Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
60
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
60 results for “Spatiotemporal prediction”
Data and codes for Landslide hazard spatiotemporal prediction based on data-driven models: Estimating where, when and how large landslide may be
<p>Data and codes for Landslide hazard spatiotemporal prediction based on data-driven models: Estimating where, when and how large landslide may be</p>
Spatiotemporal brain hierarchies of auditory memory recognition and predictive coding - Nature Communications
<p>The full analysis pipeline used in this study is available at the following link: </p> <p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11072410</p> <p>Additional in-house-built code and functions used in this study are part of the LBPD repository which is available at the following link: </p> <p>https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10701724</p> <p> </p> <p>Abstract</p> <p>Our brain is constantly extracting, predicting, and recognising key spatiotemporal features of the physical world in order to survive. While neural processing of visuospatial patterns has been extensively studied, the hierarchical brain mechanisms underlying conscious recognition of auditory sequences and the associated prediction errors remain elusive. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we describe the brain functioning of 83 participants during recognition of previously memorised musical sequences and systematic variations. The results show feedforward connections originating from auditory cortices, and extending to the hippocampus, anterior cingulate gyrus, and medial cingulate gyrus. Simultaneously, we observe backward connections operating in the opposite direction. Throughout the sequences, the hippocampus and cingulate gyrus maintain the same hierarchical level, except for the final tone, where the cingulate gyrus assumes the top position within the hierarchy. The evoked responses of memorised sequences and variations engage the same hierarchical brain network but systematically differ in terms of temporal dynamics, strength, and polarity. Furthermore, induced-response analysis shows that alpha and beta power is stronger for the variations, while gamma power is enhanced for the memorised sequences. This study expands on the predictive coding theory by providing quantitative evidence of hierarchical brain mechanisms during conscious memory and predictive processing of auditory sequences.</p> <p> </p> <p>The data is provided after pre-processing (Maxfilter, ICA for removing eye blink and heart beat, co-registration with the individual MRI T1) and epoching.</p> <p>Source data files are provided for Supplementary Figures and Tables (referred to as Supplementary Data in the paper).</p> <p>Supplementary Figures are provided in PDF format in high resolution.</p>
Spatiotemporal predictions of the alternative prey hypothesis: Predator habitat use during decreasing prey abundance
<p>The alternative prey hypothesis supposes that predators supported by a primary prey species will shift to consume alternative prey during a decrease in primary prey abundance. The hypothesis implies that during declines of one prey species, a predator modifies their behavior to exploit a secondary, or alternative, species. Despite occurring in many systems, the behavioral mechanisms (e.g., habitat selection) allowing predators to shift toward alternative prey during declines in the abundance of their primary prey are poorly understood. We evaluated habitat selection and use by a generalist predator with respect to two prey species during a dramatic decrease in the abundance of primary prey. Further, we evaluated how spatial variation in access to primary prey affected habitat selection and assessed similarity and overlap between habitats used by each prey species. Coyotes (<em>Canis</em> <em>latrans</em>) exhibited decreasing selection for cottontail rabbits (<em>Sylvilagus</em> spp.; primary prey) during population decreases but did not shift habitat selection toward neonate mule deer (<em>Odocoileus</em> <em>hemionus</em>; alternative prey). Use of rabbit habitat remained high even during historically low rabbit abundance, while mule deer habitat was used in proportion to its availability. Coyotes seemingly do not make large shifts in habitat selection toward alternative prey following spatial and temporal decreases in the abundance of primary prey, but instead, take advantage of habitat overlap to facilitate prey-switching behavior. Our work extends previous research conducted under the alternative prey hypothesis by explicitly evaluating the influence of habitat overlap between prey species and variation in access to prey habitat as factors affecting prey-switching behaviors in predators.</p>
Data for: Endogenous DAF-16 spatiotemporal activity quantitatively predicts lifespan extension induced by dietary restriction
<p>In many organisms, dietary restriction (DR) leads to lifespan extension through the activation of cell protection and pro-longevity gene expression programs. In the nematode <em>C. elegans</em>, the DAF-16 transcription factor is a key aging regulator that governs the Insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway and undergoes translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of cells when animals are exposed to food limitation. However, how large is the influence of DR on DAF-16 activity, and its subsequent impact on lifespan has not been quantitatively determined. In this work, we assess the endogenous activity of DAF-16 under various DR regimes by coupling CRISPR/Cas9-enabled fluorescent tagging of DAF-16 with quantitative image analysis and machine learning. Our results indicate that DR regimes induce strong endogenous DAF-16 activity, although DAF-16 is less responsive in aged individuals. DAF-16 activity is in turn a robust predictor of mean lifespan in <em>C. elegans</em>, accounting for 78% of its variability under DR. Analysis of tissue-specific expression aided by a machine learning tissue classifier reveals that, under DR, the DAF-16 influence on lifespan extension mainly originates from the intestine and neurons. DR also drives DAF-16 activity in unexpected locations such as the germline and intestinal nucleoli.</p>
