Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree topology of partial 18S rRNA nucleotide sequence data for different microcotylids and outgroup as diclidophorids through NJ and ME methods. The bootstrap values for 1000 replicates are shown as in the phylogram and branch length is genetic distance between taxa.

Fig. 3 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree topology of parital 28S rRNA nucleotide sequence data for the members of microcotytlidae and outgroup of members of diclidophoridae through NJ and ME methods. The bootstrap values for 1000 replicates are shown as in the phylogram and branch length is genetic distance between taxa.

Fig. 1 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 1. Diplostamenides sciaenae: A — whole mount (ventral view): OS, oral sucker; P, pharyn×; OE, oesophagus; GA, genital atrium; IC, intestinal caecum; VI, vitellarium; H, haptor; C, clamp B — reproductive system: V, vas deferens; VD, vitelline duct; O, ovary; CVD, common vitelline duct; GIC, genitointestinal canal; OD, oviduct; OT, ootype; T, testes C — genital atrium and spines: AS, atrial spines; D — clamp and associated sclerites: SMD, scleritum marginal dorsale; SMV, scleritum marginal ventrale; SM, Scleritum median; SOB, scleritum obliqum basale; ETD, extreme terminal dorsale; ETV, extreme terminal ventrale.

Fig. 2 in Redescription And New Host Record Of Diplostamenides Sciaenae (Monogenea, Microcotylidae) And Its Phylogenetic Status Using Molecular Markers

Fig. 2. Diplostamenides sciaenae digital phototmicrographs (present study): A — whole mount; B — clamp and associated sclerites; C — gential atrium and spines; D — anterior region with oral suckers, pharyn× and oesophagus. Abbreviations are provided in figure 1.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Fig. 1–4 in Redescription And New Data On Distribution Of Glyphomerus Flavabdomen With Key To The Palearctic Species Of The Genus Glyphomerus (Hymenoptera, Torymidae)

Fig. 1–4: Glyphomerus flavabdomen Zerova: 1 — female, lateral view; 2 — abdomen and ovipositor; 3 — fore wing venation; 4 — antenna.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 19. Acanthocreagris iranica Beier, 1976 in A Redescription Of Acanthocreagris Iranica (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) Inhabiting Soil Under Oak Trees In Zagros Forest, Western Iran

Fig. 19. Acanthocreagris iranica Beier, 1976: graph depicting pedipalpal femur ratio of deutonymph, tritonymphs and adults collected from Ilam and Lorestan Provinces, western Iran (mm = millimeter).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 12–18 in A Redescription Of Acanthocreagris Iranica (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) Inhabiting Soil Under Oak Trees In Zagros Forest, Western Iran

Fig. 12–18. Acanthocreagris iranica: 12 — female, right chela, lateral view; 13 — female, tip of fixed chelal finger (showing nodus ramosus); 14 — female, tip of movable chelal finger; 15 — male, right pedal coxa I (showing anterolateral process), ventral view; 16 — male, leg I (trochanter omitted); 17 — male, leg IV (trochanter omitted); 18 — male, tip of tarsus IV (showing claws, arolium and sub-terminal seta).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 1–11 in A Redescription Of Acanthocreagris Iranica (Pseudoscorpiones, Neobisiidae) Inhabiting Soil Under Oak Trees In Zagros Forest, Western Iran

Fig. 1–11. Acanthocreagris iranica: 1 — male, carapace (showing chaetotaxy, eyes position, lyrifissures and epistome structure), dorsal view; 2 — male, anterior margin of carapace (showing setal arrangement close eyes), dorsal view; 3 — female, anterior margin of carapace (showing loss of epistome), dorsal view; 4 — tritonymph, distal part of carapace, dorsal view; 5 — deutonymph, distal part of carapace, dorsal view; 6 — male, chelicera, ventral view (rallum, serrula exterior and serrula interior omitted); 7 — male, cheliceral finger (showing teeth, serrula exterior and serrula interior); 8 — male, rallum; 9 — deutonymph, left pedipalp, dorsal view; 10 — tritonymph, left pedipalp, dorsal view; 11— male, left pedipalp, dorsal view.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →

Fig. 2 in Morphological Redescription And Molecular Characterization Of Dactylogyrus Labei (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) From Catla Catla: A New Host Record In India

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic position of the present Dactylogyrus species based on 28S rDNA sequences. Distances were estimated using Kimura two-parameter model. The tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. The tree was identical to that obtained using maximum-parsimony and the numbers along branches represent bootstrap values given as above branch NJ and lower branch MP. Bootstrap support (> 50 % for 1,000 replicates) is shown at each node.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2014View details →

Fig. 1 in Morphological Redescription And Molecular Characterization Of Dactylogyrus Labei (Monogenea, Dactylogyridae) From Catla Catla: A New Host Record In India

Fig. 1. Dactylogyrus labei: a — сopulatory complex; b — egg; c — dorsal anchors and hooks I–VII; d — ventral bar; e — dorsal bar. Scale bar 40 μm.

