Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →

Background music and cognitive task performance: systematic review dataset

This repository contains the raw data used for a systematic review of the impact of background music on cognitive task performance (Cheah et al., 2022). Our intention is to facilitate future updates to this work.Contents descriptionThis repository contains eight Microsoft Excel files, each containing the synthesised data pertaining to each of the six cognitive domains analysed in the review, as well as task difficulty, and population characteristics:<ul><li>raw-data-attention</li><li>raw-data-inhibition</li><li>raw-data-language</li><li>raw-data-memory</li><li>raw-data-thinking</li><li>raw-data-processing-speed</li><li>raw-data-task-difficulty</li><li>raw-data--population</li></ul>Files descriptionTabs organisationThe files pertaining to each cognitive domain include individual tabs for each cognitive task analysed (c.f. Figure 2 in the original paper for the list of cognitive tasks). The file with the population characteristics data also contains separate tabs for each characteristic (extraversion, music training, gender, and working memory capacity).Tabs contentsIn all files and tabs, each row corresponds to the data of a test. The same article can have more than one row if it reports multiple tests. For instance, the study by Cassidy and MacDonald (2007; cf. Memory.xlsx, tab: Memory-all) contains two experiments (immediate and delayed free recall) each with multiple test (immediate free recall: tests 25 – 32; delayed free recall: tests 58 – 61). Each test (one per row), in this experiment, pertains to comparisons between conditions where the background music has different levels of arousal, between groups of participants with different extraversion levels, between different tasks material (words or paragraphs) and different combinations of the previous (e.g., high arousing music vs silence test among extraverts whilst completing an immediate free recall task involving paragraphs; cf. test 30).The columns are organised as follows:<ul><li>"TESTS": the index of the test in a particular tab (for easy reference);</li><li>"ID": abbreviation of the cognitive tasks involved in a specific experiment (see glossary for meaning);</li><li>"REFERENCE": the article where the data was taken from (see main publications for list of articles);</li><li>"CONDITIONS": an abbreviated description of the music condition of a given test;</li><li>"MEANS (music)": the average performance across all participants in a given experiment with background music;</li><li>"MEANS (silence)": the average performance across all participants in a given experiment without background music.</li></ul>Then, in horizontal arrangement, we also include groups of two columns that breakdown specific comparisons related to each test (i.e., all tests comparing the same two types of condition, e.g., L-BgM vs I-BgM, will appear under the same set of columns). For each one, we indicate mean difference between the respective conditions ("MD" column) and the direction of effect ("Standard Metric" column). Each file also contains a "Glossary" tab that explains all the abbreviations used in each document.BibliographyCheah, Y., Wong, H. K., Spitzer, M., & Coutinho, E. (2022). Background music and cognitive task performance: A systematic review of task, music and population impact. Music & Science, 5(1), 1-38. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735699272005">https://doi.org/10.1177/20592043221134392</a>

opencc-zeroNov 2022View details →

Data for Few studies of wild animal performance account for parasite infections: a systematic review

Data from a systematic review across eight scientific journals publishing primarily studies in animal behaviour and physiology over a 5-year period to assess the proportion of studies which acknowledge, treat or control for parasite infection in their study design and/or analyses. Wild animals have parasites. This inconvenient truth has far-reaching implications for biologists measuring animal performance traits: infection with parasites can alter host behaviour and physiology in profound and sometimes counterintuitive ways. Yet, to what extent do studies on wild animals take individual infection status into account? We explored whether parasite inclusion differed between studies that are experimental versus observational, conducted in the field vs the laboratory and measure behavioural vs physiological traits. We also investigated the importance of other factors such as the journal, the year of publication, the trait category (e.g. locomotion, reproduction) measured, the vertebrate taxonomic group investigated, and the host climatic zone of origin. Our results show that parasite inclusion was generally lacking across recent studies on wild vertebrates. In over 680 filtered papers, we found that only 21.9% acknowledged the potential effects of infections on animal performance in the text, and only 5.1% of studies treated animals for infection (i.e. parasite control) or considered infection status in the statistical analyses (i.e. parasite analysis). Parasite inclusion, control and analysis were higher in laboratory compared to field studies and higher for physiological studies compared to behavioural studies but did not differ among journals, performance trait categories and taxonomic groups. Overall, our literature review suggests that parasites are sorely under-acknowledged by researchers in recent years despite growing evidence that infections can modify animal performance. Given the ubiquity of parasites in the environment, we encourage scientists to consider individual infection status when assessing performance of wild animals. We also suggest ways for researchers to implement such practices in both experimental and observational studies.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Incidence and Characteristics of Adverse Events in Paediatric Inpatient Care: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This is the open data repository for the connected systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sets for the meta-analysis. Data collection file with all the information extracted from the included studies. QAT file with the information from the quality assessment tool (QAT) for all included studies. ReadMe with information on data sets and updates. Codebooks for data sets. R Code for the analysis

