Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 13 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 13. Vrijenhoekia timoharai sp. nov. holotype AM W.53702. (A) Ethanol-preserved entire specimen (prostomium features have been outlined in grey for clarity), scale bar is 1 mm; (B) dorsal view of prostomium stained with Shirlastain, scale bar is 500 µm; (C) ventral view of partially everted pharynx stained with Shirlastain, scale bar is 1 mm; (D) parapodium, scale bar is 200 µm; (E) neurochaetae, scale bar is 30 µm; (F) dorsal view of pygidium, scale bar is 500 µm. Abbreviations: a, antennae; ft, facial tubercle; ma, median antennae; no, nuchal organ; pp, palpophore; ps, palpostyle; dc, dorsal cirri; dcp, dorsal cirriphore; nra, neuroacicula; vc, ventral cirri; chb, chaetal blade; chs, chaetal shaft.

Figure 14 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 14. Neanthes adriangloveri sp. nov., holotype AM W.53703. (A) Live specimen, scale bar is 5 mm; (B) detail of prostomium, scale bar is 500 µm; (C) anterior parapodium (number 5), scale bar is 200 µm; (D) mid-body parapodium (number 35), scale bar is 200 µm; (E) parapodium from near end of incomplete holotype specimen (number 48), scale bar is 200 µm; (F) notospinigers (parapodium number 5), scalebaris 20 µm; (G) subneurofalcigers (parapodium number 5), scalebaris 20 µm; (H) supraneurofalcigers (parapodium number 5), scale bar is 20 µm; (I) supraneurofalcigers (parapodium number 35), scale bar is 20 µm; (J) neuropodium of parapodium number 48, scalebaris 100 µm.

Figure 12 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 12. Phylogeny for the Hesionidae, Microphthalmidae and Chrysopetalidae families based on Bayesian analysis of a combined dataset of the genes COI, 16S and 18S. Numbers adjacent to nodes indicate posterior probabilities, and taxa for which sequences have been contributed by the present study are indicated in bold.

Figure 10 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 10. Ophryotrocha ravarae sp. nov. (A) Photo of holotype, dorsal and ventral side, holotype 1.6 mm long; (B) weakly sclerotized jaws, scale bar is 25 μm; (C) parapodium, scale bar is 100 μm; (D) overview of anterior end, scale bar is 250 μm; (E) supra-acicular simple chaeta, scale bar is 50 μm; (F) sub-acicular compound falcigerous chaeta, scale bar is 50 μm.

Figure 7 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 7. Ophryotrocha dahlgreni sp. nov. (A) Photo of holotype, dorsal and ventral side, holotype 1 mm long; (B) anterior end; (C) mandibles, scale bar is 50 μm; (D) everted maxillae on one side, scale bar is 50 μm; (E) parapodium, scale bar is 100 μm; (F) supraacicular simple chaeta, scale bar is 25 μm; (G) sub-acicular compound falcigerous chaeta, scale bar is 25 μm.

Figure 9 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 9. Ophryotrocha hanneloreae sp. nov. (A) Photo of holotype, dorsal side, holotype 1.3 mm long; (B) anterior end with jaws, scale bar is 25 μm; (C) details of maxillae elements with mandible shafts, scale bar is 50 μm; (D) parapodium, scale bar is 50 μm; (E) supra-acicular simple chaeta, scale bar is 50 μm; (F) sub-acicular compound falcigerous chaeta, scale bar is 50 μm.

Figure 2 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 2. Detail of the whale bones trawled during the IN2017_V03 expedition, and the dominant bivalve taxon associated with these; (A) top of whale skull; (B) underside of whale skull, covered in numerous small bivalves, hands for scale; (C) side of whale vertebra with Osedax tubes and small bivalves visible, scale bar is 30 mm; (D) cross-section view of whale vertebra with Osedax tubes, scale bar is 30 mm; (E) detail of the small bivalve associated with the whale bones, scale bar is 10 mm.

Figure 3 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 3. Paramytha cf. ossicola, specimen AM W.52208 stained with methyl blue; (A) dorsal view anterior section, scale bar is 0.5 mm; (B) prostomium, scale bar is 0.25 mm; (C) notochaetae, scale bar is 50 μm; (D) lateral view of anterior, scale bar is 50 μm; (E) thoracic uncinus, scalebaris 50 μm.

Figure 1 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 1. Location of the whale fall (white star) trawled off Byron Bay, Australia, during the IN2017_V03 expedition.

Figure 6 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 6. Phylogenyof the Amphinomidaefamily based on Bayesiananalysisof the COI, 16S and 18S gene fragments. Numbersadjacent to nodes indicate posterior probabilities, and taxa for which sequences have been contributed by the present study are indicated in bold. Specimen voucher numbers are given after taxa names.

Figure 8 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 8. Phylogeny of the Ophryotrocha genus based on Bayesian analysis of the 16S gene. Numbersadjacent to nodes indicateposterior probabilities, and taxa for which sequences have been contributed by the present study are indicated in bold. GenBank accession numbers are given after taxa names for the GenBank sequences.

Figure 11 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 11. Microphthalmus sp. (A) Photoofanethanol-preservedspecimen (NHMUKANEA 2022.412–420), scalebaris 0.25 mm; (B) light micrograph of prostomium and three anterior achaetous segments (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bar is 100 µm; (C, D) light micrographs of parapodium with the prechaetal (C) and postchaetal (D) lobes in focus (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bars are 50 µm; (E) light micrograph of heterogomph falcigers with different lengths (NHMUK ANEA 2022.434), scale bar is 20 µm; (F) light micrograph of ventral aspect of the posterior end showing anal lamellae (NHMUK ANEA 2022.412–420), scale bar is 100 µm.

