Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

4,215

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

4,215 results for “high risk”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Data from: Are Mediterranean marine threatened species at high risk by climate change?

<p><span>Rapid anthropogenic climate change is driving threatened biodiversity one step closer to extinction. Effects on native biodiversity are determined by an interplay between species' exposure to climate change and their specific ecological and life-history characteristics that render them even more susceptible. Impacts on biodiversity have already been reported; however, a systematic risk evaluation of threatened marine populations is lacking. Here, we employ a trait-based approach to assess the risk of 90 threatened marine Mediterranean species to climate change, combining species' exposure to increased sea temperature and intrinsic vulnerability. One-quarter of the threatened marine biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea is predicted to be under elevated levels of climate risk, with </span><span>various traits </span><span>identified as key vulnerability traits</span><span>. Climate risk, vulnerability and exposure hotspots are distributed along the Western Mediterranean, Alboran, Aegean, and Adriatic Seas. At each Mediterranean marine ecoregion, 21% to 31% of their threatened species have high climate risk. All Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas host threatened species with high risk to climate change, with 90% having a minimum of 4 up to 19 species of high climate risk, making the objective of a climate-smart conservation strategy a crucial task for immediate planning and action. Our findings aspire to offer new insights for systematic, spatially strategic planning and prioritization of vulnerable marine life in the face of accelerating climate change.</span></p>

opencc-zeroJan 2023View details →
dryad36/100

The effectiveness and safety of intensive lipid-lowering with different Rosuvastatin-based regimens in patients at high risk: A nonblind, randomized, controlled trial

<p><span><strong>Background</strong>:</span> <span>Statin alone or nonstatins as add-ons have been introduced to intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) </span><span>lowering</span><span> therapy in patients at high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different statin-based regimens for patients at high risk</span><span>.</span></p> <p><span><strong>Methods</strong>:</span> <span>Three hundred patients at high CVD risk were randomly assigned to the statin group</span><span> (Rosuvastatin 20mg/d</span><span>), statin_EZ group</span> <span>(Rosuvastatin 10mg/d + ezetimibe </span><span>10mg/d</span><span>),  statin_pcsk group (Rosuvastatin </span><span>10mg/d</span><span> + alirocumab </span><span>75mg/2</span><span>weeks) or combine3 group (Rosuvastatin 10mg/d + ezetimibe 10mg/d + alirocumab 75mg/2weeks)</span><span>.</span> <span>The primary outcome measure was cholesterol levels </span><span>(LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC) triglycerides (TGs), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C))</span><span> after 24</span><span> weeks of</span><span> follow-up. The secondary outcome measures were safety markers and the proportion of patients who achieved the &lt; 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) LDL-C target. </span><span>A logistic</span><span> regression model was performed to explore the factors affecting lipid target achievement.</span></p> <p><span><strong>Results</strong>:</span> <span>The TC and LDL-C levels after treatment were significantly different among the four groups</span> <span>(p &lt; 0.05). The levels in both the combine3 group and </span><span>the </span><span>statin_pcsk9 group were significantly lower than </span><span>those in </span><span>the statin group and the statin_EZ group (</span><span>p &lt; 0.05</span><span>), but there was no significant difference between</span><span> the</span><span> combine3 group and </span><span>the </span><span>statin_pcsk9 group. The incidence of adverse events in the four groups was low.</span><span> Body mass index (BMI) and hypertensive status were related to target achievement.</span></p> <p><span><strong>Conclusion</strong>:</span><span> The combination of a statin</span><span> and a PCSK9 inhibitor was safe and more effective for the treatment of high-risk CVD patients, while the addition of </span><span>ezetimibe was</span><span> unable to significantly lower lipid levels any further. The rate of achieving </span><span>the </span><span>target was higher in patients </span><span>with</span><span> hypertension and a low BMI.</span></p>

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Polymorphisms in genes related to inflammation and endothelial function in the high-risk stroke population

