Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 12 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 12. Magelona nanseni. Holotype (Nigeria St. 5N–11, ZMBN132141): A, B, anterior region (dorsal and ventral views, respectively, pigmentation in posterior thorax visible); C, prostomium and first four chaetigers (dorsal view, showing dorsal speckled regions); D, E, anterior region (dorsal and ventral views, respectively); F, prostomium and first four chaetigers (dorsal view); G, H, anterior region (posterolateral and anterolateral views, respectively). D–H, stained with methyl green.

Figure 6 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 6. Magelona alleni (A–F, holotype BMNH 1958.5.2.1; G, paratype BMNH 1958.5.2.2): A, B, anterior region (dorsal and ventral views, respectively); C, D, prostomium and first five chaetigers (dorsal and ventral views, respectively); E, anterior region (laterodorsal view); F, thoracic/abdominal junction showing chaetigers 4(RH) to 13 (LH) (lateral view); G, posterior region (dorsal view).

Figure 5 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 5. Magelona alleni (A, B, holotype BMNH 1958.5.2.1; C, paratype BMNH 1958.5.2.2): A, anterior region (dorsal view); B, prostomium and first chaetiger (ventral view, showing mouth and base of LH palp); C, posterior region (dorsal view).

Figure 17 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 17. Magelona mackiei. (A, B, Liberia St. 7LI–01, NMW.Z.2021.001.0018; C–H, Liberia St. 7LI–07, NMW.Z.2021.001.0017; I, Nigeria St. 6N–11, ZMBN132179): A, anterior region (ventral view); B, anterior region (dorsal view); C, anterior region (dorsal view); D, anterior region (ventral view); E, anterior region (lateral view); F, anterior region (dorsal view); G, anterior region (ventral view); H, prostomium and first three chaetigers (dorsolateral view); I, section of sediment tube. F–H, stained with methyl green.

Figure 4 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 4. Magelona alleni (Morocco St. 2011410–GR45, NMW.Z.2021.001.0001), methyl green staining pattern: A, anterior region (dorsal view, showing pigment band. RH palp attached); B, anterior region (ventral view, showing partially everted burrowing organ); C, prostomium and first chaetiger (dorsal view); D, right-hand parapodia of chaetigers 7–10 (lateral view).

Figure 9 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 9. Magelona picta. Holotype (Angola St. 7AN–03, ZMBN107338): A, anterior region (dorsal view); B, prostomium (dorsal view, partially everted burrowing organ on the right-hand side of prostomium); C–F, parapodia of chaetigers 1, 2, 4 and 5 (anterior views); G–H, notopodium and neuropodium of chaetigers 6 and 7, respectively (anterior views); I–K, parapodia of chaetigers 8, 9 and 12 (anterior views); L, thoracic capillary chaeta (lateral view); M, abdominal tridentate hooded hook (oblique frontal view).

Figure 11 in Integrative taxonomy of West African Magelona (Annelida: Magelonidae): species with thoracic pigmentation

Figure 11. Magelona nanseni. Holotype (Nigeria St. 5N–11) (A–O, fluid preserved specimen; P, dissected chaetiger, slide mounted, ZMBN132141): A, anterior region (dorsal view); B, prostomium (dorsal view); C, parapodium of chaetiger 1 (anterior view); D, ventral neuropodial lamella of chaetiger 1 (ventral view); E, parapodium of chaetiger 2 (anterior view); F, ventral neuropodial lamella of chaetiger 2 (ventral view); G, H, parapodia of chaetigers 3–4 (anterior views); I, neuropodia of chaetiger 5 (anterior view); J–K, notopodium and neuropodium of chaetiger 6, respectively (anterior views, from opposing parapodia of the same chaetiger); L–O, parapodia of chaetigers 7, 8, 9 and 13, respectively (anterior views); P, abdominal tridentate hooded hook from the notopodium of chaetiger 26 (oblique frontal view).

Figure 8 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 8. Principal component analysis (PCA) conducted on caudal fin (A), first dorsal fin (B) and second dorsal fin (C) landmarks. Blue, pink and red dots represent, respectively, Centrophorus cf. uyato, Centrophorus granulosus and Centrophorus squamosus samples.

