Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
667
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
667 results for “distinguishability”
Fig. 10 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 10. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering tree based on shape similarities of test specimens (male as yellow and female as gray) and reference data of Haematobosca sanguinolenta and H. aberrans. Euclidean distances were used for the construction of the tree. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 2. The topographic map of the Haematobosca fly collection sites in Thailand: Chiang Mai (1), Kanchanaburi (2), and Nakhon Ratchasima (3) (A). The Nzi trap used for fly collection was placed near animal hosts at each collection site (B, C). This map was prepared from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Map Viewer available at http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/, accessed on February 10, 2023.
Fig. 9 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 9. Factor map of the principal components (PC1, 46% as horizontal axis and PC2, 22% as vertical axis) from wing shape variables of test specimens (male and female) and reference data of Haematobosca sanguinolenta and H. aberrans. Squares represent mean values in each group.
Fig. 8 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 8. Linear regression between centroid size and the first shape-based principal component (PC) of Haematobosca sanguinolenta (A) and H. aberrans (B). Linear regression prediction is shown by the orange dots. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3. The 10 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 3. The 10 landmarks on the wing of Haematobosca flies used in the wing geometric morphometric analysis.
Fig. 7 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 7. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering tree based on shape similarities of each individual for male and female Haematobosca sanguinolenta and H. aberrans. Euclidean distances were used for the construction of the tree.
Fig. 1 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 1. Heads in the lateral view and the pleura of Haematobosca sanguinolenta (A, B) and H. aberrans (C, D). The anterior and posterior katepisternal setae (arrow) were used to distinguish between both species. Photographs were prepared by the authors.
Fig. 5 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 5. Mean shape of male (A) and female (B) Haematobosca sanguinolenta and H. aberrans after Procrustes superimposition.
Fig. 6 in Wing geometric morphometrics to distinguish and identify Haematobosca flies (Diptera: Muscidae) from Thailand
Fig. 6. Factor map of the first two principal components (PC1, 47% as horizontal axis and PC2, 33% as vertical axis) of wing shape variables (A) and factor map of the first two discriminant factors (DF1, 66.8% as horizontal axis and DF2, 31.8% as vertical axis, the two discriminant factors represent 98.6% of the total discriminant space) of wing shape variables (B). Each point represents the individuals of male and female Haematobosca sanguinolenta and H. aberrans, and each polygon corresponds to a different species and sex. Squares represent the mean values in each group.
Figure 2 in Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish barracudas Sphyraena sphyraena and Sphyraena viridensis from the Algerian coast
Figure 2. - Photographs of left (L) and right (R) sagittal otoliths of S. sphyraena (LT = 37 cm) and S. viridensis (LT = 53 cm), captured in the Gulf of Annaba.
Figure 3 in Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish barracudas Sphyraena sphyraena and Sphyraena viridensis from the Algerian coast
Figure 3. - Canonical discriminant analysis achieved with both otolith of the two species of Barracuda Sphyraena sphyraena (S. s) and Sphyraena viridensis (S. v) (x) S. s right, (o) S. s left, (+) S. v right and (Δ) S.v left.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Rhigognostis senilella (Zetterstedt, 1839) and R. marmorosella (Wocke, 1849): two valid species distinguishable in genitalia (Lepidoptera, Plutellidae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/7f7f36b4-db90-4f32-a034-4ff4502d24c3">https://bionomia.net/dataset/7f7f36b4-db90-4f32-a034-4ff4502d24c3</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/7f7f36b4-db90-4f32-a034-4ff4502d24c3">https://gbif.org/dataset/7f7f36b4-db90-4f32-a034-4ff4502d24c3</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Revision of the Metallactus generosus species-group with a preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the endophallus morphology in distinguishing critical sibling species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Revision of the Metallactus generosus species-group with a preliminary evaluation of the effectiveness of the endophallus morphology in distinguishing critical sibling species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/43278c49-82a8-40a3-88c8-6e28bfb08a7e">https://bionomia.net/dataset/43278c49-82a8-40a3-88c8-6e28bfb08a7e</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/43278c49-82a8-40a3-88c8-6e28bfb08a7e">https://gbif.org/dataset/43278c49-82a8-40a3-88c8-6e28bfb08a7e</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Figure 2 in How to distinguish the Xestotrachelus Bruner, 1913 (Orthoptera: Romaleidae: Romaleini) from other Romaleini in South America, with a report of the first record in Minas Gerais, Brazil
Figure 2. Pinned specimens of Xestotrachelus robustus (Bruner, 1911) collected at Panga Ecological Reserve. A) Female. B) Male. Scale bar = 0.5 cm.
Figure 3 in How to distinguish the Xestotrachelus Bruner, 1913 (Orthoptera: Romaleidae: Romaleini) from other Romaleini in South America, with a report of the first record in Minas Gerais, Brazil
Figure 3. South America distribution map of Xestotrachelus robustus (Bruner, 1911) specimens. Black circles indicate previously known records (Table 1) and the red circle indicates the new record from Minas Gerais state.
Figure 1 in How to distinguish the Xestotrachelus Bruner, 1913 (Orthoptera: Romaleidae: Romaleini) from other Romaleini in South America, with a report of the first record in Minas Gerais, Brazil
Figure 1. Live Xestotrachelus robustus (Bruner, 1911) specimens collected at Panga Ecological Reserve. A) Males trying to copulate with the female (bigger one). B) Female dorsal view. C) Female abdomen with red punctuations in the dorsal, lateral, and ventral regions.
FIG. 3. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s in Reinstatement of the endemic New Caledonian genus Thiollierea Montrouz. (Rubiaceae) necessitated by the polyphyly of Bikkia Reinw. as currently circumscribed
FIG. 3. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s. and Thiollierea Montrouz., part 2: A, twisting of anthers; B, indument of filament; C, organization of placentation; D, shape of seeds (L. Barrabé & M. Toussirot). Scale bars: A, B, 1 cm; C, D, 1 mm.
FIG. 2. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s in Reinstatement of the endemic New Caledonian genus Thiollierea Montrouz. (Rubiaceae) necessitated by the polyphyly of Bikkia Reinw. as currently circumscribed
FIG. 2. — Key morphological features distinguishing Bikkia Reinw. s.s. and Thiollierea Montrouz., part 1: A, texture of abaxial leaf lamina; B, type and apex of stipules; C, inflorescence habit; D, margins of calyx lobes (L. Barrabé & M. Toussirot). Scale bars: A, C, 1 cm; B, D, 1 mm.
Figure 5 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Figure 5. Box plots of Kimura two-parameter (K2P) distance of 672 bp cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequences within and between Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes. Boxes indicate interquartile range (upper line, quartile 3; lower line, quartile 1). Horizontal lines with boxes indicate median and whiskers the minimum and the maximum values. Outliers are shown as individual circles.
Figure 4 in Three ways to distinguish species: using behavioural, ecological, and molecular data to tell apart two closely related ants, Camponotus renggeri and Camponotus rufipes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Figure 4. Genetic structure analyses of Camponotus renggeri (yellow) and Camponotus rufipes (red) workers from Mogi- Guaçu (Brazil), using microsatellites. A, model-based assignment of individuals to the most likely number of clusters (K = 2) using STRUCTURE software. B, model-based assignment of individuals to different classes of hybrids or 'pure' species. Each individual is represented by a vertical line and the colours indicate the probability of the individual being assigned to a group in (A), or a hybrid or 'pure species' class in (B). C, scatterplot of the model-free principal coordinates analysis considering the two first principal coordinates (PCo1 and 2).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.