Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
81
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
81 results for “research communication”
Figure 7 from: Hershberger WL (2021) Substrate-borne vibrations used during acoustic communication and the existence of courtship songs in some species of the genus Anaxipha (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Trigonidiidae: Trigonidiinae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 185-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.70990
Figure 7 Examination of the means of the average power of the combined first two and the combined last two taps of drumming bouts in courtship songs ±SD. In nearly all instances, tapping becomes louder during an individual drumming bout within courtship songs across all four species. Numbers closer to the abscissas are louder. a = average of the first two taps, b = average of the last two taps in bouts of four taps or more. * = t-tests comparing the means of first two taps to the last two taps, within each species, showed the p-values were all < 0.0001, showing that the taps are significantly louder at the end of drumming bouts (A. exigua n = 5 songs, 45 drumming bouts; A. tinnulacita n = 4, 29; A. tinnulenta n = 4, 98; A. thomasi n = 5, 75).
Figure 1 from: Hershberger WL (2021) Substrate-borne vibrations used during acoustic communication and the existence of courtship songs in some species of the genus Anaxipha (Saussure) (Orthoptera: Trigonidiidae: Trigonidiinae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 185-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.70990
Figure 1 A typical drumming bout showing the low-frequency and brief nature of these sounds. The figure is the selection of a drumming bout from a courtship song of A. thomasi showing the selection window spanning from the middle of the first tap to the middle of the last tap. This tapping bout consists of 12 taps.
Raw research data supporting "Photoswitchable gating of non-equilibrium enzymatic feedback in chemically communicating polymersome nanoreactors "
<p>Research data supporting Rifaie-Graham et al. "Photoswitchable gating of non-equilibrium enzymatic feedback in chemically communicating polymersome nanoreactors."Nature Chemistry. 2022. DOI:10.1038/s41557-022-01062-4.</p>
Figure 2 in Communicating soil biodiversity research to kids around the world
Figure 2. Full timeline of the project - from a quick idea to reaching hundreds of thousands of people around the globe. Upper part: The number of Soil Biodiversity collection articles published in Frontiers for Young Minds (black) and translations expected, received, and published (https://www.idiv.de/de/young-minds/languages.html) over time, as of 2024-06-26. Middle diagonal: Timeline of our project with the Frontiers for Young Minds Soil biodiversity collection in gray and the Translating Soil Biodiversity project in brown. Lower part: The number of translations expected, received, and published for each of the 46 languages covered so far, as of 2024-06-26.
Figure 4 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 4 Hatching intervals of two eggs kept in contact with one another (top panel), separated by ~5 mm (middle panel) with or without a screen,or connected by a piece of wire (bottom panel) at 30°C under continuous illumination in the six indicated grasshopper species (A–F.). Different letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level by the Steel-Dwass test. Diagrams in panels show how the eggs were arranged in wells.
Figure 5 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 5 Hatching activity of the eggs of Teleogryllus emma kept in a group (A.) and those kept singly (a distance of approximately 5 mm) (B.) at 30°C under continuous illumination. The hatching times for 5 groups of 10 eggs were pooled and calculated by designating the time of the first hatching egg as 1 h. The mean hatching time ± SD (sample size) is given in each panel. s2 indicates the variance. Diagrams on the right show the experimental setup.
Figure 6 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 6 Aggregations of Nomadacris succincta hatchlings at 09:46 on May 25, 2018 on Minami-Daito Island, Japan (Photographed by Masanari Aizawa). This grasshopper aggregates tightly as 1st instars only during the nymphal stage.
Figure 3 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 3 Hatching intervals of two eggs kept in contact with one another (top panel), separated by 3–5 mm (middle panel), or separated by a screen (bottom panel) in the six indicated grasshopper species. Eggs were maintained under continuous illumination and 30°C temperature (A–F.). Different letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level using the Steel-Dwass test. Diagram on the right shows how the eggs were arranged in wells.
Figure 2 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 2 Relationship between number of eggs in a group and mean hatching times in six grasshopper species under continuous illumination and 30°C temperature. For each species, hatching times were normalized by assigning a value of 5 h to the mean hatching time of the largest group. n (number of eggs in each treatment) is given above each histogram. Different letters indicate significant differences in mean values at the 5% level using the Tukey's multiple test (A–E.) or the t- test (F.). ns indicates no significant difference.
