Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

794

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

794 results for “publishing”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Penev L, Mietchen D, Chavan V, Hagedorn G, Smith V, Shotton D, Ó Tuama É, Senderov V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Groom Q, Remsen D, Edmunds S (2017) Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431

Figure 7 - Selection of the journal and "Data Paper (Biosciences)" template in the ARPHA Writing Tool.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Penev L, Mietchen D, Chavan V, Hagedorn G, Smith V, Shotton D, Ó Tuama É, Senderov V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Groom Q, Remsen D, Edmunds S (2017) Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431

Figure 4 - Occurrence records and taxonomic treatments (if present in the article), published in the Biodiversity Data Journal, are exported in two separate Darwin Core Archives (DwC-A) and are available for direct download or harvesting via web services.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Dumnicka E, Galas J (2017) An overview of stygobiontic invertebrates of Poland based on published data. Subterranean Biology 23: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.23.11877

Figure 4 - Distribution of Niphargus tatrensis in various habitats in Poland; a caves b surface waters c wells d springs.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Dumnicka E, Galas J (2017) An overview of stygobiontic invertebrates of Poland based on published data. Subterranean Biology 23: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.23.11877

Figure 5 - Number of studies performed in particular habitats (dark bar) and number of records of stygobiontic species found in them (light bar).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Dumnicka E, Galas J (2017) An overview of stygobiontic invertebrates of Poland based on published data. Subterranean Biology 23: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.23.11877

Figure 2 - Regions of Poland studied by various authors: 1 Beskid Wschodni Mts. 2 Bieszczady Mts. 3 Beskid Niski Mts. 4 Pieniny Mts. 5 Tatra Mts. 6 Orava-Podhale Depression 7 Gorce Mts. 8 Beskid Wyspowy Mts. 9 Wieliczka Foothill 10 Range of Babia Góra 11 Beskid Żywiecki Mts. 12 Beskid Mały Mts. 13 Beskid Śląski Mts. 14 Silesian Foothill 15 Sudety Mts. 16 Kłodzko Basin 17 Wałbrzych Mts. 18 Małopolska Gap of the Vistula 19 Świętokrzyskie Mts. 20 Jędrzejów Plateau 21 Kraków- Częstochowa Upland 22 Oświęcim Basin 23 Łask Upland 24 Legnica Plain 25 Poznań Lakeland 26 Vistula catchment up to Kazimierz Dolny town 27 Bóbr River catchment 28 Central Oder Valley 29 Oder catchment up to the outlet of the Warta River 30 Ełk Lakeland 31 Vistula Fen Country. a area of species occurrence without exact localization given b geographical regions with detailed localization of species provided.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Cortés J (2017) Marine biodiversity baseline for Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica: published records. ZooKeys 652: 129-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.652.10427

Figure 1 - Map of the Área de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG) in the northern Pacific coast of Costa Rica with indication of the sites mentioned in the text. See Table 2 for the codes of the sites. Stars = beaches, triangle = mangrove forests, circle = bays; green = protected area; blue circles = shoals.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary Materials for article entitled 'Sociolinguistic Monitoring and L2 Speakers of English', published in Linguistics

<p>see the publication for details</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary Materials for article entitled 'Competing constructions in Kaqchikel focus contexts', published in linguistics

<p>See the publication for details</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Statistical reporting quality of articles published in dental journals

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Рис. 2. Схема распространения и мест встречи японского ужа на российском ΔаΛьнем Востоке: 1 — места встречи Αо 1985 г. (по Λитературным Αанным); 2 — места встречи посΛе 1985 г.; 3 — «КΛючевые ΛокаΛитеты» (см. в тексте); 4 — распространение хвойноширокоΛиственных и широкоΛиственных Λесов (по: КоΛесников 1969); 5 — граница распространения манчжурской фауны (по: Куренцов 1965) Fig. 2. Distribution map and finding localities of Hebius vibakari in the Russian Far East: 1 — findings before 1985 (according to the published data); 2 — findings after 1985; 3 — Key localities (see the text of the article); 4 — distribution of coniferous/broad-leaved and broad-leaved forests (see Kolesnikov 1969); 5 — limits of the Manchurian fauna (see Kurentsov 1965) in Особенности Распространения Японского Ужа Hebius Vibakari (H. Boie, 1826) (Colubridae: Natricinae) В Российской Части Ареаλа

