Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Dataset results

79 results for “ribosomal DNA”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗

dryad28/100

Data from: Testing hypotheses of chaetognath origins: long branches revealed by 18S ribosomal DNA

Many hypotheses regarding the phylogenetic position of the Chaetognatha (arrow worms) have been proposed; these organisms are problematic primarily because their morphology offers few unambiguous systematic characters that ally them with other taxa. Early researchers proposed a plethora of phylogenetic placements for the Chaetognatha, grouping them with such divergent taxa as acanthocephalans and mollusks, but more traditional hypotheses posit that chaetognaths are, in fact, deuterostomes. Recently, Telford and Holland (1993, Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:660--676) and Wada and Satoh (1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1801--1804) disputed the deuterostome affinities of chaetognaths based on 18S nuclear ribosomal RNA (rDNA) gene sequence data. By employing published 18S rDNA gene sequence data, I extended these previous analyses by testing specific hypotheses of chaetognath affinities to nematodes, mollusks, acanthocephalans, and deuterostomes. Both parsimony and neighbor-joining analyses supported the monophyly of a chaetognath--nematode clade. Faith's T-PTP test and winning-sites analyses were employed to discriminate among competing hypotheses. The possibility of long-branch attraction accounting for the chaetognath--nematode relationship was explored by analyzing alternative four-taxon trees. An evolutionary scenario for the origin of the chaetognath lineage from a vermiform benthic organism is presented.

opencc-zeroDec 2008View details →

dryad28/100

Data from: Phylogenetic relationships of Agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences

Phylogenetic relationships of mushrooms and their relatives within the order Agaricales were addressed using nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Approximately 900 bases of the 5' end of the nucleus-encoded large subunit RNA gene (nLSU-rDNA) were sequenced for 154 selected taxa representing most families within the Agaricales. Several phylogenetic methods were used, including weighted and equally weighted parsimony (MP), maximum likelihood (ML), and distance methods (NJ). The starting tree for branch swapping in the ML analyses was the tree with the highest ML score among previously produced MP and NJ trees. A high degree of consensus was observed between phylogenetic estimates obtained through MP and ML. NJ trees differed according to the distance model that was used, however, all NJ trees still supported most of the same terminal groupings as MP and ML trees. NJ trees were always significantly suboptimal when evaluated against the best MP and ML trees, using both parsimony and likelihood tests. Our analyses suggest that weighted parsimony and ML provide the best estimates of Agaricales phylogeny. Similar support was observed between bootstrapping and jackknifing methods for evaluation of tree robustness. Phylogenetic analyses revealed many groups of agaricoid fungi that are supported by moderate to high bootstrap or jackknife levels or are consistent with morphology-based classification schemes. Analyzes also support separate placement of the boletes and russules, which are basal to the main core group of gilled mushrooms (the Agaricineae of Singer). Examples of monophyletic groups include the families Amanitaceae, Coprinaceae (excluding Coprinus comatus and subfamily Panaeolideae), Agaricaceae (excluding the Cystodermateae), and Strophariaceae pro parte (Stropharia, Pholiota, and Hypholoma); the mycorrhizal species of Tricholoma (including Leucopaxillus, also mycorrhizal); Mycena and Resinomycena; Termitomyces, Podabrella, and Lyophyllum; and Pleurotus with Hohenbuehelia. Several nonmonophyletic groups revealed by these data include the families Tricholomataceae, Cortinariaceae, and Hygrophoraceae and the genera Clitocybe, Omphalina, and Marasmius. This study provides a framework for future systematics studies in the Agaricales and suggestions for analyzing large molecular data sets.

opencc-zeroDec 2008View details →

dryad28/100

Data from: The Strepsiptera Problem: Phylogeny of the Holometabolous Insect Orders Inferred from 18S and 28S Ribosomal DNA Sequences and Morphology

