Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

84

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

84 results for “personality traits”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Functional Anatomy of Personality Trait Knowledge: An fMRI Study

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00095407. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

How Dentists' Personality Traits Affect Communication and Treatment Outcomes in TMD Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07074366. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Genetic characterization of dog personality traits

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicApr 2018View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Data for: Variation in animal personality traits across a metal pollution gradient in a free-living songbird

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Links between personality traits and problem-solving performance in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Coded respondent survey data to analyze the impact of big five personality traits on student engagement consisting of their emotional and physical engagement

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Environmental heterogeneity and population differences in blue tits personality traits

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2016View details →
dryad32/100

Micro-personality traits and their implications for behavioural and movement ecology research

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Personality traits and behaviour vary among invasive, native and hatchery-reared fish

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Does inbreeding affect personality traits?

The question of why variation is maintained in personality traits is an evolutionary puzzle. According to the condition-dependence hypothesis, such traits depend on condition, which limits the behavioural choices available to individuals. Because condition is affected by many genes, it can effectively be manipulated by inbreeding, which exposes the effects of deleterious recessive mutations. Here, I compared two personality traits, boldness and tendency to explore, of male guppies (Poecilia reticulata) from first-generation inbred and outbred treatments. Boldness in guppies is associated with increased sexual attractiveness, and is thus expected to affect fitness. Therefore, I hypothesised that the personality traits would be negatively affected by inbreeding. However, the results indicated that inbred guppies did not differ in either personality trait from their outbred counterparts. This finding suggests that mechanisms other than condition-dependence are maintaining personality variation in the guppy.

opencc-zeroJul 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Pathways linking female personality with reproductive success are trait and year-specific

<p>Personality  (i.e.  among-individual  variation  in  average  behavior)  often  covaries  with  fitness,  but  how  such  personality-fitness  relationships  come  about  is  poorly  understood.  Here,  we  explore  potential  mechanisms  by  which  two  female  personality  traits  (female-female  aggression  and  female  nest  defense  as  manifested  by  hissing  behavior)  were  linked  with  annual  reproductive  success  in  a  population  of  great  tits  (<i>Parus  major</i>),  a  socially  monogamous  species  with  biparental  care.  We  hypothesized  that  personality-related  differences  in  reproductive  success  result  from  variation  in  reproductive  decision  (lay  date,  brood  size)  and/or  parental  provisioning  rates.  Relative  support  for  these  mechanisms  was  evaluated  using  path-analysis  on  data  collected  in  two  successive  years.  We  reveal  that  larger  broods  were  provisioned  at  a  higher  rate  by  both  parents  and  that  female,  but  not  male,  provisioning  rate  was  involved  in  the  trade-off  between  offspring  number  (brood  size)  and  fledgling  mass.  Among-individual  variation  in  female  aggression,  via  its  association  with  female  provisioning  rate,  was  negatively  linked  to  fledgling  mass  (i.e.  indirect  effect),  yet  only  in  one  of  the  study  years.  Male  provisioning  rate  did  not  influence  these  relationships.  In  contrast,  among-individual  variation  in  hissing  behavior  was  directly  and  negatively  linked  with  fledgling  mass  in  both  years,  via  an  underlying  mechanism  that  remains  to  be  identified  (i.e.  direct  effect).  Together,  our  findings  emphasize  that  personality-fitness  relationships  may  come  about  via  different  mechanisms  across  personality  traits  and/or  years,  thereby  illustrating  additional  complexity  in  how  selection  might  act  on  and  maintain  among-individual  variation  in  behavioral  phenotypes  in  the  wild.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Environmental transmission of a personality trait: foster parent exploration behaviour predicts offspring exploration behaviour in zebra finches

Consistent behavioural differences among individuals are common in many species and can have important effects on offspring fitness. To understand such 'personality' variation, it is important to determine the mode of inheritance, but this has been quantified for only a few species. Here, we report results from a breeding experiment in captive zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in which we cross-fostered offspring to disentangle the importance of genetic and non-genetic transmission of behaviour. Genetic and foster-parents' exploratory type was measured in a novel environment pre-breeding and offspring exploratory type was assessed at adulthood. Offspring exploratory type was predicted by the exploratory behaviour of the foster but not the genetic parents, whereas offspring size was predicted by genetic but not foster-parents' size. Other aspects of the social environment, such as rearing regime (uni- versus biparental), hatching position, brood size or an individual's sex did not influence offspring exploration. Our results therefore indicate that non-genetic transmission of behaviour can play an important role in shaping animal personality variation.

