Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
447
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
447 results for “parasitic nematode”
Figure 2 in Four new records of plant parasitic nematodes from Iran
Figure 2. Geocenamus dobroticus: (A) anterior end of the body,(B) lip region, (C) ovary, (D) body shape, (E) lateral lines, (F, G) variation of the tail.
Figure 1 in Four new records of plant parasitic nematodes from Iran
Figure 1. Merlinius acuminatus: (A) anterior end of the body, (B) lip region, (C) ovary, (D) body shape, (E) lateral lines, (F, G) variation of the tail.
Fig. 1 in Investigating the role of urbanisation, wetlands and climatic conditions in nematode parasitism in a large Australian elapid snake
Fig. 1. The abundance of nematode infection for each tiger snake specimen in South-West Western Australia. Arrows indicate major cities used as urban centres. Colour indicates the number of worms (intensity) found in the stomach of each specimen. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3 in Investigating the role of urbanisation, wetlands and climatic conditions in nematode parasitism in a large Australian elapid snake
Fig. 3. Probability of tiger snake stomach nematode infection in relation to a) distance to wetlands, b) mean annual precipitation and c) topographic wetness index (TWI). Shaded areas represents 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 1 in Response of Hypothenemus hampei Ferrari (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) parasitized by the nematode Metaparasitylenchus hypothenemi Poinar (Tylenchida: Allantonematidae) to different colors of light
Figure 1: Relative attraction of CBB (parasitized with MetaparaSityleNChUS hypOtheNeMi and non-parasitized) to 14 light wavelengths compared to the control (570 nm). The asterisk-labeled treatment was statistically different to the control using the χ2 test (P = 0.01). Relative attraction (%) was calculated using the number of borers that chose the treatment and control, applying the formula: [(treatment) (100) / (treatment + control)].
Fig. 6 in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 6. Bayesian inference phylogram of the cox1 mitochondrial gene region. Posterior probability support values are presented along branch nodes.
Fig. 4 in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 4. Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget (1961) from Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900), scanning electron micrographs of a female. A (deirids shown by white circle), B, C – cephalic end dorsolateral and anterior views; D– lateral view of the excretory pore (as shown by white arrow); E – detail of vulva sub-ventral view; F, G – fully mature (larvated) eggs dissected out of the nematode body; H – tail tip (white arrows shows openings with a papilla); Abbreviations: a – amphids; c – submedian cephalic papilla; pt – anterior prostomal teeth.
Fig. 3 in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 3. Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget (1961) from Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900), light micrographs of an adult male. A – left (longer) and right (shorter) spicules (dorsolateral view); B– left (longer) and right (shorter – showing the boat-like shape) spicules (ventrolateral view); black and white arrows indicate left and right spicules respectively.
Fig. 1. A in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 1. A map of River Nyando, in Lake Victoria Basin, showing the study locations at Koru and Ahero.
Fig. 5 in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 5. Phylograms of the 28S rRNA gene region based on the A– maximum likelihood and B – Bayesian Inference analyses. Bootstrap and posterior probability support values are presented along branch nodes. The branch length was reduced to two (//) and three (///) times the scale bar.
Fig. 2 in Integrated morphological and molecular characterization of the fish parasitic nematode Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget, 1961 infecting Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900) in Kenya
Fig. 2. Rhabdochona (Rhabdochona) gendrei Campana-Rouget (1961) from Labeobarbus altianalis (Boulenger, 1900), scanning electron micrographs of the male. A – cephalic end, subapical view; B – deirid; (circled); C, D – posterior end of male, ventrolateral view (white stars and white circles indicate a pair of lateral pre- and postanal papillae, respectively); E – right spicule; F – excised right spicule, following enzymatic digestion. Abbreviations: a – amphid; 1–11, and 1–9 – pairs of sub-ventral preanal papillae (in C); 1–5 – pairs of postanal papillae (in D).
