Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Metamasius callizona (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): fertility and larval survival to the third instar in the laboratory

Fig. 2. Average number of eggs laid by Metamasius callizona inside, outside, and inside + outside the leaf by Metamasius callizona, with 95% confidence intervals for the first half and second half of the female reproductive periods.

Fig 2 in Biology, chemical ecology, and sexual dimorphism of the weevil Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Fig 2. Sri Lankan weevil larval distribution in top (black columns) and bottom (gray columns) 5 inches of soil in pots containing peach seedlings. No significant differences were observed in the distribution of larval stages.

Fig. 1 in Metamasius callizona (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): fertility and larval survival to the third instar in the laboratory

Fig. 1. Average number of eggs laid per leaf per Metamasius callizona female per 10 d (± SE) inside and outside leaves over time.

Fig. 2 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida

Fig. 2. Infestation and larval density of pepper weevil in 2017. Vertical bars are standard errors of the means.

Fig. 5 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida

Fig. 5. Relationship between the infestation level and the fruit wall thickness (A) and single weight (B). Each data point represents the number of infested fruits per plant in each fruit wall thickness or weight (means ± SE). Line was fitted using linear regression analysis.

Fig. 1 in Influence of plant direction, layer, and spacing on the infestation levels of Anthonomus eugenii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in open jalapeño pepper fields in North Florida

Fig. 1. (a) Adult pepper weevil feeding on the stalk of a pepper fruit; (b) young and full grown larvae inside a pepper fruit; (c) pupa inside the fruit; and (d) adult weevil exit holes in pepper fruits.

Fig. 1 in Biology, chemical ecology, and sexual dimorphism of the weevil Myllocerus undecimpustulatus undatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Fig. 1. (A) Lateral view showing the difference in size of female and male Sri Lankan weevils. Dimorphism appears as black-gray markings on the ventral mesosternum of female (B) and male weevils (C).

Fig. 3 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 3. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in barley. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 6 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 6. Number (SE) of S. zeamais male and female (n = 200) emergence when reared on the individual host grains: corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 5 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 5. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in brown rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 2 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 2. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in corn. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 1 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 1. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 4 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 4. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 1 in Alien Scolytines on the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)

Fig. 1. Emergence sequence of scolytine beetles from E. biflava (31). Emergences are shown by stratum and diameter: A = Thick Canopy branches, B = Thick Ground branches, C = Thin Ground branches. Solid lines = P. cavipennis; dotted lines = native scolytine species.

Fig. 5. Ordination plot for principal components 1 and 2 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 5. Ordination plot for principal components 1 and 2 representing elytra shape variation between sexes of Xyleborus Affinis: deformation grids describing variation between sexes on the 2 first principal components are presented.

Fig. 4 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 4. Boxplots for the body structure centroid size in Xyleborus affinis: (A) elytra centroid size; (B) pronotum centroid size. The line within each box represents the median, and the height of each box represents first and third quartiles (75% of all data). The lines correspond to the observed minimum and maximum values and dots are outliers

Fig. 2 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 2. Allometric regression of shape on centroid size for each sex: (A) predicted elytra shapes (Predline) to each centroid size; (B) predicted pronotum shapes (Predline) to each centroid size.

Fig. 1 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 1. Configuration of landmarks and semi-landmarks used to register 1 side of the 2 body structures (elytra and pronotum) of Xyleborus affinis: (A) configuration of 3 landmarks (1, 9, 10) and 7 semi-landmarks (2–8) describing elytra shape; (B) configuration of 3 landmarks (1, 2, 8) and 5 semi-landmarks (3–7) describing pronotum shape.

Fig. 3 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 3. Linear regression of partial least squares vectors from the pronotum shape matrix and elytra shape matrix.

Fig. 6. Ordination plot for principal components 1 and 2 in Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborus affinis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) using geometric morphometrics

Fig. 6. Ordination plot for principal components 1 and 2 representing pronotum shape variation between sexes of Xyleborus Affinis: deformation grids describing variation between sexes on the 2 first principal components are presented.