<p><span><strong>Aim</strong>:</span><span> T</span><span>o investigate </span><span>incidence of ischemic stroke and other vascular events during a 4.7-year follow-up </span><span>in the </span><span>high-risk stroke population</span><span>, and to identify </span><span>the associations of </span><span>the 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)</span> <span>in genes related to inflammation and endothelial function</span><span> and </span><span>interaction among these</span> <span>SNPs</span><span> with outcomes. </span><span> </span></p> <p><span><strong>Methods</strong>: </span><span>According to </span><span>the China National Stroke Screening Survey programme, we performed this multi-center </span><span>community</span><span>-based sectional survey and prospective cohort</span> <span>study in the Sichuan of southwestern China </span><span>from May 2015 to January 2020</span><span>. Eight communities were randomly selected in </span><span>Sichuan, </span><span>and the </span><span>residents in each community volunteered to participate in a face-to-face survey. </span><span>The 19 SNPs</span><span> in </span><span>genes related to </span><span>endothelial function and inflammation </span><span>were measured in </span><span>the high-risk stroke population</span><span>. </span><span>All subjects in high-risk stroke populations were followed-up for 4.7 years after the face-to-face survey. The primary outcome was a new ischemic stroke; the secondary outcome was a composite of new vascular events. </span></p> <p><span><strong>Results</strong>: </span><span>A total of</span><span> 2893 high-risk stroke population, </span><span>2698 (93.3%) completed a 4.7-year follow-up. Outcomes occurred in 192 (7.1%) subjects (</span><span>118 [4.4%] new </span><span>ischemic stroke</span><span>, 24 [0.9%] </span><span>hemorrhagic stroke, </span><span>53 [2.0%] </span><span>myocardial infarction</span><span>, and 33[1.2%]</span><span> death) in </span><span>the </span><span>2698</span><span> high-risk stroke population. </span><span>There were significant differences in </span><span>genotype distribution</span> <span>of</span><span> <em>TNF</em></span><span> rs3093662,</span><span> <em>IL6R</em> rs4845625 and <em>TLR4</em> rs752998</span> <span>between s</span><span>ubjects with and without outcomes</span><span> by </span><span>univariate analyses. </span><span>Generalized multifactor dimensionality reduction (GMDR) </span><span>analysis showed that </span><span>there was a significant gene-gene interaction among the </span><span>19 SNPs, the best model for outcomes was interaction among </span><em><span>IL6R</span></em><span> rs4845625, </span><span><em>TLR4</em> </span><span>rs1927911 and</span> <em><span>HABP2</span></em><span> rs932650</span> <span>(<em>P</em> = </span><span>0.004</span><span>).</span><span> The high-risk </span><span>interactive genotypes</span><span> among the 3 SNPs were independently associated with a higher risk for new ischemic stroke </span><span> (OR = 2.187, 95% CI: 1.256–5.374, <em>P</em></span>&lt;<span>0.001</span><span>) </span><span>and total vascular events </span><span>(OR = 2.382, 95% CI: 1.423–5.894, <em>P</em></span>&lt;<span>0.001</span><span>) </span><span>after adjustment with covariates. </span></p> <p><span><strong>Conclusion</strong>: </span><span>The </span><span>incidence of ischemic stroke and other vascular events was </span><span>found to be very high in the </span><span>high-risk stroke population. </span><span>There were associations of specific SNPs</span> <span>in genes related to inflammation and endothelial function</span><span> with outcomes. The high-risk </span><span>interactive genotypes among </span><em><span>IL6R</span></em><span> rs4845625, </span><span><em>TLR4</em> </span><span>rs1927911 and</span> <em><span>HABP2</span></em><span> rs932650 were in</span><span>dependently associated with a higher risk </span><span>for </span><span>new ischemic stroke and other vascular events.</span><span> These findings are expected to</span> <span>provide</span> <span>new strategies for prevention of </span><span>ischemic stroke and other vascular events.</span> </p>

opencc-zeroMay 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

HPV Vaccine Immunity in High-risk Women

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04590521. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

E-PRISM: Phase II Trial of Elotuzumab Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02279394. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Assess Incidence of Deep Vein Thrombosis(DVT)Following Administration of Recombinant Human Antithrombin (rhAT) to Hereditary Antithrombin(AT) Deficient Patients in High Risk Situations.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00056550. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 6. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Anticaries Effect of Xylitol,Probiotic and Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinses Among Individuals at High Risk

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04399161. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

High-Dose Gemcitabine, Busulfan and Melphalan With Hematopoietic-Cell Support for Patients With Poor-Risk Myeloma

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01237951. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Effectiveness and Safety Study of Early add-on of Ezetimibe With Atorvastatin in Very High-risk Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05761444. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Hormone Suppression and Radiation Therapy for 6 Months With/Without Docetaxel for High Risk Prostate Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00116142. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Genistein in Preventing Breast Cancer in Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00290758. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Yttrium-90 Anti-CD45 Monoclonal Antibody BC8 Followed by Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With High-Risk AML, ALL, or MDS

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01300572. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Study Of Weight-Based Versus Standard Dose Enoxaparin Thromboprophylaxis In High-Risk Hospitalized Cancer Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02706249. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

SGLT-2 Inhibitor and Myocardial Perfusion, Function and Metabolism in T2 DM Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03151343. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 25.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Pembrolizumab + Lenalidomide Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) in High-risk Multiple Myeloma (MM)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02906332. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 57.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Study of Obeldesivir in Participants With COVID-19 Who Have a High Risk of Developing Serious or Severe Illness

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05603143. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 18. Publications: 2.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Chemotherapy After Prostatectomy (CAP) For High Risk Prostate Carcinoma

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00132301. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Comparison of HD Chemotherapy Followed by Auto-transplant and R-CHOP in High Risk Patients With DLBCL.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00355199. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Oral Islatravir (MK-8591) Once-Monthly as Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in Men and Transgender Women Who Are at High Risk for HIV-1 Infection (MK-8591-024)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04652700. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 7. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

A Multiple Ascending Dose Study of Pegozafermin in Participants With Biopsy Confirmed Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) or Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and at High Risk of NASH

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04048135. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 2. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record