Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs. 26-31 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Figs. 26-31. Larvae of Satonius Endrödy-Younga, 1997. 26, 28, 30 – S. stysi sp. nov., penultimate instar; 27, 29, 31 – S. kurosawai (Satô, 1982), ultimate instar. 26-27 – abdominal segments VII-X, setae of urogomphi omitted; 28-29 – shape of setae of lateral lobes of abdominal segments I-VIII; 30-31 – right urogomphus, ventral view.

Figs. 20-25 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Figs. 20-25. Larva of Satonius stysi sp. nov., penultimate instar. 20 – left mandible, dorsal view; 21 – left mandible, ventral view; 22 – labium, ventral view; 23 – left metathoracic leg, anterior view; 24 – palmate tibiotarsal seta of prothoracic leg; 25 – left metathoracic leg, posterior view.

Figs. 11-19 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Figs. 11-19. Larvae of Satonius Endrödy-Younga, 1997. 11-17 – S. stysi sp. nov., penultimate instar; 18-19 – S. kurosawai (Satô, 1982), ultimate instar. 11 – right antenna, dorsal view; 12 – head, dorsal view; 13 – labrum, dorsal view; 14 – labrum, ventral view (epipharynx); 15 – maxilla, ventral view; 16 – maxilla, dorsal view; 17-18 – apical portion of mala; 19 – detail of maxillary palpus and basolateral portion of mala, ventral view.

Fig. 5 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 5. Metathoracic wing of Satonius stysi sp. nov.Abbreviations:AA – anterior anal vein; AP – posterior anal vein; C – costa; Cu – cubitus; CuA – anterior cubitus; MP – posterior media; PC – precosta; r – cross-vein connecting branches of radius; RA – anterior radius; RP – posterior radius; rp-mp – radio-median cross-vein; ScA – anterior subcosta; ScP – posterior subcosta. Subscript numbers refer to the branches of the respective vein. Dashed lines: wing folds.

Figs. 1-2 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Figs. 1-2. Satonius stysi sp. nov., general habitus. 1 – imago (length: 2.2 mm); 2 – larva of penultimate instar (length: 1.7 mm).

Fig. 3 in A review of the genus Satonius (Coleoptera: Myxophaga: Torridincolidae): taxonomic revision, larval morphology, notes on wing polymorphism, and phylogenetic implications

Fig. 3. Jade Dragon waterfall (China, Yunnan province), type locality of Satonius stysi sp. nov. Arrows indicate the places at which the specimens were collected.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic review of the genus Catoclastus from Peru (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae)

Fig. 3. Distribution of Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851 with paramere shape variation by locality. A – specimen from Lima (Matucana); B – specimen from Ocaña (Ayacucho); C – specimen from Cusco (Río Apurimac); D – neotype specimen from 'Chile' (erroneous locality).

Fig. 2 in Taxonomic review of the genus Catoclastus from Peru (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae)

Fig. 2. Morphology of Catoclastus Solier, 1851. A–C – neotype of C. chevrolatii Solier, 1851 (dorsal, ventral and lateral habitus); D–E – parameres, lateral and dorsal view; F – holotype of C. jaumesi Soula, 2010 (dorsal habitus); G – allotype of C. jaumesi (dorsal habitus); H – female of C. chevrolatii (dorsal habitus); I – parameres, frontal view; J–L – type specimen labels (neotype, holotype, and allotype labels).

Fig. 4 in Taxonomic review of the genus Catoclastus from Peru (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae)

Fig. 4. Morphology of Mecopelidnota rabinovichi (Martínez, 1971). A–B – holotype of Catoclastus rabinovichi (dorsal and lateral habitus). C – male specimen (dorsal view). D – parameres (holotype, frontal view). E – holotype labels.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic review of the genus Catoclastus from Peru (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Rutelinae)

Fig. 1. Detailed morphology of the genus Catoclastus Solier, 1851. A – labrum, frontal view; B–C – left mandible, dorsal and lateral view; D, F – left and right maxilla, lateral view; E – mentum, ventral view; G–H – aedeagus, lateral and caudal view; I – protarsus of male, lateral view; J – antenna.

