Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,369

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,369 results for “sexual dimorphism”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in A New Genus and Species of Histerid Beetle from Western Mexico Showing a Remarkable Sexual Mesotibial Dimorphism (Coleoptera: Histeridae: Histerinae: Exosternini)

Fig. 1. Vaquerister cantador, new species, habitus photos of male. A) Dorsal view, B) Ventral view, C) Anterior view of head and prothorax, D) Lateral view, E) Posterior view of propygidium and pygidium.

opennotspecifiedSep 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 7. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 3 in Morphological diversification with emphasis on the structural and homology patterns of male genitalia in genus Limnebius (Leach 1815; Hydraenidae: Coleoptera)

Figure 7. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 3: protibia. A, L. mesatlanticus; B, L. fretalis; C, typical female tibia (L. fretalis) for comparison.

opennotspecifiedSep 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 6. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 2 in Morphological diversification with emphasis on the structural and homology patterns of male genitalia in genus Limnebius (Leach 1815; Hydraenidae: Coleoptera)

Figure 6. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 2: abdomen. A, L. furcatus; B, L. fretalis. (s, setae; p, protuberance).

opennotspecifiedSep 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 1 in Morphological diversification with emphasis on the structural and homology patterns of male genitalia in genus Limnebius (Leach 1815; Hydraenidae: Coleoptera)

Figure 5. Limnebius structural sexual dimorphism 1: metatibia. A, typical female tibia (L. fretalis) for comparison; B, L. fretalis; C, L. furcatus; D, L. truncatellus.

opennotspecifiedSep 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Structural complexity of hunting habitat and territoriality increase the reversed sexual size dimorphism in diurnal raptors

Despite numerous efforts and many hypotheses to explain the selective pressures that may have favoured reversed sexual dimorphism (RSD) in raptors ‐ i.e. that the female is larger than the male ‐ some drivers of RSD are still unknown. Here we analyse how much variation in RSD is explained by hunting habitat structure, territoriality or territory size. We do so using data on diurnal raptors from the New World and the Western Palearctic – i.e. Cathartidae, Pandionidae, Accipitridae and Falconidae, the largest bird group showing RSD ‐ taking into account the phylogenetic relationships among species. Our results identify the type of the main prey as a major factor explaining RSD in raptors. We also found RSD to increase with increasing structural complexity in the hunting habitat from open or semi‐open habitats to forest interior. RSD also increased with increasing degree of territoriality of the species (non‐territorial < facultative < territorial). Finally, for territorial species RSD increased with increasing size of nesting territory. A model comprising only three predictor variables (prey type, structural complexity of hunting habitat and territoriality) explained up to 50% of the variation in RSD of European and American diurnal raptor species, and up to 40% of the variation in RSD when only territorial species were considered. Our results highlight the relevance of spatial facets of the niche – e.g. hunting habitat, territoriality and territory size ‐ in exerting selective pressures on the body size of diurnal raptors. These selective pressures, joint with already known trophic factors – e.g. diet ‐ are decisive for the evolution of the RSD, a key trait in the functional ecology of raptors. Our findings open up new perspectives in the study of sexual size divergence in birds.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism in the California skate, Raja inornata Jordan and Gilbert, 1881 from the Gulf of California, Mexico

FIGURE 3. Relationship between the number of middorsal thorns (T) and total length. Males (Π), T =0.003 TL + MD MD 2.51; r2=0.16; females (), T =0.01 TL – 0.76; r2=0.32.

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism in the California skate, Raja inornata Jordan and Gilbert, 1881 from the Gulf of California, Mexico

FIGURE 2. Relationship between the number of orbital thorns (T) and total length. Males (Π), T =0.01 TL+3.75; O O r2=0.16; females (), T =0.02 TL+1.31; r2=0.64.

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 5 in Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism in the California skate, Raja inornata Jordan and Gilbert, 1881 from the Gulf of California, Mexico

FIGURE 5. Bi-plot of canonical scores for factors 1 and 2 from DA of female and male R. inornata and male R. cortezensis. Discriminant analysis based on 12 morphometric characters. (+) R. inornata-males; () R. inornata-females and (o) R. cortezensis-males. (read text for explaination).