Phylogenetic relationships among the holometabolous insect orders were inferred from cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (85 exemplars) and 28S rDNA (52 exemplars) and morphological characters. Exemplar outgroup taxa were Collembola (1 sequence), Archaeognatha (1), Ephemerida (1), Odonata (2), Plecoptera (2), Blattodea (1), Mantodea (1), Dermaptera (1), Orthoptera (1), Phasmatodea (1), Embioptera (1), Psocoptera (1), Phthiraptera (1), Hemiptera (4), and Thysanoptera (1). Exemplar ingroup taxa were Coleoptera: Archostemata (1), Adephaga (2), and Polyphaga (7); Megaloptera (1); Raphidioptera (1); Neuroptera (sensu stricto ;eq Planipennia): Mantispoidea (2), Hemerobioidea (2), and Myrmeleontoidea (2); Hymenoptera: Symphyta (4) and Apocrita (19); Trichoptera: Hydropsychoidea (1) and Limnephiloidea (2); Lepidoptera: Ditrysia (3); Siphonaptera: Pulicoidea (1) and Ceratophylloidea (2); Mecoptera: Meropeidae (1), Boreidae (1), Panorpidae (1), and Bittacidae (2); Diptera: Nematocera (1), Brachycera (2), and Cyclorrhapha (1); and Strepsiptera: Corioxenidae (1), Myrmecolacidae (1), Elenchidae (1), and Stylopidae (3). We analyzed ~1 kilobase of 18S rDNA, starting 398 nucleotides downstream of the 5' end, and ~400 bp of 28S rDNA in expansion segment D3. Multiple alignment of the 18S and 28S sequences resulted in 1,116 nucleotide positions with 24 insert regions and 398 positions with 14 insert regions, respectively. All Strepsiptera and Neuroptera have large insert regions in 18S and 28S. The secondary structure of 18S insert 23 is composed of long stems that are GC rich in the basal Strepsiptera and AT rich in the more derived Strepsiptera. A matrix of 176 morphological characters was analyzed for holometabolous orders. Incongruence length difference tests indicate that the 28S + morphological data sets are incongruent but that 28S + 18S, 18S + morphology, and 28S + 18S + morphology fail to reject the hypothesis of congruence. Phylogenetic trees were generated by parsimony analysis, and clade robustness was evaluated by branch length, Bremer support, percentage of extra steps required to force paraphyly, and sensitivity analysis using the following parameters: gap weights, morphological character weights, methods of data set combination, removal of key taxa, and alignment region. The following are monophyletic under most or all combinations of parameter values: Holometabola, Polyphaga, Megaloptera + Raphidioptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Amphiesmenoptera (Trichoptera + Lepidoptera), Siphonaptera, Siphonaptera + Mecoptera, Strepsiptera, Diptera, and Strepsiptera + Diptera (Halteria). Antliophora (Mecoptera + Diptera + Siphonaptera + Strepsiptera), Mecopterida (Antliophora + Amphiesmenoptera), and Hymenoptera + Mecopterida are supported in the majority of total evidence analyses. Mecoptera may be paraphyletic because Boreus is often placed as sister group to the fleas; hence, Siphonaptera may be subordinate within Mecoptera. The 18S sequences for Priacma (Coleoptera: Archostemata), Colpocaccus (Coleoptera: Adephaga), Agulla (Raphidioptera), and Corydalus (Megaloptera) are nearly identical, and Neuropterida are monophyletic only when those two beetle sequences are removed from the analysis. Coleoptera are therefore paraphyletic under almost all combinations of parameter values. Halteria and Amphiesmenoptera have high Bremer support values and long branch lengths. The data do not support placement of Strepsiptera outside of Holometabola nor as sister group to Coleoptera. We reject the notion that the monophyly of Halteria is due to long branch attraction because Strepsiptera and Diptera do not have the longest branches and there is phylogenetic congruence between molecules, across the entire parameter space, and between morphological and molecular data.