Figure 1 from: Tanaka S (2021) Embryo-to-embryo communication facilitates synchronous hatching in grasshoppers. Journal of Orthoptera Research 30(2): 107-115. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.30.63405
Figure 1 Hatching activity of eggs kept in a group (A–F.) and those kept singly (G–L.) in a thermocycle of 30 (orange) and 25°C (blue) under continuous illumination in the six indicated grasshopper species. The numbers of eggs that hatched over 2–5 days were pooled and plotted against the time of day. Black arrows indicate the medians. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between the two treatments by the Mann Whitney U-test at the 5% level. The photographs on the right show hatchlings of respective species. Scale bars: 5 mm.
Figure 1 from: Smith V, Rycroft S, Brake I, Scott B, Baker E, Livermore L, Blagoderov V, Roberts D (2011) Scratchpads 2.0: a Virtual Research Environment supporting scholarly collaboration, communication and data publication in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2193
Figure 1 - Scratchpad usage statistics from February 2007 to September 2011. The black dashed line represents the number of Scratchpad community sites (in hundreds) and the blue solid line represents the number of registered users (in thousands). As of September 2011 we have switched to recording the number of active users (currently 4424) since this figure provides a more accurate guide to usage.
Figure 2 from: Smith V, Rycroft S, Brake I, Scott B, Baker E, Livermore L, Blagoderov V, Roberts D (2011) Scratchpads 2.0: a Virtual Research Environment supporting scholarly collaboration, communication and data publication in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150: 53-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2193
Figure 2 - Screenshots of the Scratchpad 2 publication module showing an example workflow. Top, the section writing tool showing material and methods section; middle, the relationship selector that allows a taxon and additional materials to be associated with a section of the publication; and bottom, supplementary files such as illustrations, photos or graphs can be added to complete the publication.
Figure 8b from: Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016) Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8b - Visualizaton showing all groups' visions as interconnected elements (triples), with common elements overlapping.
Figure 8a from: Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016) Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 8a - Visualization showing all ideas generated collectively in the first round (session 3, dark grey) or second round (session 4, light grey), and those generated by the respective groups (solid colors) as part of their vision of scholarly communication.
Figure 7b from: Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016) Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7b - Example of Trello card comment with link to another idea. #dep_on - idea depends on another idea; "https://trello.com/c/RaNcbKSe" - is the short link to the Trello card with the connected idea. In the visualization it would be represented as a line connecting two ideas.
Figure 7a from: Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016) Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 7a - Example of Trello card with tags. "using the public domain" - the idea name; #G2 - the idea came from the Group 2; #viz - the idea is ready to be included in the visualization; #triple - the idea has a link to another idea in the group's vision.
Figure 1 from: Seibt J, Vestergaard C (2018) Fair Proxy Communication: Using Social Robots to Modify the Mechanisms of Implicit Social Cognition. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e31827. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31827
Figure 1 A job interview using FPC, from the perspective of the interviewer. The male interviewer (in the definition: H2) communicates via the Telenoid R4 robot with H1, a female job candidate as shown in Fig. 2.
Figure 2 from: Seibt J, Vestergaard C (2018) Fair Proxy Communication: Using Social Robots to Modify the Mechanisms of Implicit Social Cognition. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e31827. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31827
Figure 2 A job interview using FPC, from the perspective of the job candidate. A female candidate (in the definition D1-1: H1) operates her robotic proxy, a Telenoid R4 robot, while she communicates with the male interviewer. Her head movements, lip movements and speech are translated directly to the robot, either via a kinetic sensor on a headset or by a facial reading programme; her voice may or may not be morphed to mask gender (see section "Practical Significance" below). The camera that projects the interviewer on to her computer screen is in the eyes of the robot –thus, in contrast to a skype session, she looks into the interviewer's eyes when facing the interviewer.
Evaluating Tools to Communicate Scleroderma Research Results to Patients - Trial #1
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06373263. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Figure 9c from: Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016) Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9340. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Figure 9c - One group's suggested principles (session 11)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.