Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
79
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
79 results for “debate”
User study data - Summaries with personalized persuasive suggestions to mitigate confirmation bias during interaction with online debates
<p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p>This data was collected to test the effect of debate summaries and personalized persuasive suggestions to engage with them on participants argument recall after engaging with the debate. It contains interaction data and questionnaire results of 212 participants who interacted with one out of four versions of an online debate page.</p> <p><strong>Variables</strong></p> <p>(names/column headers, description, coding)</p> <ul> <li><strong>display_con</strong>: debate display condition, coding: 1: without summary, 2: with summary and neutral suggestion, 3: with summary and personalized persuasive suggestion, 4: with summary and random persuasive suggestion</li> <li><strong>correct_comp</strong>: proportion of correctly recalled arguments (10 arguments)</li> <li><strong>AO_correct_comp</strong>: proportion of correctly recalled attitude-opposing arguments (5 arguments)</li> <li><strong>AC_correct_comp</strong>: proportion of correctly recalled attitude-confirming arguments (5 arguments), coding</li> <li><strong>assigned_topic</strong>: debate topic participant was assigned to</li> <li><strong>clicked_contribute</strong>: indicates whether participant made a contribution to the debate, binary</li> <li><strong>att_strength</strong>: strength of prior attitude, coding: 3: strong, 2: moderate</li> <li><strong>time_debate</strong>: time spent on the debate page in seconds</li> <li><strong>clicked_showmore</strong>: indicates whether participant clicked on the show more button to reveal two additional items of the summary, binary</li> <li><strong>att_change</strong>: change of prior to post attitude, coding: negative values indicate a weakaning, positive a strengthening of the initial attitude (attitude was measured on a seven-point Likert scale)</li> <li><strong>stps_highest</strong>: highest scoring persuasion category (persuasion profile)</li> </ul>
Interactive Documentary Theory and Debate: Participation and Politics
<p>Interactive Documentary Theory and Debate: Participation and Politics by Kate Nash, University of Leeds 7th October 2021 held in the context of the virtual lecture series, hosted by the University of Bayreuth as a part of the research project Digital Documentary Practices – Topical paradigm shifts and the potential of emerging practices to participate in public discourses. </p> <p><a href="https://did.avinus.org/virtuelle-ringvorlesung-1/ ">https://did.avinus.org/virtuelle-ringvorlesung-1/ </a></p> <p>Kate Nash has not only been working on both the documentary film and on digital media; rather she exactly investigating this relationship between documentary’s tradition and documentary’s future, analysing on presently emerging documentary practices. “There is a sense of profound change, of new possibilities, and traditions overturned”, she states in her latest publication, Interactive Documentary. Theory and Debate. And yet, in this comprehensive monograph tracing continuities as well as turning points in the evolution of digital and documentary practices, she challenges tendencies to approach interactive documentary primarily from the perspective of total novelty and change because there are more evolutionary connections than revolutionary ruptures to be found. On this basis, Kate focus in her video on Participation and Politics. </p> <p>Having come from a background in media production, specializing in documentary, Kate focusses in her research on the production, circulation and impacts of factual media – thus also documentary. Being on of the most renowned scholars in the field of interactive documentary, her research output is incredible, and a list of publications in this area is tremendous. To give you just a glimpse on the scope of issues Kate has been analyzing in this context in the last year, let me just drop some titles: Among other’s, Kate is the author of “Modes of interactivity: analysing the webdoc”, “Telling stories: the narrative study of documentary ethics” (2012), “Clicking on the real: telling stories and engaging audiences through interactive documentaries” (2014), “Strategies of interaction, questions of meaning” (2014), “What is interactivity for? The social dimension of web-documentary participation” (2015), and “I-docs