opencc-zeroDec 2012View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Individual variation in the oxidative costs of personality traits

1.'Personality traits' are behavioural differences between individuals that are stable within individuals. Different combinations of personality traits can correlate with fitness variation but the mechanisms remain unclear. There is the suggestion that personality reflects variation in physiology. For example, 'fast' (bold, active, fast exploring) individuals are predicted to maintain a higher metabolic rate than 'slow' animals. A raised metabolic rate can result in a proliferation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which, if unchecked, cause oxidative stress. Thus, the 'extended pace of life theory' predicts that 'fast' individuals will pay higher oxidative costs than 'slow' ones. Alternatively, stress hormones, which are often relatively high in 'slow' individuals, can also cause proliferation of ROS and subsequent oxidative damage. Here, we assessed co-variation between personality and oxidative profile in wild blue tits. 2.The personality traits neophobia (latency to approach food near novel objects), activity level in a novel environment and exploratory tendency (controlling for differences in activity) assayed in captivity were repeatable within individuals but were uncorrelated with each other. Reactive oxygen metabolites (ROMs an index of pro-oxidant status) and OXY (antioxidant capacity) were also uncorrelated with each other and did not vary with age or sex. Blood sampling birds within three minutes of capture from their familiar cage versus after 15 minutes of exposure to a standardised stressor did not affect ROMs or OXY. 3.Wintering blue tits that were both highly neophobic and exploratory had low OXY defences and individuals that showed low neophobia and low exploration had high OXY defences. Variation in ROMs was not explained by any personality trait. High exploratory tendency also correlated with a reduction in body condition in captivity, but body condition did not predict ROMs or OXY. Activity level in the exploration trial did not vary with oxidative profile or change in body condition. 4.Personality types differed in antioxidant defences, and it was the combination of an individual's personality traits that proved important. ROS production and antioxidant defences will vary due to many processes e.g. resource allocation, not just metabolic rate and stress responsiveness. Consequently, the costs of personality traits and thus the predictions regarding fitness are complex. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Social cues affect quantitative genetic variation and covariation in animal personality traits

The social environment is expected to have substantial effects on behavior, and as a consequence its heritability and evolvability. We investigated these effects by exposing Australian field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) to either silence or recordings of male acoustic sexual signals. We used a combined pedigree and full-sib/half-sib breeding design to estimate the repeatability, heritability, and evolvability of behaviors related to boldness, exploration, and activity. All behaviors measured were significantly repeatable in both social environments. Additionally, most behaviors showed significant heritabilities in the two environments. We found no difference in repeatabilities between the silent and the acoustic environment but did find significant differences in the heritabilities and evolvabilities between these environments. There was a high degree of similarity between the phenotypic covariance matrices across the two environments, while the genotypic covariance matrices were highly dissimilar. Reflecting this, we found significant genotype-by-environment interactions for most of the behaviors. Lastly, we found that the repeatable aspect of behavior ('personality') was significantly heritable for most behaviors, but that these heritabilities were higher in the acoustic than in the silent environment. We conclude that the social environment can have a significant impact on the heritability and evolvability of behavior, and argue that evolutionary inferences from phenotypic studies should be made with caution.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Personality traits adjusted for wild canids and re-grouped

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Big Five Personality Traits and Online Learning: A Meta-analysis of 40 Years' Research

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Long-term effects of early nutrition and environmental matching on developmental and personality traits in zebra finches

