Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

67

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

67 results for “Open Review”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Supporting dataset for : Promoting content discovery of open repositories : reviewing the impact of optimization techniques (2016-2019)

<p>This dataset supports the conference paper, &#39;Promoting content discovery of open repositories : reviewing the impact of optimization techniques (2016-2019)&#39;, <a href="https://doi.org/10.17868/67963">deposited and available&nbsp;in Strathprints</a> and presented at the 14th International Conference Open Repositories (OR2019). It also supports the journal article, &#39;Enhancing content discovery of open repositories: an analytics-based evaluation of repository optimizations&#39;, published in Publications. Full details of these publications are as follows:&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li>Macgregor, G. (2019). <em>Promoting content discovery of open repositories : reviewing the impact of optimization techniques (2016-2019)</em>&nbsp;. (pp. 1-11). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde [Strathprints repository].&nbsp;Available:&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.17868/67963">https://doi.org/10.17868/67963</a>&nbsp;</li> <li>Macgregor, G.&nbsp;(2020).&nbsp;Enhancing content discovery of open repositories: an analytics-based evaluation of repository optimizations.&nbsp;<em>Publications</em>,&nbsp;<em>8</em>(1), [8].&nbsp;<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8010008">https://doi.org/10.3390/publications8010008</a></li> </ul> <p>The dataset comprises a series of comma-separated values plain text documents (.csv). The .csv files&nbsp;contain&nbsp;data pertaining to COUNTER compliant usage statistics, search query traffic from Google Search Console, web traffic data from&nbsp;Google Analytics and figures on annual full-text repository deposits made to the Strathprints repository. A README.txt is included, describing in more detail the nature and the structure of the data.</p> <p>All data relate to the EPrints repository, <a href="https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/">Strathprints</a>, based at the University of Strathclyde.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 22. Scaphochlamys stenophylla. A. whole plant. B. pulvinate petiole base. C. inflorescence with bud and wilted flower. D. lamina adaxial surface. E. lamina abaxial surface. F. bud with visible violet veins. G. corolla lobes opening, labellum uncoiling. H in A review of Scaphochlamys (Zingiberaceae) from Borneo, with description of eleven new species

FIGURE 22. Scaphochlamys stenophylla. A. whole plant. B. pulvinate petiole base. C. inflorescence with bud and wilted flower. D. lamina adaxial surface. E. lamina abaxial surface. F. bud with visible violet veins. G. corolla lobes opening, labellum uncoiling. H. flower at anthesis, labellum violet with light yellow band along median line until distal cleft. I. corolla lobes reflexed. J. semi-erect fruit. K. immature fruit cross-section. L. stigma and crest. M. spurless anther (specimen in alcohol). N. bracts and bracteoles, artificially opened. A, C, F, G, I &amp; J from OIH74 (type); B, D, E, H, K, L &amp; M from OIH171; N from OIH91.

opennotspecifiedAug 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 12. Slit-like cuticular pores representing epidermal gland openings. A, B in An extensive review of mutualistic and similar ecological associations involving tarantulas (Araneae: Theraphosidae), with a new hypothesis on the evolution of their hirsuteness

Figure 12. Slit-like cuticular pores representing epidermal gland openings. A, B. Ephebopus cyanognathus West and Marshall, 2000, palpal femur, with urticating setae and one gland opening (marked with an arrow). C, D. Exuvia of juvenile Ephebopus cyanognathus, abdomen. E. Psalmopoeus sp., dorsal side of metatarsus. F. Liphistius sp., a slit sensillum (large) and several gland openings (small, one marked with an arrow). Photo credits: Rainer Foelix. Scale bars: 0.01 mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 11 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 11. Distribution of Trapelus boehmei sp. nov. Morocco: 1 = between Akka and Icht (ZFMK 49751–754); 2 = Oued Mird near Ikhf-n-Ouaroun (Geniez et al. 2004); 3 = Erfoud (Schleich et al., 1996); 6 = 10 km south-east of Goulmima (ZSM 207/1993), and Ksar es Souk (ZSM 688/1979/1-5); 7 = 40 km north of Zagora (ZMB 52277); 8 = 25 km west of Tissint (ZSM 225/1993). Algeria: 4 = Colomb Béchar (ZFMK 49664). Mauritania: 5 = 220 km south of Nouadhibou (MNHN 2006.0343).

