Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
762
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
762 results for “Spider phylogeny”
Figure 1 from: Kuephadungphan W, Tasanathai K, Petcharad B, Khonsanit A, Stadler M, Luangsa-ard JJ (2020) Phylogeny- and morphology-based recognition of new species in the spider-parasitic genus Gibellula (Hypocreales, Cordycipitaceae) from Thailand. MycoKeys 72: 17-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.72.55088
Figure 1 Phylogenetic tree inferred from a RAxML search of a concatenated alignment of ITS, LSU, TEF1, RPB1 and RPB2 showing the relationship among Gibellula and related genera. Bootstrap proportions/ Bayesian posterior probabilities ≥ 50% are provided above corresponding nodes; nodes with 100% support are shown as thick lines. The ex-type strains are marked with a superscript T (T) and the isolates reported in this study are bold.
Data from: Phylogeny suggests non-directional and isometric evolution of sexual size dimorphism in argiopine spiders
Sexual dimorphism describes substantial differences between male and female phenotypes. In spiders, sexual dimorphism research almost exclusively focuses on size, and recent studies have recovered steady evolutionary size increases in females, and independent evolutionary size changes in males. Their discordance is due to negative allometric size patterns caused by different selection pressures on male and female size (converse Rensch's rule). Here, we investigated macroevolutionary patterns of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in Argiopinae, a global lineage of orb weaving spiders with varying degrees of SSD. We devised a Bayesian and maximum likelihood molecular species level phylogeny, then used it to reconstruct sex specific size evolution, to examine general hypotheses and different models of size evolution, to test for sexual size coevolution, and to examine allometric patterns of SSD. Our results, revealing ancestral moderate sizes and SSD, failed to reject the Brownian motion model, which suggests a non-directional size evolution. Contrary to predictions, male and female sizes were phylogenetically correlated, and SSD evolution was isometric. We interpret these results to question the classical explanations of female-biased SSD via fecundity, gravity, and differential mortality. In argiopines, SSD evolution may be driven by these or additional selection mechanisms, but perhaps at different phylogenetic scales.
Data from: Phylogenomics resolves a spider backbone phylogeny and rejects a prevailing paradigm for orb web evolution
Spiders represent an ancient predatory lineage known for their extraordinary biomaterials, including venoms and silks. These adaptations make spiders key arthropod predators in most terrestrial ecosystems. Despite ecological, biomedical, and biomaterial importance, relationships among major spider lineages remain unresolved or poorly supported. Current working hypotheses for a spider "backbone" phylogeny are largely based on morphological evidence, as most molecular markers currently employed are generally inadequate for resolving deeper-level relationships. We present here a phylogenomic analysis of spiders including taxa representing all major spider lineages. Our robust phylogenetic hypothesis recovers some fundamental and uncontroversial spider clades, but rejects the prevailing paradigm of a monophyletic Orbiculariae, the most diverse lineage, containing orb-weaving spiders. Based on our results, the orb web either evolved much earlier than previously hypothesized and is ancestral for a majority of spiders or else it has multiple independent origins, as hypothesized by precladistic authors. Cribellate deinopoid orb weavers that use mechanically adhesive silk are more closely related to a diverse clade of mostly webless spiders than to the araneoid orb-weaving spiders that use adhesive droplet silks. The fundamental shift in our understanding of spider phylogeny proposed here has broad implications for interpreting the evolution of spiders, their remarkable biomaterials, and a key extended phenotype—the spider web.
Figure 1 from: Wang T, Li J, Chang X, Li Z, Hywel-Jones NL, Huang B, Chen M (2024) Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal three new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from spiders in China. MycoKeys 101: 329-346. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.111882
Figure 1 Phylogenetic relationships between the genus Samsoniella and closely-related species, based on multigene dataset (SSU, LSU, TEF, RPB1 and RPB2) for maximum likelihood/ Bayesian method. Note: The ML tree presented here, and the node support rate of the two methods is displayed on the branches. The maximum likelihood support values /Bayesian posterior probabilities value (≥75%/0.75) are shown, and bold lines mean support for the two analyses were 98%. The typical strain of the species is marked with the superscript "T"
Figure 4 from: Wang T, Li J, Chang X, Li Z, Hywel-Jones NL, Huang B, Chen M (2024) Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal three new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from spiders in China. MycoKeys 101: 329-346. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.111882
Figure 4 Samsoniella fusiformisporaA fungus on spider B colony on SDAY/4 C colony on PDAD, F conidiophores structure and conidia on SDAY/4 E, G conidiophores structure and conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 15 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–G).
Figure 3 from: Wang T, Li J, Chang X, Li Z, Hywel-Jones NL, Huang B, Chen M (2024) Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal three new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from spiders in China. MycoKeys 101: 329-346. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.111882
Figure 3 Samsoniella araneaA fungus on spider B colony on SDAY/4 C colony on PDAD, G conidiophores structure and conidia on SDAY/4 E, F conidiophores structure and conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 15 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–G).
