Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in Characterization of the Plasmodium and Haemoproteus parasite community in temperate-tropical birds during spring migration

Fig. 1. Location of field site in Clive Runnells Family Mad Island Marsh Preserve in Texas, USA (Image credit: Google Earth).

Fig. 5. A in Whale lice (Isocyamus deltobranchium & Isocyamus delphinii; Cyamidae) prevalence in odontocetes off the German and Dutch coasts - morphological and molecular characterization and health implications

Fig. 5. A: Ulcerative lesion with whale lice in harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena); B: rake marks with whale lice on pilot whale (Globicephala melas).

Fig. 4 in Whale lice (Isocyamus deltobranchium & Isocyamus delphinii; Cyamidae) prevalence in odontocetes off the German and Dutch coasts - morphological and molecular characterization and health implications

Fig. 4. Maximum likelihood phylogeny tree produced with MEGA (version X), sequences in red box from this study. Bootstrap values (n = 1000 replicates) above 50% are shown above the branches.

Fig. 3 in Whale lice (Isocyamus deltobranchium & Isocyamus delphinii; Cyamidae) prevalence in odontocetes off the German and Dutch coasts - morphological and molecular characterization and health implications

Fig. 3. (A) Isocyamus deltobranchium and (B) Isocyamus delphinii showing the characteristic accessory gills (asterisk).

Fig. 2. A in Whale lice (Isocyamus deltobranchium & Isocyamus delphinii; Cyamidae) prevalence in odontocetes off the German and Dutch coasts - morphological and molecular characterization and health implications

Fig. 2. A: Isocyamus deltobranchium adult male ventral view showing genitalia and accessory gills; B: Isocyamus deltobranchium adult female dorsal view; C: Isocyamus deltobranchium adult female ventral view showing genitalia and broodpouch; D: adult female ventral view with juveniles in brood pouch, all sampled from a stranded harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) on the Dutch coast.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships between 74 in Prevalence and molecular characterization of novel species of the Diplomonad genus Octomitus (Diplomonadida: Giardiinae) from wildlife in a New York watershed

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships between 74 sequences of Octomitus representing 14 genotypes estimated by maximum likelihood analysis. The GTR + I + G model (gamma shape = 0.338, prop. invariable sites = 0.619) was chosen by jModelTest2 to be the best-fitting evolutionary model. Branches with less than 70% bootstrap support were not considered statistically robust and were collapsed during manual editing of the visualization. Inset: ML phylogeny computed from Octomitus genotypes aligned with the homologous region of available Diplomonad 18S rDNA sequences from Giardia, Spironucleus, Hexamita, Trimitus, and Enteromonas.

Fig. 6 in Whale lice (Isocyamus deltobranchium & Isocyamus delphinii; Cyamidae) prevalence in odontocetes off the German and Dutch coasts - morphological and molecular characterization and health implications

Fig. 6. Intralesional whale lice (arrow) in lesion with mild hyperplasia of the adjacent epidermis and granulation tissue in the superficial dermis (scale bar 2 mm).

Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization of Lipoptena cervi from environmental samples collected in Poland

Fig. 1. Map of Poland with highlighted voivodships where Lipoptena cervi samples were collected. Legend: GP - Greater Poland voivodeship; KP - Kuyavia-Pomerania voivodeship; L - Lubusz voivodeship; P - Pomerania voivodeship; WM - Warmia-Masuria voivodeship.

Fig. 2 in Molecular characterization of Lipoptena cervi from environmental samples collected in Poland

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the rRNA 16S gene in the examined sequences of Lipoptena cervi from the studied voivodships. Legend: Phylogenetic topology for the maximum likelihood analysis of the partial rRNA 16S gene sequence of Lipoptena cervi. The unique haplotypes identified in the study are labeled with the corresponding sequence identification numbers. Bootstrap confidence values for branching reliability were calculated in 10,000 replicates. G - Greater Poland voivodeship; KP - KuyaviaPomerania voivodeship; L - Lubusz voivodeship; P - Pomerania voivodeship; WM - Warmia-Masuria voivodeship.

Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization of Lipoptena cervi from environmental samples collected in Poland

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic analysis of the rRNA 16S gene in Lipoptena cervi relative to other sequences. Legend: Phylogenetic topology for the maximum likelihood analysis of the partial rRNA 16S gene sequence of Lipoptena cervi. The unique haplotypes identified in this study are labeled with the corresponding sequence identification numbers. The reference sequences available in GenBank are indicated in the tree. Bootstrap confidence values for branching reliability were calculated in 10,000 replicates.

Figure 10 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 10: Phylogenetic relationships within LONgidOrUS and ParalONgidOrUS. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G: –lnL = 14601.9935; AIC = 29619.9870; freqA = 0.2204; freqC = 0.2274; freqG = 0.2934; freqT = 0.2588; R(a) = 0.7487; R(b) = 2.4740; R(c) = 1.4407; R(d) = 0.3992; R(e) = 4.6932; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.2290; and Shape = 0.6290). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Figure 9 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 9: Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (= Odontostyle and • = replACement ODOntOStyle); length in three developmental stages and mature females of LONgidOrUS JONeSi.

Figure 8 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 8: Scanning electron microscopy of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), oral aperture (oa), stylet (st), and amphidial aperture (aa); E–F, Female tail in lateral view (a = anus); G–H, Vulval region in lateral and ventral view (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–D = 5 μm; E = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; G–H = 30 μm).

Figure 6 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 6: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). Male and first-stage juvenile. A, Entire body of male; B, Anterior region of male; C, Tail region of male arrows showing position of supplements (spl); D, Entire body of J1; E, ANterior region of J1 arrows showing position of guiding ring (gr) and replacement odontostyle (rodt); F–G, Tail regions of J1. (Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B–C = 40 μm; D = 100 μm; E–G = 10 μm).

Figure 3 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 3: Scanning electron microscopy of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–C, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), cephalic lobe (cl), cephalic papillae (cp), oral aperture (oa), and amphidial aperture (aa). D–E, Female tail in lateral and ventral view (a = anus). F–G: Vulval region (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–C = 5 μm; D = 30 μm; E, F = 10 μm; G = 20 μm).

Figure 2 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 2: Light micrographs of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Figure 1 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 1: Light micrographs of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). Female: A, Pharynx; B–D, Lip region arrow showing amphid; E, Gonad; F, Tail region arrow showing position of anus G, Tail region arrows showing position of caudal pores; H, Ventral view of vulva; I, Vulval region (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–D= 10 μm; E= 50 μm; F–I= 10 μm).

Figure 11 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 11: Phylogenetic relationships within LONgidOrUS and ParalONgidOrUS. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequence alignment under a transitional of invariable sites model with invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (TIM2 + I + G: – lnL= 6866.9821; AIC = 14129.9643; freqA = 0.2626; freqC = 0.2109; freqG = 0.2668; freqT = 0.2597; R(a) = 1.8892; R(b) = 3.9662; R(c) = 1.8892; R(d) = 1.0000; R(e) = 7.1009; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.7060; and Shape = 0.6020). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Figure 7 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 7: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Figure 5 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 5: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). Female: A, Pharynx; B–E, Lip regions; F, Gonad; G–H, Pharyngeal bulb; I, Entire female body; J–K, Vulval regions; L, ventral view of tail; M–O, Female tails (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–E, G–H, J–O = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; I = 500 μm) am = amphid; bp = body pores; v = vulva; svn = subventrolateral nuclei; dn = dorsal nuclei; a = anus).