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 7 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 7. Holotype (A, ZFMK 63678) and paratype (B, ZFMK 20848) of Trapelus mutabilis poppeki ssp. nov.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 4. Cladogram of the tree recovered by analysis based on 512 bp of the 16S mtDNA gene. Values above nodes are neighbour-joining bootstrap replicates (20 000 replicates; values below 50% not shown); values below nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities (values below 0.80 not shown). Red dots (grey in print) and values on the nodes indicate the estimated age of the clade.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 2. The distribution of Trapelus mutabilis and Trapelus sp. nov. along the first two morphological principal components axes.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 3. Projection of two principal components from a principal components analysis run with 92 individuals of North African Trapelus species. REGR (Regression coefficient).

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 1. Figures of Geoffroy's 'Changeant d'Egypte' mentioned in the description of Agama mutabilis Merrem, 1820.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

The quantification of Open Scholarship - A mapping review

<p>We present the data set for the mapping review &quot;The quantification of open scholarship&quot;</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →
zenodo32/100

Publications and filtering decisions for the systematic literature review in "Towards a Common Definition of Open Data Intermediaries"

<p>This file contains the list of publications and filtering decisions of the systematic literature review conducted for the article &quot;Towards a common definition of open data intermediaries&quot; published in the Digital Government: Research and Practice (DGOV) journal (https://doi.org/10.1145/3585537). The literature search was done on 1 June 2022 and there was no start date set (i.e. all relevant literature up to 1 June 2022 was included).</p> <p>There are 4 documents in this folder (apart from README text describing the data in each document):</p> <ol> <li>Stage-0 Search results</li> <li>Stage-1 Remove redundant</li> <li>Stage-2 Remove irrelevant</li> <li>Stage-3 Final filtering</li> </ol> <p>The authors acknowledge the financial support from the European Union&rsquo;s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 955569, &quot;Towards a sustainable Open Data ECOsystem&quot; (ODECO).</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Retrospective Review of Xen Gel Stent Implantation With Open vs. Closed Conjunctiva Approach

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04406467. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
zenodo28/100

Assets for "A Systematic Technology Review of General-Purpose Open-Source TOSCA Orchestrators"

<p>These datasets contain the results of a systematic technology review of general-purpose open-source TOSCA orchestrators that we conducted in order to support organizations in selecting a suitable TOSCA orchestrator:&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li>Definition of the TOSCA Orchestrator Classification Framework</li> <li>List of all identified TOSCA orchestrator&nbsp;</li> <li>Classification data of selected TOSCA orchestrators</li> </ul>

openapache2.0Oct 2023View details →
dryad28/100

Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review

<p>Identifying reviewers is argued to improve quality and fairness of peer review, but is generally disfavored by reviewers. To gain some insight into the factors that influence when reviewers are willing to have their identity revealed, I examine which reviewers voluntarily reveal their identities to authors at the journal <i>Functional Ecology</i>, at which reviewer identities are confidential unless reviewers sign their comments to authors. 5.6% of reviewers signed their comments to authors. This proportion increased slightly over time, from 4.4% in 2003-2005 to 6.7% in 2013-2015. Male reviewers were 1.8 times more likely to sign their comments to authors than were female reviewers, and this difference persisted over time. Few reviewers signed all of their reviews; reviewers were more likely to sign their reviews when their rating of the manuscript was more positive, and papers that had at least one signed review were more likely to be invited for revision. Signed reviews were, on average, longer and recommended more references to authors. My analyses cannot distinguish cause-and-effect for the patterns observed, but my results suggest that "open identities" review, in which reviewers are not permitted to be anonymous, will likely reduce the degree to which reviewers are critical in their assessment of manuscripts and will differentially affect recruitment of male and female reviewers, negatively affecting the diversity of reviewers recruited by journals.</p>

opencc-zeroOct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

The Open Field test as a tool for behavior analysis in pigs - is a standardization of setup necessary? A systematic review.

<p>Systematic review.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 12 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 12. Neotype (ZFMK 77470) of Trapelus savignii Duméril &amp; Bibron, 1837.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 10 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 10. Live male of Trapelus boehmei sp. nov. of the ZFMK-type series from the type locality.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 8 in Opening a box of cryptic taxa - the first review of the North African desert lizards in the Trapelus mutabilis Merrem, 1820 complex (Squamata: Agamidae) with descriptions of new taxa

Figure 8. Holotype (ZFMK 2590) of Trapelus schmitzi Wagner &amp; Böhme, 2007.

opennotspecifiedOct 2011View details →
dryad28/100

Which peer reviewers voluntarily reveal their identity to authors? Insights into the consequences of open-identities peer review

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicOct 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Code review regression analysis of open source GitHub projects

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record