and the documentary tradition: exploring questions of citizenship” (2017). Most recently, Kate has also tackled the issue of ethics and VR documentary, editing a special issue in Studies in Documentary Film, and together with Craig Hight and Catherine Summerhayes, she edited New Documentary Ecologies. Emerging Platforms, Practices and Discourses (2014). And, as already mentioned, in her latest monograph, she investigates Interactive Documentary. Theory and Debate (2021). Moreover, Kate is a Co-Editor of the documentary studies journal Studies in Documentary Film. Currently, she is developing research in the area of health and environmental documentary, focusing particularly on engagement and impact.</p>
Data from: Four myriapod relatives – but who are sisters? No end to debates on relationships among the four major myriapod subgroups
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Resolving a heated debate: the utility of prescribed burning as a management tool for biodiversity on lowland heath
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Evolution of the Debate on Citizen Participation: A Bibliometric Analysis and a systematic literature review
<p>Attached it is possible to find results of the systematic literature review provides and discusses in the paper: <strong>Evolution of the Debate on Citizen Participation: A Bibliometric Analysis and a systematic literature review</strong></p>
Debate Eleitoral SBT 2014 (somente variáveis políticas)
<p>Dataset de memes codificados do debate eleitoral 2014 do SBT (somente variáveis políticas). O arquivo foi gerado pelo software Atlas.TI for Mac.</p>
Debate Eleitoral Band 2014
<p>Dataset de memes codificados do debate eleitoral 2014 da Band. O arquivo foi gerado pelo software Atlas.TI for Mac.</p>
Training data for the shared task Ideology and Power Identification in Parliamentary Debates (2024)
<p>This dataset contains a selection of speeches from <a href="https://www.clarin.eu/parlamint">ParlaMint</a> corpora (version 4.0) as the training set for the shared task on "<a href="https://touche.webis.de/clef24/touche24-web/ideology-and-power-identification-in-parliamentary-debates.html">Ideology and Power Identification in Parliamentary Debates</a>" in <a href="https://clef2024.imag.fr/">CLEF 2024</a>.</p> <p>All files are tab-separated text files with the following fields:</p> <ul> <li>"<em>id</em>" is a unique (arbitrary) ID for each text.</li> <li>"<em>speaker</em>" is a unique (arbitrary) ID for each speaker. There may be multiple speeches from the same speaker.</li> <li>"<em>sex</em>" is the (binary/biological) sex of the speaker. This information is collected from varying sources (typically data published by the respective parliament), and in some cases it may be unspecified or unknown.</li> <li>"<em>text</em>" is the transcribed text of the parliamentary speech. Real examples may include line breaks, and other special sequences escaped or quoted.</li> <li>"<em>text_en</em>" is an automatic English translation of the corresponding text. This field may be empty (obviously) for speeches in English, but the translations may be missing for a small number of non-English speeches as well.</li> <li>"<em>label</em>" is the binary/numeric label. For political orientation, 0 is left and 1 is right. For power identification 0 indicates coalition (or governing party) and 1 indicates opposition.</li> </ul> <p>File names indicate the task and the parliament. We provide data from the following national and regional parliaments.</p> <ul> <li>Austria (at)</li> <li>Bosnia and Herzegovina (ba)</li> <li>Belgium (be)</li> <li>Bulgaria (bg)</li> <li>Czechia (cz)</li> <li>Denmark (dk)</li> <li>Estonia (ee) [only political orientation]</li> <li>Spain (es)</li> <li>Catalonia (es-ct)</li> <li>Galicia (es-ga)</li> <li>Basque Country (es-pv) [only power]</li> <li>Finland (fi)</li> <li>France (fr)</li> <li>Great Britain (gb)</li> <li>Greece (gr)</li> <li>Croatia (hr)</li> <li>Hungary (hu)</li> <li>Iceland (is) [only political orientation]</li> <li>Italy (it)</li> <li>Latvia (lv)</li> <li>The Netherlands (nl)</li> <li>Norway (no) [only political orientation]</li> <li>Poland (pl)</li> <li>Portugal (pt)</li> <li>Serbia (rs)</li> <li>Sweden (se) [only political orientation]</li> <li>Slovenia (si)</li> <li>Turkey (tr)</li> <li>Ukraine (ua)</li> </ul> <p>The number of training instances and the class imbalance differs for each training set. We do not provide a fixed validation split. Please see the <a href="https://touche.webis.de/clef24/touche24-web/ideology-and-power-identification-in-parliamentary-debates.html">shared task website</a> for further description of the data set and the sampling process.</p>