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Data from Time since liver transplantation and immunosuppression withdrawal outcomes: a systematic review with individual patient data meta-analysis

This record provides one CSV file containing anonymized individual patient data (IPD) of pre-withdrawal times (in days) of liver transplant recipients that underwent immunosuppression (IS) withdrawal. Collection and publication of anonymized data was approved by the Ethics Committee Northwest and Central Switzerland. Patients of 15 primary studies are stratified by successfully reaching the state of IS-free operational tolerance (OT) or by developing signs of immunological rejection (non-OT).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2022View details →

"Determinants of football players' valuation: a systematic review" datasets

3 interdependent tables are available and are the materials used for a systematic review of the determinants of football players' valuation.  - model_specifications is a table where each row represents one of the 111 model specifications included in the systematic review. Characteristics of the article from which specification was retrieved (title, year, authors, journal), attributes of the specification (sample size, population, econometric modeling, etc.), the significance levels of included variables, and the associated coefficients for significant variables.  - model_specifications_dictionnary precise the names of the columns of the table model_specifications. - variables_definitions_and_classification is a table that details all the 471 variables used in the 29 articles analysed with definitions quoted from articles when possible and presents a classification of these variables into 6 categories and several subcategories.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2023View details →

A Systematic Literature Review of Machine Learning for Uncovering Software Faults and Failures

This data set contains the results of an extensive, systematic literature review on the use of machine learning (ML) for uncovering software faults and failures. Covering the period of 2019 to 2022, this literature review identifies 874 relevant publications, classified into six distinct quality assurance tasks. Results show a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of relevant publications of 38% over the last five years. This literature review particularly analyzed in how far these relevant papers leverage synergies between different quality assurance tasks. Results show that only 3% of all relevant papers leverage such synergies, indicating ample opportunities for future research. For example, a single type of quality assurance activity may not suffice to deliver the expected software quality. Ideally, one would use a suitable combination of different types of activities – such as combining dynamic testing with static code analysis. Also, leveraging the synergies between different quality assurance activities can increase the effectiveness of the individual activities. For example, having a good estimate of the fault density of a software component (e.g., using deep learning-driven fault prediction techniques) could help optimize and prioritize testing effort and budget.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →

Literature Datasets for the publication "Systematic Review: Prevalence and Practices of Immunofluorescent Cell Image Processing"

This dataset contains the CSV files returned from PubMed searches used to complete a Systematic Review of Image Processing Publication Practices for methods applied to immunofluorescent images of all CNS cells.  The file names are organized "date_supplementarytablenumber" followed by the appropriate search terms.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2023View details →

A Systematic Review on the Visualization of Avatars and Agents in AR & VR displayed using Head-Mounted Displays

This repository contains the data for the article "Systematic Review on the Visualization of Avatars and Agents in AR & VR displayed using Head-Mounted Displays" including a BibTex file and supporting figures.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →

Replication package for Decomposition of Monolithic Applications into Microservices Architectures: A Systematic Review