Fig. 4 in Molecular characterization of the parasitic nematode genus Crassicauda; larvae parasitic on the firefly squid and adults on beaked whales off the coast of Japan
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic analysis identified the specimens stored at the National Museum of Nature and Science (9 samples; 2005–2021), based on the ribosomal DNA ITS2 region, and supported by Bayesian inference (BI) tree. Analysis was performed by MrBayes 3.2.7a for BI and MEGA11 using both the neighbor joining (NJ) amd the maximum likelihood method (ML) (1000 bootstrap replicates) and the tree was rooted on midpoint. The sample ID sequenced in this study are listed with the species name. Branches with posterior probability and bootstrap values (BI/ NJ/ML) support lower than 0.5 or 50% were collapsed, respectively. *Sequences obtained in this study. The whale illustration: © National Museum of Nature and Science.
Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization of the parasitic nematode genus Crassicauda; larvae parasitic on the firefly squid and adults on beaked whales off the coast of Japan
Fig. 1. Loca lity of the stranded beaked whales and firefly squids which the Crassicauda spp. recovered. The whale illustration: © National Museum of Nature and Science.
Fig. 5 in Molecular characterization of the parasitic nematode genus Crassicauda; larvae parasitic on the firefly squid and adults on beaked whales off the coast of Japan
Fig. 5. Relationship between whale habitat and infected Crassicauda spp. The whale illustration: © National Museum of Nature and Science.
Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization of the parasitic nematode genus Crassicauda; larvae parasitic on the firefly squid and adults on beaked whales off the coast of Japan
Fig. 3. Phylogenetic analysis identified the specimens stored at the National Museum of Nature and Science (12 samples; 2005–2021), based on the cox1 gene, and supported by Bayesian inference (BI) tree. Analysis was performed by MrBayes 3.2.7a for BI and MEGA11 using both the neighbor joining (NJ) amd the maximum likelihood method (ML) (1000 bootstrap replicates) and included Habronema muscae as outgroup. GenBank accession numbers are listed along the species names. Branches with posterior probability and bootstrap values (BI/NJ/ML) support lower than 0.5 or 50% were collapsed, respectively. *Sequences obtained in this study. The whale illustration: © National Museum of Nature and Science.
Table 2 in Description Of The Nematode Dirofilaria Repens (Nematoda, Onchocercidae) Parasitic In Dogs In Ukraine
<p><b>Table 2. Metric parameters of</b> ♀ <i>Dirofilaria repens</i>, n = 8 (М ± SD, min–max)</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Present study</th><th>Railliet & Henry, 1911</th><th>Lent & Freitas, 1937</th><th>Sonin, 1975</th><th>Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2011</th><th>Kravchenko & Itin, 2012</th><th>Baisarova, 2021</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Body length, mm</th><td>17.2 ± 0.7 16.2–18.1</td><td>10–17</td><td>14–15</td><td>10.6</td><td>15.4 14.7–16.1</td><td>9.8–17.4</td><td>14.5 9.7–17.6</td></tr><tr><th>Body width, μm</th><td>565.2 ± 19.8 541.3–597.9</td><td>450–650</td><td>447–552</td><td>530</td><td>532 490–570</td><td>800–1000</td><td>1140 900–1700</td></tr><tr><th>Body width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>316.1 ± 19.1 294.1–342.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>290 283–298</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>transition from esophagus to intestine vulva</th><td>452.2 ± 26.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>417</td><td></td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>415.6–486.1</td><td></td><td></td><td>–</td><td>411–422</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>517.1 ± 31.4 463.4–556.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>503 499–508</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>anus</th><td>149.9 ± 9.6 132.2–162.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>145 128–169</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus length, mm</th><td>912.7 ± 48.7 831.7–964.2</td><td>–</td><td>1050– 1053</td><td>910</td><td>966 915–1037</td><td>1110</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>34.6 ± 4.0 30.5–40.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>middle part</th><td>53.8 ± 3.2 50.2–60.1</td><td>–</td><td>49–54</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>the widest part</th><td>71.4 ± 2.8 68.2–77.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>89 77–102</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of mouth opening, μm</th><td>10.9 ± 0.8 9.2–11.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of vulva, μm</th><td>12.3 ± 0.77 11.1–13.4</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to nerve ring, μm</th><td>258.1 ± 17.8 242.0–296.2</td><td>–</td><td>304–368</td><td>270</td><td>295 291–298</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to vulva, mm</th><td>1.4 ± 0.1 1.3–1.6</td><td>1.5–1.9</td><td>1.84–1.92</td><td>–</td><td>1.55 1.45–1.63</td><td>1.6–2.7</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the nerve ring, mm</th><td>1.2 ± 0.1 1.1–1.3</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the tail end, mm</th><td>15.7 ± 0.7 14.7–16.