Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

Figure 3 in Better biosecurity: spread-prevention of the invasive Asian clam, Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774)

Figure 3. Mean mortality (± SE) of adult Corbicula fluminea specimens (SH = 15–26 mm) 24 hrs post-exposure to 5 (50 ml L-1), 10 (100 ml L-1) or 20% (200 ml L-1) bleach solutions. Experimental groups, each consisting of ten clams, were immersed in solutions of either chemical for 10, 20, 40 and 80 minutes (n = 3, with 160 clams per n).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

Figure 1 in Better biosecurity: spread-prevention of the invasive Asian clam, Corbicula fluminea (Müller, 1774)

Figure 1. Mean mortality (± SE) of medium (A: SH = 15–20.9 mm) and large (B: SH = 21–36 mm) adult Corbicula fluminea specimens 24 hrs post-exposure to aquatic disinfectants Virasure® Aquatic and Virkon® Aquatic, at both 2% (20 g L-1) and 4 % (40 g L-1) concentrations. Experimental groups, each consisting of ten clams, were immersed in solutions (dechlorinated tap water) of either chemical for 10, 20, 40 and 80 minutes (n = 5, with 400 clams per n).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

Figure 2 in The effectiveness of hot water pressurized spray in field conditions to slow the spread of invasive alien species

Figure 2. Average temperature of hot water spray treatment applied to Dreissena polymorpha, Dikerogammarus villosus and Crassula helmsii from three distances (10, 20, 30 cm) and for three durations (5, 10, 15 seconds) and control cold water treatment (from 10 cm for 15 seconds). Grey shading shows standard error of average (n = 36).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

Figure 1 in The effectiveness of hot water pressurized spray in field conditions to slow the spread of invasive alien species

Figure 1. Photographs of four invasive alien species utilised in hot water spray effectiveness experiments; a. Dikerogammarus villosus, b. Dreissena polymorpha, c. Crassula helmsii, d. Hydrocotyle ranunculoides. Photographs by Chris Pollock (a, b, c) and Stephanie Bradbeer (d).

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →

Figure 2 in Recreational watercraft decontamination: can current recommendations reduce aquatic invasive species spread?

Figure 2. Water temperature and exposure duration resulting in 100% mortality. The regression line shows the relationship between water temperature and exposure duration among all AIS types collectively. Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence bands.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

Figure 4 in The effectiveness of hot water pressurized spray in field conditions to slow the spread of invasive alien species

Figure 4. (A) Average maximum temperature, (B) Average thermal exposure (area under the curve), of hot water spray applied to Crassula helmsii from two distances (10 and 30 cm) for three durations (30, 60, 90 seconds). Error bars show standard error (n = 12), * show statistical significance and letters show treatments statistically the same to another.

Fig. 4 in Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in livestock in the Ganja-Gazakh Region of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Bio-ecological features

Fig. 4. Correlation between season and spread of moniesiosis pathogens in goats Рис. 4. Зависимость распространения возбуÃитеΛей мониезиоза от сезонов гоÃа

Fig. 3 in Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in livestock in the Ganja-Gazakh Region of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Bio-ecological features

Fig. 3. Age-dependent dynamics of moniesiosis pathogens Рис. 3. Возрастная Ãинамика заражения мониезиями овец и коз

Fig. 1 in Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in livestock in the Ganja-Gazakh Region of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Bio-ecological features

Fig. 1. Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in sheep in different landscape/ecological territories Рис. 1. Распространение возбуÃитеΛей мониезиоза среÃи овец в ΛанÃшафтно-экоΛоги- ческих зонах

Fig. 2 in Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in livestock in the Ganja-Gazakh Region of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Bio-ecological features

Fig. 2. Spread of moniesiosis pathogens in goats in different landscape/ecological territories Рис. 2. Распространение возбуÃитеΛей мониезиоза коз по ΛанÃшафтно-экоΛогическим зонам

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 3 in Establishment and spread of two invasive subterranean termite species (Coptotermes formosanus and C. gestroi; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in metropolitan southeastern Florida (1990-2015)

Fig. 3. Cumulative area within metropolitan southeastern Florida that is at risk of infestation by Coptotermes species over time. An area at risk was determined by the zone within a 500 m radius from a termite record (at scale on the figure).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Establishment and spread of two invasive subterranean termite species (Coptotermes formosanus and C. gestroi; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in metropolitan southeastern Florida (1990-2015)

Fig. 1. Putative distribution of Coptotermes formosanus and Coptotermes gestroi in the southeastern United States. Both species have a distribution overlap in metropolitan southeastern Florida.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in Establishment and spread of two invasive subterranean termite species (Coptotermes formosanus and C. gestroi; Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) in metropolitan southeastern Florida (1990-2015)

Fig. 2. Distribution of Coptotermes formosanus and Coptotermes gestroi in metropolitan southeastern Florida 2000–2015.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Spread of Larinus minutus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), a biological control agent of knapweeds, following introduction to northwestern Arkansas

Fig. 1. Percentage of infested capitula (A) and spread rate (B) of Larinus minutus populations on spotted knapweed from the release point at each of 5 release sites in northwest Arkansas as modeled by the exponential decay function: y = Ae-Bx

Fig. 4 in Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Fig. 4. Overview of parasite detection in managed bees in North America and likely instances of parasite transmission between managed and wild bumblebees.

Fig. 3 in Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Fig. 3. Overview of parasite detection in managed bees in Japan and likely instances of parasite transmission between managed and wild bumblebees.

Fig. 5 in Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Fig. 5. Overview of parasite detection in managed bees in the British Isles and likely instances of parasite transmission between managed and wild bumblebees.

Fig. 2 in Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Fig. 2. Highlighting the three main mechanisms that influence parasite infections between managed and wild bee populations. Arrows represent direction of potential parasite spread as a result of the mechanism.

Fig. 1 in Do managed bees drive parasite spread and emergence in wild bees?

Fig. 1. The key factors that may drive disease emergence within and between populations of managed and wild bees. Adapted from Daszak et al. (2000).