Spatiotemporal predictions of the alternative prey hypothesis: Predator habitat use during decreasing prey abundance
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data for: Endogenous DAF-16 spatiotemporal activity quantitatively predicts lifespan extension induced by dietary restriction
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Demographic traits improve predictions of spatiotemporal changes in community resilience to drought
<ol> <li>Communities are increasingly threatened by extreme weather events. The cumulative effects of such events are typically investigated by assessing community resilience,<i> i.e.</i>, the extent to which affected communities can achieve pre-event states. However, a mechanistic understanding of the processes underlying resilience is frequently lacking and requires linking various measures of resilience to demographic responses within natural communities.</li> <li>Using 13 years of data from a shrub community that experienced a severe drought in 2005, we use generalized additive models to investigate temporal changes in three measures of resilience. We assess whether community-weighted, species-specific demographic traits such as longevity and reproductive output can predict changes in resilience and how the performance of these traits compares to more commonly used plant functional traits such as leaf area or root dry-matter content.</li> <li>We find significant spatiotemporal variation in community dynamics after the drought. Overall, demographic traits are better at predicting absolute and relative resilience in total plant cover, but functional traits outperform demographic traits when resilience in community composition is assessed. All resilience measures show non-linear and context-specific responses to demographic and functional traits; and these responses depend strongly on the severity of initial drought impact.</li> <li> <i>Synthesis</i>: Our work demonstrates that a full picture of the mechanisms underlying community responses to drought requires the assessment of numerous species-specific characteristics (including demographic and functional traits) and how these characteristics differentially affect complementary measures of community changes through time. </li> </ol>
Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) for pan-Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: SOCD p025, 2020–2022</strong></h2> <h2>Disclaimer</h2> <p>This is the first release of pan-EU predictions of soil health indicators (the Soil Health Data Cube). Use for testing purposes only. A publication describing methods used has been submitted to PeerJ and is in review. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Commision. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The data is provided "as is". AI4SoilHealth project consortium and its suppliers and licensors hereby disclaim all warranties of any kind, express or implied, including, without limitation, the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. Neither AI4SoilHealth project Consortium nor its suppliers and licensors, makes any warranty that the Website will be error free or that access thereto will be continuous or uninterrupted. You understand that you download from, or otherwise obtain content or services through, the Website at your own discretion and risk.</p> <h2>Description</h2> <p>This dataset covers pan-European areas, including Ukraine, the UK, and Turkey. This data cube could be used for applications such as soil property mapping and comprehensive soil health assessment across Europe. The dataset spans four depth ranges and multiple time periods, providing information for studies on soil organic carbon stock and dynamics.</p> <p>This dataset is part of the Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density for Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T dataset. Check the related identifiers section below to access other parts of the dataset.</p> <p>This data set includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Soil Organic Carbon Density (SOCD) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br> This data includes mean, p975, and p025 SOCD maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in kg/m<sup>3</sup> (scaled 10x). </li> <li><strong>Organic carbon content based on dry combustion weight percentage (WPCT) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br> This data includes mean, p975, and p025 WPCT maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in percentage (scaled 10x). </li> </ul> <h3>Related identifiers</h3> <ul> <li><strong>SOCD mean:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771721">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771841">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771911">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771967">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13772054">2020-2022</a> </li> <li><strong>SOCD p025:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13779539">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774064">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774089">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774114">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774167">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774196">2020-2022</a> </li> <li><strong>SOCD p975:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13778472">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773396">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773765">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773828">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773953">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774003">2020-2022</a> </li> </ul> <h3>Data Details</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> 2000–2022, in 4-year intervals (last period covers 2020–2022).