Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5 in Morphological variations among populations of Monochoria vaginalis s.l. (Pontederiaceae) in Thailand

FIGURE 5. Ordination plot of 244 specimens from 10 populations of M. vaginalis s.l. in Thailand based on 22 quantitative characters: MV1 = populations from Chiang Mai, Nan, Kanchanaburi, Ratchaburi, Suphan Buri and Ang Thong; MV2 = populations from Prachin Buri, Chachoengsao, Chumphon and Phatthalung.

FIGURE 4 in Morphological variations among populations of Monochoria vaginalis s.l. (Pontederiaceae) in Thailand

FIGURE 4. UPGMA clustering of each population (number of OTUs) based on Gower General Similarity Coefficient calculated between means of 22 quantitative characters of the M. vaginalis s.l. in Thailand. MV 1 and MV 2 represent the morphological forms of each population.

FIGURE 2 in Morphological variations among populations of Monochoria vaginalis s.l. (Pontederiaceae) in Thailand

FIGURE 2. Comparison of quantitative characters between 10 populations of M. vaginalis s.l. in Thailand, superscript a, b, c, d, e. f, g or h on bar graphs is significant difference at P <0.05 when compared with the other populations in each characters, analyzing by Duncan's multiple range test. (a): Leaf width, (b): Floral leaf - petiole length, (c): Rachis length, (d): Peduncle length, (e): Outer perianth width, (f): Number of flowers per inflorescence and (g): Seed length.

FIGURE 3 in Morphological variations among populations of Monochoria vaginalis s.l. (Pontederiaceae) in Thailand

FIGURE 3. UPGMA clustering of each population (number of OTUs) based on Gower General Similarity Coefficient calculated between means of 22 quantitative and 12 qualitative characters of M. vaginalis s.l. in Thailand. MV 1 and MV 2 represent the morphological forms of each population.

opennotspecifiedNov 2017View details →

FIGURE 1. Vellozia pyrantha. A. Habit with marcescent and reflexed leaves without recent fire influence. B. Habit after fire and flowering. C. Orange flammable resin. D. Flowers. E. Tepal with three stamens. F. Ovary, transversal cut. G–H. Ovary, longitudinal cut. I–M. Fruits morphology variation. K. Apical slits showing seeds inside the fruit. L in Old for people, new for science: a previously undescribed species of harvested Vellozia (Velloziaceae) endemic to the Chapada Diamantina National Park, Bahia (Brazil)

FIGURE 1. Vellozia pyrantha. A. Habit with marcescent and reflexed leaves without recent fire influence. B. Habit after fire and flowering. C. Orange flammable resin. D. Flowers. E. Tepal with three stamens. F. Ovary, transversal cut. G–H. Ovary, longitudinal cut. I–M. Fruits morphology variation. K. Apical slits showing seeds inside the fruit. L. Longer fruits in population of Morro dos Ventos. N. Seeds.

FIG. 1 in Temperature and Development Drive Variation in Oral Morphology among Tailed Frog (Ascaphus spp.) Populations

FIG. 1. Pinned specimen of Ascaphus montanus (specimen ID WCF08228 from Lost Horse Creek, MT) showing labeled oral morphology, including labial tooth rows. Rows are numbered from anterior to posterior. The A2, A3, and P1 rows are biserial (i.e., have two rows of teeth), as demonstrated by the labeled P1 row. The labial tooth row formula (see Methods) for this specimen is 3/9(1), where (1) indicates the medial gap in the P1 row.

FIG. 2 in Temperature and Development Drive Variation in Oral Morphology among Tailed Frog (Ascaphus spp.) Populations

FIG. 2. Sampling locations for Ascaphus truei (left) and Ascaphus montanus (right). Inset maps show estimated range boundaries for A. truei (in green) and A. montanus (in blue). Range maps from NatureServe & IUCN (2012).

FIG. 4 in Temperature and Development Drive Variation in Oral Morphology among Tailed Frog (Ascaphus spp.) Populations

FIG. 4. From the results of the species-specific GLMs, we predicted relationships (shown with 1.96*SE confidence intervals) between P2 tooth counts and developmental stage at each temperature point sampled (annual average stream temperature). Raw data points are also shown on these plots.

FIG. 3 in Temperature and Development Drive Variation in Oral Morphology among Tailed Frog (Ascaphus spp.) Populations

FIG. 3. Ascaphus truei tadpoles had higher overall counts of labial teeth in the P2 row than A. montanus tadpoles. Within both species, populations (here shown as different colored boxplots) varied in their P2 tooth counts.