opencc-zeroDec 2008View details →

dryad28/100

Data from: Ribosomal RNA gene repeats associate with the nuclear pore complex for maintenance after DNA damage

The ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) comprise a highly repetitive gene cluster. The copy number of genes at this locus can readily change and is therefore one of the most unstable regions of the genome. DNA damage in rDNA occurs after binding of the replication fork blocking protein Fob1 in S phase, which triggers unequal sister chromatid recombination. However, the precise mechanisms by which such DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired is not well understood. Here, we demonstrate that the conserved protein kinase Tel1 maintains rDNA stability after replication fork arrest. We show that rDNA associates with nuclear pores, which is dependent on DNA damage checkpoint kinases Mec1/Tel1 and replisome component Tof1. These findings suggest that rDNA-nuclear pore association is due to a replication fork block and subsequent DSB. Indeed, quantitative microscopy revealed that rDNA is relocated to the nuclear periphery upon induction of a DSB. Finally, rDNA stability was reduced in strains where this association with the nuclear envelope was prevented, which suggests its importance for avoiding improper recombination repair that could induce repeat instability.

opencc-zeroDec 2018View details →

dryad28/100

Data from: Ribosomal DNA sequence heterogeneity reflects intra-species phylogenies and predicts genome structure in two contrasting yeast species

The ribosomal RNA encapsulates a wealth of evolutionary information, including genetic variation that can be used to discriminate between organisms at a wide range of taxonomic levels. For example, the prokaryotic 16S rDNA sequence is very widely used both in phylogenetic studies and as a marker in metagenomic surveys and the ITS region, frequently used in plant phylogenetics, is now recognised as a fungal DNA barcode. However, this widespread use does not escape criticism, principally due to issues such as difficulties in classification of paralogous versus orthologous rDNA units and intragenomic variation, both of which may be significant barriers to accurate phylogenetic inference. We recently analysed datasets from the Saccharomyces Genome Resequencing Project, characterising rDNA sequence variation within multiple strains of the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its nearest wild relative Saccharomyces paradoxus in unprecedented detail. Notably, both species possess single locus rDNA systems. Here, we use these new variation datasets to assess whether a more detailed characterisation of the rDNA locus can alleviate the second of these phylogenetic issues, sequence heterogeneity, while controlling for the first. We demonstrate that a strong phylogenetic signal exists within both datasets and illustrate how they can be used, with existing methodology, to estimate intra-species phylogenies of yeast strains consistent with those derived from whole-genome approaches. We also describe the use of partial Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms, a type of sequence variation found only in repetitive genomic regions, in identifying key evolutionary features such as genome hybridisation events and show their consistency with whole-genome Structure analyses. We conclude that our approach can transform rDNA sequence heterogeneity from a problem to a useful source of evolutionary information, enabling the estimation of highly accurate phylogenies of closely related organisms, and discuss how it could be extended to future studies of multi-locus rDNA systems.

opencc-zeroDec 2013View details →

zenodo28/100

Fig. 1 in A phylogeny of Sericini with particular reference to Chinese species using mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)

Fig. 1 Map of the sample sites of the newly sequenced Sericini material from China

opennotspecifiedFeb 2015View details →

zenodo28/100

Table 6 in A revised taxonomy and phylogeny of opalinids (Stramenopiles: Opalinata) inferred from the analysis of complete nuclear ribosomal DNA genes

