Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

49

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

49 results for “fossil taxonomy”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Fig. 5 in Fossil freshwater sponges: Taxonomy, geographic distribution, and critical review

Fig. 5. Morphology of gemmuloscleres of Recent freshwater sponges of the order Spongillida. A. Cherokeesia armata Copeland, Pronzato, and Manconi, 2015, Nearctic Region, bean-like to ovoid strongyles. B. Potamophloios stendelli (Jaffé, 1916), Afrotropical Region, elongate to ovular strongyles. C. Oncosclera jewelli (Volkmer-Ribeiro, 1963), Neotropical Region, irregularly ovoid strongyles smooth or covered with short spines and tubercles. D. Corvospongilla loricata (Weltner, 1895), Afrotropical Region, slightly curved, stout, spiny strongyles. E. Sanidastra yokotonensis Volkmer-Ribeiro and Watanabe, 1983, Palaearctic Region, oxeas with 2–9 rays rounded to pointed or tricuspidate at tips. F. Spongilla lacustris (Linnaeus, 1759), NearcticPalaearctic Region, oxeas strongly bent with large spines. G. Pectispongilla aurea Annandale, 1909, Oriental Region, botryoidal gemmuloscleres with smooth shaft with at the apex polygonal concavities of the botryum. H. Anheteromeyenia argyrosperma (Potts, 1880), Nearctic Region, birotules with spiny shafts and circular rotules with crenulated to indented margins. I. Corvomeyenia everetti (Mills, 1884), Nearctic Region, pseudobirotules with straight, smooth shafts and pseudo-rotules at the apex (up to 10 hooks). J. Acalle recurvata (Bowerbank, 1863), Neotropical Region, pseudobirotules with cylindrical shaft and hooks of umbonate pseudorotules stout and notably recurved bearing microspines at their apices. K. Dosilia plumosa (Carter, 1849), Oriental Region, birotules with large spines on the straight shaft and flat to slightly umbonate rotules with margins bearing small blunt, recurved teeth (spines). L. Racekiela ryderi (Potts, 1882), Nearctic-Neotropical-Palaearctic Region, birotules with smooth shafts and large disk-like rotules with serrated margins and scattered spines or tubercles. M. Ephydatia muelleri (Lieberkühn, 1855), Afrotropical-Nearctic-Palaearctic Region, birotules with smooth, short shaft and rotules with indented margins. N. Trochospongilla horrida (Weltner, 1893), Nearctic-Palaearctic Region, birotules with smooth, short shaft and approximately circular rotules with irregularly thickened margins. O. Acalle recurvata (Bowerbank, 1863), Neotropical Region, tubelliform gemmuloscleres with the proximal large irregularly circular flat rotule with entire margin supporting a smooth shaft decreasing in thickness toward the distal end shaped as umbonate knob-like rotule with a few teeth. P. Drulia browni (Bowerbank, 1863), Neotropical Region, parmuliform gemmuloscleres with the single circular proximal rotule, with lower concave surface, supporting a distal short acute conical stem (shaft). SEM images. Modified from Manconi and Pronzato (2001, 2002) and Copeland et al. (2015).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 6 - Number of fossil spider species described from each geological period. The Paleogene Period has been broken down into its various Epochs (Paleocene, Eocene and Oligocene) in order to show the spread of data; the Neogene Period is represented only by the Miocene Epoch because Pleistocene sub-fossils have not been included.

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 5 - Number of fossil spider species described by different arachnologists. Only first authorship data are considered, so in reality some authors will have described more species than the value indicated.

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 2 - The numbers of described fossil spider species by year. Note that data for the 126 years where no fossil spider species were described are not included. Hence, the actual lull periods between peaks of activity are artificially shortened in this graph. For example, the period between the first described fossil spider in 1822 and the next data plot is actually 32 years. Squares = newly described fossil spider species, triangles = cumulative number of described fossil spider species. Data derived from Dunlop et al. (2012).

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 3 - The cumulative number of newly described extant spider species this century. Data from Platnick (2001–2012). Total number of described extant species = 42,751 (Platnick 2012).

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 1 - The evolutionary tree of spiders (updated from Penney and Selden 2011: data table 4) showing known ranges of spider families based on described fossils and predicted ranges of sister taxa based on their phylogenetic relationships (strictly fossil families inserted in approximate positions as per hypothesized relationships proposed in the literature, but not based on any cladistic analysis). Note that this is a highly dynamic figure, with known ranges and predicted ranges changing frequently as a result of new fossil discoveries, changes in phylogenetic hypotheses, revised dating of various deposits and even potentially through revised dating of geological periods and epochs. Researchers should check Dunlop et al. (currently 2012 and updated every six months) for the most recent data on the oldest fossils of each family and genus.

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: The fossil Osmundales (Royal Ferns)—a phylogenetic network analysis, revised taxonomy, and evolutionary classification of anatomically preserved trunks and rhizomes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2018View details →
zenodo24/100

Figure 4 from: Dunlop J, Penney D (2012) Summary statistics for fossil spider species taxonomy. ZooKeys 192: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.192.3093

Figure 4 - Number of fossil spider species per family (as currently assigned).

opencc-by-4.0May 2012View details →
zenodo20/100

FIGURE 3 in Reconciling diagnostic traits in living and fossil taxa: The taxonomy and evolution of the genus Microceratina (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Cytheruridae)

FIGURE 3. Microceratina martensi Namiotko et al., 2004, valve and carapace morphology, external views (A–D: 'LV-1'; E, F: 'C-4'; G–J: 'RV-6'): A–D—LV; A—general view; B–D—details of primary reticula cells and secondary fossae, and shape of ribs, ridges, pore conuli (A"-type) and LStPC located within shallow alveolar excavations; E, F—carapace in latero-ventral and dorsal view; G–J—RV; G—general view; H—normal pore with sensillum, located on conulus (A"-type); I–J—various combinations of LStPC located within shallow alveolar excavations.

opennotspecifiedFeb 2023View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record