Fig. 4 in Phylogenetic position of genera Acrostilicus Hubbard and Pachystilicus Casey (Staphylinidae, Paederinae) and their redescription

Fig. 4. Pachystilicus hanhami (Wickham, 1898), habitus photographs and drawings of the apical abdominal sternite and genital structures. A. Habitus, holotype, ♂ (NMNH). B. Habitus, additional male specimen with darker colouration (NMNH). C. Male sternite VIII. D. Aedeagus, parameral view. E. Aedeagus, lateral view. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 1. 50 in Phylogenetic position of genera Acrostilicus Hubbard and Pachystilicus Casey (Staphylinidae, Paederinae) and their redescription

Fig. 1. 50% majority-rule consensus tree from a Bayesian analysis of combined molecular and morphological datasets. Posterior probabilities (PP) and UFB values> 70 are shown near the corresponding nodes in PP/UFB format. A hyphen (-) refers to a lack of support in the result of certain analyses. Tribes and subtribes of Paederinae Fleming, 1821 are highlighted in colour.

Fig. 2. Acrostilicus hospes Hubbard, 1896 in Phylogenetic position of genera Acrostilicus Hubbard and Pachystilicus Casey (Staphylinidae, Paederinae) and their redescription

Fig. 2. Acrostilicus hospes Hubbard, 1896, habitus photograph and drawings of the apical abdominal sternite and genital structures. A. Habitus, lectotype, ♂ (NMNH). B. Male sternite VIII. C. Aedeagus, parameral view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic position of genera Acrostilicus Hubbard and Pachystilicus Casey (Staphylinidae, Paederinae) and their redescription

Fig. 3. Pachystilicus quadriceps (LeConte, 1880), habitus photograph and drawings of the apical abdominal sternite and genital structures. A. Habitus, lectotype, ♂ (MCZ). B. Male sternite VIII. C. Aedeagus, parameral view. D. Aedeagus, lateral view. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Figures 210–224 in Notes on Compsobuthus: redescription of C. arabicus Levy et al., 1973 from Arabia, and description of two new species from North Africa (Scorpiones: Buthidae)

Figures 210–224: Mitotic metaphases (210, 213, 216, 219, 222), male postpachytenes (211, 214, 217, 220, 223), and ideograms (212, 215, 218, 221, 224) (y axis: % of the diploid chromosome length, dark grey marks: chromosomes in multivalent association) of Compsobuthus species from Arabia and North Africa. Figure 210. Female of C. acutecarinatus (2n=22). Figures 211–212. Male of C. acutecarinatus (2n=22, 11II). Figures 213–215. Male of C. acutecarinatus (2n=22, 9II+CIV). Figures 216–218. Male of C. arabicus (2n=22, 9II+CIV). Figures 219–221. Male of C. maindroni (2n=22, 11II). Figures 222–224. Male of C. ullrichi sp. n. (2n=22, 9II+CIV). Arrows show chromosomes in multivalent association during postpachytene (214, 217, 223). Scale bar: 10 μm

Figs 62-67 in Revision of the maculate species of the Anthracus annamensis group from the East Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. Part 2. A redescription of Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936) and six new species from Nepal, India and SE Asia (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina)

Figs 62-67: Median lobe of aedoeagus, lateral aspect. Anthracus javaensis nov.sp. (62) HT and A. siamensis nov.sp. (63, 64, 67) PT, Laos, Pakkading, (65) HT, (66) Thailand, Ban Khoun.

Figs 74-79 in Revision of the maculate species of the Anthracus annamensis group from the East Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. Part 2. A redescription of Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936) and six new species from Nepal, India and SE Asia (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina)

Figs 74-79: Median lobe of aedoeagus, lateral and dorsal aspect. Anthracus skalei JAEGER (74) PT, Bangladesh, Nasirabad, (75) PT, India, Kurseong, A. spec. 1 near A. biplagiatus (BOHEMAN) (76, 77) Bangladesh, Nasirabad, A. spec. 2 near A. annamensis (BATES) (78,79) Myanmar, Pegu.

Figs 1-2 in Revision of the maculate species of the Anthracus annamensis group from the East Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. Part 2. A redescription of Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936) and six new species from Nepal, India and SE Asia (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina)

Figs 1-2: Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936). Habitus. (1) A. nesophilus, HT, (2) A. haemorrhous (LOUWERENS, 1952), HT.

Figs 50-55 in Revision of the maculate species of the Anthracus annamensis group from the East Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. Part 2. A redescription of Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936) and six new species from Nepal, India and SE Asia (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina)

Figs 50-55: Anthracus sumatraensis nov.sp. Median lobe of aedoeagus, lateral and dorsal aspect. (50, 52, 53, 55) PT, (51, 54) HT.

Figs 24-28 in Revision of the maculate species of the Anthracus annamensis group from the East Palaearctic and Oriental Regions. Part 2. A redescription of Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936) and six new species from Nepal, India and SE Asia (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Harpalini, Stenolophina)

Figs 24-28: Anthracus nesophilus (ANDREWES, 1936). Median lobe of aedoeagus, lateral aspect. (24) Sulawesi, Ujung Pandang, (25) HT, A. haemorrhous, (26, 28) Java, Batavia, (27), HT, A. nesophilus.