Table 6. Number and proportion of shared short tandem repeats (STRs) in the rDNA of opalinids. For each species* the total number of STRs (T) and the proportion of STRs species specific (not shared with other sequences) (S)* STRs shared by species of the same genus (G)* and STRs shared by species of different genera (C) are given. Incomplete sequences (those lacking ≥100 bases at the 3 ʹ or 5 ʹ end) are shown in parentheses. Abbreviation: N/A* sequence not available.<table><tbody><tr><th>Species</th><th>SSU rDNA</th><th>ITS1</th><th>5.8S rDNA</th><th>ITS2</th><th>LSU rDNA</th></tr><tr><th>T</th><th>S</th><th>G</th><th>C</th><th>T</th><th>S</th><th>G</th><th>C</th><th>T</th><th>S</th><th>G</th><th>C</th><th>T</th><th>S</th><th>G</th><th>C</th><th>T</th><th>S</th><th>G</th><th>C</th></tr><tr><th>OPALINIDA</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>(Protoopalina axonucleata)</th><td>45</td><td>13.3</td><td>35.6</td><td>51.1</td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>(Protoopalina intestinalis)</th><td>52</td><td>11.5</td><td>38.5</td><td>50.0</td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Protoopalina limnocharis</th><td>68</td><td>14.7</td><td>29.4</td><td>55.9</td><td>19</td><td>31.6</td><td>68.4</td><td>0</td><td>5</td><td>0.0</td><td>20.0</td><td>80.0</td><td>16</td><td>25.0</td><td>75.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>177</td><td>3.4</td><td>47.5</td><td>49.1</td></tr><tr><th>Protoopalina pingi</th><td>68</td><td>14.7</td><td>29.4</td><td>55.9</td><td>20</td><td>35.0</td><td>65.0</td><td>0</td><td>5</td><td>0.0</td><td>20.0</td><td>80.0</td><td>15</td><td>20.0</td><td>80.0</td><td>0.0</td><td>179</td><td>4.5</td><td>46.9</td><td>48.6</td></tr><tr><th>Zelleriella orientalis</th><td>95</td><td>0.0</td><td>41.0</td><td>59.0</td><td>22</td><td>0.0</td><td>95.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>9</td><td>0.0</td><td>33.3</td><td>66.7</td><td>23</td><td>0.0</td><td>91.3</td><td>8.7</td><td>203</td><td>3.5</td><td>23.6</td><td>72.9</td></tr><tr><th>Zelleriella sp.</th><td>95</td><td>0.0</td><td>41.0</td><td>59.0</td><td>22</td><td>0.0</td><td>95.5</td><td>4.5</td><td>9</td><td>0.0</td><td>33.3</td><td>66.7</td><td>23</td><td>0.0</td><td>91.3</td><td>8.7</td><td>212</td><td>6.1</td><td>22.7</td><td>71.2</td></tr><tr><th>Opalina undulata</th><td>104</td><td>12.5</td><td>33.7</td><td>53.8</td><td>26</td><td>80.8</td><td>15.4</td><td>3.8</td><td>8</td><td>0.0</td><td>37.5</td><td>62.5</td><td>25</td><td>44.0</td><td>48.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>213</td><td>10.3</td><td>19.3</td><td>70.4</td></tr><tr><th>Opalina triangulata</th><td>103</td><td>11.6</td><td>34.0</td><td>54.4</td><td>24</td><td>79.1</td><td>16.7</td><td>4.2</td><td>8</td><td>0.0</td><td>37.5</td><td>62.5</td><td>26</td><td>46.2</td><td>46.2</td><td>7.6</td><td>207</td><td>7.7</td><td>19.8</td><td>72.5</td></tr><tr><th>Opalina obtrigonoidea</th><td>104</td><td>12.5</td><td>33.7</td><td>53.8</td><td>27</td><td>81.5</td><td>14.8</td><td>3.7</td><td>8</td><td>0.0</td><td>37.5</td><td>62.5</td><td>26</td><td>46.2</td><td>46.2</td><td>7.6</td><td>217</td><td>12.0</td><td>18.9</td><td>69.1</td></tr><tr><th>Opalina japonica</th><td>103</td><td>11.6</td><td>34.0</td><td>54.4</td><td>25</td><td>80.0</td><td>16.0</td><td>4.0</td><td>8</td><td>0.0</td><td>37.5</td><td>62.5</td><td>29</td><td>51.7</td><td>41.4</td><td>6.9</td><td>215</td><td>11.2</td><td>19.1</td><td>69.7</td></tr><tr><th>Opalina longa</th><td>105</td><td>13.4</td><td>33.3</td><td>53.3</td><td>20</td><td>75.0</td><td>20.0</td><td>5.0</td><td>8</td><td>0.0</td><td>37.5</td><td>62.5</td><td>25</td><td>44.0</td><td>48.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>213</td><td>10.3</td><td>19.3</td><td>70.4</td></tr><tr><th>PROTEROMONADIDA</th></tr><tr><th>Karotomorpha sp. a*b</th><td>52</td><td>36.5</td><td></td><td>63.5</td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Proteromonas lacertae b</th><td>56</td><td>41.1</td><td></td><td>58.9</td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>N/A</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>aThe data presented correspond to the sequence with accession number DQ431242;the Karotomorpha sp. DQ431243 sequence is partial and has not been considered for this analysis.bData are available for only one species per genus;STRs are therefore considered in two categories* as species/genus specific* or as shared with other genera.

