Find research datasets worth reusing

Figs 4–6. — 4. Belbina falleni. 5. B. foliacea. 6. B in Revision of the Malagasy lanternfly genus Belbina Stål, 1863, with two new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 4–6. — 4. Belbina falleni. 5. B. foliacea. 6. B. laetitiae sp. nov. — A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Vertex, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. D. Head and prothorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. — Scale bar: 10 mm (C–E not to scale).

Figs 36–42 in Revision of the Malagasy lanternfly genus Belbina Stål, 1863, with two new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 36–42. Belbina in natura. — 36. B. bergrothi. Vohimana, 4 Jan 2006, photograph by N. Cliquennois. — 37–38. B. falleni. 37. Montagne d'Ambre, Joffreville, 2009, photograph by R.A. Butler. 38. Montagne d'Ambre, 27 Oct. 2009, photograph by N. Cliquennois. — 39. B. lambertoni, ♂, Berenty, 15 Nov. 2008, photograph by J. Cryan. — 40–42. B. recurva. 40. Marojejy, Cascade Humbert, 22 Nov. 2005, photograph by D. C. Lees. 41. Anajanaharibe Sud, 2 May 2010, photograph by B. Rowe. 42. Masoala Peninsula, 30 May 2009, photograph by D. Fenolio (© 2011 Danté Fenolio/www.anotheca.com, with permission).

Figs 24–29. Male genitalia. — 24–25. Belbina lambertoni. 24. Lateral view. 25. Dorsal view. — 26– 27. B. madagascariensis. 26. Lateral view. 27. Dorsal view. — 28–29. B. nympha. 28. Lateral view. 29 in Revision of the Malagasy lanternfly genus Belbina Stål, 1863, with two new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 24–29. Male genitalia. — 24–25. Belbina lambertoni. 24. Lateral view. 25. Dorsal view. — 26– 27. B. madagascariensis. 26. Lateral view. 27. Dorsal view. — 28–29. B. nympha. 28. Lateral view. 29. Dorsal view. — An = anal tube, Py = pygofer, G = gonostylus. Photographs by Y. Laurent & I. Bachy.

Figs 1–3. — 1. Belbina bergrothi. 2. B. bloetei. 3. B in Revision of the Malagasy lanternfly genus Belbina Stål, 1863, with two new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 1–3. — 1. Belbina bergrothi. 2. B. bloetei. 3. B. bourgoini sp. nov. — A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, lateral view. C. Vertex, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. D. Head and prothorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. — Scale bar: 10 mm (C–E not to scale).

Figs 46–49. Distribution maps. — 46. Belbina bergrothi, B. bloetei and B. madagascariensis. 47. B in Revision of the Malagasy lanternfly genus Belbina Stål, 1863, with two new species (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 46–49. Distribution maps. — 46. Belbina bergrothi, B. bloetei and B. madagascariensis. 47. B. bourgoini sp. nov., B. falleni and B. foliacea. 48. B. laetitiae sp. nov. 49. B. lambertoni.

Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia

Fig. 5. Phylogeny and distribution of the Crematogaster borneensis-group, C. khmerensisi sp. nov., C. fruhstorferi, C. ssAUS5, C. mjobergi and the C. tetracantha-group. Closed circle indicates C. khmerensis sp. nov., closed square indicates C. pfeifferi sp. nov. It is noted that C. pfeifferi sp. nov. is not represented in the phylogeny.

Fig. 4. A–D in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia

Fig. 4. A–D. Crematogaster khmerensis sp. nov., worker. A. Body in lateral view. B. Full-face view of head. C. Dorsal view of mesosoma. D. Petiole and postpetiole in dorsal view. — E–H. — Crematogaster pfeifferi sp. nov., worker. E. Body in lateral view. F. Full-face view of head. G. Dorsal view of mesosoma. H. Petiole and postpetiole in dorsal view.

