Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

82

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

82 results for “methane flux”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad36/100

Graminoids vary in functional traits, carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in a restored peatland: implications for modeling carbon storage

<p>1. One metric of peatland restoration success is the re-establishment of a carbon sink, yet considerable uncertainty remains around the timescale of carbon sink trajectories. Conditions post-restoration may promote the establishment of vascular plants such as graminoids, often at greater density than would be found in undisturbed peatlands, with consequences for carbon storage. Although graminoid species are often considered as a single plant functional type (PFT) in land-atmosphere models, our understanding of functional variation among graminoid species is limited, particularly in a restoration context.</p> <p>2. We used a traits-based approach to evaluate graminoid functional variation and to assess whether different graminoid species should be considered a single PFT or multiple types. We tested hypotheses that greenhouse gas fluxes (CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>) would vary due to differences in plant traits among five graminoid species in a restored peatland in central Alberta, Canada. We further hypothesized that species would form two functionally distinct groupings based on taxonomy (grass, sedge).</p> <p>3. Differences in gas fluxes among species were primarily driven by variation in leaf physiology related to photosynthetic efficiency and resource-use, and secondarily by plant size. Multivariate analyses did not reveal distinct functional groupings based on taxonomy or environmental preferences. Rather, we identified functional groups defined by plant traits and carbon fluxes that are consistent with ecological strategies related to differences in growth rate, resource-acquisition, and leaf economics, representing plants with either a strategy to grow quickly and invest in resource capture or to prioritize structural investment and resource conservation. These functional groups displayed larger average carbon fluxes compared to graminoid PFTs currently used in modeling.</p> <p>4. Existing PFT designations in peatland models may be more appropriate for pristine or high-latitude systems than those under restoration. Although replacing PFTs with plant traits remains a challenge in peatlands, traits related to leaf physiology and growth rate strategies offer a promising avenue for future applications.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Carbon Dioxide and Methane Flux Meta Analysis, Schaerer et al: Permafrost microbes unleashed: thaw reactors provide timely insights into greenhouse gas feedbacks for climate stewardship

<p>Meta-analysis results and workflow: <strong>Meta-Analysis-Report-V1.pdf</strong>&nbsp;</p> <p>raw data tables for input into meta-analysis:</p> <p><strong>co2_flux_by_layer_temp.csv</strong></p> <p><strong>co2_flux_by_layer_time.csv</strong></p> <p><strong>ch4_flux_by_layer_temp.csv</strong></p> <p><strong>ch4_flux_by_layer_time.csv</strong></p> <p><strong>co2_flux_by_headspace_temp.csv</strong></p> <p>(Data included in these tables was digitized using the R package metaDigitize)</p> <p>****</p> <p>We also attempted to summarize the raw data from 12 studies which is summarized in the&nbsp;<strong><em>Flux_Summary_Report </em></strong>document. we converted all units into mg C / g Soil * d (calculations are included in the <strong><em>co2_meta_analysis</em></strong> spreadsheet). For studies not reporting raw data or data tables (7/12 studies), we estimated the values from the figures manually. This typically resulted in an estimate of the mean flux of several replicates (all studies had 3-10 replicates). We filled in metadata as well as we could based on the information available in the papers, although there were many gaps. This information is summarized in the <strong><em>flux_data_compilation</em> </strong>spreadsheet.</p> <p>Studies in the raw data comparison include: Mackelprang 2011, Waldrop 2010 &amp; 2021, Barbato 2022, Dang 2022, Muller 2018, Monteaux 2020, Dutta 2006, Lee 2012, O'Donnell 2009, Roy Chowdhury 2014, Trubl 2021.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Mapping Russian Wetlands and Estimating Methane Fluxes