Replication Package Title: Replication package for Decomposition of Monolithic Applications into Microservices Architectures: A Systematic Review. Authors: Yalemisew Abgaz, Andrew McCarren, Peter Elger, David Solan, Neil Lapuz, Marin Bivol, Glenn Jackson, Murat Yilmaz, Jim Buckley, and Paul Clarke Year This replication package was initially generated in 2022 and following feedback from reviewers, it is revised in 2023. This package contains two files and three folders that provide additional insight for researchers who wish to replicate our work or who would like to expand the review in the future. Files <ul> <li>The file contains a detailed description of the literature search outlining the steps and the results obtained.</li> <li>Readme.md: A readme file (this file).</li> </ul> Folders <ul> <li>A folder containing the search results and the refinement steps. It contains four files listing studies included in the refinement process (Refinement_Step_1 to Refinement_Step_4) and a master file combining all the steps in one file. The master file contains detailed information about how the refinement steps are executed and all the intermediate results following each refinement step. Users may explore by expanding the filters in Refinement Step 2 (J), Refinement Step 3 (M) and Refinement Step 4 § columns in the master sheet. Readers can also directly go to the sheets that contain the selected studies in any of the refinement stages. A description of each file is also included in the Literature_Search_Strategy.pdf file.</li> <li>This folder contains the list of studies included in the snowballing process, including the last two refinement steps (Refinement_Step_5 and Refinement_Step_6). The snowballing master sheet contains studies extracted using the snowballing process and the data cleaning and filtering criteria used. The different sheets also contain the selected studies at each stage of the snowballing process.</li> </ul> <ul> <li>This folder contains the data extracted from the selected literature by employing the Systematic Review and Ground Theory. The two files included in this folder contain the data extraction template and the data extracted from the 35 selected studies including some intermediate notes.</li> </ul> If you have further questions regarding the survey, feel free to contact us via e-mail. <a href="mailto:Yalemisewm.abgaz@dcu.ie">Yalemisewm.abgaz@dcu.ie</a>.