Figure 6 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 6. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the ND2 haplotypes. Near the nodes are the support values, shown as posterior probability. In red the haplotypes from individuals sequenced in the present study. On the right of the tree the assigned OTU and the clade identified by the BCMA analysis, as well as the putative nominal species are indicated.

Figure 5 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 5. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the 16S haplotypes. Near the nodes are the support values, shown as posterior probability. In red the haplotypes from individuals sequenced in the present study. On the right of the tree the assigned OTU and the clade identified by the BCMA analysis, as well as the putative nominal species are indicated.

Figure 3 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 3. Comparison of NN (nearest neighbour or minimum interspecific distance) and maximum intraspecific distances for the different gene fragments. Equal intra- and interspecific variation is marked by the diagonal line. Points above the diagonal indicate 'species' with 'barcode gaps'.

Figure 1 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 1. Map of Geographic Sub Areas and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) regions showing the sampling areas. Red colour highlights the geographical areas included in the sampling design.

Figure 2 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 2. Median joining network of the haplotypes for the concatenated fragments. The circle size is proportional to the frequency of each haplotype, the segments represent one mutational event.

Figure 7 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 7. Analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) scatterplot representing the morphometric differences observed among the species classified as a result of the genetic analyses. Specimens of Centrophorus cf. uyato collected in the Atlantic Ocean are circled in red.

Figure 4 in Call me by my name: unravelling the taxonomy of the gulper shark genus Centrophorus in the Mediterranean Sea through an integrated taxonomic approach

Figure 4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the COI haplotypes. Near the nodes are the support values, shown as posterior probability. In red the haplotypes from individuals sequenced in the present study. On the right of the tree, the assigned OTU, the BIN, the clade identified by the BCMA analysis, as well as the putative nominal species are indicated.

FIGURE 6 in The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

FIGURE 6. Parastacus guapo sp. nov. Habitat and burrows. A, wetland area; B, small stream near the wetland area; C and D, chimneys indicated by the white arrows.

FIGURE 8 in The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

FIGURE 8. Parastacus gomesae sp. nov. Holotype and paratypes. A, epistome (holotype); B, epistome anteromedian lobe heptagonal (paratype 1); C, thoracic sternites and gonopores (holotype); D, thoracomere 8, caudal view (holotype); E, antennal scale lateral view (paratype 1); F, mandible (paratype 2); G, third maxilliped ventral view (paratype 1); H, third maxilliped dorsal view (paratype 1); I, first pereiopod lateral view (holotype); J, first pereiopod dorsal view (holotype); K, second pereiopod lateral view (holotype). Scale bars: A and D—3.33 mm; C, I, J and K—5 mm; E and F—1.6 mm; B, G and H—2.5 mm.

FIGURE 4 in The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

FIGURE 4. Parastacus guapo sp. nov. Living specimens (holotype). A, habitus dorsal view; B, living specimen in the habitat; C, living specimen placed in an aquarium. CL—31.06 mm.

FIGURE 5 in The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

FIGURE 5. Maximum likelihood analysis estimates phylogenetic relationships among selected Parastacus species based on 16S rRNA gene data from the mitochondrial genome. A, Cladogram showing the relation of analyzed sequences. B, Simplified phylogram with the lineages A–E, new species and other selected species of the genus. Numbers at nodes represent bootstraps/ posterior probabilities (ML/BAY) expressed as a percentage, values under 50% are omitted. New sequences are denoted by asterisks (*). For more information see Supplemental Table 1.

FIGURE 3 in The hole is deeper: description of two new species within the Parastacus brasiliensis (von Martens, 1869) species complex with an integrative taxonomy approach

FIGURE 3. Parastacus guapo sp. nov. Holotype and paratypes. A, epistome (holotype); B, thoracic sternites and gonopores (holotype); C, thoracomere 8, caudal view (holotype); D, antennal scale lateral view (paratype 2); E, mandible (paratype 2); F, third maxilliped ventral view (paratype 2); G, third maxilliped dorsal view (paratype 2); H, first pereiopod lateral view (holotype); I, first pereiopod dorsal view (holotype); J, second pereiopod lateral view (holotype). Scale bars: A, C and J—3.33 mm; B, H and I—5 mm; D and E—1.6 mm; F and G—2.0 mm.