Рис. 2. Схема распространения и мест встречи японского ужа на российском ΔаΛьнем Востоке: 1 — места встречи Αо 1985 г. (по Λитературным Αанным); 2 — места встречи посΛе 1985 г.; 3 — «КΛючевые ΛокаΛитеты» (см. в тексте); 4 — распространение хвойноширокоΛиственных и широкоΛиственных Λесов (по: КоΛесников 1969); 5 — граница распространения манчжурской фауны (по: Куренцов 1965) Fig. 2. Distribution map and finding localities of Hebius vibakari in the Russian Far East: 1 — findings before 1985 (according to the published data); 2 — findings after 1985; 3 — Key localities (see the text of the article); 4 — distribution of coniferous/broad-leaved and broad-leaved forests (see Kolesnikov 1969); 5 — limits of the Manchurian fauna (see Kurentsov 1965)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Generative AI in Education and Research: A systematic mapping of published articles

<p>This file contains an appendix of the analysis.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary Materials for article entitled 'Creativity, paradigms and morphological constructions: Evidence from Dutch pseudoparticiples', published in Linguistics

<p>see the publication for details</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

A Survey of the Impact of the SDG Publishers Compact and the EASE Environmental Manifesto

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Database for the article "Acclimation of fine root systems to soil warming: comparison of an experimental setup and a natural soil temperature gradient", published in Ecosystems

<p>The database contains measurements of fine root biomass, absorptive fine root biomass, absorptive root morphology (diameter, specific root length, specific root area, root tissue density, root tip length, root tip weight and branching per length and weight) and identifications and sequences of root-colonizing ectomycorrhizal fungi.</p>

opencc-by-nc-4.0Dec 2017View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Erwin T, Stoev P, Penev L (2018) ZooKeys anniversary: 10 years of leadership toward open-access publishing of zoological data and establishment at Pensoft of like-minded sister journals across the biodiversity spectrum. ZooKeys 770: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.770.28105

Figure 2 New taxa published in ZooKeys, registered in ZooBank (courtesy of Richard Pyle; *until 27.6.2018).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Erwin T, Stoev P, Penev L (2018) ZooKeys anniversary: 10 years of leadership toward open-access publishing of zoological data and establishment at Pensoft of like-minded sister journals across the biodiversity spectrum. ZooKeys 770: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.770.28105

Figure 1 Growth of submitted manuscripts and published articles in ZooKeys from 2008 to 2018 (*until 27.6.2018).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Erwin T, Stoev P, Penev L (2018) ZooKeys anniversary: 10 years of leadership toward open-access publishing of zoological data and establishment at Pensoft of like-minded sister journals across the biodiversity spectrum. ZooKeys 770: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.770.28105

Figure 3 Total number of ZooKeys mentions in social media and popular magazines (Altmetric, June 2018).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Riit T, Tedersoo L, Drenkhan R, Runno-Paurson E, Kokko H, Anslan S (2018) Corrigendum for: "Oomycete-specific ITS primers for identification and metabarcoding" published in MycoKeys, doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.14.9244. MycoKeys 41: 119-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.41.30558

Figure 1 A Map of universal and oomycete-specific ITS region primers B Taxa with mismatches in the binding sites of primers ITS1oo and ITS3oo. Only taxa with 10% or more mismatching accessions are shown.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Fig. 16 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 16. Scheme extracted from Roarmap showing the different policies regarding Open Access.

opennotspecifiedNov 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Petersen M, Hoffmann J, Glöckler F (2019) Access to Geosciences – Ways and Means to share and publish collection data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e32987. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e32987

Figure 1 Types of collection objects. Given are the frequencies of particular objects the survey participants' institution or department holds. Other objects include soil, crystal models, historical instruments, boreholes, etc.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record