Developmental plasticity is a key feature of many organisms and individuals can benefit from early programming to optimize their phenotypes for the expected environmental conditions. However, environmental conditions may sometimes change unexpectedly. Mismatches between early and adult life, for example, can have important repercussions for adult phenotypes, potentially leading to better performance under matched than mismatched conditions as predicted by the predictive adaptive response hypothesis. We conducted a long-term experimental manipulation of dietary conditions in a population of zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata. Broods were exposed to two early nutritional treatments until independence and we used a split-brood design to independently manipulate nutritional conditions after independence to create matched and mismatched nutritional environments in later life. Developmental trajectories of all individuals were followed for more than 5 years and we scored behavioural responses in trials in a special environment and while interacting with a special object three times during adult life. Overall, we found no evidence for early programming affecting morphology. Tarsus and wing length were exclusively influenced by the early nutrition. Body weight showed lasting effects of the early treatment and independent effects of nutritional condition during adulthood, but no effects of environmental matching or mismatching. Special-object trials showed effects of the adult nutritional treatment while environmental matching affected hopping activity in special environments. These behavioural responses showed substantial long-term individual stability over a 3-month period and were only marginally smaller when measured over a period of more than 4 years. Interestingly, survival of individuals from low-quality early nutritional condition was higher compared with high-quality early condition individuals, which became evident only after years of survival monitoring. Beyond the nutritional treatment itself, we found sizable brood identity effects that slowly but steadily declined with age, indicating a significant but decaying effect of natural variation in parental provisioning on adult phenotypes.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Prediction of Personality Traits using the Big 5 Framework

<p>The methodology is the core component of any research-related work. The methods used to gain the results are shown in the methodology. Here, the whole research implementation is done using python. There are different steps involved to get the entire research work done which is as follows:</p> <p><strong>1. Acquire Personality Dataset</strong></p> <p>The kaggle machine learning dataset is a collection of datasets, data generators which are used by machine learning community for analysis purpose. The personality prediction dataset is acquired from the kaggle website. This dataset was collected (2016-2018) through an interactive on-line personality test. The personality test was constructed from the IPIP. The personality prediction dataset can be downloaded in zip file format just by clicking on the link available. The personality prediction file consists of two subject CSV files (test.csv &amp; train.csv). The test.csv file has 0 missing values, 7 attributes, and final label output. Also, the dataset has multivariate characteristics. Here, data-preprocessing is done for checking inconsistent behaviors or trends.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>2. Data preprocessing</strong></p> <p>After, Data acquisition the next step is to clean and preprocess the data. The Dataset available has numerical type features. The target value is a five-level personality consisting of serious,lively,responsible,dependable &amp; extraverted. The preprocessed dataset is further split into training and testing datasets. This is achieved by passing feature value, target value, test size to the train-test split method of the scikit-learn package. After splitting of data, the training data is sent to the following Logistic regression &amp; SVM design is used for training the artificial neural networks then test data is used to predict the accuracy of the trained network model.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>3. Feature Extraction</strong></p> <p>The following items were presented on one page and each was rated on a five point scale using radio buttons. The order on page was EXT1, AGR1, CSN1, EST1, OPN1, EXT2, etc. The scale was labeled 1=Disagree, 3=Neutral, 5=Agree</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <pre><code> EXT1 I am the life of the party. EXT2 I don't talk a lot. EXT3 I feel comfortable around people. EXT4 I am quiet around strangers. EST1 I get stressed out easily. EST2 I get irritated easily. EST3 I worry about things. EST4 I change my mood a lot. AGR1 I have a soft heart. AGR2 I am interested in people. AGR3 I insult people. AGR4 I am not really interested in others. CSN1 I am always prepared. CSN2 I leave my belongings around. CSN3 I follow a schedule. CSN4 I make a mess of things. OPN1 I have a rich vocabulary. OPN2 I have difficulty understanding abstract ideas. OPN3 I do not have a good imagination. OPN4 I use difficult words.</code></pre> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>4. Training the Model</strong></p> <p>Train/Test is a method to measure the accuracy of your model. It is called Train/Test because you split the the data set into two sets: a training set and a testing set. 80% for training, and 20% for testing. You train the model using the training set.In this model we trained our dataset using linear_model.LogisticRegression() &amp; svm.SVC() from sklearn Package</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>5. Personality Prediction Output</strong></p> <p>After the training of the designed neural network, the testing of Logistic Regression &amp; SVM is performed using Cohen_kappa_score &amp; Accuracy Score.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Assessing the Influence of Personal Traits, Experiences, and Attitudes on the Perception and Evaluation of AI-generated Artworks

<p>data AI-image paper</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Trait Versus State: The Differential Impact of Personality Traits, Coping Behaviors and Cognitions on Depression and Anxiety

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04444505. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record