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

Dataset: A Systematic Literature Review on the topic of High-value datasets

This dataset contains data collected during a study ("T<a href="http://https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10234">owards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review</a>") conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu), Nina Rizun, Magdalena Ciesielska (Gdańsk University of Technology), Charalampos Alexopoulos (University of the Aegean) and Andrea Miletič (University of Zagreb) It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review" paper (pre-print is available in Open Access here -><a href="http://https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10234"> https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10234</a>) and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work. The protocol is intended for the Systematic Literature review on the topic of High-value Datasets with the aim to gather information on how the topic of High-value datasets (HVD) and their determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, incl. the indicators used in them, involved stakeholders, data-related aspects, and frameworks. The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the SLR over Scopus, Web of Science, and Digital Government Research library (DGRL) in 2023.   ***Methodology*** To understand how HVD determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, all relevant literature covering this topic has been studied. To this end, the SLR was carried out to by searching digital libraries covered by Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Digital Government Research library (DGRL). These databases were queried for keywords ("open data" OR "open government data") AND ("high-value data*" OR "high value data*"), which were applied to the article title, keywords, and abstract to limit the number of papers to those, where these objects were primary research objects rather than mentioned in the body, e.g., as a future work. After deduplication, 11 articles were found unique and were further checked for relevance. As a result, a total of 9 articles were further examined. Each study was independently examined by at least two authors. To attain the objective of our study, we developed the protocol, where the information on each selected study was collected in four categories: (1) descriptive information, (2) approach- and research design- related information, (3) quality-related information, (4) HVD determination-related information.   ***Test procedure*** Each study was independently examined by at least two authors, where after the in-depth examination of the full-text of the article, the structured protocol has been filled for each study. The structure of the survey is available in the supplementary file available (see Protocol_HVD_SLR.odt, Protocol_HVD_SLR.docx) The data collected for each study by two researchers were then synthesized in one final version by the third researcher. ***Description of the data in this data set*** Protocol_HVD_SLR provides the structure of the protocol Spreadsheets #1 provides the filled protocol for relevant studies. Spreadsheet#2 provides the list of results after the search over three indexing databases, i.e. before filtering out irrelevant studies The information on each selected study was collected in four categories: (1) descriptive information, (2) approach- and research design- related information, (3) quality-related information, (4) HVD determination-related information Descriptive information     1) Article number - a study number, corresponding to the study number assigned in an Excel worksheet 2) Complete reference - the complete source information to refer to the study 3) Year of publication - the year in which the study was published 4) Journal article / conference paper / book chapter - the type of the paper -{journal article, conference paper, book chapter} 5) DOI / Website- a link to the website where the study can be found 6) Number of citations - the number of citations of the article in Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science 7) Availability in OA - availability of an article in the Open Access 8) Keywords - keywords of the paper as indicated by the authors 9) Relevance for this study - what is the relevance level of the article for this study? {high / medium / low} Approach- and research design-related information 10) Objective / RQ - the research objective / aim, established research questions 11) Research method (including unit of analysis) - the methods used to collect data, including the unit of analy-sis (country, organisation, specific unit that has been ana-lysed, e.g., the number of use-cases, scope of the SLR etc.) 12) Contributions - the contributions of the study 13) Method - whether the study uses a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approach? 14) Availability of the underlying research data- whether there is a reference to the publicly available underly-ing research data e.g., transcriptions of interviews, collected data, or explanation why these data are not shared? 15) Period under investigation - period (or moment) in which the study was conducted 16) Use of theory / theoretical concepts / approaches - does the study mention any theory / theoretical concepts / approaches? If any theory is mentioned, how is theory used in the study? Quality- and relevance- related information     17) Quality concerns - whether there are any quality concerns (e.g., limited infor-mation about the research methods used)? 18) Primary research object - is the HVD a primary research object in the study? (primary - the paper is focused around the HVD determination, sec-ondary - mentioned but not studied (e.g., as part of discus-sion, future work etc.)) HVD determination-related information     19) HVD definition and type of value - how is the HVD defined in the article and / or any other equivalent term? 20) HVD indicators - what are the indicators to identify HVD? How were they identified? (components & relationships, “input -> output") 21) A framework for HVD determination - is there a framework presented for HVD identification? What components does it consist of and what are the rela-tionships between these components? (detailed description) 22) Stakeholders and their roles - what stakeholders or actors does HVD determination in-volve? What are their roles? 23) Data - what data do HVD cover? 24) Level (if relevant) - what is the level of the HVD determination covered in the article? (e.g., city, regional, national, international) ***Format of the file*** .xls, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only), .odt, .docx ***Licenses or restrictions*** CC-BY   For more info, see README.txt

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →

Dataset of "Early triadic interactions in the first year of life: A systematic review on object-mediated shared encounters"

<pre>Two files are available as a result of data extraction from the 51 studies included in the systematic review entitled: "Early triadic interactions in the first year of life: A systematic review on object-mediated shared encounters": (1) DataExtraction.csv -> Dataset resulting from data extraction. (2) DictionaryVariables.csv -> dictionary of the variables included in the dataset: Authors, doi, Year of publication, Study type, Design type, Data analysis strategy, Type of task, Objects, Infants' age (months), Context of interaction, and Country. </pre>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Cognition in Social Engineering Empirical Research: a Systematic Literature Review

