Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
47
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
47 results for “clearcuts”
Figure 6 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 6 - Multivariate regression tree based on sum-of-squares depicting differences in beetle assemblages among experimental plots where forest was a clearcut with stem-only harvested (SOH) b clearcut with whole-tree harvested (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). The tree was selected based on 935/1000 cross-validations and explains 64% of the variance. Both experimental treatment and deadwood volumes provided equivalent improvement at each split. We have labelled splits using experimental treatments.
Figure 4 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 4 - Boxplots depicting overall catch rates (beetles/day) where forest was a clearcut and deadwood was left intact (SOH) b clearcut with quantity of deadwood reduced (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 3 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 3 - Boxplots showing volume of fine and coarse woody debris in stem-only harvested plots (SOH), whole-tree harvested plots (WTH), and in uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 1 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 1 - Schematic representation of treatments with pitfall trap locations, Forêt Montmorency, Quebec.
Figure 2 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 2 - Photographs of experimental plots taken one year following harvest (2012) A, B photos of uncut forests (Control) C stem-only harvested plot (SOH) (operational level) D whole-tree harvested plot (WTH).
Clearcutting and selective logging have inconsistent effects on liana diversity and abundance but not on liana–tree interaction networks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Forest Disturbance Polygons containing Dieback and Clearcuts at Five Locations in Germany
<p>The Geopackages contain polygonized data representing observations from airborne digital orthophotos (DOP) for the 9 classes described below, mainly focussing on forest disturbance. The five Geopackages represent areas between 2*2km and 4*4km in Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP), Northrhine-Westphalia (NRW), Saxony (SAX), Thuringia (THU) and Brandenburg (BB).</p> <p> </p> <p>Observation dates based on the following DOP’s for each AOI (available online for free):</p> <ul> <li> <p>RLP: September 6th/7th, 2021</p> </li> <li> <p>NRW: June 14th, 2021</p> </li> <li> <p>BB: June 18th, 2022</p> </li> <li> <p>THU: June 15th/19th, 2022</p> </li> <li> <p>SAX: June 3rd, 2022</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>Geopackages contain the following classes in the field „dmg_cat“:</p> <ul> <li> <p>class 1: dead coniferous tree</p> </li> <li> <p>class 2: dead broadleaved tree</p> </li> <li> <p>class 3: dead tree (unclear tree type)</p> </li> <li> <p>class 4: planned to represent „thinning“, but not used; coded as class 6 if observed</p> </li> <li> <p>class 5: infrastructure/gravel road/road/building/timber piles/arable land/meadow/grassland/etc. (used to mask out non-forested area)</p> </li> <li> <p>class 6: clear-cut/harvest, including lying deadwood and bare soil that was not visible in the preceeding DOP (presumably a thinning operation or cleared tree after dieback)</p> </li> <li> <p>class 7: apparent re-growth, e.g. re-planting after clear-cut</p> </li> <li> <p>class 8: vegetated, non-forested non-disturbance area within forest patch, e.g. glade</p> </li> <li> <p>class 9: bare soil (no disturbance area)</p> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>The orthoimages of the observation date were compared to previous orthoimages to determine if a potential clearcut, for instance, is actually a glade or bare ground. This is to try to ensure that the disturbance actually happened in the up to 4 years preceeding the respective observation.</p> <p> </p> <p>CRS: EPSG:3035</p> <p> </p> <p>In case this dataset is used in your publication, please cite this repository.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.