Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
116
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
116 results for “seasonal abundance”
Figure 11 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus. carpiniobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 11 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus. carpiniobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in Farm B.
Figure 7 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 7 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 2 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 2 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 8 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 8 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 9 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 9 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 4 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 4 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 3 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 3 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 6 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 6 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 1 Seasonal abundance ofPanonychus ulmiobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 1 Seasonal abundance ofPanonychus ulmiobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards
Figure 5 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 5 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 8a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 8a–b. Mean captures of female C. capitata per trap per week in torula yeast traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 315.75; df = 6,27535; P <0.001; r2 = 6.44%; n = 228 (coffee), 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 13230 (residential), 1658 (rural), 5630 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Figure 4a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 4a–b. Mean captures of female B. cucurbitae per trap per week in torula yeast traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 2897.68; df = 5,27536; P <0.001; r2 = 34.48%; n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 13230 (residential), 1886 (rural), 5630 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Figure 3a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 3a–b. Mean captures of male B. cucurbitae per trap per week in cue-lure traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 5453.02; df = 5,18128; P <0.001; r2 = 60.06%); n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 8879 (residential), 1720 (rural), 739 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Figure 7a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 7a–b. Mean captures of male C. capitata per trap per week in trimedlure traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 586.20; df = 6,18127; P <0.001; r2 = 16.25%; n = 228 (coffee), 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 8879 (residential), 1492 (rural), 739 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Figure 2a–f in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 2a–f. Overall mean (±SE) monthly captures of male B. cucurbitae in cue-lure traps (a), female B. cucurbitae in protein traps (b), male B. dorsalis in methyl eugenol traps (c), female B. dorsalis in protein traps (d), male C. capitata in trimedlure traps (e), and female C. capitata in protein traps, based on all trapping sites maintained on Oahu between April 2009 and December 2013.
Figure 9a–c in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 9a–c. Correlation between mean monthly captures of female flies in protein traps and males in male lure traps for B. cucurbitae (a), B. dorsalis (b), and C. capitata (c).
Figure 6a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 6a–b. Mean captures of female B. dorsalis per trap per week in torula yeast traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 447.43; df = 5,27536; P <0.001; r2 = 7.51%; n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 13230 (residential), 1886 (rural), 5630 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Figure 5a–b in Abundance and Seasonal Occurrence of Pest Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Residential and Rural Areas of Oahu (Hawaiian Islands)
Figure 5a–b. Mean captures of male B. dorsalis per trap per week in methyl eugenol traps at different sites (a), in different habitats (a, insert graph), and as monthly means throughout the trapping periods in different habitats (b). Values with the same letter in insert graph are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Tukey's test, post ANOVA). F = 1459.54; df = 5,18128; P <0.001; r2 = 28.70%; n = 2514 (gardens), 1807 (NW Oahu), 8879 (residential), 1720 (rural), 739 (urban), 2475 (Waialua).
Seasonal surveys of fish abundance and diversity in streams of central, eastern, and southern Arizona, USA (2016-2019)
Fish communities in desert streams are shaped by both the long-term selective pressures of streamflow regimes and the short-term effects of floods and droughts. Between spring 2016 and spring 2019 we conducted seasonal sampling of nine streams across the state of Arizona, USA on a gradient of flow regime variability. We calculated populations size for each species at all surveys to analyze seasonal and long-term variations in fish community composition. We additionally used the data to calculate annual rates of fish biomass production. This data set includes the raw catch data from three pass depletion electrofishing, population size estimates at each season, sampling locations, and the USGS stream gauges we used to obtain streamflow data.
Climate Change Across Seasons Experiment (CCASE) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Foliar Nitrogen and Natural Abundance Nitrogen Isotopic Composition
Foliar nitrogen and natural abundance stable isotopes of nitrogen in foliage were measured on all Climate Change Across Seasons Experiment (CCASE) plots. There are six plots total (each 11 x 14 m). Two are warmed 5 degrees C throughout the growing season (Plots 3 and 4). Two others are warmed 5 degrees C in the growing season and have snow removed during winter to induce soil freezing and then warming cables turn on to create thaws; each soil freeze/thaw cycle includes 72-hours of soil freezing followed by 72-hours of thaw (Plots 5 and 6). Four kilometers (2.5 mi) of heating cable are buried in the soil to warm these four plots. Two additional plots serve as controls for our experiment (Plots 1 and 2). This data set includes foliar nitrogen and natural abundance stable isotopes of nitrogen in foliage from 2012 to 2018. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.