# Description of contents This repository contains the codebook, dataset and analysis scripts in R used for the following publication: Pavlo Burda, Luca Allodi, Nicola Zannone. "Cognition in Social Engineering Empirical Research: a Systematic Literature Review". ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). The repository consists of the following files: ## dataset_and_codebook.xlsx contains the dataset, the codebook and a detailed description of contents. ## scripts/ contains the R scripts used for the analysis ## readme.txt contains this readme # Dataset and codebook The dataset_and_codebook.xlsx contains the following sheets: ## Codebook Contains a detailed description of the dataset (tables, columns, fields, etc.). The codebook describes the concepts and variables that are present in the dataset. This includes explanations on meaning, numerical values, classification schemes and labels. ## Hypotheses table         Contains the hypotheses for all analyzed papers and is used in the results of the paper.      Each row is a hypothesis of an included paper, cells contain one or more values (e.g., value1,value2,...) with or without sub values (e.g., value1,value2(sub-value1, ...)). Any content that is in square brackets [] is ignored in the analysis. Empty cells mean that there is no applicable value for that column. ## Papers table Contains the analyzed papers and is used in the results of the paper. It is also used in the overview table (Table 6) in Appendix C. Each row is an included paper, cells contain up to two values (e.g., value1, value2) or the word 'multiple' in case of more than two values. Empty cells mean that there is no applicable value for that column. ## Values table         Contains the description of cell values of 'Hypotheses' and 'Papers' and sub-values (specific variables in a study) that belong to a value.      It has a hierarchical structure from left to right where each field on the right column falls under the first non-empty field on the immediate left-top. # Reproducing results with scripts/ (generate figures) To run the R scripts included in the 'scripts' directory it is sufficient to follow the instructions in and run the 'RUN_ALL_SCRIPTS.R' in 'scripts' directory. The scripts use the TSV (Tab Separated Values) format of the dataset, which is the exact copy of the 'Papers' and 'Hypotheses' tables in the 'dataset_and_codebook.xlsx' file. The resulting figures are stored in the 'scripts/results' directory.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →

Bibliographic data for the systematic review on tilting table tests of masonry assemblies

This database contains all the bibliographic information about the records found after applying the Search Strategy used for the Systematic Review on Tilting Table Tests of Masonry Assemblies. The search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Explore, Engineering Village, and Wiley Online Library databases. It was performed on 13/09/2023. The bibliographic data of the records found in the different databases is presented in .ris, .bib, and .csv format.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →

Data from Comparative effectiveness of common therapies for Wilson disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled studies

This dataset contains three text files in RIS format. They represent the screening process during study selection for "Comparative effectiveness of common therapies for Wilson disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of controlled studies" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14179">https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14179</a>). The file DOKU_All TiAb-Screening_20200116_cap contains all 3453 records (merged from original and update search) that were subjected to title-abstract screening. The file DOKU_All FT-Screening_20200116_cap contains all 174 records that were subjected to full-text screening. The file DOKU_All Included_20200116_cap contains all 26 records that were included into the final review. In addition, a PRISMA flow diagram (Fig. 1 in the paper) is available in TIF format.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2020View details →

MiRoR4_P1_A systematic review describes models for recruitment prediction at the design stage of a clinical trial

This dataset is related to the publication "A systematic review describes models for recruitment prediction at the design stage of a clinical trial".

Figs 181-189 in Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution

Figs 181-189. Genital structures of Gnypeta minuta: 181, median lobe of the aedeagus in lateral view, 182, dorsal view; 183, paramere; 184, male tergite 8; 185, male sternite 8; 186, 187, spermatheca; 188, female tergite 8; 189, female sternite 8.

Figs 172-180 in Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution

Figs 172-180. Genital structures of Gnypeta saccharina: 172, median lobe of the aedeagus in lateral view, 173, dorsal view, 174, apical part of median lobe in ventral view; 175, paramere; 176, male tergite 8; 177, male sternite 8; 178, spermatheca; 179, female tergite 8; 180, female sternite 8.

Figs 148-155 in Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution

Figs 148-155. Genital structures of Gnypeta helenae: 148, median lobe of the aedeagus in lateral view, 149, dorsal view; 150, paramere; 151, male tergite 8; 152, male sternite 8; 153, spermatheca; 154, female tergite 8; 155, female sternite 8.

Figs 125-129 in Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution

Figs 125-129. Genital structures of Gnypeta manitobae (lectotype): 125, female tergite 8; 126, female sternite 8; 127-129, spermatheca.

Figs 117-124 in Species review of the genus Gnypeta Thomson from Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae): systematics, bionomics and distribution

Figs 117-124. Genital structures of Gnypeta crebrepunctata: 117, median lobe of the aedeagus in lateral view, 118, dorsal view; 119, paramere; 120, male tergite 8; 121, male sternite 8; 122, spermatheca; 123, female tergite 8; 124, female sternite 8.