Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 12–19 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 12–19. Paraphlebia spp. colour pattern of head and thorax. Head frontal view (12–19); thorax lateral view (14– 19).

FIGURE 1 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of Paraphlebia's generic characters; (1a) ♂ genital ligula: a – lateral, a' – ental, scS – sclerotized shaft, Llb – lateral lobe, iF – internal fold; (1b) ♂ anterior and posterior hamuli lateral view: ah – anterior hamuli, pH – posterior hamuli; (1c) ♂ S2 ventral view; (1d) ♀ S9–10 ventral view, St – stylus, V1/V3 – first/third valves of ovipositor, Lam – basal plate of ovipositor.

FIGURES 164–166 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 164–166. Field photographs. Paraphlebia quinta ♂Bw (164), 5.5 km al O de Chimalapa 1ª sección, camino hacia Francisco J. Mújica, Tabasco, Mexico, 4 Sep 2015; P. quinta ♂Bw (165), Km. 56.9 carretera federal 175 Tuxtepec-Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico, 10 May 2016; P. quinta ♂Bw (166), Reserva Ecológica La Otra Opción, Veracruz, Mexico, 1 Aug 2019.

FIGURES 170–171 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 170–171. Field photographs. Paraphlebia zoe ♂Bw♀ (170), Teocelo, Veracruz, Mexico, 14 Jul 2020; P. zoe ♂ Hw (171), Teocelo, Veracruz, Mexico, 15 Apr 2020. Photograph 170 by C. Bota-Sierra.

FIGURES 28–34 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 28–34. Paraphlebia spp. colour pattern of thorax and abdomen. Thorax lateral view (28–32); abdomen lateral view (33–34).

FIGURES 161–163 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 161–163. Field photographs. Paraphlebia kinich ♂ (161), Cascada Misol-Ha, Chiapas, Mexico, 30 Aug 2015; P. quinta ♀ (162), Km. 56.9 carretera federal 175 Tuxtepec-Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico, 10 May 2016; P. quinta ♂Bw, young individual (163), 5.5 km al O de Chimalapa 1ª sección, camino hacia Francisco J. Mújica, Tabasco, Mexico, 4 Sep 2015.

FIGURES 105–116 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 105–116. Paraphlebia spp. posterior lobe of prothorax frontal view (105–107); dorsal view (108–116).

FIGURES 155–157 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 155–157. Field photographs. Paraphlebia esperanza ♂ (155), Km. 85 carretera federal 175 Tuxtepec-Oaxaca, Oaxaca, Mexico, 10 May 2016; P. flinti ♂ (156), Km 177.5 carretera federal Mex-195, 8 km al N de Jitotol, Chiapas, Mexico, 1 Aug 2016; P. hyalina ♂ (157), Arroyo 1 km al S de Santa Cruz Tepetotutla sobre la carretera, Oaxaca, Mexico, 16 May 2016.

FIGURES 138–143 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 138–143. Paraphlebia spp. mesostigmal plates, type labels and type photograph. Mesostigmal plates dorsal view (138–139); type labels (140, 142–143); P. zoe holotype dorsal view.

FIGURES 152–154 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 152–154. Field photographs. Paraphlebia chaak ♂ (152), Barranca a 50 m de la carretera hacia Chicacao, km 155, Suchitepequez, Guatemala, 25 Jul 2018; P. duodecima ♂Bw (153), Escurridero 200 m al N del camino. A 3.8 km al E de la garita municipal de Purulhá, Baja Verapaz, Guatemala, 21 Jul 2016; P. duodecima ♂Hw (154), Refugio del Quetzal, San Marcos, Guatemala, 27 Jul 2016.

FIGURES 73–78 in Untangling the waterfall damsels: a review of the Mesoamerican genus Paraphlebia Selys in Hagen, 1861 (Odonata: Thaumatoneuridae) with descriptions of 11 new species

FIGURES 73–78. Paraphlebia spp. caudal appendages. (a) dorsal view; (b) mediodorsal view. W – maximum width of mediodorsal flange, w – maximum width of the distal lobe.

opencc-byJun 2021View details →

Effect Waterfall Spray Emitter A

Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURES 15–34 in Two new species of the genus Gomphonema (Bacillariophyceae) from Guayabo Waterfall, Cuba

FIGURES 15–34. Gomphonema curatorum sp. nov. LM and SEM images from the type population. 15–27. LM images. 15. Initial valve. 18. Holotype specimen. 27. Girdle view. 28–34. SEM images. 28. Internal view of an entire valve. 29. External view of an entire frustule, tilted 40°. 30. External view of footpole with pore field. 31. Internal view of valve centre showing alveoli without stubs or struts and curved proximal raphe fissures. 32. External view of the central part of a valve tilted 40° showing foramina and depressions near the central raphe endings. 33. External view of the central part of a valve lacking depressions in the central area. 34. External view of headpole, foramina at the border of the axial area strongly C-shaped. Scale bar (SEM) = 2 μm, except Figs. 28 & 29, scale bar = 10 μm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURES 9–14 in Two new species of the genus Gomphonema (Bacillariophyceae) from Guayabo Waterfall, Cuba

