Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
107
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
107 results for “larval frogs”
FIGURE 4 in Larval morphology in four species of Madagascan frogs of the subgenus Brygoomantis (Mantellidae: Mantidactylus)
FIGURE 4. Drawings of the preserved voucher tadpole of Mantidactylus biporus (stage 37), series ZSM 879/2004 (part of dorsal fin cut for tissue sample); (A) dorsal view, (B) lateral view, (C) oral disc.
FIGURE 9 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 9. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 34) of Mantella viridis (ZSM 797/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 5 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 5. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 36) of Mantella crocea/milotympanum (ZSM 1414/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 2 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 2. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 42) of Mantella baroni (ZSM 1418/2004) in (a) lateral (b)
FIGURE 6 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 6. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 25) of Mantella laevigata (ZSM 1447/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photography of its oral disc (ZSM 1502/2004; GS 38). Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 1 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 1. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 30) of Mantella aurantiaca (ZSM 1478/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 4 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 4. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 41) of Mantella betsileo (ZSM 616/2003) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 3 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 3. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 35) of Mantella bernhardi (ZSM 835/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 8 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 8. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 28) of Mantella pulchra (ZSM 1/2008) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 7 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 7. Drawings of the preserved tadpole specimen (GS 41) of Mantella madagascariensis (ZSM 1425/2004) in (a) lateral and (b) dorsal view, and (c) photograph of its oral disc. Scale bar represents 5 mm, and 1 mm, respectively.
FIGURE 10 in Comparative larval morphology in Madagascan frogs of the genus Mantella (Amphibia: Mantellidae)
FIGURE 10. Graphical results obtained by statistical analysis; (a) NMDS analysis performed without M. baroni and M. madagacariensis; (b) PCA analysis for GS group 1 (includes tadpoles between GS 24–29); (c) PCA analysis for GS group 2 (includes tadpoles between GS 30–39); (d) PCA analysis for GS group 3 (group 3 includes tadpoles between GS 41–44). Each species is represented with its own symbol and each colour represents one Mantella species group.
FIGURE 10 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 10. Proportions (%) of simple tonal calls (black) and other call types (grey) in the three parts of a natural calling session of Rhacophorus helenae containing 15 call series.
FIGURE 9 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 9. Proportions (%) of different calls types in the initial and final (A) and middle (B) parts of all series within the recorded calling session of Rhacophorus helenae.
FIGURE 3 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 3. External morphology of the tadpole of Rhacophorus helenae (ZMMU NAP-03164, Stage 37, TL 40.1 mm). (A) lateral view; (B) dorsal view; (C) coloration in preservative.
FIGURE 6 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 6. Waveform (A) and spectrogram (B) of different call types of Rhacophorus helenae: 1—simple tonal, 2—tonal with pulses, 3—simple wideband, 4—wideband with pulses, 5—pulsed calls, and 1-4 —example of transitional call. The waveform shows the presence of rhythmic amplitude modulation in some call types. Call sequence and intervals are not natural.
FIGURE 2 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood dendrogram of Rhacophorus derived from the analysis of 843 bp of 16S rRNA mtDNA gene. Voucher samples and GenBank accession numbers are given in Table 1. Numbers near nodes represent bootstrap support values (1000 replicates) for ML / and posterior probabilities (PP) for Bayesian inferences respectively.
FIGURE 1 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 1. Known distribution of Rhacophorus helenae in southern Vietnam. Yellow dots correspond to localities reported by Rowley et al. (2012a); red dots correspond to localities reported in the present study. Locality information: 1—Nui Ong Nature Reserve, Binh Thuan Province; 2—Tan Phu Forest, Dong Nai Province; 3—Binh Chau–Phuoc Buu Nature Reserve, Ba Ria– Vung Tau Province; 4—Ma Da Forest, Dong Nai Province.
FIGURE 5 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 5. Differences in coloration (A, B) and webbing development (C, D) between juvenile (approximately one month after the completion of metamorphosis) and adult Rhacophorus helenae. Photographs by V. Trounov.
FIGURE 4 in Larval morphology and complex vocal repertoire of Rhacophorus helenae (Anura: Rhacophoridae), a rare flying frog from Vietnam
FIGURE 4. Larval mouthparts morphology of Rhacophorus helenae (ZMMU NAP-03164, Stage 37, TL 40.1 mm) (A) and coexisting large rhacophorids: (B) Rhacophorus annamensis (NAP-02609, Stage 35, TL 38.8 mm); (C) Polypedates megacephalus (NAP-02415, Stage 37, TL 33.8 mm).
FIGURE 7 in Larval morphology of Dart-Poison Frogs (Anura: Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae and Dendrobatidae)
FIGURE 7. Topology of the Dendrobatoidea as presented by Grant et al. (2006), together with the topology of Dendrobatinae in Brown and Twomey et al. (2011). Gray lines represent some differences between these two topologies with that of Santos et al. (2009). The only genus whose monophyly is different in different topologies is that of Colostethus. The distribution of the generalized morphologies of the three features studied (Upper jaw sheath, Gut morphology and Nostril ornamentation) is depicted over the topology. S gut = Sinistrally long coiled gut concealing other organs behind; D = Differentiated short gut with visible organs; P nostril = projection on the inner margin of the nasal rim; NP nostril = No projection on the inner margin of the nasal rim. See other figures and text for further explanation. Exceptions and particular cases are explained in the text.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.