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the vulva to the anus, mm</th><td>15.7 ± 0.7 14.6–16.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Tail length, μm</th><td>81.1 ± 8.6 70.4–92.2</td><td>105–126</td><td>–</td><td>90</td><td>85 73–102</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>MicroFIlaria length, μm</th><td>208.7 ± 10.2 193.4–224.9</td><td>300–360</td><td>–</td><td>300–360</td><td>329 296–362</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>MicroFIlaria width, μm</th><td>5.8 ± 0.4 5.3–6.4</td><td>6–8</td><td>–</td><td>6–8</td><td>7 5–8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table><p>N o t e. Рarameters were not deFIned.</p>
Table 1 in Description Of The Nematode Dirofilaria Repens (Nematoda, Onchocercidae) Parasitic In Dogs In Ukraine
<p><b>Table 1. Metric parameters of</b> Ơ <i>Dirofilaria repens</i>, n = 5 (М ± SD, min–max)</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Parameter</th><th>Present study</th><th>Railliet & Henry, 1911</th><th>Lent & Freitas, 1937</th><th>Sonin, 1975</th><th>Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2011</th><th>Kravchenko & 2012</th><th>Baisarova, 2021</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Body length, mm</th><td>57.1 ± 6.5</td><td>48–70</td><td>27.75</td><td>51</td><td>63</td><td>58–71</td><td>87.3 ± 9.6</td></tr><tr><td>48.0–66.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>56–70</td><td></td><td>71–110</td></tr><tr><th>Body width, μm</th><td>406.7 ± 16.6</td><td>370–450</td><td>–</td><td>320</td><td>325</td><td>800–1000</td><td>1100 ± 0.4</td></tr><tr><td>390.1–432.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>298–379</td><td></td><td>900–1700</td></tr><tr><th>Body width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>238.5 ± 11.9</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>224.1–251.6</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>junction between esophagus and intestine – cloaca</th><td>382.7 ± 16.3</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>293</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>359.4–402.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>269–317</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>118.8 ± 15.0</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>99</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>98.6–137.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>95–104</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus length, mm</th><td>761.9 ± 39.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>750</td><td>713</td><td>до 1400</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>698.2–797.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>696–730</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Esophagus width in the region of, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>nerve ring</th><td>42.2 ± 2.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>39.8–44.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>middle part</th><td>56.3 ± 4.6</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>48.2–59.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>the widest part</th><td>62.1 ± 2.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td></td><td>40</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>59.8–64.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>36–45</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Thickness of the cuticle in the region of mouth</th><td>9.2 ± 0.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>(8.2–10.4)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>opening, μm</th></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to nerve ring, μm</th><td>227.9 ± 10.5</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>240</td><td>162</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>211.8–241.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>160–165</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Distance from anterior end to cloaca, mm</th><td>57.1 ± 6.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>47.9–66.4</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Distance from the nerve ring to cloaca, mm</th><td>56.8 ± 6.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>47.6–66.2</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Tail length, μm</th><td>72.9 ± 7.1</td><td>66–85</td><td>72</td><td>80</td><td>77</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>62.2–80.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>73–82</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Long spicule, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>length</th><td>432.9 ± 24.0</td><td>465–590</td><td>430</td><td>300</td><td>541</td><td>160–270</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>392.1–450.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>537–547</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of proximal end</th><td>37.2 ± 1.8</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>22</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>35.2 – 39.