FIGURES 9–14. Gomphonema guayabense sp. nov. SEM images from the type population. 9. External view of the central part of a valve with the central raphe endings. 10. External view showing foramina on valve mantle, small granula on the interstriae at the junction of valve mantle/face and the otherwise unornamented mantle. 11. Internal view of an entire valve with pseudosepta at both poles. 12. External view of foramina on valve face and granula at the junction of valve face/mantle. 13. External view of footpole with pore field, tilted 40°. 14. Internal view of valve centre showing alveoli, central nodule and proximal raphe fissures. Scale bar = 2 μm, except Figs. 9 & 11, scale bar = 10 μm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURES 1–8 in Two new species of the genus Gomphonema (Bacillariophyceae) from Guayabo Waterfall, Cuba

FIGURES 1–8. Gomphonema guayabense sp. nov. LM images from the type population. 1. Holotype specimen. 8. Girdle view.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Online Appendix of the Paper "The Power of Words in Agile vs. Waterfall Development: Written Communication in Hybrid Software Teams"

<h2>GENERAL INFORMATION</h2> <div>In our publication “<em><strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112243">The Power of Words in Agile vs. Waterfall Development: Written Communication in Hybrid Software Teams</a>,”</strong></em> in the Journal of Systems and Software, we present an exploratory case study conducted in a large software organization, AFAS Software. Our study investigates the influence of the development paradigm and the formality of communication channels on written communication within hybrid development teams. Our main research question is: <em>“<strong>How do the employed development paradigm and the formality of the communication channel impact the written communication content within hybrid software development teams?”</strong> </em>To address the main research question, we operationalize communication content through a coding scheme comprising codes derived from the Project Management Life Cycle (PMLC), the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), and speech acts types, which leads to the following sub-research questions:</div> <ul> <li><em>How do the employed development paradigm and the formality of the communication channel impact </em><em>the content of written communication pertaining to the Project Management Life Cycle phases? </em><em>(RQ1A & RQ1B)</em></li> <li><em>How do the employed development paradigm and the formality of the communication channel impact </em><em>the content of written communication pertaining to the Software Development Life Cycle phases? </em><em>(RQ2A & RQ2B)</em></li> <li><em>How do the employed development paradigm and the formality of the communication channel impact </em><em>the use of speech acts types in written communication? (RQ3A & RQ3B)</em></li> </ul> <div>To answer these research questions, we test the following hypotheses regarding the PMLC, the SDLC, and speech acts types:</div> <div> </div> <div><em><strong>The content of written communication within a development team</strong></em></div> <div> <ul> <li><strong>H1</strong>: is affected by the development paradigm. <ul> <li><strong>H1.1</strong>: in formal communication channels is affected by the development paradigm.</li> <li><strong>H1.2:</strong> in informal communication channels is affected by the development paradigm.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </div> <div><em><strong>The content of written communication within</strong></em></div> <div> <ul> <li><strong>H2:</strong> a development team is affected by the formality of the communication channel. <ul> <li><strong>H2.1:</strong> a non-agile development team is affected by the formality of the communication channel.</li> <li><strong>H2.2:</strong> an agile development team is affected by the formality of the communication channel.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </div> <div>This online appendix contains supplementary material to uphold transparency and facilitate the reproduction of the statistical analysis. For more information, refer to the publication:</div> <ul> <li>Section 2.5 for the projects sampling</li> <li>Section 2.6 for data extraction and preparation</li> <li>Section 2.7 for the coding scheme and data analysis</li> </ul> <p><strong>Software Dependencies: </strong></p> <ul> <li>PDF Viewer (e.g. Acrobat Reader)</li> <li>IBM SPSS</li> <li>Microsoft Excel</li> <li>Python</li> </ul> <h2>FILES OVERVIEW</h2> <h3>JSS Online Appendix</h3> <div>The root folder includes the <strong>“Project Teams Composition.pdf</strong><em><strong>”</strong></em> file, which contains the anonymized compositions of 20 project teams: 11 agile (PrAG) projects and 9 waterfall (PrWF) projects. This file lists the project team members involved in communication within the Microsoft Teams and Insite channels. </div> <h3>Subfolder “SPSS Files”</h3> <div>This subfolder includes the SPSS files, which contain the normality test and Mann-Whitney U Tests. </div> <div> <ul> <li><strong>Normality Test.spv</strong>: This file contains the results of the normality test.</li> </ul> </div> <div>We performed the normality test. In most cases, the significance of Shapiro-Wilk is below 0.05; thus, the data is not normally distributed and fails to meet the assumption for the t-test. We, therefore, opted for the Mann-Whitney U test, the non-parametric alternative of the t-test.</div> <div> </div> <div>The files below contain the results of Mann-Whitney U Tests, which are presented in Appendix A - Tables A.7 (a), A.8 (a), A.9 (a):</div> <ul> <li><strong>H1 - PrAG vs PrWF Product.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 1. </li> <li><strong>H1.1 - PrAG vs PrWF Formal.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 1.1.</li> <li><strong>H1.2 - PrAG vs PrWF Informal.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 1.2.</li> </ul> <div>The files below contain the results of Mann-Whitney U Tests, which are presented in Appendix A - Tables A.7 (b), A.8 (b), A.9 (b):</div> <ul> <li><strong>H2 - PrAG vs PrWF Formality.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 2.</li> <li><strong>H2.1 - PrWF Formal vs Informal.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 2.1.</li> <li><strong>H2.2 - PrAG Formal vs Informal.spv</strong>: This file contains the results for hypothesis 2.2.</li> </ul> <h3>Subfolder “Excel Files”</h3> <div>This subfolder includes the necessary files to perform calculations and the results of these calculations.</div> <ul> <li><strong>JSS Paper.xlsx</strong>: This file contains the absolute numbers, which are used as input for the calculations.</li> <li><strong>JSS-Statistics.py</strong>: This Python script uses the <strong>“</strong><strong>JSS Paper. xlsx<em>”</em></strong><em><strong> </strong></em>file to perform calculations based on the hypotheses for Project Life Cycle Management (PMLC), Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), and Speech Acts.</li> </ul> <div>The files below contain the results of the calculations:</div> <ul> <li><strong>PMLC (RQ1A & RQ1B)_v1.xlsx:</strong> This file contains the results for the PMLC phases. The results are presented in Appendix A.1.</li> <li><strong>SDLC (RQ2A & RQ2B)_v1.xlsx:</strong> This file contains the results for the SDLC phases. The results are presented in Appendix A.2.</li> <li><strong>Speech Acts (RQ3A & RQ3B)_v1.xlsx:</strong> This file contains the results for the speech act types. The results are presented in Appendix A.3.</li> </ul> <h2>DATA ACCESS AND SHARING</h2> <div><strong>Recommended citation for this dataset:</strong> Ly, D., Overeem, M., Brinkkemper, S., Dalpiaz, F., 2024. Online Appendix of the Paper “The Power of Words in Agile vs. Waterfall Development: Written Communication in Hybrid Software Teams”. [Data set]. In The Journal of Systems and Software. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13894086.</div> <div> </div> <div><strong>License information:</strong><em><strong> </strong></em>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International</div>