opennotspecifiedNov 2023View details →

zenodo28/100

Table 5 in A revised taxonomy and phylogeny of opalinids (Stramenopiles: Opalinata) inferred from the analysis of complete nuclear ribosomal DNA genes

Table 5. Types of short tandem repeats (STRs) found in the sequences from opalinids.<table><tbody><tr><th>Type</th><th>Characteristics</th><th>Example</th><th>Sequence (position)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Direct</th><td>Head to tail</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Perfect</th><td>All units equal</td><td>TAATAATAATAATAA</td><td>Opalina undulata MN 638758 (3423)</td></tr><tr><th>Imperfect</th><td>With substitutions and/or indels</td><td>AGTTT ATTTT AATTT</td><td>Zelleriella sp. MN638763 (1762)</td></tr><tr><th>Overlapped</th><td>STR includes bases</td><td>TTTA[T ATTAT]/ [TAT TAT] TAT</td><td>Protoopalina limnocharis MN 638759 (1493/1497)</td></tr><tr><th>Inverted</th><td>Head to head</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Perfect</th><td>All units equal</td><td>TTTATAATATTT</td><td>Opalina triangulata MN 638762 (470)</td></tr><tr><th>Imperfect</th><td>With substitutions and/or indels</td><td>TTATTATTATTATTTTTTTTATTA(-) TATTATT</td><td>Opalina japonica MN 638764 (73)</td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedNov 2023View details →

zenodo28/100

Table 4. Posterior means and 95 in A revised taxonomy and phylogeny of opalinids (Stramenopiles: Opalinata) inferred from the analysis of complete nuclear ribosomal DNA genes