Resolving the Do/Do Not Debate: Communication Perspective to Enhance Sustainable Lifestyles
<p>A statewide recycling message experiment was conducted (n= 1199) using an online survey panel. All identifying information (i.e., IP address, response ID) have been removed.</p>
Subspecies and Distribution. L.n.nigricollisF.Cuvier,1823—SIndia(SoftheGodavariRiver). L.n.aryabertensisHodgson,1844—SCNepal. L.n.dayanusBlanford,1874—SEPakistanandNWIndia(GreatIndianDesert). L.n.ruficaudatusE.GeoffroySaint-Hilaire,1826—EPakistan,NIndia,SNepal,Bangladesh,Bhutan,exceptthehigherreachesoftheHimalayasandthemangroveareaswithintheSundarbans. L.n.sadiyaKloss,1918—NEIndia(Assam). L.n.simcoxiWroughton,1912—CIndia(NMaharashtraandMadhyaPradesh). L. n. singhala Wroughton, 1915 — Sri Lanka. Indian hares (probably ruficaudatus) also occur in extreme E Afghanistan, in the border areas with Pakistan. Situation in Java is debated and the so called "Javan Hare" might be native there. The species has been introduced by founder individuals of either unknown subspeciesaffiliation or belonging to various subspecies into Comoro, Mayotte, Madagascar, Réunion (including Gunners Quoin I), Mauritius (Agaléga Is), Seychelles (Cousin I), and Andaman Is in the Indian Ocean, and into New Guinea. In Gunners Quoin the Indian Hare has been eradicated. in Leporidae
Subspecies and Distribution. L.n.nigricollisF.Cuvier,1823—SIndia(SoftheGodavariRiver). L.n.aryabertensisHodgson,1844—SCNepal. L.n.dayanusBlanford,1874—SEPakistanandNWIndia(GreatIndianDesert). L.n.ruficaudatusE.GeoffroySaint-Hilaire,1826—EPakistan,NIndia,SNepal,Bangladesh,Bhutan,exceptthehigherreachesoftheHimalayasandthemangroveareaswithintheSundarbans. L.n.sadiyaKloss,1918—NEIndia(Assam). L.n.simcoxiWroughton,1912—CIndia(NMaharashtraandMadhyaPradesh). L. n. singhala Wroughton, 1915 — Sri Lanka. Indian hares (probably ruficaudatus) also occur in extreme E Afghanistan, in the border areas with Pakistan. Situation in Java is debated and the so called "Javan Hare" might be native there. The species has been introduced by founder individuals of either unknown subspeciesaffiliation or belonging to various subspecies into Comoro, Mayotte, Madagascar, Réunion (including Gunners Quoin I), Mauritius (Agaléga Is), Seychelles (Cousin I), and Andaman Is in the Indian Ocean, and into New Guinea. In Gunners Quoin the Indian Hare has been eradicated.
CMV Debaters Dataset (Review Version)
<pre><strong>Analyzing Persuasion Strategies of Debaters on Social Media - Dataset</strong> This dataset contains 3,801 debaters from Reddit, their comment, and their persuasion effectiveness. The debates originate from the subreddit <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/cmv">Chage my View</a> and are extracted from the Webis CMV dataset (<a href="https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.632/">Al Khatib et al., 2020</a>). The dataset consists of three files in <a href="https://jsonlines.org/">JSON Lines</a> (.jsonl) format ## Content of the Dataset ``` +-- Reddit Debaters | +-- README.md # This information + file format description | +-- debaters.jsonl # Minimal dataset with only the (source) comment text and persuasiveness | +-- debaters-full.jsonl # All debater-level datapoints, computed an retrieved from Reddit | +-- comments.jsonl # All comments and comment-level datapoints for each debater ```</pre>
Respuestas Debate Cerrado
<p>Respuestas del Debate Cerrado surgido en el estudio Delphi.</p>
Supplementary Materials for "How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate"
<p>Supplementary Materials for Connolly et al. (2021), i.e., R. Connolly, W. Soon, M. Connolly, S. Baliunas, J. Berglund, C. J. Butler, R. G. Cionco, A. G. Elias, V. M. Fedorov, H. Harde, G. W. Henry, D. V. Hoyt, O. Humlum, D. R. Legates, S. Lüning, N. Scafetta, J.-E. Solheim, L. Szarka, H. van Loon, V. M. Velasco Herrera, R. C. Willson, H. Yan and W. Zhang (2021). How much has the Sun influenced Northern Hemisphere temperature trends? An ongoing debate. <em>Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics</em> 21, 131. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/6/131">https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/21/6/131</a></p> <p>1. Supplementary Materials for Connolly et al. (2021) originally hosted on the journal's website at https://www.raa-journal.org/docs/Supp/ms4906Supplementary%20Materials.xlsx</p> <p>2. Additional Supplementary Materials: Python 3 code, input files and output files used for generating various Land Surface Air Temperature time series used as part of the analysis of Connolly et al. (2021)</p> <p> </p>