<h3>Mapping Russian Wetlands and Estimating Methane Fluxes</h3> <p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>Wetlands are crucial in regulating the Earth&rsquo;s climate, acting as both carbon sinks and significant methane sources. Russian wetlands represent one of the largest and most diverse wetland complexes globally, extending across biomes from Arctic tundra to boreal forests. Despite their importance, these wetlands remain underexplored, particularly in terms of their spatial distribution and greenhouse gas contributions. This dataset provides a detailed typological map of Russian wetlands and accompanying methane flux estimates, representing the most comprehensive methane emissions dataset for Russian wetlands to date. The maps and calculations were developed in Google Earth Engine (GEE) through a combination of multi-seasonal Landsat composites, PALSAR radar imagery, and extensive field-based validation data from peatland sites across Western Siberia.</p> <h3>Data Overview</h3> <p><strong>Input Layers</strong></p> <p>The wetland mapping relied on seasonal Landsat composites (spring, summer, fall) and PALSAR radar data to capture the distinct structural and hydrological characteristics of each wetland type. Additional layers, such as GMTED topographic slope and Hansen&rsquo;s TreeCover, were included to exclude non-wetland areas and to enhance the classification by distinguishing forested from non-forested wetlands.</p> <p><strong>Training Points</strong></p> <p>A comprehensive training site database was created, integrating field knowledge, high-resolution imagery, and georeferenced photos. Approximately 2,450 representative points were selected to capture 12 primary wetland types across Russia, with each point validated against high-resolution imagery to ensure accuracy. Points were collected to represent the wide-ranging wetland ecosystems in Russia, from open water and patterned bogs to swampy and forested fens, providing robust ground-truth data for training the classification model.</p> <p><strong>Random Forest Classifier</strong></p> <p>The random forest classifier was chosen for its capacity to handle large datasets and complex relationships among input layers. Optimized for Landsat and PALSAR inputs, the classifier used over 100 trees, each making independent predictions based on subsets of data, which were averaged to produce the final classification. This ensemble approach minimized overfitting, a crucial factor for the varied ecological regions across Russia.</p> <p><strong>Russian Wetlands Map</strong></p> <p>The final <strong>Russian Wetlands Map</strong> encompasses 12 wetland types, detailing their distribution and extent across the country:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Total Wetland Area</strong>: 173.96 million hectares of mapped wetlands, capturing diverse ecosystems, including bogs, fens, and swampy areas.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Open Water Area</strong>: Lakes, rivers, and smaller water bodies within wetland zones were separately mapped, totaling 42.6 million hectares.</p> </li> </ul> <h3>Emission Modeling and Ecosite Analysis</h3> <p><strong>Ecosite Proportions for Methane Emission Modeling</strong></p> <p>Each wetland type was further divided into <strong>ecosite units</strong> representing distinct, smaller areas with uniform hydrological and geochemical properties. This level of detail enabled precise methane emission estimates by capturing the variability within complex wetland ecosystems. For instance, ridges and hollows within patterned bogs exhibit unique methane emission dynamics due to differences in vegetation and water levels. Ecosite proportions for methane emission were calculated from 20-30 representative field sites per wetland type, capturing the typical area breakdown of each wetland type across Russia.</p> <p><strong>Methane Emission Period Calculation</strong></p> <p>To estimate seasonal methane emission periods across Russia&rsquo;s climatic zones, the average summer temperature (Bio10) parameter from WorldClim data was used. Bio10 values reflect seasonal variation in emission potential, correlating with longer and warmer summers in southern regions versus shorter, cooler summers in the north. Using these data, an emission period was calculated for<strong> each 50 km x 50 km grid</strong> cell based on a regression model derived from Western Siberia data:<br>Emission Period (hours) = 303 * Bio10 &ndash; 675</p> <p>This equation, which explained 98% of the variation in emission duration, provided a dynamic method for estimating emission periods across Russia&rsquo;s diverse landscape.</p> <h3>Methane Emission Estimates</h3> <p><strong>Calculation Approach</strong></p> <p>Methane emission estimates were derived from a multi-step approach that incorporated ecosystem-specific emission factors, ecosystem area, and the estimated emission period:</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong>Ecosystem Area Calculation</strong>: Area estimates for each ecosite type were derived from field-based proportions applied to the classified wetland map.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Emission Period</strong>: Calculated for each grid cell based on Bio10 data, varying continuously across climatic zones.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Methane Flux Values</strong>: Based on quantiles from field measurements within three main zones (Tundra, Northern Taiga, and Southern Taiga) to account for natural variability in methane emissions.</p> </li> </ol> <p>Using this approach, methane emissions were calculated for each 50 km per 50 km grid cell, factoring in the unique emission characteristics of each wetland type and zone. This produced a spatially detailed estimate of methane fluxes, reflective of the temperature and vegetation gradients across Russia.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Resulting National Estimate</strong></p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Total Annual Methane Emissions</strong>: 11.39 MtCH₄ per year from all mapped wetland areas.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Open Water Contributions</strong>: 2.54 MtCH₄ per year from open water bodies, including intra-wetland lakes and rivers.</p> </li> </ul> <h3>Data Highlights</h3> <ul> <li> <p><strong>High-resolution wetland classification</strong> covering 173.96 million hectares across diverse wetland ecosystems.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Detailed methane emission data</strong> derived from multi-year field measurements and validated against climatic data, providing spatially continuous methane flux estimates across Russia.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>50x50 km&sup2; grid cell calculations</strong>, accounting for methane emission rates, emission periods, and ecosystem proportions for each cell.</p> </li> </ul> <p>This dataset serves as an essential tool for environmental scientists, climate modelers, and conservationists, supporting further research into wetland carbon dynamics, climate mitigation strategies, and regional land-use planning. The high resolution data availbale at url: https://code.earthengine.google.com/d6a9d4045255fd84298777e56a38ae03</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
zenodo36/100