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4 in Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism in the California skate, Raja inornata Jordan and Gilbert, 1881 from the Gulf of California, Mexico

FIGURE 4. Photographs of male and female upper jaw teeth (symphysial teeth) of juveniles and adults of Raja inornata: (A) mature female, 570 mm LT; (B) juvenile female, 262 mm LT; (C) mature male, 500 LT and (D) juvenile male, 262 mm LT (photographs 25 X).

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Morphological variation and sexual dimorphism in the California skate, Raja inornata Jordan and Gilbert, 1881 from the Gulf of California, Mexico

FIGURE 1. Morphometric measurements made on R. inornata and R. cortezensis. (A) Dorsal and (B) ventral views (see table 1 for definitions)(Figure from McEachran & Notarbartolo di Sciara, 1995).

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in Range, sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry of rostral tooth counts in the smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinata Latham (Chondrichthyes: Pristidae) of the southeastern United States

FIGURE 2. Relative frequency of left and right side rostral tooth counts for Pristis pectinata specimens from the southeastern United States. A) All specimens (n= 105). B) Males (n=25). C) Females (n=26).

opennotspecifiedJun 2008View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Range, sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry of rostral tooth counts in the smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinata Latham (Chondrichthyes: Pristidae) of the southeastern United States

FIGURE 1. Relative frequency of total rostral tooth counts for Pristis pectinata from the southeastern United States (n=105).

opennotspecifiedJun 2008View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in Range, sexual dimorphism and bilateral asymmetry of rostral tooth counts in the smalltooth sawfish Pristis pectinata Latham (Chondrichthyes: Pristidae) of the southeastern United States

FIGURE 3. Relative frequency of rostral tooth count bilateral asymmetry in Pristis pectinata from the southeastern United States (n=105)

opennotspecifiedJun 2008View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Reproduction, diet and sexual dimorphism of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Sauria: Squamata) from a Restinga area in northeastern Brazil

Figure 5. Linear regression between SVL (Snout-vent length) and prey size of Gymnodactylus geckoides from a Restinga Fragment at Centro de Lançamento da Barreira do Inferno, Parnamirim Municipality, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in Reproduction, diet and sexual dimorphism of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Sauria: Squamata) from a Restinga area in northeastern Brazil

Figure 4. Distribution of snout-vent lengths per month of male and female Gymnodactylus geckoides from a Restinga fragment in Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in Reproduction, diet and sexual dimorphism of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Sauria: Squamata) from a Restinga area in northeastern Brazil

Figure 2. Location of Centro de Lançamento da Barreira do Inferno, Parnamirim Municipality, Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Reproduction, diet and sexual dimorphism of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Sauria: Squamata) from a Restinga area in northeastern Brazil

Figure 1. Gymnodactylus geckoides (unvouchered specimen), from Centro de Lançamento da Barreira do Inferno, Parnamirim, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Reproduction, diet and sexual dimorphism of Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 (Sauria: Squamata) from a Restinga area in northeastern Brazil

Figure 3. Total number of Gymnodactylus geckoides individuals collected per month from a Restinga fragment in Rio Grande do Norte State, Brazil.

opennotspecifiedSep 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Sexual dimorphism in chelicerae, forelegs and palpal traits in two burrowing wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) with sex-role reversal

Figure 1. Dimorphism in chelicerae pigmentation (frontal views). Males (A, C) show darker pigmentation than females (B, D) in both species: Allocosa brasiliensis (above) and Allocosa alticeps (below).

opennotspecifiedApr 2010View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in Sexual dimorphism in chelicerae, forelegs and palpal traits in two burrowing wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) with sex-role reversal

Figure 3. Palpal tarsi (lateral views) of Aglaoctenus lagotis (A,B) and Schizocosa malitiosa (C,D), showing female claws (A,C), and male palpal tarsus without claws or specialized structures on distal position (B,D).

opennotspecifiedApr 2010View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record