Figure 4 in The Annelid Community of a Natural Deep-sea Whale Fall off Eastern Australia

Figure 4. Phylogeny of the Ampharetidae family based on Bayesian analysis of the COI, 16S and 18S gene fragments. Numbers adjacent to nodes indicate posterior probabilities, and taxa for which sequences have been contributed by the present study are indicated in bold. Specimen voucher numbers are given after taxa names.

Fig. 5 in Systematic revision of a Miocene sperm whale from Patagonia, Argentina, and the phylogenetic signal of tympano-periotic bones in Physeteroidea

Fig. 5. Schematic comparisons of the periotic of MLP 76-IX-5-1, "Preaulophyseter gualichensis" Caviglia and Jorge, 1980 (A) with "Aulophyseter" rionegrensis (B), Acrophyseter deinodon (C, modified from Lambert et al. 2016), Zygophyseter varolai (D, modified from Bianucci and Landini 2006), Aulophyseter morricei (E, modified from Kellogg 1927), Orycterocetus crocodilinus (F, modified from Kellogg 1965), and Physeter macrocephalus (G, modified from Kasuya 1973). In dorsal (A1–G1), ventral (A2–G2), medial (A3–G3), and lateral (A4–C4, E4–G4) views. Black areas indicate anatomical foramina. Not to scale.

Fig. 4 in Systematic revision of a Miocene sperm whale from Patagonia, Argentina, and the phylogenetic signal of tympano-periotic bones in Physeteroidea

Fig. 4. Isolated periotics of a sperm whale Physeteroidea indet. from the Miocene of Patagonia. A. MPEF-PV-605, right periotic. B. MPEF-PV-651, right periotic. C. MPEF-PV-6098, left periotic. D. MLP 80-VIII-30-133a, right periotic. E MLP 80-VIII-30-133b, left periotic. F. MLP 52-X-2-8, right periotic. In dorsal (A1–F1), ventral (A2–F2), medial (A3–F3), and lateral (A4–F4) views. G. MLP 56-IX-2-7, fragmentary periotic in dorsal (G1) and medial (G2) views.

Fig. 2 in Systematic revision of a Miocene sperm whale from Patagonia, Argentina, and the phylogenetic signal of tympano-periotic bones in Physeteroidea

Fig. 2. Teeth of a sperm whale Physeteroidea indet. previously described as "Preaulophyseter gualichensis" Caviglia and Jorge, 1980, MLP 76-IX5-1, from the Miocene of Gran Bajo del Gualicho Formation, Patagonia, Argentina; in labial (A1) and lingual (A2) views, and detailed view of the crown (A3) and enamel (A4). I and II refer to the two fragmentary teeth of the MLP 76-IX-5-1 (the best and worst preserved tooth, respectively).

Fig. 3. Sperm whale Physeteroidea indet. A in Systematic revision of a Miocene sperm whale from Patagonia, Argentina, and the phylogenetic signal of tympano-periotic bones in Physeteroidea

Fig. 3. Sperm whale Physeteroidea indet. A. Left periotic of nomen dubium "Preaulophyseter gualichensis" Caviglia and Jorge, 1980, MLP 76-IX-5-1, from the Miocene of Gran Bajo del Gualicho Formation, Patagonia, Argentina, in dorsal (A1, A2), ventral (A3, A4), medial (A5, A6), and lateral (A7, A8) views. B, C. Two isolated right periotics from the Miocene of Patagonia, MLP 76-IX-2-3 (B) and MLP 76-IX-2-4 (C), in dorsal (B1, C1), ventral (B2, C2), medial (B3, C3), and lateral (B4, C4) views. Photographs (A1, A3, A5, A7, B, C) and explanatory drawings (A2, A4, A6, A8). Abbreviations: abf, anterior bullar facet; aca, aperture for cochlear aqueduct; ai, anterior incisure; ao, accessory ossicle; ava, aperture for the vestibular aqueduct; eh, epitympanic hiatus; fasu, facial sulcus; fo, fenestra ovalis; fosi, foramen singulare; fr, fenestra rotunda; iam, internal acoustic meatus; lt, lateral tuberosity; mf, mallear fossa; pbf, posterior bulla facet; pofc, proximal opening of facial canal (VII); sct, spiral cribiform tract (VIII).

Fig. 1 in Systematic revision of a Miocene sperm whale from Patagonia, Argentina, and the phylogenetic signal of tympano-periotic bones in Physeteroidea

Fig. 1. Geographic location of studied area in Patagonia, southern Argentina (A) and location of the marine Miocene outcrops (B, stars) where the specimens included in this study were collected: Gran Bajo del Gualicho Formation (1) and Gaiman Formation (2).

Fig. 3 in The first possible remingtonocetid stem whale from North America

Fig. 3. Paleogeographic reconstructions and distributions of Eocene cetaceans. A. Ypresian, reconstructed at 52 Ma. B. Lutetian, reconstructed at 45 Ma. C. Bartonian, reconstructed at 40 Ma. D. Priabonian reconstructed at 36 Ma. Data are derived from occurrences in the Paleobiology Database and includes every published occurrence of archaeocete cetaceans (Uhen 2020).

Fig. 2. A in The first possible remingtonocetid stem whale from North America

Fig. 2. A. Remingtonocetus sp. (IITR-SB 2630) from Lutetian; Kachchh, India; right P4. B.?Remingtonocetidae indet. (USNM 449550) from Lutetian– Bartonian; Martin Marietta Quarry (formerly Superior Stone Quarry), near Castle Hayne, North Carolina, USA. Shown as if it were an upper premolar for comparison, but it may also represent a lower premolar as well. Note the extreme narrowness of the tooth. In lateral (A2, B2), medial (A1, B1), and occlusal (A3, B3) views.