</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Spatiotemporal soil organic carbon data cube, with depth ranges and weighted percentage data for soil carbon assessments.</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> The data was derived using machine learning models.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> Quantile Random Forest</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Svalbard. </li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:3035</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (900,000, 899,000, 7,401,000, 5,501,000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 216,700P x 153,400L</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <h3>Support</h3> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: GitLab Issues (tbc)</p> <h3>Name convention</h3> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Ai4SoilHealth and Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describe important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> oc = organic carbon</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> iso.10694.1995.mg.cm3 = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in mg/cm<sup>3</sup> for SOCD | iso.10694.1995.wpct = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in weighted percentage of organic carbon content.</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution/variable type:</strong> m = mean | p975 = percentile 97.5 | p025 = percentile 2.5</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> b0cm..20cm = depth range from 0 to 20cm</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000101 = 2000-01-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20041231 = 2004-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> eu = pan-Europe</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.3035</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20240804 = version from 2024-08-04</li> </ol>
Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) for pan-Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: SOCD mean, 2016–2020</strong></h2> <h2>Disclaimer</h2> <p>This is the first release of pan-EU predictions of soil health indicators (the Soil Health Data Cube). Use for testing purposes only. A publication describing methods used has been submitted to PeerJ and is in review. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Commision. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The data is provided "as is". AI4SoilHealth project consortium and its suppliers and licensors hereby disclaim all warranties of any kind, express or implied, including, without limitation, the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. Neither AI4SoilHealth project Consortium nor its suppliers and licensors, makes any warranty that the Website will be error free or that access thereto will be continuous or uninterrupted. You understand that you download from, or otherwise obtain content or services through, the Website at your own discretion and risk.</p> <h2>Description</h2> <p>This dataset covers pan-European areas, including Ukraine, the UK, and Turkey. This data cube could be used for applications such as soil property mapping and comprehensive soil health assessment across Europe. The dataset spans four depth ranges and multiple time periods, providing information for studies on soil organic carbon stock and dynamics.</p> <p>This dataset is part of the Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density for Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T dataset. Check the related identifiers section below to access other parts of the dataset.</p> <p>This data set includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Soil Organic Carbon Density (SOCD) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br> This data includes mean, p975, and p025 SOCD maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in kg/m<sup>3</sup> (scaled 10x). </li> <li><strong>Organic carbon content based on dry combustion weight percentage (WPCT) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br> This data includes mean, p975, and p025 WPCT maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in percentage (scaled 10x). </li> </ul> <h3>Related identifiers</h3> <ul> <li><strong>SOCD mean:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13754343">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771721">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771841">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771911">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13771967">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13772054">2020-2022</a> </li> <li><strong>SOCD p025:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13779539">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774064">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774089">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774114">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774167">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774196">2020-2022</a> </li> <li><strong>SOCD p975:</strong><br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13778472">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773396">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773765">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773828">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13773953">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13774003">2020-2022</a> </li> </ul> <h3>Data Details</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> 2000–2022, in 4-year intervals (last period covers 2020–2022).</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Spatiotemporal soil organic carbon data cube, with depth ranges and weighted percentage data for soil carbon assessments.</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> The data was derived using machine learning models.