Test data for the shared task Ideology and Power Identification in Parliamentary Debates 2024
<p>This dataset contains a selection of speeches from <a href="https://www.clarin.eu/parlamint">ParlaMint</a> corpora (version 4.0) as the test set for the shared task on "<a href="https://touche.webis.de/clef24/touche24-web/ideology-and-power-identification-in-parliamentary-debates.html">Ideology and Power Identification in Parliamentary Debates</a>" in <a href="https://clef2024.imag.fr/">CLEF 2024</a>. The format of the files are similar to the <a title="training set" href="10450640">training set</a>, with the exception that the labels are not provided in this data set.</p>
Transkripte von drei TV-Debatten mit Schweizer PolitikerInnen vor eidgenössischen Abstimmungen. Transcripts of three TV debates with Swiss politicians before popular votes.
<p>Der Datensatz enthält Transkripte (doc, htm, PDF) von drei 'Arena'-Abstimmungssendungen mit Schweizer PolitikerInnen vor eidgenössischen Abstimmungen. Die TV-Sendungen wurden nach GAT 2 transkribiert / The dataset contains transcripts (doc, htm, PDF) of three 'Arena' TV-debates with Swiss politicians before popular votes. The debates were transcribed according to GAT 2.</p>
Comment Dataset on Presidential 3rd Debate.
<p><em><span>The presidential election of the Republic of Indonesia (RI) some time ago was the main topic of public concern, especially at the third debate of the Indonesian presidential candidates which was aired on YouTube on January 7, 2024. At the event, there were many comments from YouTube users in the comment column that were interesting to analyze. This study aims to compare the performance of two classification algorithms in machine learning, namely naïve bayes and support vector machine (SVM). The stages passed in this study are data collection, data preprocessing, model classification and evaluation results. The data used is comment data in the comment column in the YouTube application which is crawled using Netlytic which produces 2.440 comments for analysis. Both algorithms are used to classify sentiment into two classes, namely positive and negative. The result of its performance is that the accuracy of naïve bayes is better than SVM for the dataset used, namely the accuracy of naïve bayes is 94.85% and SVM is 84.92%. </span></em></p>
Debate de control polí tico proyecto Hidroituango, Medellí n
<p><span><br></span></p> <p><span>Debate de control político proyecto Hidroituango, Medellín.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Kavilando</span></strong><span>: 17 Julio 2018</span></p> <p><span>Concejal Luz María Múnera – Sala de Crisis Social</span></p> <p><span>La Invitación es abierta a toda la Ciudadanía Defensora del Patrimonio Público y de los Derechos de las Comunidades impactadas por esta obra de "Progreso y Desarrollo", martes 24 de julio 9am recinto del Concejo de Medellín.</span></p> <p><span><br></span></p> <p><span><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcFjxzqeXdY">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcFjxzqeXdY</a> </span></p> <p><span>Por iniciativa de la Concejal Luz María Múnera y la Sala de Crisis Social, el Concejo de Medellín hará Debate de Control Político al proyecto Hidroituango el martes 24 de julio a partir de las nueve de la mañana (9:00 a.m.)</span></p> <p><span>La Invitación es abierta a toda la Ciudadanía Defensora del Patrimonio Público y de los Derechos de las Comunidades impactadas por esta obra de "Progreso y Desarrollo", para que asistan y participen.</span></p> <p><span> </span></p> <p><strong><span>Insuasty Rodriguez, Alfonso </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-1371"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2880-1371</span></strong></a><strong><span> Universidad de San Buenaventura - Medellín</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Barrera Machado, Daniela </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-6311"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-6311</span></strong></a><strong><span> Universidad de San Buenaventura - Medellín</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Villa Holguín, Edison Eduardo </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-3580"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1031-3580</span></strong></a><strong><span> Academia