Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

176

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

176 results for “management tool”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

Evaluation of a Computer-Based, Self-Management Tool for People With Type 2 Diabetes

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00877851. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov36/100

i-Matter: Investigating an mHealth Texting Tool for Embedding Patient-reported Data Into Diabetes Management

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03652389. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Resolving a heated debate: the utility of prescribed burning as a management tool for biodiversity on lowland heath

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJun 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Does a decision support tool designed to depict West Nile Virus risk explain variation in ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) use of managed forests?

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2025View details →
dryad36/100

Empowering regional conservation: Genetic diversity assessments as a tool for eelgrass management

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Hunting suitability model: A new tool for managing wild ungulates

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2023View details →
dryad36/100

In-situ feeding as a new management tool to conserve orphaned Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Development and testing of an environmental DNA (eDNA) assay for endangered Atlantic sturgeon to assess its potential as a monitoring and management tool

<p>Significant declines in Atlantic sturgeon (<i>Acipenser oxyrhynchus oxyrhynchus</i>) abundances along the US east coast have spurred major research efforts and management actions over the last 50 years, yet information on spawning stock abundances and habitat use is still lacking for many river systems, including in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Here, we developed and tested a new quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay to detect Atlantic sturgeon environmental DNA (eDNA) in water samples with the goal of providing an alternative method to monitor presence and relative abundance. We also examined Atlantic sturgeon eDNA shedding rates in laboratory experiments. A qPCR-probe assay targeting  Cytochrome-B  was developed and showed no amplification of other related and co-occurring fishes. Pond trials at a density of ~0.2 g/L sturgeon produced relatively strong eDNA detections (~1,000-25,000 copies/L) in all seven water samples assayed. Water samples taken from two river systems in the Chesapeake Bay produced zero eDNA detections in the summer, while fall sampling during sturgeon spawning produced positive eDNA detections in 26% of samples, though at much lower concentrations (400-1,800 copies/L) compared with the pond (mesocosm) detections.  Acoustic detections of sturgeon near river sampling sites were positively associated with eDNA detections. However, the eDNA assay failed to detect the presence of sturgeon in some samples when abundances were very low or when fish were in deep water. Finally, Atlantic sturgeon eDNA shedding rates were estimated to be on the order of estimates for other fish species, which suggests that relatively weak detections in the field are not necessarily driven by low rates of eDNA shedding. Overall, eDNA analysis represents a promising new monitoring tool for Atlantic sturgeon. Applying these methods in other rivers along the US east coast is an important next step in documenting Atlantic sturgeon distribution for management and conservation purposes.</p>

opencc-zeroNov 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritisation software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools

1. Well-designed marine protected area (MPA) networks can deliver a range of ecological, economic and social benefits, and so a great deal of research has focused on developing spatial conservation prioritization tools to help identify important areas. 2. However, whilst these software tools are designed to identify MPA networks that both represent biodiversity and minimize impacts on stakeholders, they do not consider complex ecological processes. Thus, it is difficult to determine the impacts that proposed MPAs could have on marine ecosystem health, fisheries and fisheries sustainability. 3. Using the eastern English Channel as a case study, this paper explores an approach to address these issues by identifying a series of MPA networks using the Marxan and Marxan with Zones conservation planning software and linking them with a spatially explicit ecosystem model developed in Ecopath with Ecosim. We then use these to investigate potential trade-offs associated with adopting different MPA management strategies. 4. Limited-take MPAs, which restrict the use of some fishing gears, could have positive benefits for conservation and fisheries in the eastern English Channel, even though they generally receive far less attention in research on MPA network design. 5. Our findings, however, also clearly indicate that no-take MPAs should form an integral component of proposed MPA networks in the eastern English Channel, as they not only result in substantial increases in ecosystem biomass, fisheries catches and the biomass of commercially valuable target species, but are fundamental to maintaining the sustainability of the fisheries. 6. Synthesis and applications. Using the existing software tools Marxan with Zones and Ecopath with Ecosim in combination provides a powerful policy-screening approach. This could help inform marine spatial planning by identifying potential conflicts and by designing new regulations that better balance conservation objectives and stakeholder interests. In addition, it highlights that appropriate combinations of no-take and limited-take marine protected areas might be the most effective when making trade-offs between long-term ecological benefits and short-term political acceptability.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Evaluating tools for the spatial management of fisheries

