Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
736
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
736 results for “habitat distribution”
Figure 3 from: Bogyó D, Magura T, Nagy DD, Tóthmérész B (2015) Distribution of millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) along a forest interior – forest edge – grassland habitat complex. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8657
Figure 3 - DCCA analysis for the millipede species of the study area. Squares represent the sampled habitats (blue squares: samples from the forest interior habitat; red squares: samples from the forest edge habitat; black squares: samples from the grassland habitat).The arrows denote the increase of the value of the environmental variables (airtemp: air temperature on the surface; canopy: canopy cover; DH: soil dehydrogenase enzyme activity; dwood: cover of decaying wood material; herbs: cover of herbs; littcover: cover of leaf litter; littdepth: depth of leaf litter; humidity: relative humidity on the surface; pH: soil pH; shrubs: cover of shrubs; stemp: soil temperature at 2cm depth; smoisture: soil moisture; woodysp: number of woody plant species). Green circles and the four-letter abbreviations indicate the millipede species (BRBA: Brachyiulus bagnalli; BRSU: Brachydesmus superus; GLTE: Glomeris tetrasticha; JUTE: Julus terrestris; KROC: Kryphioiulus occultus; LECI: Leptoiulus cibdellus; MABO: Mastigona bosniensis; MEUN: Megaphyllum unilineatum; POCO: Polydesmus complanatus).
Figure 2 from: Bogyó D, Magura T, Nagy DD, Tóthmérész B (2015) Distribution of millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) along a forest interior – forest edge – grassland habitat complex. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8657
Figure 2 - Hierarchical cluster analysis of millipede assemblages of the studied habitats using Hellinger distance and Ward fusion method.
Figure 1 from: Bogyó D, Magura T, Nagy DD, Tóthmérész B (2015) Distribution of millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) along a forest interior – forest edge – grassland habitat complex. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 181-195. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8657
Figure 1 - Millipede abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity at the studied habitats. Mean values (±SD) of the overall millipede abundance (A), species richness (B) and Shannon diversity (C) per samples at the studied habitats. Different letters indicate significant differences by Tukey test.
Supplementary material 1 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
The non-significant results of the ANOVA tests :
Figure 8 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 8 Scanning electron (A, C, E, G) and light microscope (B, D, F, H) micrographs on the studied Armadillidium species' tergites. Armadillidiumvulgare (A, B), A.versicolor (C, D), A.nasatum (E, F), A.zenckeri (G, H). Abbreviations: pl – plaques, t – tricorn receptor. Staining: hematoxylin-eosin (HE) – B, D, F, H. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figure 5 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 5 Intrageneric (between the two specimens per species) comparison of tergal cuticle thickness in four Armadillidium species (2 specimens/species, 5 slides/specimen, 10 measurements/slide). [Measures: median ± first quartile and max/min (Species names as in Figure 3)].
Figure 6 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 6 Light microscope micrographs of the studied species' tergites. Armadillidiumvulgare (A), Cylisticusconvexus (B), Orthometoponplanum (C), Protracheoniscuspolitus (D), Porcellionidespruinosus (E), Trachelipusrathkii (F). Abbreviations: ec – epicuticle, pc – procuticle, p – polysaccharide spheres, t – tricorn receptor, n – nerve; x 63. Staining: hematoxylin-eosin (HE) – A, E, F; Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) – B, C, D. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figure 2 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 2 Mass-specific water loss at ~30% relative humidity. s – surviving individuals, d – dead individuals. [Measures: median ± first quartile and max/min (species names as in Figure 1)].
Figure 7 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 7 The dorsal surface of the studied sympatric terrestrial isopod species. Armadillidiumvulgare (A), Cylisticusconvexus (B), Orthometoponplanum (C), Protracheoniscuspolitus (D), Porcellionidespruinosus (E), Trachelipusrathkii (F). Abbreviations: pl – plaques, p – polysaccharide spheres, t – tricorn receptor. Scale bars: 50 µm.
Figure 4 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 4 The tergal cuticle thickness in intra-, and interspecific relations (2 specimens/species, 5 slides/specimen, 10 measurements/slide). [Measures: median ± first quartile and max/min (species names as in Figure 1)].
Figure 3 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 3 Mass-specific water loss of the survived individuals at the three different relative humidity values (white: ~30%, medium gray: ~75%, dark grey: ~100%). The experiment took 6 hours. [Measures: median ± first quartile and max/min; in species names A. means Armadillidium]
Figure 1 from: Csonka D, Halasy K, Buczkó K, Hornung E (2018) Morphological traits – desiccation resistance – habitat characteristics: a possible key for distribution in woodlice (Isopoda, Oniscidea). In: Hornung E, Taiti S, Szlavecz K (Eds) Isopods in a Changing World. ZooKeys 801: 481-499. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.801.23088
Figure 1 Mass-specific water loss of the survived individuals (*all individuals died) at three different relative humidity values (white: ~30%, medium gray: ~75%, dark grey: ~100%). The experiment took 6 hours. [Measures: median ± first quartile and max/min; species initials: P.politus – Protracheoniscuspolitus, O.planum – Orthometoponplanum, C.convexus – Cylisticusconvexus, T.rathkii – Trachelipusrathkii, P.pruinosus – Porcellionidespruinosus, A.vulgare – Armadillidiumvulgare].
Supplementary material 1 from: Kostova R, Bekchiev R, Popgeorgiev G, Kornilev YV (2023) First exhaustive distribution and habitat modelling of Morimus asper (Sulzer, 1776) sensu lato (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) in Bulgaria. Nature Conservation 53: 39-59. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.53.104243
Morimus asper occurrence in Bulgaria data set
FIGURE 61 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 61. Distribution of Orobanche javakhetica in Georgia.
FIGURE 57 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 57. Distribution of Orobanche cicerbitae in Georgia.
FIGURE 47 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 47. Distribution of Orobanche hederae in Georgia.
FIGURE 45 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 45. Distribution of Orobanche laxissima in Georgia.
FIGURE 63 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 63. Distribution of Orobanche gracilis in Georgia.
FIGURE 43 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 43. Distribution of Orobanche owerinii in Georgia.
FIGURE 41 in Holoparasitic Orobanchaceae in Georgia (Caucasus): taxonomic revision, diversity, distribution, habitats and host range
FIGURE 41. Distribution of Orobanche minor in Georgia.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.