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia

Fig. 3. Posterior estimates of divergence time of 24 taxa on the phylogenetic tree. Blue bars depict the 95% highest posterior density (HPD). Estimations were performed with MCMCTree using the independent rate model.

Fig. 10 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 10. Diplopeltoides grandis sp. nov. A. Female anterior end, surface view. B. Female tail. C. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. D. Vulval region. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 11 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 11. Light microscopy images of anterior ends. A. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov., female, amphid. — B–C. Diplopeltoides grandis sp. nov., holotype, female. B. Amphid. C. Cuticularised plate. Scale bars: A–C = 20 µm.

Fig. 1. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 in Phylogenetic analysis and systematic position of two new species of the ant genus Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) from Southeast Asia

Fig. 1. Bayesian majority rule consensus tree reconstructed for 90 taxa using five genes (ArgK, CAD, LWRh, Top1, Wg) in a MrBayes analysis. Above node numbers indicate posterior probability. Data were partitioned by PartitionFinder v.1.1.1 and analyzed using a best fit model for each gene and codon position, with 10 million generations and a burn-in of 25 %. Area enclosed by dashed lines is enlarged on Fig. 2.

Fig. 7 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 7. Diplopeltoides nudus (Gerlach, 1956). A. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. B. Vulval region. C. Female tail. D. Male tail. E. Female anterior end, surface view. F. Male anterior end, surface view. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 6 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 6. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov. SEM micrographs of females. A–B. Anterior end, right sublateral view (arrow points at the anterior edge of longitudinal striation of cuticle). C. Female tail (arrow points at the posterior edge of the longitudinal striation of the cuticle). D. Anterior end, left sublateral view. E. Vulval region, ventrosublateral view. F. Vulval region, lateral view. G. Tail terminus (arrows point at openings of caudal glands. Scale bars: A–G = 5 µm.

Fig. 5 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 5. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov. A. Female anterior end, surface view. B. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. C. Vulval region. D. Female tail. E. Male anterior end, surface view. F. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 4 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 4. Diplopeltoides asetosus (Juario, 1974) comb. nov. A. Vulval region. B. Female tail. C. Male tail. D. Female anterior end, surface view. E. Male anterior end, surface view. F. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 3 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 3. Diplopeltoides suecicus sp. nov. SEM micrographs. A. Male cloacal region, lateral view. B. Male cloacal region, ventrosubventral view. C. Male tail, lateral view. D–E. Female tail, ventrosublateral view. Scale bars: A–E = 5 µm.

Fig. 1 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 1. Diplopeltoides suecicus sp. nov. A. Anterior part of the female reproductive system. B. Female anterior end, surface view. C. Male anterior end, surface view. D. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. E. Female tail. F. Male tail. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 34. Disco-submarginal cell. A in The genus Enicospilus Stephens, 1835 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ophioninae) in Saudi Arabia, with twelve new species records and the description of five new species

Fig. 34. Disco-submarginal cell. A. Enicospilus psammus (after Gauld & Mitchell 1978). B. E. perlatus (after Shestakov 1926).

Fig. 31. Hind tarsal claw. A in The genus Enicospilus Stephens, 1835 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ophioninae) in Saudi Arabia, with twelve new species records and the description of five new species

Fig. 31. Hind tarsal claw. A. Enicospilus pacificus (Holmgren, 1868). B. E. pallidus (Taschenberg, 1875). C. E. pseudoculator Gadallah & Soliman sp. nov. D. E. rundiensis Bischoff, 1915. E. E. senescens (Tosquinet, 1896). F. E. shadaensis Gadallah & Soliman sp. nov.

Fig. 33. A in The genus Enicospilus Stephens, 1835 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ophioninae) in Saudi Arabia, with twelve new species records and the description of five new species

Fig. 33. A. Mid tibial spurs of Enicospilus nervellator Aubert, 1966. B. Mid tibial spurs of E. splendidus Rousse, Soliman & Gadallah sp. nov. C. Hind tibial spurs of E. splendidus Rousse, Soliman & Gadallah sp. nov.