Fig. 12 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 12. Photographs of some species of the genera Tubuca, Xeruca and Ucides. A, T. urvillei (Ranong, Thailand); B, X. formosensis (Taiwan); C, D, U. cordatus (Brazil).

Fig. 10 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 10. Photographs of some species of the genera Minuca, Paraleptuca, Petruca and Tubuca. A, M. herradurensis (Panama); B, M. rapax (Brazil); C, Pa. chlorophthalmus (East Africa); D, Pa. crassipes (Donghsa, Taiwan); E, Pa. splendida (Penghu, Taiwan); F, Pe. panamensis (Costa Rica); G, T. arcuata (Hainan, China); H, T. bellator (Labuan, Malaysia). C, courtesy of S. Cannicci.

Fig. 8 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 8. Photographs of some species of the genus Austruca. A, A. annulipes (Tioman, Malaysia); B, A. bengali (Selangor, Malaysia); C, A. iranica (Iran); D, A. lactea (Taiwan); E, A. mjoebergi (New Territory, Australia); F, A. perplexa (Dongsha, Taiwan); G, A. sindensis (Iran); H, A. triangularis (Cebu, Philippines). E, courtesy of P. Backwell.

Fig. 7 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 7. Photographs of some species of the genus Gelasimus. A, G. borealis (Taiwan); B, G. dampieri (Northern Territory, Australia); C, G. hesperiae (Zanzibar, holotype); D, G. jocelynae (Penghu, Taiwan); E, G. neocultrimana (Fiji); F, G. tetragonon (Penghu, Taiwan); G, G. vocans (Labuan, Malaysia); H, G. vomeris (Queensland, Australia).

Fig. 5 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 5. Photographs of some species of the genus Ocypode. A, O. ceratophthalmus (Taiwan); B, O. cordimana (Dongsha, Taiwan); C, O. fabricii (Northern Territory, Australia); D, O. kuhlii (Christmas Island); E, O. occidentalis (Panama); F, O. rotundata (Iran); G. O. sinensis (Dongsha, Taiwan); H, O. stimpsoni (Taiwan).

Fig. 2. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 2. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S, 16S and COI markers. The solid circle at the node means it is strongly supported by both BI (≥ 90) and ML (≥ 70); and the open circle means only one method is strongly supported. Name of species or genus quoted means it is suggested as a synonym in this study.

Fig. 6 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 6. Photographs of some species of the genera Afruca and Uca s. str. A, B, A. tangeri (Spain); C, U. heteropleura (Panama); D, U. insignis (El Salvador); E, U. major (Bahamas); F, U. maracoani (Brazil); G, U. princeps (Peru); H, U. stylifera (Panama).

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 3. The simplified phylogenetic tree modified from Figs. 1 & 2, with number of species beside or below the taxa/group. The gray boxes mean the genera are not fiddler crabs.

Fig. 1. A in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 1. A Bayesian inference (BI) tree of the family Ocypodidae and outgroups, based on the combined 28S rRNA, 16S rRNA and COI markers, showing the three clades (three subfamilies), indicated in different colours. The subfamily Gelasiminae is composed of two groups, one is for all Indo-West Pacific fiddler crabs, the other for the American broad-fronted fiddler crabs.

Fig. 4 in Systematics of the family Ocypodidae Rafinesque, 1815 (Crustacea: Brachyura), based on phylogenetic relationships, with a reorganization of subfamily rankings and a review of the taxonomic status of Uca Leach, 1814, sensu lato and its subgenera

Fig. 4. The distribution of 11 genera of fiddler crabs, mainly based on Crane (1975) and the website (http://www.fiddlercrab.info/index. html; Rosenberg, 2014).