Fig. 5 in Morphological and environmental variation within Hibiscus krichauffianus (Malvaceae), and the recognition of two new species, H. verecundus and H. calcareus

Fig. 5. PCA of environmental envelopes for four Hibiscus krichauffianus sens. lat. specimens sorted by morphotype groupings. Morphotype A, grey squares; Morphotype B, orange circles; Morphotype C, blue triangles; and Morphotype D, black crosses.

Fig. 4 in Morphological and environmental variation within Hibiscus krichauffianus (Malvaceae), and the recognition of two new species, H. verecundus and H. calcareus

Fig. 4. Habit of morphotypes A–C. (a) Morphotype A Hibiscus krichauffianus sens. strict. (voucher: D.E.Albrecht 16356, CANB; images: Dave Albrecht); (b) morphotype B Hibiscus verecundus (voucher: T.G.B.McLay TM333, CANB; images: Mike Bayly); and (c) morphotype C Hibiscus calcareus (voucher: D.E.Albrecht 16345, CANB [holotype]; images: Dave Albrecht).

Fig. 1 in Morphological and environmental variation within Hibiscus krichauffianus (Malvaceae), and the recognition of two new species, H. verecundus and H. calcareus

Fig. 1. Distribution map for the four morphotypes of H. krichauffianus sens. lat. in Australia. Distributions are based only on material viewed by the authors. Morphotype A: Hibiscus krichauffianus sens. strict., grey squares; Morphotype B: Hibiscus verecundus, orange circles; Morphotype C: Hibiscus calcareus, blue triangles; Morphotype D: Hibiscus sp. Belele (voucher: D.W.Goodall 3417), black crosses.

Fig. 2 in Morphological and environmental variation within Hibiscus krichauffianus (Malvaceae), and the recognition of two new species, H. verecundus and H. calcareus

Fig. 2. Example herbarium specimens of the four morphotypes of H. krichauffianus sens. lat. (a) Morphotype A Hibiscus krichauffianus sens. strict. (voucher: C.J.Brodie & P.J.Lang 3402, AD 249644); (b) morphotype B Hibiscus verecundus (voucher: R.J.Fensham 2991, BRI AQ653057); (c) morphotype C Hibiscus calcareus (voucher: P.Hudson s.n., AD 98321044); and (d) morphotype D Hibiscus sp. Belele (voucher: D.W.Goodall 3417, PERTH 3427285). Scale bar: 2 cm.

Fig. 3 in Morphological and environmental variation within Hibiscus krichauffianus (Malvaceae), and the recognition of two new species, H. verecundus and H. calcareus

Fig. 3. Seeds of the four morphotypes. (a) Morphotype A Hibiscus krichauffianus sens. strict. (voucher: C.J.Brodie & P.J.Lang 3402, AD 249644); (b) morphotype B Hibiscus verecundus (voucher: R.J.Fensham 2991, BRI AQ653057); (c) morphotype C Hibiscus calcareus (voucher: P.Hudson s.n., AD 98321044); and (d) morphotype D Hibiscus sp. Belele (voucher: D.W.Goodall 3417, PERTH 3427285). Scale bar: 1 mm.

FIGURE 4 in Quantitative analysis of the morphological variation within the tiger beetle Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Mongolia

FIGURE 4. Association between the variables of longitude and body size. A) observed in female individuals (R2 = 0.28), B) observed in male individuals (R2 = 0.25). P<0.01 for both.

FIGURE 3 in Quantitative analysis of the morphological variation within the tiger beetle Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Mongolia

FIGURE 3. Association between the variables of longitude and the proportion of each C. littoralis population that contains a black dorsum. Expected distribution of phenotypic variation under models of A) random association, B) two distinct subspecies with a contact zone, C) clinal variation. D) Observed data based on 494 specimens collected from 34 populations (R2 = 0.63, P<0.01).

FIGURE 2 in Quantitative analysis of the morphological variation within the tiger beetle Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Mongolia

FIGURE 2. Map of Mongolia displaying the location of sampling sites used in this study. Red M's represent populations considered C. littoralis mongolensis and blue P's are C. littoralis peipingensis by Mandl's (1981) definitions. Purple I's correspond to intermediate populations that do not fit cleanly into either subspecies definition.

FIGURE 1 in Quantitative analysis of the morphological variation within the tiger beetle Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Mongolia

FIGURE 1. Left to right: dorsal habitus of C. littoralis peipingensis (Dornod Province, Mongolia); intermediate phenotype (Omnogovi Province, Mongolia) between both of Mandl's subspecies; and C. littoralis mongolensis (Khovd Province, Mongolia).

FIGURE 5 in Quantitative analysis of the morphological variation within the tiger beetle Calomera littoralis (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Mongolia

FIGURE 5. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling analysis of individuals, nominally assigned (via Mandl 1981) to either C. l. peipingensis (blue "P"), C. l. mongolensis (red "M") or intergrades (purple "I"), based on 14 character states (see Introduction).