Dataset for "Interpreting eddy covariance data from heterogeneous Siberian tundra: land cover-specific methane fluxes and spatial representativeness"

<p>The micrometeorological dataset used in</p> <p>Tuovinen, J.-P., Aurela, M., Hatakka, J., R&auml;s&auml;nen, A., Virtanen, T., Mikola, J., Ivakhov, V., Kondratyev, V. and Laurila, T.: Interpreting eddy covariance data from heterogeneous Siberian tundra: land cover-specific methane fluxes and spatial representativeness. <em>Biogeosciences Discussions</em>, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-155, 2018 (accepted for publication in <em>Biogeosciences</em>).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →
dryad36/100

Maps of predicted carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from waterbodies in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska

<p>In the Arctic, waterbodies are abundant, and rapid thaw of permafrost is destabilizing the carbon cycle and changing hydrology. It is particularly important to quantify and accurately scale aquatic carbon emissions in arctic ecosystems. Recently available high-resolution remote sensing datasets capture the physical characteristics of arctic landscapes at unprecedented spatial resolution. We demonstrate how machine learning models can capitalize on these spatial datasets to greatly improve accuracy when scaling waterbody CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes across the Yukon-Kuskokwim (YK) Delta of south-west AK. These datasets include carbon dioxide and methane dissolved concentrations and diffusive fluxes from a research watershed in the central YK Delta. </p>

opencc-zeroDec 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Methane Fluxes and 13C-CH4 from a Northern Temperate Peatland

<p>This dataset contains methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions and their&nbsp;<sup>13</sup>C isotope composition&nbsp;(&delta;<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>) measured using the static flux chamber method&nbsp;in a poor fen in New Hampshire, USA. Measurements were collected weekly (CH<sub>4</sub> emissions) to bi-weekly&nbsp;(&delta;<sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>)&nbsp;from flux collars with varying microtopgraphy (hummock, lawn, and wet) from May to August 2020 and 2021. Datasets includes metadata of water table depth, peat and air temperature, and precipitation collected alongside flux meausurements.&nbsp;Each data file contains a &quot;README&quot; tab with a guide for variable units and descriptions.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Subsurface redox interactions regulate ebullitive methane flux in heterogeneous Mississippi River deltaic wetland

<p>This dataset is model outputs archive from a&nbsp;model study about&nbsp;&nbsp;&#39;Subsurface redox interactions regulate ebullitive methane flux in heterogeneous Mississippi River deltaic wetland&#39; (manuscript is Under Review). Plotting scripts are also included in this data file. There are four model results. &#39;Ebull&#39; model output are ebullition flux, &#39;Jswi&#39; model output&nbsp;are diffusion flux across soil-water interface, and &#39;Methane&#39; files are porewater concentration results in each soil layers, and &#39;LtranR&#39; model outputs&nbsp;for redox species exchange rates across different soil layers.&nbsp;The model source codes can be found at&nbsp;<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8084441">https://zenodo.org/record/8084441</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://zenodo.org/record/8087566">https://zenodo.org/record/8087566</a>.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Microbial activity contributes to spatial heterogeneity of wetland methane fluxes

<p>The emission of methane from wetlands is spatially heterogeneous, as concurrently measured surface fluxes can vary by orders of magnitude within the span of a few meters. Despite extensive study and the climatic significance of these greenhouse gas emissions, it remains unclear what drives these large within-site variations, creating a knowledge-gap that impedes a mechanistic understanding of wetland fluxes. While geophysical variables including water table depth (WTD) and soil temperature are known to correlate with CH<sub>4</sub> flux, measurable variance in these parameters declines as spatial and temporal scales become finer. Here, we leveraged depth-stratified gene abundance and gene expression measurements of methanogenesis and methanotrophy to investigate CH<sub>4</sub> flux variance at an ombrotrophic peat bog. Our results show that the flux variance was strongly correlated to methanogen abundance and that peat depth also exerted significant control over CH<sub>4</sub> flux, methanogen abundance, and the relationship between the two. Correlations between CH<sub>4</sub> flux and either WTD or soil temperature were absent or minimal. These findings suggest that microbial factors likely underlie localized variance in wetland CH<sub>4</sub> flux, and that a greater reliance on biological predictors could improve our ability to understand wetland methane fluxes at finer scales than is currently possible.</p>

opencc-zeroSep 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Hourly methane and carbon dioxide fluxes from temperate ponds