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> Quantile Random Forest</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Svalbard. </li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:3035</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (900,000, 899,000, 7,401,000, 5,501,000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 216,700P x 153,400L</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <h3>Support</h3> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: GitLab Issues (tbc)</p> <h3>Name convention</h3> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Ai4SoilHealth and Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describe important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> oc = organic carbon</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> iso.10694.1995.mg.cm3 = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in mg/cm<sup>3</sup> for SOCD | iso.10694.1995.wpct = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in weighted percentage of organic carbon content.</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution/variable type:</strong> m = mean | p975 = percentile 97.5 | p025 = percentile 2.5</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> b0cm..20cm = depth range from 0 to 20cm</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000101 = 2000-01-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20041231 = 2004-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> eu = pan-Europe</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.3035</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20240804 = version from 2024-08-04</li> </ol>
Synthetic dataset and prediction files for the paper "Denoising of Geodetic Time Series Using Spatiotemporal Graph Neural Networks: Application to Slow Slip Event Extraction", by Costantino et al. (2024)
<p>Synthetic database used for training and evaluation of SSEdenoiser</p>
Pretrained Model of Channel Mixer Layer for Spatiotemporal Predictive Learning
<p>Model supplementary material for <em><strong>Space Weather</strong></em> journal paper with the title: Channel Mixer Layer: Multimodal Fusion Towards Machine Reasoning for Spatiotemporal Predictive Learning of Ionospheric Total Electron Content</p>
Supplementary Materials for 'Spatiotemporal Prediction of Air Quality Using Machine Learning Techniques'
<p>This package includes supplementary materials used to implement air quality prediction in the city of Madrid. It consists of two main subdirectories: Data and Code. The Data directory contains Raw-Data (air quality, meteorological and traffic data from the period of January-June 2019 and January-June 2020, and the location of air quality and meteorological monitoring stations and traffic measurement points of the city of Madrid) and Processed-Data (the output after raws data has gone through the workflow to meet the requirements corresponding to the implementation of the proposed forecasting approaches). The Code directory contains Process Raw Data, Chapter4-ConvLSTM, Chapter5-BiConvLSTM, and Chapter6-A3T_GCN, which provides the procedure for constructing and implementing the proposed approaches.</p>
Data from: Spatiotemporal use predicts social partitioning of bottlenose dolphins with strong home range overlap
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Demographic traits improve predictions of spatiotemporal changes in community resilience to drought
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Predicting Hydrophobicity by Learning Spatiotemporal Features of Interfacial Water Structure: Combining Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Convolutional Neural Networks
<p>Files for reproducing results from Kelkar et al. (JPCB 2020) - Predicting Hydrophobicity by Learning Spatiotemporal Features of Interfacial Water Structure: Combining Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Convolutional Neural Networks</p> <p> </p> <p>This folder contains simulations starter files and also plug-and-play datasets to test ML algorithms on molecular dynamics (MD) simulation data.</p> <p> </p> <p>All analysis scripts can also be found on GitLab on this link: https://gitlab.com/atharva-kelkar/kelkar_et_al_jpcb_2020</p>
Data and Code for: Proximal microclimate: moving beyond spatiotemporal resolution improves ecological predictions
<p>Data and code corresponding to analyses and figures for the paper in review.</p>
Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density (SOCD) for pan-Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T
<h2><strong>Sub-dataset: SOCD mean, 2000-2004</strong></h2> <h2>Disclaimer</h2> <p>This is the first release of pan-EU predictions of soil health indicators (the Soil Health Data Cube). Use for testing purposes only. A publication describing methods used has been submitted to PeerJ and is in review. Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Commision. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. The data is provided "as is". AI4SoilHealth project consortium and its suppliers and licensors hereby disclaim all warranties of any kind, express or implied, including, without limitation, the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose and non-infringement. Neither AI4SoilHealth project Consortium nor its suppliers and licensors, makes any warranty that the Website will be error free or that access thereto will be continuous or uninterrupted. You understand that you download from, or otherwise obtain content or services through, the Website at your own discretion and risk.</p> <h2>Description</h2> <p>This dataset covers pan-European areas, including Ukraine, the UK, and Turkey. This data cube could be used for applications such as soil property mapping and comprehensive soil health assessment across Europe. The dataset spans four depth ranges and multiple time periods, providing information for studies on soil organic carbon stock and dynamics.