Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
690
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
690 results for “Geometric morphometric”
Figures 4 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figures 4 - Falsopodabrus tridentatus sp. n. A–B habitus, dorsal view: A male B female C abdominal sternite VIII of female, ventral view D female genitalia, lateral view. The abbreviations: ag: accessory gland; di: diverticulum; sd: spermathecal duct; sp: spermatheca; ov: median oviduct; va: vagina. Scale bars A–B: 2.0 mm; C–D: 1.0 mm.
Figures 5 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figures 5 - Male of Falsopodabrus tridentatus sp. n. A–C aedeagus (A ventral view B dorsal view C lateral view) D–F tarsal claws of left legs, dorsal view (D fore leg E middle leg F hind leg). The abbreviations: dp: dorsal plate of each paramere; is: inner sac of median lobe; lp: laterophyse; ml: median lobe; vp: ventral process of each paramere. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 6 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figure 6 - Distribution of Falsopodabrus. The location of Falsopodabrus particularis (Pic, 1931) lacks specific locality information in Yunnan Province, China.
Figure 3 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figure 3 - Plots of the first two components of Principal Component Analysis for Falsopodabrus himalaicus, Falsopodabrus tridentatus sp. n., and Falsopodabrus martensi, showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means: A pronotum B hind wing. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 2 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figure 2 - Plots of the first two canonical axes of Canonical Variates Analysis for Falsopodabrus himalaicus, Falsopodabrus tridentatus sp. n., and Falsopodabrus martensi, showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means: A aedeagus B abdominal sternite VIII of female C pronotum D hind wing.
Figure 1 from: Li L, Qi Y, Yang Y, Bai M (2016) A new species of Falsopodabrus Pic characterized with geometric morphometrics (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). ZooKeys 614: 97-112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.614.6156
Figure 1 - A Aedeagus B abdominal sternite VIII of female C pronotum D hind wing showing digitizing landmarks or points around the outline. A–B Falsopodabrus himalaicus C–D Falsopodabrus tridentateus sp. n.
Figure 8 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 8 - Canonical variate analysis (CVA) based on the shape variations of different characters showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. A pronotum B elytra C protibia D aedeagus.
Figure 7 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 7 - Principal component analysis (PCA) based on the shape variations of different characters. The averaged shape of extreme specimens is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines. A pronotum B elytra C protibia D aedeagus.
Figure 6 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 6 - Habitus of Oreoderus arrowi (female). A dorsal view B pygidium C female genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 5 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 5 - Habitus of Oreoderus oblongus (holotype). A dorsal view B pygidium C aedeagus. Habitus of Oreoderus oblongus (female). D dorsal view E pygidium F female genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 4 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 4 - Habitus of Oreoderus dasystibialis (holotype). A dorsal view B pygidium C aedeagus. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 3 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 3 - Habitus of Oreoderus brevitarsus (holotype). A dorsal view B pygidium C aedeagus. Habitus of Oreoderus brevitarsus (female). D dorsal view E pygidium F female genitalia. Scale bars: 1.0 mm.
Figure 1 from: Li S, Ricchiardi E, Bai M, Yang X (2016) A taxonomy review of Oreoderus Burmeister, 1842 from China with a geometric morphometric evaluation (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Valgini). ZooKeys 552: 67-89. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.552.6096
Figure 1 - Curve selection of four characters. A the red curve (Curve 1) is the outline of pronotum, which resampled into 50 semi-landmarks (SLM); the two green curves (Curve 2, 3) are outline of the carinae, which resampled into 15 SLM; two blue curves (Curve 4, 5) are the outline of lateral carinae, which resampled into 10 SLM B the curve is the outline of elytra, which resampled into 50 SLM C the curve is the outline of protibia, which resampled into 50 SLM D the curve is the outline of the left paramere, which resampled into 50 SLM.
Figure 2 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 2 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the genera of Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (74.39% of total variation) and PC2 (8.52% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each genus is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 5 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 5 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Themus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (32.87% of total variation) and PC2 (16.48% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 4 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 4 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Prothemus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (38.40% of total variation) and PC2 (15.88% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 3 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 3 - Shape variables of the hind wings in the Lycocerus species. A principal component analysis (PCA) of hind wing configuration. Plot of PC1 (49.02% of total variation) and PC2 (14.92% variation) showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means B canonical variate analysis (CVA) of same matrix, also showing 90% confidence ellipses of population means. The averaged shape of each species is depicted as deformations using thin plate splines.
Figure 6 from: Guan K, Su J, Wang J, Yang Y (2015) Significance of hind wing morphology in distinguishing genera and species of cantharid beetles with a geometric morphometric analysis. ZooKeys 502: 11-25. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.502.9191
Figure 6 - Comparisons of centroid size variables among different groups: A Lycocerus, Prothemus and Themus B Lycocerus asperipennis, Lycocerus metallescens and Lycocerus orientalis; Prothemus chinensis, Prothemus kiukiangensis and Prothemus purpuripennis; Themus licenti, Themus coelestis and Themus impressipennis.
Figure 4 from: Barour C, Baylac M (2016) Geometric morphometric discrimination of the three African honeybee subspecies Apis mellifera intermissa, A. m. sahariensis and A. m. capensis (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Fore wing and hind wing landmark configurations. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 52: 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.52.8787
Figure 4 - Extreme shape differences between Apis mellifera intermissa, Apis mellifera sahariensis and Apis mellifera capensis along the first two canonical variates (Fig. 3A, B). A and B fore wing shape differences along the first and second canonical variate, respectively. C and D hind wing shape differences along the first and second canonical variate, respectively (scale factor ×3 and ×2 respectively). Grey lines depict the shape associated with the negative values and black lines the shape associated with the positive values of the respective canonical variate.
Figure 1 from: Barour C, Baylac M (2016) Geometric morphometric discrimination of the three African honeybee subspecies Apis mellifera intermissa, A. m. sahariensis and A. m. capensis (Hymenoptera, Apidae): Fore wing and hind wing landmark configurations. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 52: 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.52.8787
Figure 1 - Location of the landmarks digitized on a right fore and hind wing of Apis mellifera workers (drawn to the same scale). MR: marginal cell, CC: cubital cell, MC: median cell, SMC: sub-median cell, and RC: radial cell.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.