputia corrugata Tripathi, 1957 from Sphyraena forsteri Cuvier, 1829 in New Records of Gemmaecaputia corrugata (Monogenea: Chauhaneidae) from Sphyraena forsteri (Sphyraenidae) off Yomitan Town, Okinawa-jima Island, Southern Japan

Fig. 2. Gemmaecaputia corrugata Tripathi, 1957 from Sphyraena forsteri Cuvier, 1829 (ventral view, MPM 21744e) for A–C, (ventral view, MPM 21744d) for D, E. A, Reproductive organs; B, common genital pore; C, genital ducts of middle body; D, first clamp of right side; E, second clamp of left side. Scale bars: A, C, 100 µm; B, D, E, 50 µm. Abbreviations for morphological characters: acs, accessory sclerite; als, antero-lateral sclerite; atm, atrium musculinus; cgp, common genital pore; dms, dorsal mid-sclerite; gic, genito-intestinal canal; o, ovary; oö, oötype; ovd, ovo-vitelline duct; ovi, oviduct; p, penis; pls, postero-lateral sclerite; spl, subtriangular proximal lobe; ss, small sclerite; t, testes; u, uterus; vas, vas deferens; vd, vaginal duct; ve, vasa efferentia; vid, vitelline duct; vms, ventral midsclerite; vp, vaginal pore.

Fig. 3 Neopolystoma scorpioides n in Tracking platyhelminth parasite diversity from freshwater turtles in French Guiana: First report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species

Fig. 3 Neopolystoma scorpioides n. sp. Hohotupe. a Ventnah vies. b testis of hohotupe. c cenitah spines. d haptonah sucken shosinc a ninc of skehetah ehements. e mancinah hookhets. Abbreviations: ec, ecc; cb, cenitah buhb; hp, hapton; ic, intestinah caecum; mo, mouth; ov, ovanu; ph, phanunx; su, sucken; te, testis; va, vacina; vd, vas defenens; vi, vitehhania. Scale-bars: a, 500 μm; b, 100 μm; c, 10 μm; d, 100 μm; e, 10 μm

Fig. 1 Neopolystoma cayensis n in Tracking platyhelminth parasite diversity from freshwater turtles in French Guiana: First report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species

Fig. 1 Neopolystoma cayensis n. sp. Hohotupe. a Ventnah vies. b Testis. c Genitah spines. d Haptonah sucken shosinc a ninc of skehetah ehements. e Mancinah hookhets. Abbreviations: ec, ecc; cb, cenitah buhb; hp, hapton; ic, intestinah caecum; mo, mouth; ov, ovanu; ph, phanunx; su, sucken; te, testis; va, vacina; vd, vas defenens; vi, vitehhania. Scale-bars: a, 500 μm; b, 500 μm; c, 10 μm; d, 100 μm; e, 10 μm

Fig. 4 in Tracking platyhelminth parasite diversity from freshwater turtles in French Guiana: First report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species

Fig. 4 Bauesian tnee infenned fnom the anahusis of foun concatenated cenes. Numbens at nodes connespond to Bauesian postenion pnobabihities. Abbreviations: C. sacs, conjunctivah sacs; P. cavitu, phanunceah cavitu

Fig. 2 Neopolystoma guianensis n in Tracking platyhelminth parasite diversity from freshwater turtles in French Guiana: First report of Neopolystoma Price, 1939 (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) with the description of three new species

Fig. 2 Neopolystoma guianensis n. sp. Hohotupe. a, Ventnah vies. b, testis. c cenitah spines. d haptonah sucken shosinc a ninc of skehetah ehements. e mancinah hookhets. Abbreviations: ec, ecc; cb, cenitah buhb; hp, hapton; ic, intestinah caecum; mo, mouth; ov, ovanu; ph, phanunx; su, sucken; te, testis; va, vacina; vd, vas defenens; vi, vitehhania. Scale-bars: a, 1,000 μm; b, 100 μm; c, 10 μm; d, 100 μm; e, 10 μm

Fig. 5 in Redescription of Bicotyle reticulata (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) from Pampus punctatissimus (Scombriformes: Stromateidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Fig. 5. Bayesian inference (BI) tree for the Microcotylinea based on partial 28S rDNA data (840 bp) using two species of Plectanocotylidae as the outgroup. The species newly sequenced in this study is indicated in bold. The corresponding INSD accession numbers are shown. The tree includes results for Bayesian inference and ML with PP/BS branch support values.

Fig. 2 in Redescription of Bicotyle reticulata (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) from Pampus punctatissimus (Scombriformes: Stromateidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Fig. 2. Bicotyle reticulata (Goto, 1894) from Pampus punctatissimus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845). A, Clamp on right side (closed, ventral view, MPM Coll.-No. 25262); B, clamp on left side (open, apical view, MPM Coll.-No. 25262); C, mouth (MPM Coll.-No. 25262); D, genital atrium (MPM Coll.-No. 25261); E, vaginal pore (MPM Coll.-No. 25261). Scale bars: A, B, 50 µm; C, 600 µm; D, E, 250 µm.

Fig. 1 in Redescription of Bicotyle reticulata (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) from Pampus punctatissimus (Scombriformes: Stromateidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Fig. 1. Bicotyle reticulata (Goto, 1894) from Pampus punctatissimus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845). Whole body (ventral view, MPM Coll.-No. 25262). Scale bar: 10 mm.

Fig. 4 in Redescription of Bicotyle reticulata (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) from Pampus punctatissimus (Scombriformes: Stromateidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Fig. 4. Digestive tract of Bicotyle reticulata (Goto, 1894) from Pampus punctatissimus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845) (ventral view, MPM Coll.-No. 25262). Scale bar: 5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Redescription of Bicotyle reticulata (Monogenea: Heteraxinidae) from Pampus punctatissimus (Scombriformes: Stromateidae) in the Seto Inland Sea, Japan

Fig. 3. Bicotyle reticulata (Goto, 1894) from Pampus punctatissimus (Temminck and Schlegel, 1845). Reproductive organs (ventral view, MPM Coll.-No. 25262). Scale bar: 500 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 5. Uteropolystomoides multifalx n in Revision of the systematics of the Polystomoidinae (Platyhelminthes, Monogenea, Polystomatidae) with redefinition of Polystomoides Ward, 1917 and Uteropolystomoides Tinsley, 2017

Figure 5. Uteropolystomoides multifalx n. comb. (Stunkard, 1924). A: Full parasite; B: Genital bulb with genital spines; C: Sclerotized haptoral hooks. Abbreviations: Gb, genital bulb; Ha, haptor; Hm, hamulus; Hm1, hamulus 1; Hm2, hamulus 2; Mh1, marginal hooklet 1; Mo, mouth; Ph, pharynx; Su, sucker; Te, testis; Ut, Uterus with eggs; Va, vagina; Vi, vitellarium. Scale bars: A = 500 µm; B = 200 µm; C = 50 µm.