Figure 2 from: Wang T, Li J, Chang X, Li Z, Hywel-Jones NL, Huang B, Chen M (2024) Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal three new species of Samsoniella (Cordycipitaceae, Hypocreales) from spiders in China. MycoKeys 101: 329-346. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.101.111882
Figure 2 Samsoniella anhuiensisA fungus on spider B colony on SDAY/4 C colony on PDAD, F conidiophores structure and conidia on SDAY/4 E, G conidiophores structure and conidia on PDA. Scale bars: 15 mm (B, C); 10 μm (D–G).
Figure 1 from: Maddison WP, Evans SC, Hamilton CA, Bond JE, Lemmon AR, Lemmon EM (2017) A genome-wide phylogeny of jumping spiders (Araneae, Salticidae), using anchored hybrid enrichment. ZooKeys 695: 89-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.695.13852
Figure 1 - Maximum likelihood phylogeny from the partitioned concatenated matrix of 447 loci captured by Anchored Hybrid Enrichment. Numbers indicate percentage of likelihood bootstrap replicates showing the clade. Half circle indicates clades supported also in the results of Maddison et al. (2014) or, for the Amycoida, of Ruiz and Maddison (2015). Letters u, p, a, and s indicate clades that fail to appear in the analyses by unpartitioned likelihood, parsimony, ASTRAL and SVDQuartets respectively.
Figure 8 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 8 Belisana and Hantu. For Belisana, the background colours signify microhabitat: red = ground; green = leaf. D, domed web; R, highly regular 'curtain' web. Photos aHantuniah (Sarawak) bHantukapit (Sarawak) cBelisanasandakan (Sumatra) dBelisanasabah (Sabah) e domed web of Belisana sp. n. "Mal77" (Malaysia) f regular 'curtain' web of Belisanabohorok (Sarawak).
Figure 4 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 4 Mesabolivar clade aOtavaloalisei (Brazil) bMesabolivarmaraba (Brazil) cLitoporus sp. n. "Br16-153" (Brazil) dMesabolivarcyaneotaeniatus (Brazil) eMesabolivarkathrinae (Brazil) fMesabolivarsaci (Brazil).
Figure 6 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 6 Smeringopinae aHoplopholcus sp. n. "Mar66" (Turkey) bStygopholcusabsoloni? (Bosnia and Herzegovina) cCrossopriza sp. n. "Om11" (Oman) dSmeringopuspallidus (Philippines) eSmeringopinapulchra (Ghana) fSmeringopinaankasa (Ghana).
Figure 3 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 3 'Basal' Modisiminae a Gen. n., sp. n. "Br16-50" (Brazil) bPrisculaandinensis? (Venezuela) c Gen. n., sp. n. "Br16-196" (Brazil) dTupigea sp. n. "Br14-47" (Brazil) ePisaboasilvae (Brazil) fPsilochorusimitatus (USA) gModisimusincertus (Cuba).
Figure 12 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 12 PholcusaP.creticus (Crete) bP.camba (Sulawesi) cP.mulu (Sarawak) dP.baka (Gabon) eP. sp. n. "SL43" (Sri Lanka).
Figure 9 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 9 Pholcinae 'group 2' (Zatavua and relatives, Metagonia), and Quamtana (marked: non-South African species). Photos aMetagoniataruma (Brazil) bMetagonia sp. n. "Br07-1" (Brazil) cMetagoniabifida? (Brazil) dQuamtana sp. n. (cf. mabusai) (Germany).
Figure 11 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 11 Micropholcus-Leptopholcus clade aMicropholcus sp. n. "Br15-152" (Brazil) bCanticussepaku (East Kalimantan) cMicromerysbaiteta (West Papua) dLeptopholcusborneensis (Singapore).
Figure 2 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 2 Ninetinae and ArteminaeaArtema sp. n. "Om14" (Oman) b Gen. n. (Ninetinae) sp. n. "Om6" (Oman) cChisosadiluta (USA) d Gen. n. (Arteminae) sp. n. "Ind82" (Sulawesi).
Figure 1 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 1 Backbone of the pholcid tree shown in Figs 2–12, derived from IQ-TREE analysis of the complete dataset.
Figure 5 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 5 Venezuelan clade + Aymaria + CarapoiaaMecolaesthusyawaperi (Brazil) bAymaria sp. n. "Br16-188" (Brazil) cCarapoiarubra (Brazil) dCarapoiakaxinawa (Brazil) eCarapoiapulchra (Brazil) fCarapoiaagilis (Brazil).
Figure 7 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 7 Pholcinae 'group 1' (Spermophora and relatives) a Gen. n., sp. n. "Ind206" (Halmahera); b' Spermophora sp. n. "Ind27" (Sumatra) cAetanabaganihan (Philippines) dSpermophorasenoculata (Turkey) eSavarnatessellata (Thailand) fWanniyalaagrabopath (Sri Lanka).
Figure 10 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781
Figure 10 Calapnita-Panjange clade aKintaqasatun (Malaysia) bMerahanarathiwat (Thailand) cCalapnitavermiformis (Philippines) dApokayanakapit (Sarawak) eUthina sp. n. "Ind121" (Indonesia) fPanjangecasaroro (Philippines).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.