Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 40 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 40. Lectotype of Trox hemisphaericus Burmeister, 1876 (now Polynoncus hemisphaericus), here designated: habitus in a, dorsal and b, lateral view; c, labels. Photos by Luis Compagnucci (MACN).

Figure 38 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 38. Holotype of Polynoncus gibberosus Scholtz, 1990: habitus in a, dorsal and b, lateral view; c, dorsal view of male genitalia; d, labels. Photos by Karolyn Darrow (USNM).

Figure 24 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 24. Holotype of Trox ecuadorensis Vaurie, 1962 (now Polynoncus ecuadorensis): habitus in a, dorsal and b, lateral view; c, male genitalia in dorsal view; d, labels. Photos by Eliana Buenaventura (ZMUC).

Figure 45 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 45. Type labels of a, Pilobalia baerii Fairmaire, 1902 (Tenebrionidae) and b, Polynoncus mirabilis Pittino 1987, both species collected by Gustave Adolphe Baer between 1896 and 1906. Photos copyright MNHN (available in https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/ec/item/ec9536? listIndex=1&listCount=7) and Riccardo Pittino, respectively.

Figure 36 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 36. Lectotype of Trox gemmingeri Harold, 1872 (now Polynoncus gemmingeri), here designated: habitus in a, dorsal and b, lateral view; c, labels. Photos by Antoine Mantilleri (MNHN).

Figure 43 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 43. Holotype of Trox longitarsis Harold, 1872 (now Polynoncus longitarsis): habitus in a, dorsal and b, lateral view; c, labels. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 34 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 34. Sexual dimorphism in Polynoncus gemmiferus (Blanchard, 1847): a, male, pronotal ridges thin and distinctly separated from the basal tubercles; and b, female, pronotal ridges broader and connected with the basal tubercles. Scale bar: 1 mm.

Figure 35 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 35. Distribution map of Polynoncus gemmiferus (red circles), P. gibberosus (green triangles), and P. juglans (blue squares) in South America. The records with a black dot in the centre indicate the type locality of the respective species.

Figure 1 in Taxonomic revision of the South American genus Polynoncus Burmeister, 1876 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea: Trogidae)

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the Trogidae antennae showing the relation between scape and pedicel for a, Polynoncus and b, Omorgus (Omorginae); and c, Trox genera (Troginae). Scutellum form for d, Polynoncus; e, Omorgus; and f, Trox genera (also found in some exceptions in Omorgus).

Supplementary material 3 from: Artaev ON, Turbanov IS, Bolotovskiy AA, Gandlin AA, Levin BA (2024) Taxonomic revision of Phoxinus minnows (Leuciscidae) from Caucasus, with description of a new narrow-ranged endemic species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 100(1): 291-308. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.115696

Meristic and qualitative characters of Phoxinus adagumicus sp. nov., P. chrysoprasius, P. colchicus and other Phoxinus species published in the literature

Supplementary material 2 from: Artaev ON, Turbanov IS, Bolotovskiy AA, Gandlin AA, Levin BA (2024) Taxonomic revision of Phoxinus minnows (Leuciscidae) from Caucasus, with description of a new narrow-ranged endemic species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 100(1): 291-308. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.115696

Primary morphological data of Phoxinus adagumicus sp. nov. from type locality (Pryamaya Shchel River)

Supplementary material 1 from: Artaev ON, Turbanov IS, Bolotovskiy AA, Gandlin AA, Levin BA (2024) Taxonomic revision of Phoxinus minnows (Leuciscidae) from Caucasus, with description of a new narrow-ranged endemic species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 100(1): 291-308. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.115696

Additional material on Phoxinus adagumicus sp. nov. and comparative material on Phoxinus chrysoprasius and P. colchicus

Supplementary material 7 from: Artaev ON, Turbanov IS, Bolotovskiy AA, Gandlin AA, Levin BA (2024) Taxonomic revision of Phoxinus minnows (Leuciscidae) from Caucasus, with description of a new narrow-ranged endemic species. Zoosystematics and Evolution 100(1): 291-308. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.115696

ML phylogenetic tree of concatenated COI and cytb mtDNA sequences representing all available species in Genabnk combined with our data set

Figure 4 in A taxonomic reassessment of Ichthyosaurus communis and I. intermedius and a revised diagnosis for the genus

Figure 4. Examples of forefin morphology of Ichthyosaurus. A, CAMSM J35183 from Somerset, an example of what a 'typical' fin from Somerset looks like; B, CHMUS 2015.0102 possibly from Lyme Regis, an example of a wide, five-digit forefin; C, AGC 11 from Somerset, an example of a narrow, five digit forefin; D, YORYM 2006-3803 from Lyme Regis, an example of a narrow, six digit forefin. Specimens B–D are exceptionally complete. The arrows indicate the point at which specimens from Somerset (such as A) are usually considered to be complete. Scale bars = 5 cm.