Table 4. Posterior means and 95% credibility intervals (CIs) of divergence times (DTs) of Opalinata lineages (in million years) inferred in the TimeTree analysis. Three groups of calibration time points were used to calibrate the molecular clock. Group A (‘sequence evolution’): calibration points with uniform distribution were assigned for the origin of Stramenopiles (1469.6–812.4 Mya) and Ciliophora (1344.0–627.3 Mya) and to the split of Apicomplexa and Dinoflagellata (1098.8–501.9 Mya). Group B (‘host class constraints’): the maximum bounds of the origin of Amphibia (355.7 Mya) and Sauropsida (322.4 Mya) were assigned to the nodes where Karotomorpha (parasite of amphibians) and Proteromonas (parasite of lizards) branched off* respectively. Group C (‘anuran family constraints’): a maximum bound was assigned to the nodes where Protoopalina * Zelleriella * and Opalina branched off* based on the estimated maximum time of emergence of the most ancient anuran family in which species of each genus have been cited (respectively: Ascaphidae * 204 Mya; Microhylidae * 116.3 Mya; Bombinatoridae and Alytidae * 196 Mya). Four scenarios were analysed by combining the groups of calibration time points.<table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Scenario 1 (A)</th><th>Scenario 2 (A + B)</th><th>Scenario 3 (A + C)</th><th>Scenario 4 (A + B + C)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td>DT (95% CI)</td><td>DT (95% CI)</td><td>DT (95% CI)</td><td>DT (95% CI)</td></tr><tr><th>Opalinata</th><td>586.7 (304.6–1130.1)</td><td>515.7 (267.0–996.0)</td><td>586.7 (304.6–1129.8)</td><td>515.7 (267.0–996.1)</td></tr><tr><th>Karotomorpha</th><td>351.7 (165.2–748.8)</td><td>309.2 (178.8–355.7)</td><td>351.7 (165.6–746.9)</td><td>309.2 (178.8–355.7)</td></tr><tr><th>Opalinida</th><td>250.4 (110.7–566.5)</td><td>220.1 (119.3–286.8)</td><td>250.4 (112.2–558.6)</td><td>220.1 (119.3–286.8)</td></tr><tr><th>Protoopalina</th><td>119.4 (48.6–293.5)</td><td>105.0 (56.1–196.6)</td><td>119.4 (55.1–204.0)</td><td>105.0 (56.0–196.9)</td></tr><tr><th>Zelleriella – Opalina split</th><td>49.7 (17.4–142.3)</td><td>43.7 (20.1–95.0)</td><td>49.7 (19.8–124.7)</td><td>43.7 (20.4–93.5)</td></tr></tbody></table>

opennotspecifiedNov 2023View details →

zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Tedersoo L, Liiv I, Kivistik PA, Anslan S, Kõljalg U, Bahram M (2016) Genomics and metagenomics technologies to recover ribosomal DNA and single-copy genes from old fruit-body and ectomycorrhiza specimens. MycoKeys 13: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.13.8140

Figure 2 - Impact of maximum obtained DNA concentration and number of Illumina HiSeq reads on the size of all scaffolds (A, B) and largest nuclear rDNA scaffold (C, D). Regular straight lines and dotted lines indicate linear and better fitting logarithmic relationships, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Tedersoo L, Liiv I, Kivistik PA, Anslan S, Kõljalg U, Bahram M (2016) Genomics and metagenomics technologies to recover ribosomal DNA and single-copy genes from old fruit-body and ectomycorrhiza specimens. MycoKeys 13: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.13.8140

Figure 1 - Effect of specimen age on the recovery of reads in the Illumina HiSeq run. Closed circles, 'old' fruit-bodies; shaded circles, 'regular' fruit-bodies; open circles, 'unsequenced' fruit-bodies; shaded triangles, ectomycorrhizal root tips representing unique rare lineages; open triangles, 'unsequenced' ectomycorrhizal root tips.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →

zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Xu M, Liu Y, Möller E, LaGreca S, Moya P, Wang X, Timdal E, de Boer H, Barreno E, Wang L, Thüs H, Andrésson Ó, Magnússon KP, Ólafsdóttir ES, Heiðmarsson S (2023) Mycobiont-specific primers facilitate the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA: a focus on the lichenized fungal genus Melanelia (Ascomycota, Parmeliaceae) in Iceland. MycoKeys 96: 57-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.96.100037

Multiple sequence alignment for fungal mtSSU primer design of the genus Usnea

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →

zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Xu M, Liu Y, Möller E, LaGreca S, Moya P, Wang X, Timdal E, de Boer H, Barreno E, Wang L, Thüs H, Andrésson Ó, Magnússon KP, Ólafsdóttir ES, Heiðmarsson S (2023) Mycobiont-specific primers facilitate the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA: a focus on the lichenized fungal genus Melanelia (Ascomycota, Parmeliaceae) in Iceland. MycoKeys 96: 57-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.96.100037

Priming sites for alternative mtSSU primers, Nanodrop results and in silico PCR amplicons

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →

dryad28/100