</p> <p>This dataset is part of the Spatiotemporal prediction of soil organic carbon density for Europe (2000-2022) in 3D+T dataset. Check the related identifiers section below to access other parts of the dataset.</p> <p>This data set includes:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Soil Organic Carbon Density (SOCD) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br>This data includes mean, p975, and p025 SOCD maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in kg/m<sup>3</sup> (scaled 10x).</li> <li><strong>Organic carbon content based on dry combustion weight percentage (WPCT) (2000-2022, 4-year intervals):</strong><br>This data includes mean, p975, and p025 WPCT maps for four depth ranges (0-20cm, 20-50cm, 50-100cm, and 100-200cm) in percentage.</li> </ul> <h3>Related identifiers</h3> <ul> <li><strong>SOCD mean:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13754343">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13771721">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13771841">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13771911">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13771967">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13772054">2020-2022</a></li> <li><strong>SOCD p025:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13779539">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774064">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774089">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774114">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774167">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774196">2020-2022</a></li> <li><strong>SOCD p975:</strong><br><a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13778472">2000-2004</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13773396">2004-2008</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13773765">2008-2012</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13773828">2012-2016</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13773953">2016-2020</a> <a href="https://zenodo.org/records/13774003">2020-2022</a></li> </ul> <h3>Data Details</h3> <ul> <li><strong>Time period:</strong> 2000–2022, in 4-year intervals (last period covers 2020–2022).</li> <li><strong>Type of data:</strong> Spatiotemporal soil organic carbon data cube, with depth ranges and weighted percentage data for soil carbon assessments.</li> <li><strong>How the data was collected or derived:</strong> The data was derived using machine learning models.</li> <li><strong>Statistical methods used:</strong> Quantile Random Forest</li> <li><strong>Limitations or exclusions in the data:</strong> The dataset does not include data for Svalbard.</li> <li><strong>Coordinate reference system:</strong> EPSG:3035</li> <li><strong>Bounding box (Xmin, Ymin, Xmax, Ymax):</strong> (900,000, 899,000, 7,401,000, 5,501,000)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Image size:</strong> 216,700P x 153,400L</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Cloud Optimized Geotiff (COG) format.</li> </ul> <h3>Support</h3> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact, or inconsistency, or if you have a question please raise a GitHub issue: GitLab Issues (tbc)</p> <h3>Name convention</h3> <p>To ensure consistency and ease of use across and within the projects, we follow the standard Ai4SoilHealth and Open-Earth-Monitor file-naming convention. The convention works with 10 fields that describe important properties of the data. In this way users can search files, prepare data analysis etc, without needing to open files. The fields are:</p> <ol> <li><strong>generic variable name:</strong> oc = organic carbon</li> <li><strong>variable procedure combination:</strong> iso.10694.1995.mg.cm3 = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in mg/cm<sup>3</sup> for SOCD | iso.10694.1995.wpct = ISO method 10694:1995, with values in weighted percentage of organic carbon content.</li> <li><strong>Position in the probability distribution/variable type:</strong> m = mean | p975 = percentile 97.5 | p025 = percentile 2.5</li> <li><strong>Spatial support:</strong> 30m</li> <li><strong>Depth reference:</strong> b0cm..20cm = depth range from 0 to 20cm</li> <li><strong>Time reference begin time:</strong> 20000101 = 2000-01-01</li> <li><strong>Time reference end time:</strong> 20041231 = 2004-12-31</li> <li><strong>Bounding box:</strong> eu = pan-Europe</li> <li><strong>EPSG code:</strong> epsg.3035</li> <li><strong>Version code:</strong> v20240804 = version from 2024-08-04</li> </ol>
Replication data for Convolutional neural networks with hierarchical context transfer for high-resolution spatiotemporal predictions
<p>Data represents number of posts from Instagram in area for six large cities (New York, London, Moscow, Vienna, Tokyo, and Saint Petersburg) covering 2017 and 2018. We aggregated data by hours and split each city using hierarchical area split by 10x10 grid with three levels. The size of the cell on the micro-level equals to 50 meters. Thus, we get 8760 examples for each year. Cells with zero number of posts in an hour are not listed.</p> <p>Data stored in JSON files with the following format:<br> {"2018-12-13 04:00:00":<br> {"(4, 4)":<br> {"sum":1,<br> "data":<br> {"(9, 6)":<br> {"sum":1,<br> "data":{"(2, 4)":1}}}}}}</p>
Datasets and Model Predictions for "Scalable Spatiotemporal Prediction with Bayesian Neural Fields"
<p>This repository contains the evaluation datasets and model predictions that appear in the research article <em>Scalable Spatiotemporal Prediction with Bayesian Neural Fields</em> (Saad et al., 2024). Refer to the README files in each zip file for additional information.</p>
Iono_Electron Dataset for Multimodal Fusion and Spatiotemporal Predictive Learning
<p>Data supplementary material for <em><strong>Space Weather</strong></em> journal paper with the title: Channel Mixer Layer: Multimodal Fusion Towards Machine Reasoning for Spatiotemporal Predictive Learning of Ionospheric Total Electron Content</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.