Figure 5. A in A taxonomic reassessment of Ichthyosaurus communis and I. intermedius and a revised diagnosis for the genus

Figure 5. A, skull of Ichthyosaurus communis neotype (NHMUK PV R1162); B, interpretive illustration of the neotype; C, skull of SMNS 13111; D, interpretive illustration of SMNS 13111. Abbreviations: a, angular; den, dentary; en, external naris; f, frontal; ju, jugal; la, lacrimal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; p, parietal; po, postorbital; pmx, premaxilla; pf, postfrontal; prf, prefrontal; q, quadrate; qj, quadratojugal; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal; su, surangular. Light grey denotes matrix and openings in skull. Dashed lines indicate broken edge and possible sutures. The dorsal skull roof of the neotype is poorly preserved and the extent of the bones should be interpreted with caution as other bones and openings in the skull could not be identified. The parietal in SMNS 13111 is not well preserved and the shape and extent is deformed due to crushing. Scale bars = 5 cm. The scale bar for A is estimated because the specimen is behind glass and is inaccessible for measurement.

Figure 3. A in A taxonomic reassessment of Ichthyosaurus communis and I. intermedius and a revised diagnosis for the genus

Figure 3. A, original figure by Conybeare (1822, pl. 16, fig. 8) of a specimen referred to as Ichthyosaurus communis. B, holotype specimen of I. breviceps (NHMUK PV OR43006) with lines indicating key sutures of the skull; the skull has been reversed to show the same orientation; note the similar extent of the subnarial process of the premaxilla and the reduced anterior process of the lacrimal; the medial portion of the lacrimal is damaged, and the dorsal extent is estimated. Abbreviations: en, external naris; la, lacrimal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; pmx, premaxilla. Scale: A, no size information in the original publication, B, specimen behind glass and inaccessible, so scale bars cannot be provided.

Figure 2. A in A taxonomic reassessment of Ichthyosaurus communis and I. intermedius and a revised diagnosis for the genus

Figure 2. A, type skull of Ichthyosaurus intermedius as figured by Conybeare (1822, pl. 17); B, interpretive skull illustration of the neotype of I. communis (NHMUK PV R1162), reversed to show the same orientation; the dorsal skull roof of the neotype is poorly preserved due to crushing, so sutures and openings in the skull could not be determined with certainty; C, postcranial skeleton of the type specimen (A) of I. intermedius as figured by Home (1819b). Abbreviations: a, angular; den, dentary; en, external naris; f, frontal; ju, jugal; la, lacrimal; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; p, parietal; po, postorbital; pmx, premaxilla; pf, postfrontal; prf, prefrontal; q, quadrate; qj, quadratojugal; sq, squamosal; st, supratemporal; su, surangular. Light grey denotes matrix or openings in skull. Dashed lines indicate broken edge and possible sutures. Scale: A, C, no size information given in the original publications, B, specimen behind glass and inaccessible, so scale bars cannot be provided.

Figure 1 in A taxonomic reassessment of Ichthyosaurus communis and I. intermedius and a revised diagnosis for the genus

Figure 1. Original figures of teeth of A, Ichthyosaurus communis (Conybeare, 1822, pl. 15, fig. 8); and B, I. intermedius (Conybeare, 1822, pl. 15, fig. 9). No size information given in the original publication, so a scale bar cannot be provided.

opennotspecifiedSep 2023View details →

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic revision of Australian Erythrophleum (Fabaceae: Caesalpinioideae) including description of two new species

Fig. 1. Maximum-likelihood tree of aligned ribosomal sequences of Erythrophleum, rooted with Pachyelasma tessmannii. Nodal support values are bootstrap support values (RAxML) followed by posterior probabilities (MrBayes). Indel positions in ITS1 are indicated by grey bars, and numbered as in the text (see Results). Three clades (E. arenarium, E. chlorostachys and E. pubescens) match species designations from morphology, as described in the taxonomy section. Within the sampled Erythrophleum taxa, the three Australian species form a clade, and there is weak support for a sister relationship between E. arenarium and E. chlorostachys. The intraspecific variation within E. pubescens lacks support, and is not considered taxonomically informative. Sample names indicate species, state, location, collector and number, and GenBank or ENA accession number.