<p>This dataset consists of methane and carbon dioxide flux measurements from three forest and three open-land ponds in Denmark. Furthermore, oxygen, water temperature and weather data are also available.</p> <p>The data is part of the scientifical paper published in Springer Biogeochemistry&nbsp;</p> <p><em><strong>Hourly methane and carbon dioxide<sub> </sub>fluxes from temperate ponds</strong></em></p>

openother-openJun 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Evolution of sediment temperature, pressure, phases distribution, carbon pools and seabed methane flux at the Arctic continental Shelves since the Last Glacial Maximum

<p>This dataset are produced by&nbsp;a manuscript (<strong>Biodegradation of Ancient Organic Carbon Fuels Seabed Methane Emission at the Arctic Continental Shelves</strong>)&nbsp;&nbsp;to be submitted to the Journal of Geophysical Research - Global Biogeochemical Cycles.&nbsp; I</p> <p>The file &quot;MethaneEmission_Permafrost&quot; contains the predicted&nbsp; temperature, pressure, pore water salinity, ice stable zone, methane hydrate stable zone, ice saturation, methane hydrate saturation, free methane gas saturation, labile organic carbon content, stable organic carbon content, and methanogenesis rate from seafloor to 1200 m depth from 18,000 years before present to 2,000 years after present for 8 different simulation scenarios.&nbsp;</p> <p>The file &quot;Seabed_Methane_Flux&quot; contains the predicted seabed methane emission rate from&nbsp;18,000 years before present to 2,000 years after present for 8 different simulation scenarios.&nbsp;</p> <p>Detailed information about the model could be found in the paper&nbsp;<strong>Biodegradation of Ancient Organic Carbon Fuels Seabed Methane Emission at the Arctic Continental Shelves.&nbsp;</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Methane fluxes measured by eddy covariance on Dutch peatlands

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2024View details →
dryad36/100

Graminoids vary in functional traits, carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in a restored peatland: implications for modeling carbon storage

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from different surface types in a created urban wetland

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Data from: Microbial activity contributes to spatial heterogeneity of wetland methane fluxes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Variations in ecosystem-scale methane fluxes across a boreal mire complex assessed by a network of flux towers

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2025View details →
dryad36/100

Maps of predicted carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from waterbodies in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Seasonality of temperature dependence of methane fluxes from natural wetlands

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2025View details →
dryad36/100

Fencing the flux: Seasonal trends, environmental drivers, and mitigation opportunities of methane emissions from farm dams

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2025View details →
edi36/100

Biogeochemical and physical controls on methane fluxes from two ferruginous meromictic lakes

Data was collected at Brownie Lake in Minneapolis, MN, USA and at Canyon Lake in the Upper Peninsula of MI, USA. The methane flux, or the amount of methane entering the atmosphere over a given area per time, was assessed at Brownie Lake and Canyon Lake. Sampling of Brownie Lake during geochemical characterization revealed that the methane flux out of the lake was much higher than Canyon Lake, as well as other ferruginous meromictic lakes used as geochemical analogs for early Earth’s ferruginous oceans. The dataset here was used to discern why the methane flux out of Brownie Lake was high. Brownie Lake was sampled in May, July and September of 2017 and June 2018. Canyon Lake was sampled in June and September 2017 and May 2018. We used various limnological probes and sensors (LDO sensor, Hydrolab multiprobe) to collect water column profiles (temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, chlorophyll a, pH). We also analyzed water samples (cations, anions, CH4, DIC) using ion chromatography and ICP-MS and measured isotopes (CH4, DIC) utilizing isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The methane flux was constrained in two ways: taking direct samples from the surface of each lake using floating static flux chambers, which were measured by gas chromatography, and estimated from geochemical reaction-transport modeling based on the diffusional profiles of methane and other dissolved species throughout the water column.

openCC (other)Sep 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

Efficient oxidation attenuates porewater-derived methane fluxes in mangrove waters

<p>Data set used in the publication (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12639">https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12639)</a></p> <ul> <li>timerseries.xlsx&nbsp;&nbsp; <ul> <li>This data includes continous data of ch4 concentration with other environmental parameters e.g. salinity, temperature, water depth, oxygen saturation and calculated water-air ch4 fluxes at two mangrove creeks in southeastern Brazil (Paraty-Mirim National Park, Florian&oacute;polis)&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> <li>discrete data&nbsp; <ul> <li>This data includes discrete surface water sampling during spring and neap tide and porewater. The data includes ch4 concentration, d13C-CH4 and environmental parameters.&nbsp;</li> </ul> </li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record