1. The ability to define the spatial dynamics of fish stocks is critical to fisheries management. Combating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and the implementation of area based management through physical patrols and port side controls are growing areas of management attention. Augmenting the existing approaches to fisheries management with forensic techniques has the potential to increase compliance and enforcement success rates. 2. We tested the accuracy of three techniques that can be used to identify geographic origin (genotyping, otolith microchemistry and morphometrics). We used fish caught from three fishing grounds separated by a minimum of 5km and a maximum of 60km to list the accuracy of these approaches at relatively small spatial scales. 3. Using nearest-neighbor analyses, morphometric analysis was the most accurate (79.5%) in assigning individual fish to their fishing ground of origin. Neither otolith microchemistry (54.0%) or genetic analyses (52.4%) had sufficient assignment accuracy at the spatial scales we examined. 4. The combination of accuracy and minimal resource requirements make morphometric analyses a promising tool for assessing compliance with area based fishing restrictions at the scale of kilometers and have promising application especially in small scale fisheries through to community-based management approaches where technical and financial resources are limited.22-Jun-2018

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Signatures of selection for bonamiosis resistance in European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis): new genomic tools for breeding programs and management of natural resources

The European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) is a highly appreciated mollusk with an important aquaculture production throughout the 20th century, in addition to playing an important role on coastal ecosystems. Overexploitation of natural beds, habitat degradation, introduction of non-native species and epidemic outbreaks have severely affected this important resource, particularly, the protozoan parasite Bonamia ostreae, which is the main concern affecting its production and conservation. In order to identify genomic regions and markers potentially associated with bonamiosis resistance, six oyster beds distributed throughout the European Atlantic coast were sampled. Three of them have been exposed to this parasite since the early 1980's and showed some degree of innate resistance (long-term affected group, LTA), while the other three were free of B. ostreae at least until sampling date (naïve group, NV). A total of 14,065 SNPs were analyzed, including 37 markers from candidate genes and 14,028 from a medium density SNP array. Gene diversity was similar between LTA and NV groups suggesting no genetic erosion due to long term exposure to the parasite, and three population clusters were detected using the whole dataset. Tests for divergent selection between NV and LTA groups detected the presence of a very consistent set of 22 markers, located within a putative single genomic region, which suggests the presence of a major quantitative trait locus associated with B. ostreae resistance. Moreover, 324 outlier loci associated with factors other than bonamiosis were identified allowing fully discrimination of all the oyster beds. A practical tool which included the 84 highest discriminative markers for tracing O. edulis populations was developed and tested with empirical data. Results reported herein could assist the production of stocks with improved resistance to bonamiosis, and facilitate the management of oyster beds for recovery production and ecosystem services provided by this species.

opencc-zeroJun 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

SECO-RCR: A Tool to Manage Requirements Change in Software Ecosystems

<p>Video de apresenta&ccedil;&atilde;o para a ferramenta SECO-RCR submetido ao SBES Tools 2024.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Dataset from the second wave of a pre-post study to test an interactive blended learning tool for delirium management in Belgian Nursing Homes by measuring delirium knowledge and evaluation of the tool

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Dataset from the first wave of a pre-post study to test an interactive blended learning tool for delirium management in Belgian Nursing Homes by measuring delirium knowledge and strain of care for delirium

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Unterweger PA, Klammer J, Unger M, Betz O (2018) Insect hibernation on urban green land: a winter-adapted mowing regime as a management tool for insect conservation. BioRisk 13: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.13.22316

