Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 17 in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 17. Idiops duocordibus Fonseca-Ferreira, Guadanucci & Brescovit sp. nov. A–I. ♂, holotype (MPEG 0124). A. Prosoma (dorsal view). B. Prosoma (ventral view). C. Part of palp (retrolateral view). D–F. Palpal bulb. D. Dorsal view. E. Retrolateral view. F. Prolateral view. G. Tibia, metatarsus and tarsus I (prolateral view). H. Tibial apophysis (prolateral view). I. Tibial apophysis and metatarsus I (dorsal view). J–L. ♀, paratype (MPEG 0123). J. Prosoma (dorsal view). K. Prosoma (ventral view). L. Genitalia (dorsal view). Abbreviation: K = keel. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 21 in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 21. Scanning electron micrographs of Idiops guri Fonseca-Ferreira, Guadanucci & Brescovit sp. nov., ♂ (IBSP 220523). A. Chelicera (retrolateral view). B. Rastellum (retrolateral view). C. Tibial apophysis (dorsal view). D. Part of the palp, showing retrolateral depression. E–F. Detail of the final portion of the embolus in prolateral view. Abbreviation: EL = embolar lamella. The arrow indicates the hook-shaped projection near the sperm duct. Scale bars: A = 0.4 mm; B, E–F = 0.2 mm; C = 0.3 mm; D = 1 mm.

Fig. 27 in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 27. Idiops pirassununguensis Fukami & Lucas, 2005. A–I. ♂ (UFMG 607). A. Prosoma (dorsal view). B. Prosoma (ventral view). C. Part of palp (retrolateral view). D–F. Palpal bulb. D. Dorsal view. E. Retrolateral view. F. Prolateral view. G. Tibia, metatarsus and tarsus I (prolateral view). H. Tibial apophysis (prolateral view). I. Tibial apophysis and metatarsus I (dorsal view). J–L. ♀ (UFMG 11264). J. Prosoma, dorsal view. K. Prosoma, ventral view. L. Genitalia (dorsal view). Abbreviation: EL = embolar lamella. The arrow indicates a constriction. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 5. Chelicera teeth arrangement. A in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 5. Chelicera teeth arrangement. A. Smaller retrolateral teeth arranged in rows (I. camelus (Mello-Leitão, 1937)). B. Smaller retrolateral teeth arranged randomly (I. germaini Simon, 1892). C. Smaller retrolateral teeth absent (I. harti (Pocock, 1893)). Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 6. Diagnostic characters of Idiops Perty, 1833 spp. A. Ocular disposition, with emphasis on the anterior lateral eyes apart from the others (I. fuscus Perty, 1833, CHNUFPI 0036). B. Rows of chelicera teeth (I. clarus (Mello-Leitão, 1946), FCE 0340). C. Rastellum (I. carajas Fonseca-Ferreira, Zampaulo & Guadanucci, 2017, MPEG 00109). D. Tarsus showing the pseudoscopula and tarsal claws (I. camelus (Mello-Leitão, 1937), MZSP 28832). E. Palpal bulb (I. carajas). F. Retrolateral depression of palpal bulb (I. rastratus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1889), MZSP 24215). G. Tibial apophysis (I. pirassununguensis Fukami & Lucas, 2005, MZSP 15651). H–I. Putative slit organ between the branches of the tibial apophysis (I. camelus). Abbreviations: PT = promarginal teeth; RT = retromarginal teeth. Scale bars: A–D, F– G = 0.5 mm; E = 1 mm; H–I = 0.05 mm.

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic revision of the Neotropical spiders of the genus Idiops Perty, 1833 (Araneae, Idiopidae), with description of four new species

Fig. 1. Natural habitats and diversity of burrows and trapdoors of Idiops Perty, 1833 spp. A–G. Ravine habitats. H–L. Ground habitats. Images by Rafael P. Indicatti (A–B); by Arthur Anker and Pedro H. Martins (C–D); by Leonardo S. Carvalho (E–F); by Rafael Fonseca-Ferreira (G–L).