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>20–27</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of distal end</th><td>3.1 ± 0.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>2.9–3.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width in middle part</th><td>18.2 ± 0.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>17.1–18.9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>width of widening part</th><td>25.2 ± 1.4</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>23.6–27.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>– handle length</th><td>250.3 ± 10.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>237.1–261.3</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>– lamina length</th><td>182.5 ± 32.1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>130.7–209.5</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Ratio of handle to lamina length</th><td>1.42:1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>1.15:1–2.00:1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Short spicule, μm:</th></tr><tr><th>length</th><td>178.7 ± 9.4</td><td>185–206</td><td>175</td><td>130</td><td>185</td><td>180–200</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>170.9–194.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>181–189</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>proximal end width</th><td>21.9 ± 4.0</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>27</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>14.9–25.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>23–35</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>distal end width</th><td>14.4 ± 0.7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>13.2–15.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>middle part width</th><td>31.4 ± 1.2</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>30.1–33.1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Ratio of spicules’ lengths</th><td>2.43:1</td><td>2.5: 1</td><td>2.5: 1</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><td>2.23:1–2.58:1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><p>N o t e. Рarameters were not deFIned.</p>
Linked collectors and determiners for: ARC-PPRI: National Collection of Nematodes and South African Plant-Parasitic Nematode Survey(1901-2014).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "ARC-PPRI: National Collection of Nematodes and South African Plant-Parasitic Nematode Survey(1901-2014)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/5edbfe13-c150-43d3-ac38-729b6aeb6147">https://bionomia.net/dataset/5edbfe13-c150-43d3-ac38-729b6aeb6147</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/5edbfe13-c150-43d3-ac38-729b6aeb6147">https://gbif.org/dataset/5edbfe13-c150-43d3-ac38-729b6aeb6147</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Figure |. Hystrignathus splendidus sp. n. female. A Esophageal region, lateral view. B Cephalic end, internal view C Cephalic end, external view D Spines at level of the end of procorpus E Tail, lateral view F Vulva, lateral view G Egg. H Genital tract I Habitus, lateral view. in Two new species of nematode (Oxyurida, Hystrignathidae) parasites of Passalus interstitialis Escholtz, 1829 (Coleoptera, Passalidae) from Cuba and a new locality for Longior similis Morffe, Garcia & Ventosa, 2009
Figure |. Hystrignathus splendidus sp. n. female. A Esophageal region, lateral view. B Cephalic end, internal view C Cephalic end, external view D Spines at level of the end of procorpus E Tail, lateral view F Vulva, lateral view G Egg. H Genital tract I Habitus, lateral view.
Ancient diversity in host-parasite interaction genes in a model parasitic nematode
<p>Files associated with the "Ancient diversity in host-parasite interaction genes in a model parasitic nematode" manuscript. </p> <p><strong>VCF files:</strong></p> <p>HB1_vs_nxHelBake1.biallelic_noRefCall.qual.repeat_filtered.vcf.gz<br> HB2_vs_nxHelBake1.biallelic_noRefCall.qual.repeat_filtered.vcf.gz<br> HB3_vs_nxHelBake1.biallelic_noRefCall.qual.repeat_filtered.vcf.gz<br> HP1_vs_ngHelPoly1.biallelic_noRefCall.qual.repeat_filtered.vcf.gz<br> HP2_vs_ngHelPoly1.biallelic_noRefCall.qual.repeat_filtered.vcf.gz</p> <p><strong><em>H. mixtum</em> genome assemblies:</strong><br> Hm16_merged_spades_scaffolds.fa.gz<br> Hm2_merged_spades_scaffolds.fa.gz</p> <p><strong>Strongylomorph phylogeny:</strong></p> <p>Strongylomorph_phylogeny_18Jan2023_20spp_511orthos.astral.nwk.gz</p> <p><strong>Gene annotation files:</strong><br> ngHelPoly1.1.primary.final_annotations.cds.fa.gz<br> ngHelPoly1.1.primary.final_annotations.gff3.gz<br> ngHelPoly1.1.primary.final_annotations.proteins.fa.gz</p> <p>nxHelBake1.1.primary.final_annotations.cds.fa.gz<br> nxHelBake1.1.primary.final_annotations.gff3.gz<br> nxHelBake1.1.primary.final_annotations.proteins.fa.gz</p> <p><strong>Curated repeat libraries:</strong><br> ngHelPoly1.1.repeats.01062023.fa.gz<br> nxHelBake1.1.repeats.01062023.fa.gz</p> <p><strong>Assembled transcripts:</strong></p> <p>ngHelPoly1_hq_transcripts.fa.gz</p> <p>nxHelBake1_hq_transcripts.fa.gz</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.