FIGURES 1–28 in Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new benthic diatom from a waterfall in Zambia, Africa

FIGURES 1–28: Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov. LM (DIC). Figures 1–26. Valves from the holotype slide BR 4345, Ntumbachushi Falls, Luapula Province, Zambia, showing size range, valve view. Figures 27–28. Girdle views. Scale bar = 10 µm.

FIGURES 35–38 in Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new benthic diatom from a waterfall in Zambia, Africa

FIGURES 35–38: Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov., type material from sample 12-349, Ntumbachushi Falls, Luapula Province, Zambia, SEM. Internal valve view. Figure 35. Overview of the entire valve. Figure 36. Detail in the middle of the valve showing the simple portulae and the bi- to triseriate striae composed of unoccluded areolae. Figure 37. Apical pole with simple, slightly bent internal terminal raphe fissures. Figure 38. Base pole with simple, straighter terminal raphe fissures extending slightly onto the valve mantle. Scale bars: 10 µm (in Fig. 35). Scales bar: 2 µm (in Figs 36–38).

FIGURES 29–34 in Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new benthic diatom from a waterfall in Zambia, Africa

FIGURES 29–34: Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov., type material from sample 12-349, Ntumbachushi Falls, Luapula Province, Zambia, external valve view. SEM. Figure 30. Entire valve showing the slightly elevated axial area on the valve face and the distinct fenestra on both valve face and valve mantle. Figures 31, 33–34. Detail of the terminal raphe fissures bent to the valve mantle. Figure 32. Valve face showing bi-to triseriate striae composed of round areolae, the broad axial area and one to two shortened transapical ribs in between the ribs connected to the alar wings. Figure 33. Mantle view showing the slightly comma-shaped terminal raphe fissures, the shortened ribs and one open girdle band near the apex. Figure 34. Junction of the valve face and mantle with the funnel-shaped thickenings near the apex. Scale bars: 10 µm (in Figs 29–30)., Scale bar: 3 µm (in Fig. 32). Scale bar: 2 µm (in Figs 31, 33–34).

FIGURE 39 in Stenopterobia cataractarum sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), a new benthic diatom from a waterfall in Zambia, Africa

FIGURE 39: Length to width ratio of 141 valves of Stenopterobia cataractarum (diamonds) and 3 valves of Stenopterobia delicatissima var. ghanaensis (squares) from material of sample 12-349, Ntumbachushi Falls, Luapula Province̡ Zambia and Foged (Foged 1966, Cocquyt & Kusber 2010) respectively.