Superior de Artes</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Valencia Grajales, José Fernando </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4903"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8128-4903</span></strong></a><strong><span> Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana (UNAULA)</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Muñoz Gaviria, Gustavo Adolfo </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-0605"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-0605</span></strong></a><strong><span> Escuela Superior de Administración Pública ESAP</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Zuluaga Cometa, Héctor Alejandro </span></strong><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-8098"><strong><span>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-8098</span></strong></a><strong><span> Grupo de Investigación y Editorial Kavilando</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Martín Humberto Román, Concejo de Medellín </span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>David Sánchez Calle Concejo de Medellín</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Luz María Múnera Concejo de Medellín</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>REDIPAZ, Concejo de Medellín, Grupo de Investigación y Editorial Kavilando, Universidad Autónoma Latinoamericana (UNAULA), Universidad de San Buenaventura - Medellín, Escuela Superior de Administración Pública ESAP, Academia Superior de Artes</span></strong></p>
FIGURE 3 in The Cause and Effect of Polarization: Thoughts on the "Morphological vs. Molecular Debate" in Systematics, with Examples from the Study of Sturgeons (Actinopterygii: Acipenseridae)
FIGURE 3. Alternative reconstruction for the recovered morphological hypothesis based on a matrix of 62 characters. Nodes in common between the morphological and molecular character matrices are numbered the same and are denoted with an asterisk.
FIGURE 4 in The Cause and Effect of Polarization: Thoughts on the "Morphological vs. Molecular Debate" in Systematics, with Examples from the Study of Sturgeons (Actinopterygii: Acipenseridae)
FIGURE 4. One of three reconstructed molecular topologies based on the mitochondrial Cytochrome b gene. Nodes in common between the morphological and molecular character matrices are numbered the same and are denoted with an asterisk.
FIGURE 1 in Debating Liolaemidae diversity and classification, and a bit more: A response to Lobo et al.
FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic topologies of major clades of the Liolaemidae family presented by Schulte et al. (2000, 2004), Espinoza et al. (2004), Cruz et al. (2005) and Abdala (2007), compared to the topology presented in Figure 2 of Pincheira-Donoso et al.'s (2008; abbreviated P-D et al.). Note that all topologies are essentially identical, except of that of Cruz et al., which is in general highly similar in four of the six terminal branches depicted. Also, while Pincheira-Donoso et al.'s topology is entirely identical to Espinoza et al.'s tree, differences with the other four trees are almost entirely explained by different sets of clades included. For example, Ctenoblepharys and Phymaturus were not included in Schulte et al. (2004), while Ctenoblepharys was not included in Schulte et al. (2000). In both cases, however, the only species regarded by Pincheira-Donoso et al. (2008) and Abdala (2007) as member of the anomalus clade that was included in Schulte et al.'s (2000) and Cruz et al.'s (2004) studies, L. pseudoanomalus, is nested within the boulengeri clade. However, as declared by Pincheira-Donoso et al.'s (2008), the anomalus clade was recognized following phylogenetic evidence recently presented by Abdala (2007; see comments number 1 and 7 in the text for additional information). This comparative scheme demonstrates that Lobo et al.'s affirmation that two thirds of the phylogenetic tree presented by Pincheira-Donoso et al. (2008) differ from the rest of known (and cited) phylogenetic hypotheses known for Liolaemidae, is unjustified. Liolaemidae clades are detailed at the right hand side of the panel, where colours that identify lineages are shown. All groups identified as "clades" are lineages of the Liolaemus genus. The archeforuslineomaculatus clade is abbreviated (arch-lineo clade). The name 'boulengeri' clade is the same used by Etheridge (1995) and Espinoza et al. (2004).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.