Figure 7 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 7 Pseudohydrosme ebo (A–D from van der Burgt 2377, K, YA; E from Morgan 25, K,YA). (A) Primary lateral division (one of three divisions) of leaf-blade, with petiole folded, behind; (B) seedling (probably in first year); (C) seedling plant (probably in third or later year); (D) seedling leaf-blade (pre-mature); ((E) obique view (B) and (F) from above); trilobed stigma. Drawn by Andrew Brown. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-7

Figure 3 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 3 Global distribution of the species of the African genus Pseudohydrosme. Red dot = P. buettneri; black dots= P.gabunensis (location not available for Congo specimen); blue dot = P. ebo. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-3

Figure 6 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 6 Pseudohydrosme ebo (van der Burgt 1888, K, YA). Drawing of flowering plant. ((A) ventral side view and (B) oblique side view) habit, rhizome and inflorescences; (C) inflorescence, longitudinal section, showing spadix from base to apex with sparse female flowers, partially naked axis of female zone, separated by naked axis from the densely flowered, male zone; (D) group of three stamens, ventral side view; (E) stamen; (F) stamen, transverse section; (G) female flower, entire, side view; (H) female flower, longitudinal section; (I) ovary, transverse section. Drawn by Andrew Brown. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-6

Figure 2 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 2 Pseudohydrosme ebo (van der Burgt 2377, K, YA). Photo of plant in leaf, in habitat, Ebo forest, December, 2019. Photo by Xander van der Burgt. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-2

Figure 5 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 5 Pseudohydrosme gabunensis. Photo of flowering, leafless plant cultivated at University of Vienna Botanic Garden (courtesy of David Prehsler). Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-5

Figure 1 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 1 Pseudohydrosme ebo (van der Burgt 1888, K, YA). Photo of flowering, leafless plant at Ebo forest, October 2015. Photo by Xander van der Burgt. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-1

Figure 4 in Taxonomic revision of the threatened African genus Pseudohydrosme Engl. (Araceae), with P. ebo, a new, critically endangered species from Ebo, Cameroon

Figure 4 Pseudohydrosme buettneri (Buettner 519, B). Drawing of flowering plant. (A) Habit, rhizome and inflorescences; (B) spadix after removal of spathe showing from base to apex, female, male and staminodal flowers; (C and D) paired stamens, side view; (E) paired stamens flowers, transverse section; (F and G) staminodes, sterile male flower; (H) female flower, entire, side view; (J) female flower, longitudinal section. Reproduced from protologue, (Engler, 1892: taf. XVII). Drawn by Josef Pohl. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10689/fig-4

Fig. 9. A‒D. Agamopus viridis Boucomont, 1928 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 9. A‒D. Agamopus viridis Boucomont, 1928. Holotype, ♀ (MNHN). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Labels. E. Sulcus of the pygidium in an ordinary specimen (CEMT). Photographs A‒D: Christophe Rivier, MNHN.

Fig. 11. Agamopus convexus Balthasar, 1965 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 11. Agamopus convexus Balthasar, 1965 (now Ateuchus convexus comb. nov.). Holotype (NMPC). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Labels. Length of specimen: 6.5 mm. Photograph: Jiří Hájek, NMPC.

Fig. 6. Agamopus lampros Bates, 1887. A–B in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 6. Agamopus lampros Bates, 1887. A–B. Lectotype, ♂ (BMNH). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Labels. C. Hind leg of a non-type specimen (CEMT) showing the posterior femoral edge crenulate (black arrows). Length of specimen: 4.5 mm. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 8. Canthon unguicularis Harold, 1883 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 8. Canthon unguicularis Harold, 1883 [now Agamopus unguicularis]. Lectotype, ♀ (MNHN). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Labels. Photographs: Christophe Rivier, MNHN.

Fig. 5 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 5. Cephalic integument of species of Agamopus Bates, 1887. A. A. lampros Bates, 1887 (CEMT): smooth and lacking tubercles. B. A. joker sp. nov., holotype, ♂ (CEMT), with dense punctuation and two small tubercles. White arrows indicating the small cephalic tubercles. Red arrows indicating the lateral clypeal carina. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 4 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 4. Agamopus joker sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (CEMT). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view (black arrow indicating the longitudinal keel slightly marked). C. Hind tibia (black arrow indicating the elongate apical process in the metatibia). D. Sulcus in the pygidium. E. Aedeagus, lateral view (black arrow indicating the gibbosity near base). F. Aedeagus, dorsal view. G. Labels. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 2 in A taxonomic revision of the New World genus Agamopus Bates, 1887 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae: Ateuchini)

Fig. 2. Ventral view of the abdomen. A. Agamopus unguicularis (Harold, 1883), dissected specimen (CEMT), with one row of several yellow setae along the anterior edge of the pygidial sulcus (black arrows). B. Agamopus castaneus Balthasar, 1938, dissected specimen (CEMT) with three (sometimes two) yellow setae in the centre of the pygidial disc (black arrows). Scale bars = 1 mm.