Table with all captured species / morphotypes sorted by order, family and species / morphotype. : Explanation note: Collection: University of Tübingen, Evolutionary Biology of Invertebrates, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Individuals with scientific species name that were checked by a taxonomic expert were counted as taxonomic species (s); all the other determinations were counted as morphotypes (m). Morphotypes are defined by the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). In some cases, the family or the morphometric body length (in mm, numbers in column C, Mini: smaller than 1 mm) was counted as a morphotype (Daly 1985). In cases for which the determination was not validated by a taxonomic expert, our species determination was checked for plausibility in terms of its geographical occurrence via the Entomofauna Germanica (http://www.colkat.de, 2017.11.06). Alternatively (if no taxonomic name could be found), a classification letter / number was assigned for a morphotype. The provided author name refers to the lowest practical taxonomic level (e.g. Hanula et al. 2009; Kutschbach-Brohl et al. 2010). Validation: name of scientific expert who checked the taxonomic determination. Management type of meadow in autumn: mown /unmown. Plant compartment: flower head, stem, tuft, leaves. All numbers represent total sums of all sample sites over the entire study period. Brown-labelled species names are thought to have hibernated in the soil. Green-labelled species names could only be found in flower heads and stems. Black-labelled species occurred in all plant compartments without any preference for a specific plant compartment.

opencc-zeroFeb 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

MADFORWATER: WP3: Adaptation of technologies for efficient water management and treated wastewater reuse in agriculture: Task3.1: Reduction of crop water requirement and tools for irrigation management with treated WW: Subtask 3.1.1: Plant Growth Promotion (PGP) bacteria to enhance crop resistance to water stress and salinity

<p>This dataset contains the data underlying the following publication: Hassen W, Neifar M, Cherif H, Najjari A, Chouchane H, Driouich RC, Salah A, Naili F, Mosbah A, Souissi Y, Raddadi N, Ouzari HI, Fava F and Cherif A (2018) Pseudomonas rhizophila S211, a New Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium with Potential in Pesticide-Bioremediation. Front. Microbiol. 9:34. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00034</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2018View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Publication and use of genetics tools in conservation management applications: a systematic review

<p><span>Genetic tools are used in applied conservation management for taxonomic identification, delineation of management units, management of wild populations, captive breeding and reintroduction, and control of invasive species, disease, and hybridisation.  </span></p> <p><span>To assess the extent to which genetics tools are being used for applied conservation management, we conducted a systematic literature review of over 53,767 papers focussing on wildlife research that reported results on species delineation, translocations, and population augmentation. We synthesised information on papers that used genetics tools in an expressly applied manner across all wildlife species. </span></p> <p><span>We found that the application of genetics tools in conservation management was biased towards fishes, mammals, and birds and northern hemisphere locations, especially the USA and Europe. </span></p> <p><span>Despite genetics tools being a highly published topic, it was difficult to find published applications of these tools in both the primary and the grey literature. Of the 115 papers on 152 species that could be considered an applied use of a genetics tool expressly for conservation management, only 49 had definable applied outcomes. The remaining 66 made recommendations, but it was often unclear if the recommendations were ever used to make conservation management decisions because of the time-lag between publication of the initial recommendation and publication of the results of the use of the tool in a conservation management situation, as well as the lack of dissemination in the primary literature.  </span></p> <p><span>Our study highlights the relatively low publication rate of applications of genetics tools compared to the general conservation genetics field. These tools appear to have either a low percentage of translations into publication ('conservation genetics publishing gap') or a poor uptake among wildlife conservation managers ('conservation genetics gap')—the two are indistinguishable in this review. </span></p> <p><span><em>Policy implications</em>. Conservation genetics tools must be brought to the forefront of conservation policy and management. Users should support the use of systems and accessible databases to increase the uptake of genetic tools for conservation in applied management decisions for wildlife, reducing barriers to disseminating the results to other end users and interested parties.</span></p>

opencc-zeroMay 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Effectiveness of a Decision-Support Tool for Adult Consumers With Mental Health Needs and Their Care Managers

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02761733. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 5.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Osteoporosis Screening Tools' Re-validation in Egypt Guide for the Management of the Condition in Males

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03513107. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

GLUCOSAFE 2 - A New Tool for Nutritional Management and Insulin-therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03890432. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record